Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2017-06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Soldados da FEB no segundo asalto da batalha de Monte Castelo.jpg

The photo was taken during the Second World War in Rocca Corneta (municipality of Lizzano in Belvedere, province of Bologna, Italy) during the second assault of the Battle of Monte Castello by the Brazilian Army on 29 November 1944. According to italian law, images shot in Italy are on Public Domain after 20 years (see: Template:PD-Italy). Then, according to Brazilian Copyright Law (see: Template:PD-Brazil-media) photographic works shall be protected for a period of 70 years from the first of January of the year following that of their disclosure (this photo was shot 72 years ago). So I guess this photo can be restored, fixing the correct licence (original uploader listed it as "own work" with cc-by-sa-4.0, instead of Author:Brazilian Army, date:1944-11-29; license:PD-Italy+PD-Brazil-media). Thanks for your attention. If you need any additional info, please ping me. --Holapaco77 (talk) 15:50, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 22:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Istfan².jpg

Reason: Owner/mark was missing, but will be added after undeletion. Bagoly23 (talk) 09:32, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose I doubt very much that you were actually the photographer, as you claimed. Unless I am wrong, and you were the photographer, in order to restore these, the actual photographer(s) must send a free license(s) using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jim. OTRS verification needed. --Mates (talk) 00:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Planb88

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I talked to the uploader and verified that he is in fact Marcus Kayne, husband of Rebecca Mader. I asked him to confirm via Twitter, which he did. [1] Rebecca Mader also retweeted this.

With this new information, it seems safe to presume that he is telling the truth about taking these photos himself. Guanaco (talk) 07:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Now ongoing dispute, photo being allegedly a cropped professional photo. Planb88 denies this and reasserts he took it with his iPhone. Guanaco (talk) 08:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose the first three files are copyright violations, no doubt. The other two files are cropped versions of the photo at [2] or photos taken from the exact same position and therefore by the same photographer. --Martin H. (talk) 09:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose I can't find the first two images -- the site that the deletion says they are from has similar images from the same photo shoot, but not the same ones. The third is definitely claimed by Getty. The last two are indeed crops from the image Martin H. cites. If, in fact, Planb88 is Marcus Kayne, then he cannot have taken the image because he appears in it and it is not a selfie. On the other hand, the Twitter page cited by Guanaco is fairly convincing. I think the best thing here is to follow our usual procedure and require an OTRS license. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kimaera Promo1.jpg

Hello,

This was wrongly deleted. The author has posted this on flickr with sharealike license. Link below:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/150123902@N07/34847094662/

Please undelete.

--Warman631 (talk) 13:04, 31 May 2017 (UTC)Peter Abboud 31/05/2017

 Oppose The image came from Facebook, which is copyrighted. There is absolutely no evidence that the Flickr user has the right to freely license the image. License laundering is common on Flickr. It cannot be restored without a free license from an authorized official of the band using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:08, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello Jim,

The band manager has just sent an e-mail as requested to OTRS confirming that they have released this picture for free use. The email is kimaeraband@gmail.com and can be confirmed on the band's website or facebook page. www.kimaera.info or facebook.com/kimaeraofficial.

Please advise, thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warman631 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the image will be restored automatically when and if the e-mail is received, processed, and approved. If the e-mail has been properly received there, then the sender should receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be several weeks or more before the e-mail is processed and the image is restored. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 16:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Edbarseghyan

Please restore the following pages:

It seems like these files were deleted without any discussion while they were works of the uploader per User talk:Edbarseghyan. From uploader's reply it seems that he was just new to the site and did not know how to affirm that his files are his own work. The user seems to have uploaded the rest of the series as well without any problem. Thank you, Chaojoker (talk) 14:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: HR with EXIF data. Deleting these without a DR is not good. However, EXIF shows different authors in 2 cases, and one is a derivative work. --Yann (talk) 16:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pink Safety Razor and Razor Blades.jpg

This picture was professionally commissioned for the website Shaving Made Better - I am the owner of this website and the copyright holder, and I want to make this image available. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Menton (talk • contribs) 10:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:14, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chrome Stainless Steel Safety Razor.jpg

I am the owner of this image and the copyright holder, and I wish to make it available — Preceding unsigned comment added by Menton (talk • contribs) 10:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LordsGroup2017 3 sm.jpg

The file in question (and the other copyright strike files I've uploaded) are of me and my band, which I OWN. These are not copyrighted, and I give them to the commons freely, relinquishing any rights to the photo. People are free to copy, edit, etc. the photos.

Again: These are MY photos of ME and MY BAND. I own these photos, this is NOT COPYRIGHTED.

Mshabooboo (talk) 13:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:16, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 19:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LordsGroup2015 1.jpg

These are MY photos of MY band which I own. I wish to make it available without copyright. These photos are NOT copyrighted.

Mshabooboo (talk) 13:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:16, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 19:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LordsGroup2015 4.jpg

These photos are MY band and I own the photo. It is NOT copyrighted. I wish to make these available without copyright.

Mshabooboo (talk) 13:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:17, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 19:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:HSD New Logo.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: We are the owners of the logo. Tallman91 (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi,
Please ask a legal representative from the organisation to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 19:30, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eric P. Winer MD.jpg

I received a notice that the photograph of Eric P. Winer MD was deleted due to a copyright violation. I am the owner of the photo so there is no copyright violation. Can you re-instate the photo? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisClea (talk • contribs) 17:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi,
This is a small copy from [3]. So please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 19:30, 2 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:$uperhubs - -how the Financial Elite and their Networks Rule Our World- - Sandra Navidi.jpg

Diese:

Declaration of consent

I hereby affirm that I choose one: [am name] or [represent copyright holder's name], the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of choose one: [the media work][1] or [the work depicted in the media][2] or [both the work depicted and the media][3] as shown here: choose one: [web page of the content] or [in the attached images/text],[4] and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work. I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5] I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. [Sender's name] [Sender's authority (if applicable. E.g. "Copyright holder", "Director", "Appointed representative of", etc.)] [Date]

mit allen Freigaben des Verlages müsste bei Commons sein. Darum bitte ich um Wiederherstellung des Bildes.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Hi Wald-Burger8,
Please send the permission to COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 19:29, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Up_at_the_66th_Mostra.jpg

This has been tagged as copyright violation by AntonierCH but this file had been kept once per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Up at the 66th Mostra.jpg. Therefore it needed at least a DR if he wanted to question it again with new arguments.
(NB : AntonierCH's recent activity looks like he's upset against me for some reason. I hope I'm wrong and that he's not in a revenge/ animosity logic, but there are some strange relations between recent attempts of deleting some of my uploads) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:00, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

 Info The deletion request is from 2009. Since 2011 we have COM:COSTUME. Thuresson (talk) 16:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
@Thuresson: I wasn't aware of COM:COSTUME, thanks for that information. Just a "technical" question : as I wrote above, I wasn't saying that the file shouldn't be deleted but that a DR might have been a better thing to do since there was a previous DR. Moreoever, I think the "copyvio" tag doesn't apply to cases like costumes. Am I wrong ? --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:30, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 Comment. "... posting pictures of costumes or masks that are themselves under copyright, or which depict characters that are under copyright could qualify as copyright infringement" per this WMF statement. This is obviously the case here, where it is even more than a costume : the 3D character has been directly 3D printed to create the costume. It is obviously copyrighted. TwoWings: Please assume good faith, I have other stuff to do and there is no reason for a revenge or whatever has it has been already been stated. --AntonierCH (d) 17:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
@AntonierCH: Since you recently wrote wrong accusations towards me when I asked you any explanations (you assumed it was not important when you deleted my message ! wow !), and since it seemed strange to see you trying to delete several of my uploads afterwards (and apparently you're upset when they are kept), I assumed it was logical to think that from you. At least, you may not be the perfect person to ask me to assume good faith from you. So just try not to abuse (even if you may be right in this case). Thanks. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:30, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
@AntonierCH: But I agree that you proved your good faith here. So let's end with that and try not to be rancorous with each other. Regards. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Clearly a DW. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:18, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eva Sonnino and Dino Sonnino, cover photo.jpeg

Reason: The photo is most probably not covered by copyright since Bernardo Sandals, the company owned at the time by R G Barry in 1970, went out of business in the early 1990's. Edward Sonnino (talk) 21:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose In most cases the copyright will be held by the photographer or his heirs. If, in the rare case that that photographer transferred the copyright to Bernardo Sandals, then it is likely that the company's intellectual property (including its copyrights) was sold at the windup auction. If not, then they are orphan copyrights. In any case, the copyrights still exist and the images cannot be kept on Commons unless there is a copyright holder and he is willing to freely license them. If the copyrights are orphans, then the images cannot be kept on Commons until the copyrights expire. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:23, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: We don't accept w:orphan works. --Storkk (talk) 12:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Konvoluttenengra00gjel 0001 (08).jpg

work by Louis Moe died 1945, so PD 2016. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 01:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

 Support Author of text, Karl Gjellerup (1857-1919). Illustration by Louis Moe (1857-1945). Published 1897. Although it was not out of copyright in Norway on the URAA date, no work published before 1923 has a URAA copyright in the USA, so it is PD in both Norway (per pma 70) and the USA (pre-1923). .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: per Jim. --Storkk (talk) 12:10, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Offa triomphant.jpg

work by Louis Moe (died, 1945) PD 2016. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 01:31, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

 Support This is an 1891 work (see signature in the lower left), so it also does not qualify for URAA restoration. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: per Jim, "91" clearly visible on image - original DR assumed this was 1991, but it was clearly 1891. --Storkk (talk) 12:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files from MapQuest

According to the DR's below it does not seem that MapQuest published under a free license. But there are a lot's of files that created with ShareMap (Category:Created with ShareMap). The EXIF indicate that the file is CC-BY-SA 3.0 but the source also mentioned MapQuest as one of the sources (example). If files from ShareMap are ok then those DR's should be undeleted.

Also raised it in Commons:Village pump/Copyright#files from MapQuest. -- Geagea (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose File:Belarus (night train).svg shows a ShareMap source, which would be OK (Sharemap is CC-BY-SA-3.0), but it is not the same map as the one one Sharemap -- it has more detail in the countryside. It mentions six data sources, of which only MapQuest is not freely licensed, but that is enough to make it unusable here.

The third and fourth cases are taken directly from MapQuest and clearly cannot be kept here. The first two are from a a now discontinued "MapQuest Open", for which license information is not available any more. Since we can't cite the now-missing license there, I think we must assume that the DRs were correct. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:49, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

The point is that it's also means that files from ShareMap are not ok as well. -- Geagea (talk) 17:57, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion, also the maps should be easily recreatable via OpenStreetMap. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Grabados de José, Jesús y María,.jpg

User sent an OTRS ticket, but I can't figure out if the image is a photo or own-made art. Superzerocool (talk) 16:52, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Not done for now. Please open a new UnDR request if applicable. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:29, 3 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BSADC Logo transparent.jpg

The file deleted was drawn by me, and used for the club of which I was a member the chairman and Diving officer, the club no longer exists as Jan 2016. I was also the designer and webmaster of the club site www.bsadc.com. if any copyright was ever applicable it would have been and still will b e my copyright as the artist/designer of this logo. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 36.80.80.17 (talk) 05:10, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Until the article draft has been accepted for inclusion. Thuresson (talk) 05:37, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: And it has been deleted, so not restoring it, because the logo is out of scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:27, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bank misr.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: this is mistake, I'm the the orginal uploader not (جار الله), this is public domain in Egypt Ibrahim.ID ✪ 20:22, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

I uploaded this file in Arwiki in 2010 and (جار الله) transfer it to commons later --Ibrahim.ID ✪ 20:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose There are two problems here. First, the image has no useful filename or description, only " ترخيص" which Google translates as "License". It has no categories, so it will be lost among our 39 million files. It is small and blurred, so I doubt that even if we knew what it was that it would ever be used.

Second, you say it is PD in Egypt. The law in Egypt is 50 years pma. This image shows an automobile that is from the 1930s or perhaps later. Therefore we cannot assume that the photographer died more than 50 years ago. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:26, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Didier Vermeiren, Adam, 1999 Tate Modern.jpg

This file has been deleted today or yesterday, so i asked Mr. Vermeiren, the artist (the author of the photography and also of the work) to ad it himself to the wikicommons project so I could use it on wikipedia. So he created his own account and he did it this afternoon.

Shev123 has been very suspicious of every move regarding the Vermeiren page on wikipedia, but everything has now been done by the book, at least I'm trying too when I have enough time

Thanks alot for your attention

--DiePlastik (talk) 16:23, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

 Info From Commons:Deletion requests/File:Didier Vermeiren, Adam, 1999 Tate Modern.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 18:44, 1 June 2017 (UTC) Also see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Didier Vermeiren, Adam, 1999 Tatemodern.jpg

 Oppose I do not see an account in the name User:Didier Vermeiren. I do see that someone has uploaded the image a second time using a slightly different filename after it was deleted. If that person knew that the image had been deleted previously, then this is a violation of Commons rules and a waste of human and computer resources.

If M. Vermeiren wishes to open an account in order to upload and freely license his work, that would be very welcome. However, since both vandals and fans can easily open an account and claim that they are a famous artist, policy requires that the artist must send proof of his identity using OTRS.

As far as I can see, Shev123's suspicions have been entirely correct. We do not yet have any evidence that M. Vermeiren has freely licensed his work or wants to do so. Such suspicions may be very frustrating to the honest user, but please understand that we are only trying to protect the artist's copyright in a world where there are many people who might want to violate it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:map_info_04.jpg

This picture is the picture that tells us the entrance to Yangjae cheon. This picture is in the original site of gangnam gu office. I believe that we can use this picture without violating copyright. --Science0324 (talk) 00:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose On what basis do you say "I believe that we can use this picture without violating copyright." The map certainly has a copyright. Neither here nor in the file description do you give any reason why we can ignore that. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:UEFA Cup trophy.jpg

The photo was properly attributed, the original file is released under a permitted license, all the author's other photos seem to be of their own work complete with EXIF data and other cropped photos of UEFA trophies are permitted. I'm not sure why this one fell afoul. VEO15 (talk) 06:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

 Info See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:UEFA Cup trophy or Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:UEFA Champions League trophy. Thuresson (talk) 09:12, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose The trophy is protected by copyright and will be for many years to come. We cannot keep images of it on Commons without a free license from its creator(s). See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:UEFA trophies. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:18, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Derivative work of a protected sculpture. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Musiceditormk

I need to have my photo back, ita my own photo! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musiceditormk (talk • contribs) 19:24, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

@Musiceditormk: You have seven deleted photos. Which one do you mean? If it's the new one and that is like the old ones, please send permission via OTRS. Also, please post in a new section at the bottom as requested above, and sign each post.   — Jeff G. ツ 01:54, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Since the files appear to be personal images, with no useful descriptions or categories, I oppose restoring any of them. At least one was "taken by a friend" and will require a free license from the friend, the actual photographer, using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Unclear which photo was meant. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dharampal Singh

All uploaded content is for an article that I am writing. It is in my Sandbox soon will be published on wikipedia. So I request to cancel the deletion of the listed content, and all other files are in use of wikipedia articles So please do not raise deletion request for any of them. All the files are useful content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dharampal Singh (talk • contribs) 19:19, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Files not yet deleted. Please comment in the Deletion Request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Baker-Washington March cut.jpg

Wrong deletion about Pr Fox's pictures.


Hello,
What I've you done ? Why my pictures loaded since a long time are deleted now, though it is Public domain !?

It is very complicated to contribute with visual pictures on wikipédia (in addition to that tutorials are in english) ; but I assure you it is a "maldonne" (like we say in French) ! First (about Josephine Baker) are from public notoriety free to use (ex: [J.B. in Washington March] etc.)
And the second choice (Georges Arnaud) is a review of a picture offered by the son of the writer himself. (P.D.) I'll be pleased if you can undelete those contributions (or if you'll do not erase it again, in the case I'll be obliged to re-load them...) Thanks for your attention. --Pr Fox (talk) 13:50, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose These were deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pr Fox. You claimed these images as your "own work", and now you tell me each comes from a different source and author (which is why we deleted them in the first place, since it's obvious they weren't your own work). Public notoriety doesn't make these free to use. OTRS permission from the copyright holder of these images is needed. If you re-upload any of these three images, I'll be forced to delete them again and block your account, so I wouldn't recommend that you do so. Daphne Lantier 18:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Agreed. It is clear that Pr Fox is not the author of these images as he originally claimed. As Daphne says, in order for any of them to be restored, the actual copyright holder of the image, which is almost always the photographer, must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per Daphne and Jim, actual copyright holders must send a license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Cardiovascular_Hospital_RHCC.jpg Permission was received

Regarding: Cardiovascular_Hospital_RHCC.jpg This picture was also provided courtesy of the Spokesperson's Office of Rambam Health Care Campus. When permission was given, it was included and other pictures have received that commentary.

This picture should be covered by the same permission as shown below: Wikimedia has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by an OTRS member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2017031610007122. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 777desha777 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Apologies, the OTRS agent appears to have missed tagging that file. I have restored it, and checked that the other files in the ticket are correctly tagged. --Storkk (talk) 10:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Oxford-Gargoyles1-.jpg

{{Own work}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steven C. Price (talk • contribs)

✓ Done in view of uploader's other contributions. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

PaulO'Keefe.jpg

File:Paul O'Keefe.jpg

The image of Mr. O'Keefe was taken at Social Security banquet in 2010. It is not a headshot, promotional photo, or ad promoting a tv show or movie. Social Security is government controlled and not for profit. Please reconsider. Thank you. Clarawolfe (talk) 09:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose The copyright to a photograph belongs to the person who took the photograph, not the organizers of the event at which it was taken. This was by Getty/Fred Brown, who will have to send in a free license that allows for commercial use, by following the instructions at OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Requires a free license from the actual photographer via OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Edward Byers.jpg

This is Edward Byers official photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hem300 (talk • contribs) 22:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


That may or may not be correct, but the image has not been deleted so this is not the place to discuss it. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Edward Byers.jpg..     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: please direct comments to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Edward Byers.jpg. Daphne Lantier 00:34, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gary Vaynerchuk (33094544565).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Autorisation given with Template:OTRS ticket. Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as above. --Yann (talk) 17:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jane Wong.jpg

This photograph is mine. I offer it up for fair use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdwllhntng (talk • contribs) 01:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Not done. Thuresson (talk) 18:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TEDxPineCrestSchool - Zeitgeist stage.jpg

Undelete this photograph. This is my photograph and I allow it for fair use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdwllhntng (talk • contribs) 01:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per COM:FU. Daphne Lantier 19:34, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Viljo Vesterinen 1930-luvulla.jpg

In Finland the copyright protection ordinary photos is 50 years. This photo of Viljo Vesterinen was taken in 1930 and the copyright protection has expired

Phewnix (talk) 18:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. {{PD-Finland50}} --Yann (talk) 22:10, 5 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Edward Byers operational mode.jpg‬

This is personal photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hem300 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Making incorrect claims that you were the photographer of images you did not take is a waste of your time and ours. Doing it again may result in your being blocked from editing on Commons. However, both Stars and Stripes and the Navy Times web sites credit the image as "US Navy", so I  Support restoration. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 22:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DOCTOR VICTOR 2016.jpg

This photo is my property. Please provide me with the feedback why the photo was deleted without warning. Thank ypu. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TankaGazi (talk • contribs) 12:59, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 06:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:IntrudersTVLogo.jpg

This file should qualify as {{Pd-text}}. Should be undeleted. A similar copy exists in En wiki at File:IntrudersTVLogo.jpg --Sreejith K (talk) 04:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

@Sreejithk2000: Evidently, Krdbot and Jcb disagreed.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
I saw that, but I would like to know why. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: pd-text. Daphne Lantier 05:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DOCTOR VICTOR 2014.png

I request to undelete the photo as I am the owner of it. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TankaGazi (talk • contribs) 08:56, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 06:01, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Redmi Note 4.jpg

My file Redmi Note 4.jpg has been deleted.I request to undelete the file and want to know the exact reason for the deletion of the file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AthulKriZz (talk • contribs) 03:48, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
@AthulKriZz: It was deleted as a derivative of copyrighted work. Please do not post where you're instructed not to post.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per COM:DW. Daphne Lantier 06:03, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ejkm.png

I request you undelete this file, for the following reasons:


As it was found easily on Google images, and I have seen the file used on multiple different sites, I see it as fair game.


It is the only suitable file of it's kind. There are no other files of a good enough quality and suitable pixel size depicting the same image.


I feel this is a far more appropriate image than any other, as it is closest in design to the original flag. The currently used photo is an incorrect image.


The currently used item shows signs of bias/propaganda. The icon depicts Ériu, the symbol of Irish Nationalism (the topic in question) in a Negroid fashion. This is disrespectful to the topic, and is in my opinion racist. The currently used icon is not true to the original image it is meant to be depicting.


There was no copyright signature on the original image, and no signs the creator of such an image did not want others to redisplay their work in similar Wikis to the one in which it was originally used. I would surmise quite the opposite is the case.


I believe we at Wikipedia have a moral obligation to the truth, and to display history in a non-biased, objective fashion. I hope you consider my request, and the implications of ignoring such demands, as simple as they may be.


Thank you for your time.

Yours sincerely, MacRudraige, 6 June 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by MacRudraige (talk • contribs) 06:52, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: "found easily on Google images" is not a free license. The copyright owner has to send a permission. --Yann (talk) 08:08, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FlagSynevyrOfficial.jpg

ЦИВІЛЬНИЙ КОДЕКС УКРАЇНИ (http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15/print1454024152046652)

Стаття 434. Твори, які не є об'єктами авторського права

1. Не є об'єктами авторського права:

1) акти органів державної влади та органів місцевого самоврядування (закони, укази, постанови, рішення тощо), а також їх офіційні переклади;

2) державні символи України, грошові знаки, емблеми тощо, затверджені органами державної влади;

3) повідомлення про новини дня або інші факти, що мають характер звичайної прес-інформації;

4) інші твори, встановлені законом.

ЗАКОН УКРАЇНИ "Про авторське право і суміжні права" (http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3792-12/print1454024152046652)

Стаття 10. Об'єкти, що не охороняються

Не є об'єктом авторського права:

г) державні символи України, державні нагороди; символи і знаки органів державної влади, Збройних Сил України та інших військових формувань; символіка територіальних громад; символи та знаки підприємств, установ та організацій;


According to the Article 10 of the Law of Ukraine on Copyright and Related rights this work is in the public domain within Ukraine and possibly in other jurisdictions because it is one of the following: (a) daily news or details of current events that constitute regular press information; (b) works of folk art (folklore); (c) official documents of a political, legislative or administrative nature (laws, decrees, resolutions, court awards, State standards, etc.) issued by government authorities within their powers, and official translations thereof; (d) State symbols of Ukraine, government awards; symbols and signs of government authorities, the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations; symbols of territorial communities; symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations; (includes postage stamps) (e) coins and banknotes; (f) transport schedules, TV and radio broadcast schedules, telephone directories and other similar databases that do not meet the originality criteria and to which the sui generis right (a particular or special right) is applicable; Note that drafts of anything that falls under sections (d) and (e), unless officially approved, are under copyright.

Отже, це суспільне надбання (Public Domain) --Gregory Korshinsky (talk) 18:31, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored -- {{PD-UA-exempt}}. Daphne Lantier 21:26, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SynevyrCoatOfArmsOfficialColor.png

ЦИВІЛЬНИЙ КОДЕКС УКРАЇНИ (http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/435-15/print1454024152046652)

Стаття 434. Твори, які не є об'єктами авторського права

1. Не є об'єктами авторського права:

1) акти органів державної влади та органів місцевого самоврядування (закони, укази, постанови, рішення тощо), а також їх офіційні переклади;

2) державні символи України, грошові знаки, емблеми тощо, затверджені органами державної влади;

3) повідомлення про новини дня або інші факти, що мають характер звичайної прес-інформації;

4) інші твори, встановлені законом.

ЗАКОН УКРАЇНИ "Про авторське право і суміжні права" (http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3792-12/print1454024152046652)

Стаття 10. Об'єкти, що не охороняються

Не є об'єктом авторського права:

г) державні символи України, державні нагороди; символи і знаки органів державної влади, Збройних Сил України та інших військових формувань; символіка територіальних громад; символи та знаки підприємств, установ та організацій;


According to the Article 10 of the Law of Ukraine on Copyright and Related rights this work is in the public domain within Ukraine and possibly in other jurisdictions because it is one of the following: (a) daily news or details of current events that constitute regular press information; (b) works of folk art (folklore); (c) official documents of a political, legislative or administrative nature (laws, decrees, resolutions, court awards, State standards, etc.) issued by government authorities within their powers, and official translations thereof; (d) State symbols of Ukraine, government awards; symbols and signs of government authorities, the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations; symbols of territorial communities; symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations; (includes postage stamps) (e) coins and banknotes; (f) transport schedules, TV and radio broadcast schedules, telephone directories and other similar databases that do not meet the originality criteria and to which the sui generis right (a particular or special right) is applicable; Note that drafts of anything that falls under sections (d) and (e), unless officially approved, are under copyright.

Отже, це суспільне надбання (Public Domain) --Gregory Korshinsky (talk) 18:33, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

 Support This file was deleted because when you uploaded it you did not put any declaration of a licence on the file page. If you had used {{PD-UA-exempt}} or simply added a written note about this image being public domain, the file would not have been deleted at all. De728631 (talk) 21:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored -- {{PD-UA-exempt}}. Daphne Lantier 21:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pink Safety Razor and Razor Blades.jpg

I am the copyright holder for this image and wish to release it under the creative commons licence — Preceding unsigned comment added by Menton (talk • contribs) 09:25, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 05:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1930s-jamesw.curran-woodpeckershole.jpg

Ticket:2017020810015078 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 06:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Restored. Daphne Lantier 06:53, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done, thanks!   — Jeff G. ツ 07:52, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Green Kerala Tour Packages Images.jpg

i dont understnd why you deleted my pics, its taken by me from my asus phone for my website ..so i uploaded it so how it be violation ? i need to bring me back — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sreejir (talk • contribs) 03:38, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 03:45, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
@Sreejir: It was probably found elsewhere on the Internet. Please send permission via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ 03:45, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Advertisment, small image without EXIF. --Yann (talk) 09:51, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MacOS Architecture.svg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: An autorisation has been sent with Template:OTRS ticket. I would like to check where the file has already been uploaded : can you please temporarily undelete this file. Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:33, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 09:48, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Badlo soch badlo zindagi by faiz hassan siyal.pdf

I think it should be undelete... AliShanMeo111 (talk) 07:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)Ali Shan

@AliShanMeo111: Why? It was deleted as a copyright violation for lack of proper permission. Who wrote it? Where did you get it? What gives you the right to license it? If you are writing about File:Islamic wallpaper 720p.jpg, please post at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Islamic wallpaper 720p.jpg, as action here would be premature. Also, since you posted at the top of the page, removing instructions to post at the bottom, please only post where directed by instructions, and leave instructions alone.   — Jeff G. ツ 13:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jeff. --Yann (talk) 16:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SHi-ON-logo.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Can you please undelete temporarily this file to handle the OTRS request : Template:OTRS ticket. Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:51, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TinaHowe2016.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Ticket:2017040110010171 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me. Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:56, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:45, 7 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Neoopsis 25 300.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: autorisation provided with Ticket:2017040210009725. Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:38, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AJRCCM 4-1-17 Cover.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Autorisation provided with Ticket:2017040410014475. Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 21:27, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ASTURIA quartet.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Ticket: 2017041010012616 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:30, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 21:37, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Joabbyson

Houve um engano, pois a foto em questão é de minha autoria. Portanto, é autorizada a publicação. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joabbyson (talk • contribs) 05:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Google translated: There was a mistake, because the photo in question is my own. Therefore, publication is authorized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joabbyson (talk • contribs) 05:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
@Joabbyson: File:Estúdio da Rádio Rural de Guarabira.jpg was deleted as a copyright violation. Please send permission to permissions-pt via OTRS. Also, please post in a new section at the bottom as requested above, and sign each post.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:02, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
@Joabbyson: File:Estúdio da Rádio Rural de Guarabira.jpg foi excluído como violação de direitos autorais. Envie permissão para permissions-pt via OTRS. Além disso, publique em uma nova seção na parte inferior como solicitado acima e assine cada publicação.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:02, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: COM:OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:41, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:HaginsVenezia.jpg

The user Ronhjones‬ deletes this file thinking that it's a violation of copyright. I don't know why he thinks this. I'm the author of the photo and I hold the right of it, so I uploaded it. Please tell me when I can re-upload it. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by FrancescoSoliani (talk • contribs) 08:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

@FrancescoSoliani: Because we cannot verify that your username on this site actually belongs to Francesco Soliani the photographer, for photographs published elsewhere first, we require the photographer to confirm the free license by following the instructions at OTRS. Storkk (talk) 10:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

@Storkk. Sorry, but I don't understand what I have to do. It's really difficult to upload an image on wikipedia :(

@FrancescoSoliani: Hi, Could you upload the original image, and not a small scaled-down version? Otherwise, as for all content previously published elsewhere, please send a permission via COM:OTRS as explained above. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
@Yann: Thanks Yann. I've uploaded the original image. I used the COM:OTRS procedure after the advice of another user, I'm waiting for the answer. Thanks again Yann

 Not done: Will be restored through the OTRS process if applicable. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:41, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image Undeletion

Hello Yann,

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

Hello Wiki,

As per adhering to wiki guidelines & getting permission to upload image through wiki email template granting common licensing to use my image for any purposes, the link page image got removed by an administrator.

Kindly look into this matter to solve the query.

Thank You

Good Day

Greatica (talk) 04:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello Daphne, I already did the OTRS permission part (through interactive release generator) on 27/5/2017 for hosting my image. Thank You Greatica (talk) — Preceding undated comment added by Greatica (talk • contribs) 04:07, 6 June 2017‎ (UTC)


 Oppose Spam. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
@Greatica:
  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply.  — Jeff G. ツ 04:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello Jeff G. ツ, the ticket no. is Ticket:2017052710005511 Greatica (talk) — Preceding undated comment added by Greatica (talk • contribs) 04:18, 6 June 2017‎ (UTC)

Hello Hedwig in Washington, you could see the email id and owner of the source name matching below. Thank You Greatica (talk) — Preceding undated comment added by Greatica (talk • contribs) 04:07, 6 June 2017‎ (UTC)

Once the OTRS permission is processed and confirmed, the file will be restored or an OTRS member will request its restoration. The admin who deleted this image is an OTRS member by the way. I'm not, so I have no access to any OTRS information. Daphne Lantier 04:57, 6 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greatica (talk • contribs) 04:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Will be restored through the OTRS process, if applicable. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:39, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Brisbane Christian College Logo.svg

Hi,

I would like to ask guidance regarding the correct way to upload an image under Fair Use, not Free Use. Based on my reading of the Wikimedia article and other similar types of images for an education entity I understand I have followed the guidelines.

I am happy to do the work for this to be correct but feel that the deletion is unwarranted due to the current Wikimedia policy.

Thank you, I appreciate your time.

Article for the entity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brisbane_Christian_College References: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Upload/Uploadtext/en-nonfree-logo

- LB (Ben) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lb.ee (talk • contribs) 10:14, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

As per COM:FU, fair use is not allowed here on Commons. You would have to upload the file at Wikipedia (see Wikipedia:Non-free content). Daphne Lantier 19:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
No such file of this name has ever been uploaded at Commons or the English Wikipedia and hotlinking images from the web or from your computer does not work at all on Wikimedia pages, so the image was not deleted either. This logo from the website of the Brisbane Christian College, however, seems to be creative enough to be copyrighted under Australian law, so you would have to upload it locally at Wikipedia with a fair use rationale.
I have now done this for you, but for future reference, I'll list the required steps for the fastest way below:
  • Download the logo to your computer and convert it to a small raster image (jpg, png) using some image-processing software of your choice. This is required to satisfy the fair use criteria of the English Wikipedia which demand that the sampled image is always reasonably small enough to prevent misuse by third parties. 300 x 300 pixels should be ok and this SVG logo was even smaller.
  • At the English Wikipedia click the "Upload file" button in the "tools" menu on the left side of the page.
  • Choose "Wikipedia / Plain form for local uploads" in the next screen.
  • Then comes the file upload form. Enter the source file from your computer and change the destination filename if needed so it becomes descriptive.
  • In the big text box called "Summary", enter the following code:

{{Non-free use rationale logo | Article = Brisbane Christian College | Use = Infobox | Website = https://brisbanechristiancollege.com.au/ }}

  • Select "Logo" from the "Licensing" menu.
  • "Upload file"
Feel free to ask me for details on my user talk page. De728631 (talk) 21:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Davittschutlaschwili.png

Moin zusammen, bitte das Bild wiederherstellen, Genehmigung unter Ticket#2017032310020933 eingegangen. Tschüß -- Ra Boe watt?? 07:34, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Raboe001: Done. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:35, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Anntoine-wagner-portrait.jpg

The file in question was provided by me by the subject of the image, Antoine Wagner. I can forward an email from him giving permission, if necessary.

Thank you.

--Ls 1990 (talk) 14:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Note, please, that the e-mail must come directly from the copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer. We have too many bad actors who forge permissions, so we do not generally accept forwarded permissions. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:19, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission required. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:D 29(DAIKI).jpg

no problem — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hgr086 (talk • contribs) 08:53, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose That bald assertion is not a reason to restore the image. It was deleted because it appears elsewhere on the Web without a free license. In order to have it restored, the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. Also note that without a useful file description (where? when?) and categories, it will simply be lost and useless among our 40 million images. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:45, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: No reason for undeletion given. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:31, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:3D Secure Flow.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Ticket:2017040510013401 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 08:09, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.


File:Young Thunder Video Shoot.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request:Ticket:2017041310001917 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 08:09, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:APaiaya.jpg

I own the copyright to this image.--JohnBradley2015X (talk) 14:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done Image is copyrighted Raging Pictures on imdb.com. If you are authorised to consent to publication on their behalf, please follow the instructions at OTRS. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SFOD-D Patch.svg

This is a batch worn by Delta Force units. As such, en:Copyright status of work by the U.S. government applies and the symbol is therefore in the public domain. I created the file myself as exercise in raster image to SVG conversion, since there was a bad quality raster image file which appeared in a list requesting SVG conversion. I did respond on the deletion talk only very short, since I supposed that the deciding admin would know that the work is in the PD. --WolfgangRieger (talk) 09:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Restored -- @WolfgangRieger: Please add proper source info. Daphne Lantier 19:56, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ILO 1-TRANSFERT Général-General-A3-150dpi.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: User:AntonierCH/undel AntonierCH (d) 10:59, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done @AntonierCH: please update the OTRS tags at the file pages. De728631 (talk) 19:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Façade de l'École des chartes au 65, rue de Richelieu.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent ( verify ) request: Ticket:2017060210009874 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, and ping me. If the permission looks good for me, I'll remove {{Temporarily undeleted}} and add {{PermissionOTRS}}, otherwise, {{OTRS received}}. Thanks ! --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 17:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

@Framawiki: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Done --Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 19:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 19:45, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Filmworker.jpg

I am the producer of the film Filmworker. I own the copyright to this piece of artwork. How do I prove it to you so that the file can be restored? --Kedesk (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, Elizabeth Yoffe

Please send an email from an account associated with the production company. You can find instructions and a link to a templated text in COM:OTRS. Once the email has been processed by our team of volunteers, the file will be restored, but this may take some time. De728631 (talk) 19:06, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 19:13, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1408964 orig.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I Am Owner of this images. these images are creating in Autodesk 3Ds max TRUECOSMOS (talk) 05:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose The first two are pictures of nondescript trees in gray tones. The third, also in gray tones is something else -- but who knows what? There are no categories, no description, and no useful image name, so they cannot be found among our 39+ million images. I see no possible educational use. They also appear elsewhere on the Web with an explicit copyright notice. That could be fixed, but they would still be useless. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:38, 8 June 2017 (UTC) NB -- my comment above got attached to the next UnDR -- I have moved it here from the archive. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. No COM:EDUSE. Daphne Lantier 20:12, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DeathofJohnHernandez.png

This is a screenshot that I took of the video that was released as public domain to news and the internet as evidence in the case — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexf505 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Please present a source for this claim. Thuresson (talk) 23:53, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose There is no reason to believe that the video, which was shot by a bystander, is public domain. The bystander owns the copyright and in order to restore it to Commons, he or she must provide a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:29, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 08:20, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ratare-Village-In-Paracin-Area.svg

On what basis did you conclude that this was "copyrighted" and felt the need to remove it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tditdatdwt (talk • contribs) 10:10, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose I did neither tag nor delete the image, but in the file cache I can see that you credited "Google Maps" as a source. Google Maps content is copyrighted by default so you can't create a derivative work based on their maps. De728631 (talk) 19:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: copyvio -- COM:DW of Google Maps. Daphne Lantier 08:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Walking on an Earthlike Planet cover.jpg File:ALS Walking on an Earthlike Planet PK.pdf File:ALS picture.jpg

OTRS agent (verify) request:Ticket:2017041310018991 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   --Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:41, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Two files restored. No file named File:ALS picture.jpg has ever existed on Commons. Daphne Lantier 19:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Just to note, I checked all the deleted images uploaded by Lpgomar, and none of them has a title anywhere close to File:ALS picture.jpg. Daphne Lantier 19:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the search @Daphne Lantier: , the client mentioned this file, I will ask fore more details. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: 2 restored -- @Arthur Crbz: Further restorations can be done using a new request. Daphne Lantier 08:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wiener Linien ULFB.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Ticket:2017041410007295 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 08:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:House 8x10.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Ticket:2017041510011288 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:28, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 08:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Playing card deck sUUper Seven game created by Christopher Burtt.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Ticket:2017041710023931 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:09, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 08:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cascade chart.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission provided with Ticket:2017041310017482. Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored -- @Arthur Crbz: Please add the ticket and license. Daphne Lantier 08:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Norton - Teatro do Bairro - Lisbon.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Ticket:2017041210016467 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:58, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 20:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lance Selwyn Cousins.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request:Ticket:2017041510009924 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:15, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:22, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 20:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Anupama Chopra.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Ticket:2017041510004198 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 20:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DreamCheaper founders.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Ticket:2017041810016885 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:27, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 20:12, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dumer Pedraza - biografía.png

Cordial saludo:

De la manera mas atenta y respetuosa me dirijo a ustedes para solicitar la restauración del archivo png: dumer pedraza - biografía, el cual fue eliminado sin justa causa. El archivo es de mi autoria, tiene licencia libre y es de uso para referencia con mis estudiantes, profesores y pacientes.

Agradezco su oportuna atención,

--Dumer Pedraza-Ordóñez (talk) 01:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Dúmer Antonio Pedraza Ordoñez best regard

In the most attentive and respectful way I turn to you to request the restoration of the png file: 'dumer pedraza - biography' , which was removed without just cause. The file is my own, has a free license and is of use for reference with my students, teachers and patients.

I appreciate your timely attention,

--Dumer Pedraza-Ordóñez (talk) 01:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC)Dúmer Antonio Pedraza Ordoñez

 Oppose The file is out of scope. Such information must be set in wiki markup. We do not allow images of things like personal infoboxes. Also, aside from uploading this file with four different file names and two personal essays, all of which have been deleted as out of scope, you have made no contributions to Commons. Commons is not facebook and we ae not here to host your information for the use of your "students, teachers, and patients". Finally, the photo in the file does not appear to be a selfie, so it is unlikely that you are actually the photographer as you claimed. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim, not within COM:SCOPE & possible copyright violation. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Urtina logo circle png 01.png

Dear Administrator

I want this files to be retrieved because the logo is bought on freelancer. I paid 50 $ for the logo to be made on the open contest in freelancer. Whenever I announced and selected the winner all rights to use the logo are granted and transferred to me. If you need additional proof please let me know.

(OsmanDzudzevic (talk) 10:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC))

 Oppose First, you must show that the logo is that of a significant organization -- that usually requires that there be a Wikipedia article on it. Then, having done that here, you must have the actual copyright holder send a free license using OTRS. Note that there appears to be nothing in Freelancer's terms of service that suggests that your commissioning a work includes a transfer of the copyright. Unless there is a specific written agreement, signed by the creator, which transfers copyright to you, you do not have the right to freely license these logos. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim, notability must be proven and OTRS permission provided. Daphne Lantier 21:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Enterprise, Alabama Page Image.jpg

A series of photos taken by me on Enterprise, AL for use on the Enterprise, Alabama page.


— Preceding unsigned comment added by Skuzbucket (talk • contribs) 19:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose The images must be sourced individually. The preferred method is to upload each of the images separately, with a full description and categories. After that is done, we will consider the request for restoring the montage. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:28, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim's instructions. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:lasallecollegianfrontpage.jpg

The file was a photo of free, public weekly newspaper, the La Salle Collegian, which currently does not have a photo. The previous photo was outdated. The new photo was deleted by user:Secondarywaltz, which, on his talk page suggested that I don't need a photo. I think the page does, since it has a photo before and I deleted it because it was outdated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lasalleexplorer (talk • contribs) 20:02, 9 June 2017‎ (UTC)

 Oppose The photo was deleted because it constitutes a copyright violation. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:16, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose The paper may be distributed free of charge, but that does not mean that it is free of copyright. In order to have it restored here, the publisher of the paper must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:30, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 03:15, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:王晓波（2).jpg to undelete

Mr. Xiaobo Wang gave the authorization to wiki for using his photos (王晓波（1).jpg and 王晓波（2).jpg)

Xssk representative --Xssk2017 (talk) 23:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose @Xssk2017: Please have Mr. Wang email permission to permissions-commons in English or permissions-zh in Chinese via OTRS. Courtesy link: File:王晓波（1).jpg.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:30, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 03:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:《香山诗刊》2016秋冬卷.jpg undelete

Please undelete File:《香山诗刊》2016秋冬卷.jpg, as the Journal editer-in-Chief Mr. Xiaobo Wang has given authorization to WIki for using the Journal's cover photo.

Xssk representative --Xssk2017 (talk) 23:34, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose @Xssk2017: Please have Mr. Wang email permission to permissions-commons in English or permissions-zh in Chinese via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:29, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 03:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:《香山诗刊》2016秋冬卷.jpg Undelete request

Please undelete File:《香山诗刊》2016秋冬卷.jpg as the Editor-in-Chief, Mr. Xiaobo Wang has given authorization to WIki for using Journal's coverpage photo.

Xssk representative --Xssk2017 (talk) 23:36, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose @Xssk2017: Please have Mr. Wang email permission to permissions-commons in English or permissions-zh in Chinese via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:28, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 03:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:《香山诗刊》2016春夏卷.jpg undelete request

Please undelete File:《香山诗刊》2016春夏卷.jpg as the Editor-in-Chief, Mr. Xiaobo Wang, has given his authorization to WIKI for using the Journal's coverpage photo for this entry.

Xssk representative --Xssk2017 (talk) 23:38, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose @Xssk2017: Please have Mr. Wang email permission to permissions-commons in English or permissions-zh in Chinese via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:28, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 03:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:王晓波（1).jpg undelete request

Please undelete File:王晓波（2).jpg as Mr. Xiaobo Wang, who is featured in the photo, gave authorization to WIKI to use his photo for his entry.

Xiaobo Wang's representative --Xssk2017 (talk) 23:40, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose @Xssk2017: Please have Mr. Wang email permission to permissions-commons in English or permissions-zh in Chinese via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 03:17, 10 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files by Yousef abdinejad

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017041310021351 alleges permission for this file or these files. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:46, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: The files are identical dupes, so I've restored 1 for you. Daphne Lantier 03:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 03:58, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:John-mcgough.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017041510001806 alleges permission for this file or these files. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:59, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Restored. Daphne Lantier 03:23, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Thanks.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:22, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MyDeal Logo.png

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017041810001855 alleges permission for this file or these files. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 03:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Restored. Daphne Lantier 04:01, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 04:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dr. Jay.jpg

This is my image. I personally took this picture with my camera. I own this image. Please undelete. I am the copyright holder for this image and wish to release it under the creative commons licence. Signed, Anthony G. Jay --Anthjay (talk) 03:09, 7 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthjay (talk • contribs) 03:06, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I have trouble believing you. More than half of your uploads have been deleted, mostly as copyright violations. If you think you're following correct procedures, you're not. If you're posting your pictures somewhere without indicating a license free enough for us, and then uploading here, we will think that is a copyright violation because we don't know how your accounts are connected, so please indicate if that's the case via OTRS.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done Thuresson (talk) 08:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Femme Kabyles.jpg

Request temporary undeletion

The file was initially uploaded to the German Wikipedia were it was licensed with this de:wiki-license: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorlage:Bild-PD-alt-100 Somehow it ended up being transfered to Commons were it was deleted. I request the temp. undeletion to transfer the file back to de:wiki. --Lamilli (talk) 13:41, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: It was deleted because Haabet noticed that it had been photoshopped by you to add the nipple rings, so removed the license. I have restored it because I think adding the rings does not make it enough of a new work to invalidate PD status of the original. If it should be deleted on scope grounds, that should be done by a DR, not just removing the license tag. --Storkk (talk) 14:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Haabet should have reverted to the old version with advice to upload with a new filename.   — Jeff G. ツ 14:48, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Enterprise, Alabama Page Image.jpg

Each photo has already been uploaded individually, before I made the montage.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Enterprise_Hospital.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Coffee_County_AL,_Courthouse.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Enterprise_Alabama_Water_Tower.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Palm_Tree_Lined_Road.jpg

The photo of the Boll Weevil Monument was the one previously used on the page, and is in the public domain:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Boll_weevil_monument.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skuzbucket (talk • contribs) 21:56, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment This relates to the previous request by the same person two hours earlier.   — Jeff G. ツ 00:34, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 Support This is in fulfillment of the requirement I noted in the last UnDR that the individual photos be uploaded. Except for the PD USDA image, these all were taken with the same camera, so I think the Own Work claim is valid. Note that after restoration, the source and author must be modified to show that not all of the images are, in fact, Own Work. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Restored and properly attributed. De728631 (talk) 20:42, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files by CloudInYourHead

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017041810006814 alleges permission for this file or these files. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:58, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Thanks, @Jeff G.: please add the appropriate templates if you validate the ticket. A cursory look on my part yielded no red flags. --Storkk (talk) 14:44, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

@Storkk: Thanks, I will do that later today at home.   — Jeff G. ツ 15:15, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
@Storkk and Ruthven: These are all images which were: originally watermarked "© 2012 Terese Winslow LLC" and "U.S. Govt. has certain rights" in the bottom right corner; later posted to cancer.gov; and photoshopped to remove the watermarks and claim new copyright while uploading here in April. They all need to go, along with File:Estrogen-dominance-treatment.jpg, which Tineye first found in 2008. That encompasses all the uploads of CloudInYourHead (talk | contribs) through 28 April which are still alive. That user also added a PermissionOTRS tag without authorization in this edit. I hereby withdraw my undeletion request above.   — Jeff G. ツ 23:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Male Scrotum.jpg

I think this picture adds to a category that is not too large. But perhaps I am wrong, another explanation would be greatly appreciated!Also some recommendations would be welcome! Thanks!--Themccoy502 (talk) 00:49, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

@Themccoy502: It is overcategorized. Since Category:Human scrotum is in Category:Scrotum, this file should be in the former but not the latter. Also, it is poorly named (is there any scrotum which is not male (or at least on a male)? If you are trying to draw attention to the DR, shame on you for canvassing.   — Jeff G. ツ 01:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jeff G. ツ Well that's pretty rude of you, and I'm not "canvassing". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Themccoy502 (talk • contribs) 04:15, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done, file exists, nothing to be done here, move along.   — Jeff G. ツ 01:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Thomas_McNaught.jpg

The photograph (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm6425890/mediaviewer/rm3450873856) of myself uploaded to the page was taken by Hayley Greer, under a free license to myself as the subject. I have both her permission and my own authorisation to include this image on my page.

--Thmsmcn (talk) 18:13, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Since the image appears at IMDB, policy requires that Hayley Greer send a free license directly using OTRS. Note that permission to use the image on your page is insufficient -- images on Commons and WP:EN must be free for any use anywhere by anybody. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:24, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

The image didn't first appear on IMDb however, it was published on her Instagram and mine and I uploaded it to IMDb myself. Since she was not paid for the shoot, she doesn't have the copyright; I have a copy of the contract stating that.

--Thmsmcn (talk) 21:04, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

It doesn't matter where it was first uploaded (other than if that was on Commons) - policy is the same. Her not being paid cuts the other way -- assuming she actually signed a formal written license or transfer of copyright, there was not consideration (in the formal legal sense) for the agreement and therefore it may not be binding. In any case, as I said above, shoe must send a free license using OTRS. You could also try sending a free license yourself, but you would have to prove to the satisfaction of the OTRS agent that Greer has actually given you the right to freely license the work and that that agreement is binding despite the lack of consideration. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

My apologies, a type - I meant to say since she *was* paid for the shoot. I will email a copy of the contract to OTRS, and ask her to as well.

--Thomas McNaught (talk) 21:45, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

You should not have uploaded the same image under a slight different name File:ThomasMcNaught.jpg because the copyright situation is still unclear. Unless we have received evidence by email that the copyright was transferred to you, please do not upload this photo again. Once the email has been processed by our team of volunteer, the first file will be restored but this may take some time. De728631 (talk) 22:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: awaiting processing of OTRS permission. Daphne Lantier 04:29, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Photo of Lydia Villa-Komaroff.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017041810014752 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:28, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:WS40.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017041210014996 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done. --Natuur12 (talk) 12:27, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MikeVranos.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017042010015747 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:16, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done --Ruthven (msg) 15:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 17:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Official portraits of Donald Trump

File:Donald Trump official portrait.jpg and its derivatives were deleted based on information received by the OTRS team. The OTRS concluded that the official portrait was not made in the capacity as an employee of the federal government, and as such, is not in the public domain. The community has accepted this decision as valid.

Because the portrait is not in the public domain, its author can license the work under any license he chooses in whatever publication he wishes. Based on publicly available information, it can be concluded that the copyright holder has agreed to license the photograph under a free content license on the official website of the White House:

The portrait is sourced to the official website of the White House, whose Copyright Policy notes that: "Except where otherwise noted, third-party content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License." Because the Trump portrait is not accompanied by a message that would state otherwise, the assumption is that the White House website has published it under the CC BY license.

The situation is thus that we have a reputable publisher (the White House) claiming that the copyright holder has agreed to publish the portrait under a CC BY license on their website. Unless we have the copyright holder explicitly deny this, I think we should trust what the White House is telling the public: the image has been granted publication under a free license by its copyright holder.

The only way to justify the deletion of these files is thus if OTRS agents can confirm that the copyright holder has, in the OTRS ticket that the deletion was based on, explicitly stated that they have not agreed to the license on the White House website.

For further information, please see pre-undeletion request discussion at User talk:Revent#Regarding the Trump portrait deletions. Finnusertop (talk) 23:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

The reputability of this administration in regards to licences is questionable. As mentioned in the deletion discussion by Stemoc they may have made mistakes on the WH Flickr. In the can make mistakes during the administration, mistakes prior to it are completely plausible. Furthermore it is curious as to why only the image of Trump was tagged and not those of Pence. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 23:57, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
The White House is not listed at Commons:Problematic sources as a notorious license launderer. In fact, the White House, with an army of lawyers and media people, politically responsible of its good standing, and legally responsible as a government agency, is an exceptionally reputable source of media. We should absolutely assume that they have the competence and integrity to correctly use licensed files. If they have made a mistake in this particular case, that should be proven, not assumed. Finnusertop (talk) 00:29, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
I can totally accept that, but I was just saying that we should be open minded and not believe that they are infallible. My point about Pence still stands as it was revealed in the same inauguration document and is also present on the website. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 00:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Agreeing with the Emir re: reputability of the source of the license. I tend to think, in the absence of a chief technology officer, Mr. Obama's work is in use by Mr. Trump's administration. The White House copyright page was first crawled on January 21, 2009 (Internet archive); it had the same license (CC-BY-3.0) eight years ago. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:36, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support per request and for the reasons I gave on the closer's talk page. The deletion discussion centered around the OTRS ticket and whether or not these images were in the public domain; neither those proposing deletion nor the closer addressed the argument that these are, per the White House, licensed to us under the Commons-compatible CC BY 3.0 US license. Since we have a valid license, it's irrelevant that these are not public domain. Rebbing 01:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
    • If the Whitehouse did not produce the photograph, then they have no standing to grant a CC license. Unless the photographs were produced as "work for hire", the right to grant licenses is reserved solely to the photographer.- MrX 16:45, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
      • I'm not suggesting that the White House produced the photograph or licensed it by its own right. I'm arguing that the White House had seen to it in some way that this image was validly licensed under a Creative Commons license. Perhaps it obtained a contractual right to sublicense the photograph as it saw fit; perhaps it had a work for hire arrangement. It doesn't matter. What matters is that the White House publicly attests that this image is lawfully licensed under a free license, and we ought to take its word for it. Rebbing 16:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Reluctant oppose based on Rob13's statement that the ticket affirmatively and conclusively rebuts the White House's claim that these are licensed under a Creative Commons license, as well as on our precautionary principle. Rebbing 13:43, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support as the OTRS notice fails to provide information indicating the White House license is in breach of copyright. Being an official source, the onus is on the government to maintain this license and present this information, or otherwise on those handling the ticket to prove that the White House notice is invalid or currently a matter under consideration for legal action. --Simtropolitan (talk) 02:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support. "CC licenses are not revocable." per "What if I change my mind." Licensing with predictable, standard usage rights extending to all users is a fundamental practice of both the Wikimedia commons archive and the Creative Commons. This deletion, sorry to say, made no sense in light of an existing CC license. -SusanLesch (talk) 13:58, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
    • The first five words are accurate, but since there is no evidence that the photographer granted a CC license, and apparently OTRS has evidence that he did not, then those five words are inapplicable. The Whitehouse website cannot grant a license for content that they do not own.- MrX 16:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
No, the OTRS ticket as reported does not contain evidence nor make any claims about whatever license the photographer chose except to say it is NOT public domain. The only license we have is from the White House. -SusanLesch (talk) 17:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - A website's claim that all of its hosted content falls under CC is not compelling, nor does it have any affect whatsoever on the photographer's assertion of copyright. If the photographer wishes to release the images under a CC license, they need to either communicate that by publicly posting such notice for example, on a website that they control, or by contacting an OTRS volunteer with sufficient information to convince the volunteer that they are the copyright holder and that they are willing to license the work under CC.- MrX 16:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Of course a websites claim as to how it hosts content effects the rights under which the content is released for everything on that site, that is exactly how free licence websites work. Alanscottwalker (talk) 02:17, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support The photo is currently on the White House website [5] and their copyright/licensing policy is clear [6]. Apparently the White House hasn't heard that we've determined that this is a copyrighted photo that they shouldn't be licensing CC-BY-3.0. And of course what the White House says about the licensing has much more weight that anything we, or an anonymous OTRS ticket can have. See also [7] Smallbones (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support. The United States Government states that the content is in the public domain, and that trumps (pardon the expression) any claim made in an OTRS ticket. If there is a bona fide dispute over the validity of that claim, it should be fought someplace other than via an anonymous, secret OTRS ticket. Coretheapple (talk) 18:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
    No, nobody placed this image in the public domain. Look at the license again. -SusanLesch (talk) 21:23, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support. In the absence of a credible and specific claim by the photographer that image is licensed improperly by the White House, there is insufficient reason to delete these files. Concerns about the reputability of the president himself are irrelevant. Deli nk (talk) 20:44, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - It wouldn't be the first time a USGov website host improperly licensed content (or fails to properly identify third-party content not falling under standard licenses). If multiple OTRS agents and Wikimedia Legal consider the original request valid then we have no choice than to keep the images deleted here.--Denniss (talk) 20:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support The US government pays for the transition activities of the President-elect.[8] Moreover, there is no reasonable doubt let alone "substantial doubt" about the public release that all content on the White House site has is under free CC licence. The free CC release is public and indisputable.[9] Any claim that the release of this work is not public and indisputable has no basis in fact - you cannot take back that CC licence. Alanscottwalker (talk) 01:59, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. OTRS agent (verify): per COM:PRP and due to the info given in the OTRS ticket. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:24, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Note: Doug also took this picture which was taken from the WhiteHouse facebook feed during the inauguration, Doug did not seem pleased that his White House image was taken from Wikimedia instead of the WH but he did not mention anything about licensing in his post, are we really making a mountain out of a molehill?, his only issue perhaps was that in that Presidential/VP portraits, his name was not tagged as the Author (mainly because his name did not appear in the exif so there was no way of knowing who took that image at that time)..If thats the issue, it can be rectified by him being tagged as the author and possibly the license changed to a more acceptable, cc-by 4.0 instead of public domain. --Stemoc 03:07, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
    @Stemoc: If OTRS receives an acceptable license from the copyright holder (and one was specifically requested), then the files will of course be undeleted. Given the amount of time that has passed since the request was made, it seems unlikely. - Reventtalk 18:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Multiple OTRS agents continue to assert that these images need to remain deleted, and that Wikimedia does not have permission to use them. OTRS have been given ample opportunity to evaluate the situation and understand arguments presented here and elsewhere, and if they continue to object based on confidential information in the OTRS ticket then that must be allowed to stand. This is exactly what OTRS are there for, and they must be allowed to do their job. Until an editor is able get a signed release from the copyright holder (assumed to be the photographer, unless OTRS knows differently), and provide that to OTRS, this will continue to be the case. As I understand from discussions with OTRS agents in IRC, WMF Legal have evaluated the situation and are happy with OTRS' decision in this matter. TheDragonFire (talk) 06:15, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
@TheDragonFire: If I recall correctly they merely stated that the images were not in the public domain and failed to clarify if they were CC. As suggested above by Jonatan Svensson Glad under the user Josve05a this was probably due to COM:PRP, and not a thorough analysis of the licence. This whole situation also fails to explain images like File:Donald Trump at inauguration.jpg, which were purportedly taken by the same photographer. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:49, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
@Emir of Wikipedia: It doesn't 'explain' them because they were not mentioned in the ticket or the DR.... I did not, personally, go hunting for any other images by Doug Coulter on Commons. Feel free to open a DR regarding that image, however... the license is rather clearly wrong, and it's probably also a copyvio. - Reventtalk 18:11, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
@Emir of Wikipedia and Spellcast: I should note that Commons:PRP is policy, and is not just overridable. A ticket from the the photographer could easily constitute the significant doubt required under that policy and if you have OTRS saying so then that is fairly hard to rebut. I have however, had a discussion with Yann over IRC and that has created doubt in my mind that the interpretation of the ticket is correct and hence I'm stricking my !vote. OTRS needs to work this out amongst themselves. TheDragonFire (talk) 10:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
There is no substantial doubt, because despite the image being deleted here (based on whatever was misconstrued in a supposedly secret communication), it is still to this day downloadable publicly by the whole world under the written CC licence, and thus without doubt within Commons policy to say 'it's from that government website with that CC licence.' -- Alanscottwalker (talk) 01:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
@Alanscottwalker: Please read meta:OTRS before scaremongering about "supposedly secret communication". I do believe that there is significant doubt as OTRS has been unable to verify that the license granted to the US Government was in fact the license claimed on the White House website and have explicitly requested deletion per COM:PRP based on confidential information in the OTRS ticket. Beyond that, no-one without OTRS access has been able to add much to the discussion than speculation. One OTRS member has expressed concerns, but OTRS are more than capable of discussing that amongst themselves. TheDragonFire (talk) 12:11, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
So you repeat there is supposedly secret information which deletion is based upon, yet you object to it being called supposedly secret information - that's not scare mongering that's just what it is. It remains that the file is downloadable by the whole world under the CC licence right now, there is no doubt about it, whatsoever. Alanscottwalker (talk) 14:46, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support I can't really agree with the deletion, although I can't say why without discussing the content of the ticket. I will add a note in the ticket. I can add that, in my opinion, only a DMCA could invalidate the White House Copyright policy. This official policy trumps a private email (pun intended). Regards, Yann (talk) 10:18, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support So let me get this straight. The White House site explicitly says third party content is under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License unless noted. There is no note for this image. Then we have an email from someone purporting to be the photographer rebutting that license? If true, shouldn't that issue be between the photographer and the White House - NOT Commons - especially since the photographer did NOT make a DMCA takedown request. The OTRS team should have told the photographer something along the lines of: 'We are unable to determine whether your copyright claim or the White House copyright claim is correct. The Wikimedia projects, including Commons, are merely repositories which reflect existing information provided by reputable and reliable sources. And since an official government website claims this work is CC, any legal objections should be directed towards them." Spellcast (talk) 10:29, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Summary

This is going to go on ad nauseam, so I think it's time to slow down the pile on. Feel free to continue discussing above but please read the following before posting.

Statements by OTRS:

Statements by Administrators:

It appears as this summary is contradicted by the actual edit rather, we are proposing that the private photographer granted to the White House the right to sublicense these images under a Creative Commons license. That's what the White House's website indicates. I understand that the OTRS ticket refutes the public domain claim, but does it also prove that the photographer never agreed to let the White House sublicense these photographs (or never issued such a license himself)? I see no confirmation in the statement saying that is is not under CC. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:51, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Issue at Hand: COM:PRP, a Commons policy, states that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted. OTRS has made it very clear that the images are not public domain, and that does not appear to be particularly in dispute. The point which the closing administrator will need to consider, is whether there is significant doubt as to whether the image is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Hence it should be noted that proof of an infringement is not needed. TheDragonFire (talk) 12:01, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

I don't have OTRS access but if the photographer explicitly rejected the public domain license but made no comment to the White House's CC-BY-3.0 license, then I find that very telling. It would only constitute "significant doubt" if the copyright holder gave any shred of evidence explicitly rejecting the CC license, but there doesn't seem to even be a mere claim from him that the CC license is wrong! Correct me if I'm wrong on that. Spellcast (talk) 13:31, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
I think the point is that OTRS cannot reveal if there has been such a claim or not, and continually badgering the volunteers to tango with their confidentiality agreement isn't going to get us anywhere. At this rate, OTRS will probably organise for this to be an office action and that will be the end of it. TheDragonFire (talk) 14:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Thus there is no significant doubt, pretending someone disputes a public and prominent licence - in private - is describing the very opposite of asserting or protecting a copyright over a work that is -- right this minute -- publically and prominently licensed for the whole world to download. Alanscottwalker (talk) 20:06, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
We are not concluding a lack of license due to the absence of a licensing email. We are concluding a lack of license based on substantive statements in the ticket. Once again, I cannot say more. It is very interesting and frustrating how community members take what limited statements OTRS agents are allowed to make and extrapolate from them whatever they please so long as it supports their view. At the end of the day, you have multiple Commons admins and trusted Commons editors who are OTRS agents universally looking at this ticket and saying "We must delete this." Is that genuinely worth nothing? ~ Rob13Talk 17:05, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: I have to agree with BU Rob13. I have little to add to the statements already provided by Revent and Josve at the original DR and Revent’s talk page. I don’t think it’s healthy too let a situation continue in which volunteers are at risk off violating their confidentiality agreement because the statements of OTRS-agents are twisted/misused. The ticket itself creates significant doubt which is the threshold we have to apply, not explicit evidence that a file is a copyright violation. And I have to say, this discussion hasn’t exactly helped saving the files. Please realise (meanth as a general note since experience learns that resolving issue's witht hird parties becomes much harder when we have a heavy debate) that everyone can read this page and that certain comments make photographers more reluctant to help us out. This decision is final and I would like to ask everyone to respect this. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vodien-logo-official-2017.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017042410004877 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:22, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 17:26, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 22:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lisa Chambers.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017061110008321 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:46, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 22:25, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files by Sedicesimo

Ticket:2017032710013845 alleges permission for these files. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 02:58, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Restored and marked with {{Temporarily undeleted}}. The ticket looks fine to me, however, so feel free to remove the template if you approve it. - Reventtalk 03:23, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done @Revent: Thanks.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Holtzapffel&Cobracemark.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2017032710013845 alleges permission for this file or these files. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me. I am positive I tagged it {{OTRS received|id=2017032710013845|year=2017|month=June|day=7|user=Jeff G.}} less than five days ago, I don't know why JuTa deleted it so quickly.   — Jeff G. ツ 03:50, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Nope, you didn't. Temp undeleted for you, however. - Reventtalk 03:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done @Revent: Thanks, I must have missed it.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Art of Thinking Clearly UK cover.jpg

I believe this falls under {{Pd-text}}. This was deleted as "missing permission" but it does not hold true. Please restore. The file exists in en wiki as File:Art of Thinking Clearly UK cover.jpg --Sreejith K (talk) 22:51, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Hmm. If this were a US book cover, I could easily agree that it is below the ToO and therefore PD. However, the UK ToO is significantly lower and there is also the special 25 year copyright for typography, so I  Oppose restoring it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

UK Files can also qualify to be pd-simple. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:HSBC.svg --Sreejith K (talk) 15:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
The HSBC logo has a long non-UK history and is not a good precedent for this case. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. Daphne Lantier 05:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Zamiatin WE.jpg

Tiven2240‬ identified this picture of a book as a possible copyright violation. But he or she is mistaken. The book itself -- and the cover art -- were published in 1924, and are therefore in the public domain. The picture was taken by me, and I signed the creative commons consent form. There is therefore no basis for deleting it.

--Bverter (talk) 02:27, 12 June 2017 (UTC) 11 June 2017

@Bverter: More precisely, Tiven2240‬ tagged it and Moheen Reeyad deleted it. Where was it first published, when was it published in the US, who wrote it, who illustrated or photographed for the cover, and when did they all die?   — Jeff G. ツ 03:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: The image is a photograph of two books together, one of which is apparently a first edition of a book published in New York in 1924.
@Bverter: You are incorrect, in that a 1924 work published in the United States is not necessarily in the public domain. The cutoff date is 1923, and will not start moving again until 2019. A 1924 US publication needs evidence that it was either published without a copyright notice, or a copyright renewal search. - Reventtalk 03:17, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
@Jeff G.: I'm actually doing the 'renewal search' I mentioned right now.... the book was indeed registered, however, as A815379 with a date of 22 Dec 1924. - Reventtalk 03:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
And with that, it pops up. Gregory Zilboorg, the translator, filed renewal R101210 on 22 October 1952. @Bverter: The US first edition will not enter the public domain (in the US) until 2020. - Reventtalk 03:39, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per revent -- copyright was renewed -- not pd until 2020. Daphne Lantier 05:50, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Will_Bruin_Sounders.jpg

To whom it may concern,

My name is Max Aquino. I am the photographer that took the photo of Will Bruin and I also hold all copyrights to said photo. It was initially posted on my twitter account here: https://twitter.com/maxaquinophoto/status/871574515255463936. Please undelete the photo.

Regards,

Max Aquino — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxaquinophoto (talk • contribs) 03:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

@Maxaquinophoto: Because wiki accounts are inherently anonymous, we have no way of knowing that the person behind your account is actually the owner of the Twitter account where the image was first published (and we see such false claims quite often, unfortunately). The easiest way to resolve this is for you just to reply to your original tweet stating that you are releasing the image under a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license. - Reventtalk 03:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
@Revent: I placed the license release in the reply of the tweet as requested. Note: I'm not sure if it's "Will_Bruin_Sounders.jpg" or "Will Bruin Sounders.jpg"- MaxAquinoPhoto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxaquinophoto (talk • contribs) 04:46, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 05:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
@Maxaquinophoto: Spaces are preferred in wikilinks; underscores are required in URLs.   — Jeff G. ツ 05:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Evidence of permission provided at the source. Other search results for this image make it apparent that the Twitter account is the original source. - Reventtalk 06:00, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Anthony Goldstone.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017042210011318 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:01, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 17:12, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MAHEK - film poster.gif

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017042210001892 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:09, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 17:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 19:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Le givre et la cendre.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017042410009247 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:53, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Ruthven -- OTRS permission insufficient. Daphne Lantier 19:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Emika_Kamieda_in_a_photo_event.jpg

Dear admin, I do really appreciate the work done and the control by bots that regularly do to our addings at Wikipedia. However, I would ask for the undeletion of the above stated picture. Based on the image laws in Japan as well as the copyright laws of the 48 holdings groups, any fan attending a photo event who takes pictures of the idol with her and her manager's permission has the rights to use the pictures.as its own. He is the owner of these rights and neither the member idol or the management company shall make any approach regarding the picture since it has been done by a free individual. Since, in this case, I am the fan who took the picture with the permission, I would request the undelition and the subsequent reupload.

Sincerely,

Uri_91 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uri 91 (talk • contribs) 12:16, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose The image appears without a free license at http://48matomemolog.ldblog.jp/archives/1065524277.html. Therefore, policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is usually the photographer, must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 19:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Alexandra Goncharik

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017041910018354 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:34, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FINAL LEGIONARIOsmall.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission provided with Ticket:2017032710013578 Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:28, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by HSUN

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017053010015093 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:27, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Union Nationale des Étudiants en Architecture et Paysage

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017051310008954 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:28, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Стёганое пальто с мехом производства СХКБ.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017061010005621 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 19:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Стёганое пальто с мехом производства СХКБ.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017061010005621 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:59, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:07, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 19:19, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Пальто с русскими.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017061010005586 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:16, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 19:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kaduna_Women_Summit.jpg

Please undelete the picture as it was taken by me at the Kaduna State Women Economic Empowerment Summit and posted on the @KDMWASD twitter handle which I curate. All Images inserted were put up by me from my Personal Computer as the Special Assistant to the personality whose Wikipedia page I created and edited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lawkonvict (talk • contribs) 08:16, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

@Lawkonvict: If that's so, you have two options for this image to be undeleted: state on your Twitter account that this image is released under the free license of the said image, or follow the procedures at OTRS. Thanks, ★Poyekhali 09:21, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Requires OTRS license or change at Twitter. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Suhail A.L. Galadari.jpg

Hi, this was a picture obtained by Mr. Suhail Galadari, and is not a copyright violation in any manner — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sginvestments (talk • contribs) 21:21, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose No license template. Press photo from Khaleej Times, "©2017 Khaleej Times. All rights reserved.". Thuresson (talk) 00:10, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jürgen Partenheimer. Lichtschwarm, White Cube Bermondsey, London, 2017, ISBN 978 1 910844 17 5.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017042710014182 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 19:28, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cruachan2016.png undelete

hello - please undelete this picture. I have uploaded the picture and explained that is is my licensed picture to use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pagandawn456 (talk • contribs) 10:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 14:00, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose @Pagandawn456: This file has been discussed at DR and at Ffd, deleted thrice, and reuploaded. Please follow the procedure at OTRS and do not reupload it.   — Jeff G. ツ 14:00, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

I will re-upload it, it is my picture, I just want to make sure it won't be deleted. I can rename it if you wish but it has to be that photo. Why are you making this so insanely ridiculously difficult. 165.225.81.12 14:46, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

We are trying to protect the rights of the photographer and any other rights holder. Is it that difficult to send an email message from a specific address containing specific text? Where else on the Internet is that photo, exactly? I will be watching the infobox at en:Cruachan (band).   — Jeff G. ツ 16:18, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission from copyright holder needed. Daphne Lantier 19:24, 13 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Suhail A.L. Galadari.jpg

Hi,

This was a picture provided to me by Mr. Suhail Galadari, who is in the picture himself and he owns all rights to the picture, hence I believe it is not a copyright violation in any manner. Kindly undelete the picture

Thanks --Ahyk93 (talk) 14:24, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Also note that the subject rarely owns the rights to an image -- that is almost always owned by the photographer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:08, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission from copyright holder needed. Daphne Lantier 19:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The world of android and frees.webm

File:The world of android and frees.webm restore the file to edit --Kader japonis (talk) 20:35, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Stop dreaming of using Commons as your playground. WP0 abuse. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 20:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/2017/06/04

Deleted by User:Krd with the following reason: Empty deletion requests log.

There were nominations on that day (example: Commons:Deletion requests/File:20151106 lyon301.jpg), so surely it can't be empty. Maybe it was emptied in error or the page history has the full page? 84.250.0.210 11:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

All the nominations have been processed and archived. So the log was indeed empty.
 Not done Ankry (talk) 12:20, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Biewerlover

Please restore the following pages:

List of 100 files
* File:Biewer Terrier .jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Ticket:2017042610002848 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

 Support Although the OTRS ticket does not contain a free license, it clearly confirms that the uploader is the owner of the web site on which these appear, causing deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:45, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz, Jameslwoodward, and Biewerlover: I am reserving judgement until the customer replies via email. That ticket does not specifically allege permission, so this request was premature.   — Jeff G. ツ 16:59, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Jeff, I disagree strongly. The uploader, User:Biewerlover, put a cc-by-sa-4.0 license on the images. We deleted them because they appeared on the web site http://www.biewerworld.com/. We now have an OTRS e-mail coming from an address at that domain confirming that User:Biewerlover is the owner of the web site. Therefore, we clearly have permission via the original license from the confirmed owner of the web site. That's a lot more solid than many OTRS confirmations. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:04, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Restored per above and marked with {{OTRS received}}. @Arthur Crbz: you can continue. Ankry (talk) 13:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:G. Hokken.jpeg and File:Jan van Bommel.jpeg

Please undelete those files. They are freely licened at Europeana by the municipality of Schouwen Duivenland. Acusing a municipality of copyfraud without any further evidence other than not knowing who the author is, is pretty much ridiculous. Since when don’t we trust official bodies who have the resourced too let an expert assess the situation before donating? For the attribution issue: please see Carl’s comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:C.H. Linde.jpeg. Natuur12 (talk) 22:07, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Actually, I have found that Europeana's contributors have claimed the right to freely license images that they do not, in fact, have the right to. Municipalities have no reason to be copyright experts and as we all well know, many people believe that if you own a paper copy of a photograph, you have right to freely license it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Is this merely your opinion or do you have evidence to back this up? (Not trying to be offensive, just curious too find out why you had a different experience with this source than I had.) Please realise that a municipality has many experts on board including people with legal expertise and that the source is financially supported by the EU. How can we, the commons novices actually know better than they? . Natuur12 (talk) 00:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
I can't cite cases, but I do know that I have run into this question with Europeana before. I doubt very much that Schouwen-Duiveland, with 33,000 inhabitants, has any lawyers on staff and certainly not a copyright expert. It seems very likely to me that someone decided to make publicly available a number of photographs from the municipal archive and did not consider copyright at all or, if they did, assumed, as many of our new users do, that the fact that the municipality owned the paper copy of the image gave it the right to freely license it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
They have a pretty large archive and this page provides some information about the images in their archive. (They only donated a part off their collection via Europeana). They state here that not all images are available via their archive because they don't own the copyright which means they do research and not just drop every scan they have in a database without checking the legal status. Here they claim even more explicitly that they own the copyright of the images. Natuur12 (talk) 12:05, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
This allows me to  Support undeletion. While I have no opinion on the trustworthiness of licenses on Europeana in general, I don't think it's reasonable to require much more than an explicit claim of copyright ownership and a clear sense that they know which things in their collection they do and don't hold the copyright to. Storkk (talk) 07:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
I'm still uneasy, but I withdraw my opposition. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored, attributions added, & license reviews passed. Daphne Lantier 22:47, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jari Bull Mentula.jpg

The photo was donated to Wikimedia Commons by Fitfarm where Mentula works. See https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipO-z5g5BJjUKLR66gx-hD18VPiiqgjl5XkW4wZmEQfiyBxZqU-59W0v2sAVD-RKeA/photo/AF1QipMj8Jfvt02KJjYWxUAV4A8mQDAm0numBooxiQws?key=M1lGMkh4d2dvbTdxaXNKYXdocktTZ1lzYnJNQi1n CC-BY-SA Kuvaaja Tomi Rehell / Rehell Photography — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjanhone (talk • contribs) 05:56, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jjanhone: The page on Google Photos is not really reliable evidence that the copyright holder themselves actually released the image under that license... anyone could have created that page (see COM:License laundering). We need clear evidence that the license was granted by the owner. - Reventtalk 06:24, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
The Google account is owned by Heli Malinen. She works at Fitfarm marketing, see [10]. What kind of evidence do you suggest? An email from Heli from Fitfarm address to whom? What is the proper place to donate photos to Commons? Anyone can create a Flickr account too so that is no good either. --Jjanhone (talk) 07:32, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 22:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:File:Anthony Benjamin Headshot.jpg TO UNDELETE ALL (7) IMAGES

Nancy Patterson owns the copyrights for all images posted on the Anthony Benjamin wiki page. All images and information posted by AbbessesArt are done on behalf of Ms Patterson and the Anthony Benjamin Trust and are in relation to such requests.

Please undelete the following (7) images:

AbbessesArt (talk) 14:42, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose You say that "Nancy Patterson owns the copyrights for all images posted on the Anthony Benjamin wiki page". That seems unlikely. These are a collection of art works and photographs. In both cases, owning a physical copy of the work does not mean that one owns the copyright. The copyrights almost certainly reside with the photographers and the artist or their heirs. In order for the images to be restored, the actual copyright holder(s) must send free licenses using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 22:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Wr newlogo.png

Добрый день!

Вы удалили логотип игры War Robots без оснований. Компания-правообладатель не запрещает его использование на информационных ресурсах, и даже предоставляет его в так называемом фан-ките на официальном сайте http://faq.wwr.mobi/hc/ru/articles/115002807085-Fan-kit. Пожалуйста, восстановите логотип игры, он должен быть размещен на ее странице в Википедии.--Whitery (talk) 09:59, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Providing a fan kit does not freely license the material in it. I see no evidence that any of the material on the site is freely licensed. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. Daphne Lantier 22:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JUAN RAMON GOMEZ DIAZ.jpg

Hi, this file was provided by Juan Ramón Gómez Díaz himself to be used on his Wikipedia page, there was no copyrigth infringment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geki03 (talk • contribs) 12:34, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose First, it is unlikely that the subject of the image owns the right to freely license it. That almost always remains with the photographer. Second, "to be used on his Wikipedia page" is insufficient. Images on Commons and WP must be free for use anywhere by anyone for any purpose. In order for this to be restored, the actual copyright holder (usually the photographer) must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 22:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jenő Hódi.jpg to undelete

I would like to request to undelete this image since I am the owner of it. I am Jenő Hódi and I have previously uploaded this image to several sites, such as my own http://www.budapestfilmacademy.com/ that is why there could be some copyright issues. Please help me to keep this file.--Hodijeno (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)Hodijeno, 14/06/2017

 Oppose There are two problems with this file: We need permission from the copyright holder to host this file under a free licence. Unless this is an image you took yourself, the copyright is almost always held by the original photographer and not by the subject depicted in the photo. Next, even if you made this photo yourself, we need to be sure that you are really Jenő Hódi. We get a lot of fake user accounts and impostors every day who claim to be a person when they are in fact someone else. So the original photographer has to send a permission by email (please see COM:OTRS for instructions). If you created this yourself, you could also put a disclaimer on your website releasing the image under a free license. De728631 (talk) 14:23, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per De728631. Daphne Lantier 22:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:sultannuir1.jpg File:sultaNur1896.jpg

un-deletion request for two files Both files appeared on pp.313-316( Hartebeest hunting on Toyo Plain By D. G. Elliot) in Outing, Volume 39, October, 1901, to March, 1902

The Outing magazine was published in the united States, 

"OUTING: The Illustrated Magazine of Sport, Travel, Adventure

and Country Life, issued on the 27th day of every month at 239 Fifth Avenue, New York City, by The Outlook Publishing Company. Caspar Whitney, President and Editor; Robert Bacon, Vice-President; Fletcher Harper, Secretary and Treasurer. Advisory Board -- C. C. Cuyler, S. R. Bertron, S. F. Houston, T. D. M. Cardeza, David M. GoodriCh, Walter Camp."

The author an American naturalist died in 1915. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Giraud_Elliot

So both the magazine edition and the author's work are not in copy right in the united states , — Preceding unsigned comment added by XKeyse (talk • contribs) 19:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: procedural close -- file has not been deleted -- please direct all comments to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by XKeyse. Daphne Lantier 22:31, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SultanNur2.jpg

un-deletion request file appeared on pp.313-316( Hartebeest hunting on Toyo Plain By D. G. Elliot) in Outing, Volume 39, October, 1901, to March, 1902

The Outing magazine was published in the united States, 

"OUTING: The Illustrated Magazine of Sport, Travel, Adventure

and Country Life, issued on the 27th day of every month at 239 Fifth Avenue, New York City, by The Outlook Publishing Company. Caspar Whitney, President and Editor; Robert Bacon, Vice-President; Fletcher Harper, Secretary and Treasurer. Advisory Board -- C. C. Cuyler, S. R. Bertron, S. F. Houston, T. D. M. Cardeza, David M. GoodriCh, Walter Camp."

The author an American naturalist died in 1915. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Giraud_Elliot

So both the magazine edition and the author's work are not in copy right in the united states , — Preceding unsigned comment added by XKeyse (talk • contribs) 19:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: procedural close -- file has not been deleted -- please direct all comments to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by XKeyse. Daphne Lantier 22:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Matthew Romeo - Love This City (Toronto) 2 (high-res).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I'm the original copyright holder of this photo. please keep deleted thanks Itsmatthewromeo (talk) 15:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Image was published online prior to upload. OTRS is required to verify licensing. - Reventtalk 23:46, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ok then following your guidelines. Czapski died in 1904, 120 years ago which would make the limit 1897, seven years before he passed away. The photograph taken of him is most likely taken quite a few years before. I have another photo of him taken before 1897 and he looks quite a bit older. The photograph can be dated because he is holding in his arms his eldest daughter, who is less than a year old, and she was born in 1895. --Gzegosh (talk) 01:06, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

File:ALIA MUNDI NASLOVNICA.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017042610018681 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: The ticket is completely unrelated to this file. - Reventtalk 23:37, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Brissoklippt.JPG

After being online for two years I got a message that the picture had been nominated for deletion. I followed the instructions I got. I didn't get an answer except an autoreply with [Ticket#: 2017052910012973]. The picture is mine. I took it on my Canon eos 60d. The person in the photo was sitting in the chair I am sitting in now. I just don't understand what is going on.

Óli Gneisti (talk) 17:54, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

@Hedwig in Washington: . Thuresson (talk) 19:18, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
@Óli Gneisti: I responded to your ticket. Please check your email. Thanks! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:25, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: by Hedwig. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:05, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Requesting Undeletion

Requesting Undeletion of file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dr._Rav_Sharan_Singh.jpg

Thank You Greatica (talk)

@Greatica: For what reason do you want this file to be undeleted? ★Poyekhali 08:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello Poyekhali, for being a commons/general file, thats all Thank You Greatica (talk)

Come on Man I already discussed the whole thing for getting publishing an image on a free licence here (Same Image Upload Removed Still (https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hedwig_in_Washington&actionsection=13) Now anybody comes up and ask you to do the same thing for getting a free image published what will you do. Go over the same thing time and again for a public domain image. Even showing policies being adhered too for my image. Imagine what would be the case if I had chosen another Commons licence.

Thank You Greatica (talk)

Read COM:SCOPE. Twice so that you can understand. The reason why this file is deleted is because the file is out of our project's scope and is self-promotional content. Commons strictly don't allow promotional content. You are not reading the deletion reason, are you? ★Poyekhali 09:12, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

What scope does my image does not fit in? Now when you write something/source about an individual you have to back that up. Am I wrong. Obviously No. And when perfect source is mine with the image, you say that is promotional. In layman terms we call it spreading the word for the good of all (purpose/knowledge/education/degree etc.), but if you use business term then all words are related to promotional/profit only. Even if I want to put an image of a guy being jumping from an aeroplane using source as my site you will say it promotional but in reality it is spreading word. People would want to know why that guy jumped or so. The same goes with my case spreading the word without any advertising just releasing in public domain, knowing about that person that's all.

What was my mistake apart from spreading the word of image who have worked so hard just to get some notification around in here. Earlier too I followed all protocols regarding email verification/ticket no. But now when I uploaded another image, comes the reason promotional/advertisement/scope. What is this ? Come on man give honesty a chance and do upload the same. Thank You Greatica (talk)

 Oppose As a general rule, we do not keep images of people unless they are notable. That generally means that someone has written a WP article about them. We also do not keep promotional images, see COM:ADVERT. This is not even a close call -- it is obviously not within Commons scope and violates COM:ADVERT. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs)

Now WP credentials and notability and still the promotional word (in fact spreading). The closest call is to see this as proof https://www.practo.com/patiala/doctor/dr-rav-sharan-dermatologist-cosmetologist#recommended. & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Practo_Health & http://ahrsindia.org/ahrs-india-membership.html Come on man do it this time now. Thank You Greatica (talk)

 Not done I'm declining this because "Copyright @ Safe Hair Transplant All Rights Reserved" as a source would seem to prevent us hosting this image without OTRS permission, regardless of any content-based argument. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Carnaval de Paris 2011

Bonjour,

Je m'appelle Bernard Jean-Marc. Je suis passionné notamment par l'informatique, la photographie, l'histoire sociale, l'histoire de Paris et de ses fêtes.

Je suis de près depuis nombre d'années le remarquable et très généreux travail bénévole de mon ami Basile Pachkoff, dit Basili ou Basilou, pour la renaissance du Carnaval de Paris.

Quand je prends des photos de Basile, naturellement je les lui offre. Il a souhaité mettre de mes photos dans Wikipédia. J'ai bien sûr accepté. Il m'a demandé si je souhaitais voir apparaître mon nom. J'ai trouvé plus simple qu'il indique être l'auteur de mes photos.

Cette manière de faire a fonctionné durant longtemps. Mais voilà que très judicieusement un contributeur consciencieux a fait remarquer que des photos où Basile figurait ne pouvait pas être faites par lui.

C'est pourquoi j'ai créé mon compte sur Commons afin de clarifier la situation en indiquant quand des photos étaient de Bernard Jean-Marc et pas de Basili ou Basilou.

Je félicite et remercie le contributeur consciencieux et précis qui a montré par son initiative qu'il veille avec attention au bon fonctionnement de Wikipédia et Commons !

Paris, le 6 juin 2017

Bernard Jean-Marc

---

Fichier concerné https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Carnaval_de_Paris_2011.JPG

Post-scriptum: I am not fluent in english, this is why I wrote this request in french. If you need it, I will do my best to translate it. Best regards, Jean-Marc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjmarc (talk • contribs) 14:38, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Bjmarc (talk) 14:55, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

I condensed your three identical requests to this one section. Pinging deleting admins @Daphne Lantier and Ellin Beltz: and @Yann: as one of our francophone admins. Affected files and DRs:

✓ Done: Looks OK to me. --Yann (talk) 18:50, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Juspreet Singh Walia.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017050110005952 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:05, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:43, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Loh Xian Jun (1).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017050110005461 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:07, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:42, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ralph-drollinger.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017042810018426 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:40, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mr Hekmat Khalil Karzai.jpg

Ticket:2017032610006426 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ 06:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jeff G.: Restored. Daphne Lantier 06:54, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, permission verification pending.   — Jeff G. ツ 08:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: more than 1 week with no verification. Daphne Lantier 20:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Srinath Singh.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Ticket:2017040910004101 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 21:54, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 Comment Temporary undeletion. I am not sure this is OK. We need more information from the client. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Yann -- insufficient permission. Daphne Lantier 20:47, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sex-in-the-Title-Cover.jpg_USE_for_WIKI.jpg

Hello,

I am Zack Love's personal assistant and I am working creating a Wiki page for Zack's novel "Sex in the Title" I am trying to go along with all Wiki's regulations and requirements and that is why I asked Zack to fill in and submit a release the copyright of that work: http://zacklove.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Sex-in-the-Title-Cover.jpg

It is my understand that since he issued and published the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.[5], I am allowed to use that image.

We also received this ticket #2017060910017272

Was I supposed use this link: http://zacklove.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Sex-in-the-Title-Cover.jpg when adding the book image to the page.

Please advise and thanks in advance for your help.

Best Regards, Anita Viccica Toss — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitareeny (talk • contribs) 17:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

 Comment Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 20:49, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Thomas McNaught.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017061010012167 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:17, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

 Comment No permission in the ticket, PD mark on Flickr. I don't think this is sufficient. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
I asked for a full permission statement but I don't think it's necessary as the picture is tagged PD on Flickr + copyright transfer contract provided in the first email. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:17, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Temporary undeletion. Please add a license. --Yann (talk) 08:00, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dhiraj-Mishra-in-Medinipur-for-a-biopic-on-freedomfighter-Khudiram.jpg

This is my own work. I have taken this photograph using my own camera. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arindambhowmik (talk • contribs) 03:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose © poster --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Hedwig. --Yann (talk) 07:59, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Belmont Hill School Seal.svg

On May 29, 2017, I had uploaded an SVG file containing the Belmont Hill School seal. Having accidentally uploaded the seal multiple times, I requested for the files to be deleted. On June 15, 2017, I re-uploaded the school seal and added it to the Belmont Hill School Wikipedia page. This SVG is a relevant file to the school's page, and should be undeleted.

--Bhstudent2018 (talk) 04:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose The logo is not free. You may be able to upload it locally, if the wiki accepts fair use. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:37, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Hedwig. --Yann (talk) 07:58, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dr._Rav_Sharan_Singh.jpg

Hello Unable to upload subject file again or kindly do the same

Thank You Greatica (talk)

Do NOT re-upload deleted content. Ignoring this rule will ultimately result in your account being blocked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

then how to do this or kindly do the upload Thank You Greatica (talk)

Don't do it at all. The file got deleted and the undeletion request didn't get approved. Or did it? I already told you multiple times that even with an OTRS ticket we do not accept spam. Why is that so difficult to understand? Do your hair club advertising in a newspaper or wherever you like. Wrong website for advertisements. READ Com:Scope at least TWICE! before asking for undeletion again. Actually, you better read it THREE TIMES, as you seem to have a problem grasping what Commons is and what Commons accepts as within project scope. Geez.... --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:26, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

even after giving all proofs/laymanism yesterday (no less than applausible credibility) you are still giving me the same reason advertising common reason which my image is not doing. The other administrator also approved with me. Why are you wasting your valuable time arguing for a case which we all know who is correct, but opposing this image which has so much value, scope and credibility in it? Man we should spare our arguments for a tough uploads, my upload is just a flash not tough to ignore. Pls let us complete this thing in good reason and faith. Thank You Greatica (talk)

 Not done: as per Hedwig. --Yann (talk) 07:58, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Didier Vermeiren - Catalogue musée Bourdelle, Paris, 2005.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Permission provided with Ticket:2017060310007669. Arthur Crbz (talk) 07:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: ticket 2017060310007669. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:32, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kalista Zackhariyas.jpg Request for undeletion

This is my my image. I have the full rights to it. I own the copyright to all images I am uploading. Not sure why it does not meet your policies or requirements. Can you please help me understand this? Thanks Kalista — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Creative House (talk • contribs) 20:55, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Kalista typically the photographer owns the photo. You will need to send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with a release from the photographer. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

No, because of many forgeries, OTRS does not generally accept forwarded licenses. The photographer (or other copyright holder) must themselves send the free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Photographer must confirm license or transfer of copyright by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 08:57, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alberto Acuña.jpg

por favor les explico que la foto es de mi propiedad y tomada con mi cámara , no se por que alguien pide borrar la foto, he tratado de subir otras fotos y todas dicen que no soy propietario cuando son producciones propias. gracias — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acunarmas (talk • contribs) 11:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Alberto Acuña.jpg, which was not uploaded by you, was deleted in 2011 because it was an obvious copyright violation. You have uploaded four files:

I deleted File:Alberto Acuña 03.jpg because the background was taken from a copyrighted source. The other three remain on Commons. What do you want done here? The two deleted files will not be restored -- the first is not yours and the second cannot be restored without a free license from the creator of the background. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: per Jim. --Storkk (talk) 08:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Artsgrie

undelete... [for each photo:] This photo is my personal image; done by me George Grie, it is unlicensed and free for usage. Artsgrie (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: sufficient OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 17:37, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:José Gómez Tejedor -1900.jpg

No entiendo porque se elimina una fotografia que es de mi propiedad y que permito que se difunda libremente. Ademas se trata de una foto de mi bisabuelo — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.42.246.179 (talk) 17:16, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose First, these are not your "own work" as claimed. Making incorrect claims that you are the photographer just wastes your time and ours. Second, owning a paper copy of a photograph does not give you the right to freely license it. That right is almost always held by the photographer and his heirs. These are too recent to assume that the photographer has been dead for 80 years, as required by Spanish law at the time these were taken. Our current practice is to wait 130 years in countries where the rule is PMA 80, so without information about the photographer's death, we cannot keep these until 2030 and 2032. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. Daphne Lantier 17:36, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:KrasMapka.png

A generic map, not copyrightable. There are others in e.g. Category:Maps of traditional regions of Slovenia. We've already had a discussion on them at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Maps of traditional regions of Slovenia. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored as per Eleassar. Daphne Lantier 17:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Written consent of parents?

Please undelete the following files:

There was no reason to delete them. Otherwise, you can delete almost all files in the category Category:Children. The files were used (wikt:fi:семья, wikt:es:читать, etc). --Insider (talk) 07:48, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored as per St1995 & Yann. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kim Roberts HS copy.jpg

Hello, please undelete this above mentioned file. I do have permission to use it. I just did not include all of my references before I hit save. I now have my reference together and wish to complete my work. Please bear with me as I am just learning how to create an article. Also could you please advise how to rename an article. Could you please advise if there is a "help" function I could refer to when in need. Thank you--Kevinyearwood (talk) 22:31, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose You having "permission to use it" is not sufficient. Everyone must have permission to use it, including for commercial derivative works. If the file is so licensed, please have the copyright holder (likely the photographer) confirm that license by following the instructions on OTRS. If the file is not so licensed, we will not host it here. See COM:Licensing. Storkk (talk) 08:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Storkk, sufficient OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 17:32, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:QUICK 2 GAME Official Tiles.jpg

Reason: i will use it again to my revised article JhazminMoya (talk) 05:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose There is a sandbox draft of an article on this game at WP:EN, but the article gives no evidence of notability. In fact, it has no outside links at all and is unlikely to be approved for WP:EN. Until it achieves at least limited popularity, I think it is out of scope and this is simply an effort to advertise.

Also, the images themselves have appeared elsewhere without a free license or are derivative works of copyrighted game materials and packaging. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:53, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per COM:ADVERT and COM:DW. Daphne Lantier 17:31, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PeterJacobs.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017061610012085 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 14:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 17:29, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Le givre et la cendre.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Permission provided with Ticket:2017042410009247. Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:05, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 17:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:air scout Nigeria.jpg

This is my work not someone work — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrickphilemon65 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 16 June 2017 (UTC) i did it for the promotion of scouting in my country

No file by that name has ever existed on Commons. For a list of actual names of files that you have uploaded, see Special:Log/Patrickphilemon65. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose This is a logo well above COM:TOO. Daphne Lantier 17:27, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Daphne and Jeff. --Yann (talk) 18:15, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Filipiniana.jpg

I have the permission to use this image as this pictures belongs to me, i am the great Grand daughter of Elena De Veyra and Felicidad De Veyra who are the women potrayed in the image.--Sarahli777 (talk) 08:27, 17 June 2017 (UTC)04:26, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

That file has not been deleted. (There was another file previously uploaded under the same name that was deleted as a result of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Filipiniana.jpg, but that was more than three years ago.) In fact, none of the files you have uploaded have been deleted or nominated for deletion. Correction: the file was tagged as missing truthful source information, but you blanked out the problem tag and the notice on your talk page. Hard to figure out what's going on and to help if you sweep problems under the rug like that.
That said, the claims that you personally created the photos that you have uploaded seem really, really unlikely given their apparent age. Please provide truthful source, authorship and copyright information, or they may indeed be deleted. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:17, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per LX. --Yann (talk) 09:48, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Filipiniana.jpg .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:12, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nixon_sonny-west_jerry-schilling-elvis-presley-.jpg

I didn't upload this but noticed it was deleted from the en:WP Sonny West article. The photo was taken by the same photographer at the same session as File:Elvis-nixon.jpg. I followed the NARA link to the exhibit where there's a downloadable zip file containing a copyright notice saying the photos were taken by a White House photographer as part of his duties and are in the PD. Photo is here at NARA. If this could be undeleted, I would be glad to take care of sourcing it, etc. as it was deleted for no sourcing. Thanks, We hope (talk) 15:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! off to fix things now! We hope (talk) 17:04, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Please check my edits. Thanks, We hope!. --Storkk (talk) 17:05, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

This is fine-just re-added it to the Sonny West article at en:WP-thanks again! :-) We hope (talk) 17:09, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Biloonheadshotweb2.jpg

Request temporary undeletion, to evaluate an OTRS ticket (ticket:2017060210013225) alleging permission for this file:

seb26 (talk) 22:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Seb26: Restored. Daphne Lantier 22:51, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Gilmour Space images

Request temporary undeletion: 4 images, so they can be viewed to evaluate an OTRS permission ticket (2017061710003646)

seb26 (talk) 21:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

@Seb26: Temp restored. 22:14, 17 June 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srittau (talk • contribs)
Requesting restore. The ticket above was examined and has been verified as sufficient evidence for the copyright status of the 4 files. seb26 (talk) 22:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Seb26: Please add the tickets. Daphne Lantier 23:27, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Count Karol Hutten-Czapski.jpg

Maybe is maybe..in this case incorrect to delete the image. 1. Its over 100 years old. 2. The original image belongs to me, inherited from my family(from my mother, who inherited from her grandmother Maria Czpaska nee Puslwoska, who was Karol Czapskis wife. In other words Karol Czapski was my great grandfather 3. The image is already in the public domain, as an example an image is used in Belarus for a postcard. If persisting to delete it, would please ask on what basis Thank you

--Gzegosh (talk) 04:33, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose

  1. A hundred years is not a long time in copyright matters. We generally do not assume that the photographer has been dead for 70 years unless the image is at least 120 years old. see {{PD-old-assumed}}
  2. Owning a paper or digital copy of a photograph does not give you the right to freely license it. That right is almost always held by the photographer or his heirs.
  3. Using an image on a postcard does not somehow put it into the public domain. Postcards are copyrighted just like other created works.

This shows Karol Hutten-Czapski (1860-1904)). He was not a count until 1896 when his father died. He was not particularly notable until he became president of Minsk in 1890. Therefore, it is a fair guess that this postcard image is from after that, so it is questionable under our test in (1). .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:38, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

@Gzegosh: if the image was used on a postcard, the postcard publishing date (and country) may matter. If it is a modern postcard, the image may still be copyrighted in the US. Ankry (talk) 13:20, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Ankry, according to the WP article I cited above, he was a Polish Count who served as president of Minsk, in Lithuania. Both Poland and Lithuania are 70 year countries. I agree that Minsk is now in Belarus, so there may be a question there, but I think we still have a significant doubt here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
@Jameslwoodward: We cannot consider Lithuania as an independent state for pre-1918 (unless you mean en:Grand Duchy of Lithuania). I assume that "Lithuania" in this context means either Russian Empire province or geographical/historical region. At least during whole Czapski's life. But it probably does not matter here, either (I am afraid it is a modern postcard). Ankry (talk) 17:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
You certainly know eastern European history far better than I -- all I know is in Karol Hutten-Czapski. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (]]User talk:Jameslwoodward|talk to me]]) 17:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)


Editors photo is used at https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karol_Hutten-Czapski or Karol Hutten-Czapski Karol is long dead, the photographer, unkown is long dead, When Belarus, (not Lithuania) used this image for the postcard, they did not request any copyright permission. This image was never published in the US. I really dont understand what the issue is here..The image was of Karol was used in various books such as https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/10502265 after page 224, Illustration number 10, as well as in various other editions such as http://www.montbel.com/czapska-comtesse-maria-une-famille-d-europe-centrale-lacurne,fr,4,M178.cfm as well as https://www.abebooks.co.uk/servlet/BookDetailsPL?bi=11532326350&searchurl=sortby%3D17%26an%3Dmaria%2Bczapska. This photo is in the public domain.--Gzegosh (talk) 19:10, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

@Gzegosh: We must assume, in the absence of specific evidence, that the copyright in the image belongs to the photographer. For the image to be in the public domain, the photographer must have died prior to 1946 (70 years ago). When the date of death of the photographer is unknown, the community has decided to not accept images that are not evidenced to be at least 120 years old, on the grounds that there is a reasonable chance that the work is still under copyright. Commons policies favor deletion in cases where the status of the image is not clearly established. - Reventtalk 23:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Ok then following your guidelines. Czapski died in 1904, 120 years ago would make the limit 1897, seven years before he passed away. The photograph taken is most likely taken quite a few years before the time limit. I have another photo of him taken before 1897 and he looks quite a bit older. The photograph can be dated because he is holding in his arms his eldest daughter, who is less than a year old, and she was born in 1895. --Gzegosh (talk) 01:06, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

 Support With this latest information. It is probably {{PD-RusEmpire}}. Yann (talk) 18:19, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: PD-RusEmpire. --Yann (talk) 14:34, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Donald Trump official portrait.jpg

Whitehouse.gov shows that this photo is indeed fair use and therefore I believe it should be undeleted and reinstated as the portrait on Donald Trump's page. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2600:8803:4000:FE:39D7:5047:9C46:A426 (talk) 09:09, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose "Fair use" is not permitted on Commons, so that is not a reason to restore the image. The fact the image appears on Whitehouse.gov says nothing about its copyright status. It is well established that the image was taken by Doug Coulter (who is not a Federal employee) in December of 2016 before Trump assumed office and therefore there is every reason to believe that it is under copyright.
Note, by the way, that this is not unusual. The official painted portraits of most of the recent presidents are under copyright and cannot be kept on Commons, see Category:Official presidential painted portraits in the White House. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:32, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: COM:FU. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paul Nelson 1.jpg

Also:

Hello, I am writing to clarify the situation regarding the photo identified as Paul Nelson 1.jpg. I represent Paul Nelson and Paul Nelson Band in an official capacity as Director of Marketing for Paul's own record label. This material is contained on his website listed under "Approved Media" for all promotional use without copyright restriction. The URL where the material is available: http://paulnelsonguitar.com/media.html

Thank you very much. Marc Alan

MarcAlan (talk) 02:33, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose @MarcAlan: please follow the instructions on OTRS to confirm that you are who you say you are and have the legal capacity to license the files. Note that "promotional use" is insufficient, and all licenses we accept allow for commercial third party use and derivative works. If you do not wish to allow for this, we will not host your files. Storkk (talk) 08:37, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Manshour Varasteh3.jpg

This Picture has been taken around 10 years ago, also has been used by subject (Mr. Manshour Varasteh) in his own Facebook page.--DejaVu (talk) 01:03, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

@Thuresson: In this picture if copyright law does not grant these freedoms and should delete, I do not have any argument. as you can see I am new in wiki commons and not expert like you, but I never call anyone you are not a credible contributor!! Also the picture that you mentioned has been uploaded by another User! DejaVu (talk) 16:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Farid 69 is your previous user name and uploader's talk page redirects to your own. If there is a reason for this I'd be happy to withdraw my comment. Thuresson (talk) 17:31, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:11, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sara Shrawan.jpg un delete this file

Hello,

I have mailed permission of Sara Shrawan.jpg on permissions-commons@wikimedia.org [Ticket#: 2017061710004271] please do not delete that file. Shrinivaskulkarni1388 (talk) 07:39, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the image will be restored automatically when and if the e-mail is received, processed, and approved. If the e-mail has been properly received there, then the sender should receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be several weeks or more before the e-mail is processed and the image is restored.
★Poyekhali 07:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: once the OTRS permission has been processed and confirmed, the file can be restored. Daphne Lantier 18:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lulu Larsen, années 1980.jpg

About the page : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lulu_Larsen. I have put a photography of the artist that has been deleted. I put it again and it is now refused. I own the copyright of this file and I give the authorization to wikimedia commons to use it. If this is not the reason why you deleted this image can you tell me your reasons. Or must I put another photography of the artist? That can be done but this one was very representative of him and his work. I am not very familiar with wikipedia and media and the amount of different discussions and protocols I have to follow before succeeding doing the good thing. Best --Criome (talk) 12:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC)Criome

Well, how did you become the copyright owner of this photo? Thuresson (talk) 15:30, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose There are two copyrights here, the first for the photograph and the second for the painting. You say "I own the copyright of this file [the photograph]". Unless you are the actual photographer, that is unlikely. The copyright almost always is owned by the photographer or his heirs. You make no claim to have the right to freely license the painting.
In order to restore the image both the actual photographer and the painter must send free licenses directly themselves using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is required. Daphne Lantier 18:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

photo of Sylvia Brooks

This photograph is owned by me. I am the artist referenced and paid for this photo to be taken for my new album cover, and am the lawful owner of this image. I am lifeline4. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lifeline4 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi,
There is a copy on http://sylviabrooks.net/ where there is a mention © 2017 SYLVIA BROOKS MUSIC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. So please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:42, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is required. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

FILE:TomHUCK drawing.jpg

I am requesting an undeletion of the file mentioned from the Tom Huck article. It is a photo I took of Tom Huck at work and while it is also in use on his website www.evilprints.com, I have full permission from the artist to add it to his wikipedia page and I give my permission as the one who took the photo. It should not be under copyright as I used both a different edit version of the image than that which appears on the website and am the owner of said image.--Lessl (talk) 00:01, 18 June 2017 (UTC) , employee of Tom Huck's Evil Prints

 Oppose First, all created works are copyrighted upon creation, so "It should not be under copyright" is impossible. Second, "full permission from the artist to add it to his wikipedia page" is not sufficient -- images on Commons and WP must be freely licensed for any use anywhere by anybody, including commercial use and derivative works.
There are two copyrights here, the first for the photograph and the second for the painting Huck is working on (the other works are arguably de minimis). The photograph appears at http://www.evilprints.com/the-shop/ without a free license, so policy requires that the photographer must send a free license using OTRS. Tom Huck must, himself, send a license for the painting using OTRS. Note that I would be surprised if Huck were willing to freely license the painting since such a license would allow others to make and sell tee shirts and posters of the painting..     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is required. Daphne Lantier 18:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hotel لGhasr.jpg or File:Hotel Ghasr.jpg

حذف عکس اشتباه می باشد — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alimajrai (talk • contribs) 10:40, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose You uploaded the same photo under two different names. Neither should be undeleted, unless you were the photographer and you follow the instructions on OTRS. You can write in Arabic if you wish. Storkk (talk) 10:45, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is required. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:EmadTohidi.png

— Preceding unsigned comment added by بابک معماری (talk • contribs) 08:15, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is required. Daphne Lantier 18:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

file:Wavinya Ndeti.jpg

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Invisiblered (talk • contribs) 21:15, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Quite a consensus. --Yann (talk) 19:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Indian Professional Boxing Association Logo.jpg

Please restore the following image as permission has been granted, per ticket:2017051910011724. seb26 (talk) 19:13, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:42, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Motocross-MX-Academy-Schweiz.png

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate a ticket (ticket:2017060110020648) which has claimed permission for this file: seb26 (talk) 19:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:41, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ara Paiaya.jpg

I own the copyright to this image and we are making this available in the public domain for Wikipedia and everyone to use.

JohnBradley2015X (talk) 19:48, 18 June 2017 (UTC) 18/06/2017

 Oppose Source according to uploader is Internet Movie Database. Small size, 526 x 527. Image available here. Thuresson (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
In other words: what was said in Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2017-06#File:APaiaya.jpg still applies. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on ➡this page⬅ and note that asking again will elicit the same response again. --Storkk (talk) 21:18, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mao Zedong portrait.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason:

  • FoP in mainland China seems more border than in other countries. There are no detailed regulations on 2D or 3D, commercial or uncommercial use, etc. The copyright law itself only claimed doing so is legal.
  • According to a previous case, a photograph of a statue, even cropped to fit into a phone card is still considered legal. So Jcb and several other Wikimedians' comment "not a panorama" in the deletion request is groundless.
  • Article 22 (10) stated that photos of an "artistic work" apply. "Artistic work" should not only include statues, but also other forms of work. Photos should be "artistic work" according to Article 3.
  • Another judicial interpretation released by the supreme court of P.R. China, Article 18 claims that photos are in the scope of "artistic works".
  • Also, Article 18 of that interpretation claims that "The photographer, imitator, painter, and cameraman of the artistic work can use their works in a reasonable range and methods, and should not be considered violating copyright".
  • Files on Wikimedia Commons should be free content. That means it can be used for commercial. This explanation released by the supreme court suggested that it could be used for commercial purposes.
Techyan（Talk） 04:39, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 Support in accordance with the statements I made in the deletion discussion. Irrelevant closing rationale. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 Support The artist is named and the work title is given, both of which are required by Chinese FOP. Chinese FOP allows use of all artistic works -- that is, all created works except literary works -- so I see no reason why this cannot be kept on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Per above and per judicature in China. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

By the way: All delinks must be reverted. :/ --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:RANDALL CARVER.png

I forwarded all the messages from three months ago to the permissions email address, so I was assigned ticket:2017061910006327. Also, I sent in the above deleted photo via email. Therefore, the above photo should be undeleted. --George Ho (talk) 08:40, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose First, the ticket number you cite is from today, not three months ago. In the e-mail contained there you claim that because you commissioned the work, you are the copyright owner. That is rarely the case and, since you do not know the name of the photographer, cannot possibly be the case here. In order for you to have the right to freely license the image, you would have to have a written agreement, signed by the photographer, transferring the right to you. If you had such an agreement, you would obviously know the name of the photographer. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: there is currently a backlog at OTRS, you have to wait until a OTRS member is processing the ticket in question. The OTRS member will then restore the file or request undeleton here. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:59, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:55bc1e8fad13f.image.jpg

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate a ticket (ticket:2017060110020282) which has claimed permission for this file: seb26 (talk) 00:52, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gary Haney, Architect.jpg

ticket:2016070710023429 contains OTRS verification. Please restore this image and ping me so I can apply the OTRS template. Thank you! ~ Rob13Talk 00:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: BU Rob13: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:35, 19 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gullfoss waterfall November 2016.jpg

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate a ticket (2017060110003112) that alleges permission for the following file:

seb26 (talk) 01:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AntonPosset.jpg

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate a ticket (2017061810002869) that alleges permission for the following file:

seb26 (talk) 20:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 20:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

More Dutch spoken articles

In the last weeks the files File:Nl-BNN Today-article.ogg, File:Nl-Dirk van den Broek-article.ogg and File:Nl-Matthijs van Nieuwkerk-article.ogg have been undeleted after my request. These files lacked licensing, but they are derivative works of Wikipedia articles, and now have been licensed properly.

The same goes for the following files:

Licensing can be performed the same way as at the 3 first mentioned undeleted files. Wikiwerner (talk) 13:02, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Wikiwerner: Looks OK. Please check the license and description. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:5v6a2929.jpg

I took this picture myself as i was privileged to be a part of the remarkable event. Please undelete it.

Thanks AGCSL --AGCSL (talk) 09:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Comment There has never been an image with that file name on Commons. There is nothing in your deleted uploads that is anything like it. Therefore there is nothing we can do with this. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: procedurial close, no file exist. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:37, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rydefit.pngFile:RYDEFIT.png

This picture is copyrighted by the owner- Rydefit and i have permission to publish on their page here on Wikipedia. Thanks AGCSL --AGCSL (talk) 10:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose First, there is the question of whether this is in scope. Google shows a gymnasium in Abuja, Nigeria. There is no WP article, nor is there likely to be one. I think it is probably not in scope, but my colleagues may disagree.

Second, "permission to publish on their page here on Wikipedia" is not sufficient. Images on WP and Commons must be free for any use by anybody anywhere. If my colleagues accept that this is in scope, then in order for this to be restored, an authorized official of Rydefit must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Logo aboce ToO, it need an OTRS permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CANDY☆STAR logo 20140306.jpg

I did design and made the LOGO. I am rights holder. I request the undeletion of it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 翰哥 (talk • contribs) 04:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Published elsewhere previously. Copyright owner can use Commons:OTRS to verify the license. Thuresson (talk) 05:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Logo above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:34, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Whiteplains British School (Primary Section).jpg and File:Whiteplains British School Secondary Section.jpg

I observed that you deleted the files Whiteplains British School (Secondary School), Whiteplains British School Logo and Whiteplains British School (primary school) which I uploaded. You noted that they violated Wikipedia copyright polcies and guidelines. While my first attempt was unsuccessful because of copyright violation, this last upload attempt, I think, is perfect because I tried to apply appropriate copyright tags for the files. I think the file should be restored. Subsequently, I suspect that my last article Whiteplains British School is not on my sandbox, perhaps deleted as I await its review and acceptance on Wikipedia page. Can you help me? --Nwachinazo (talk) 12:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)|11:54, 20 June 2017|Nwachinazo}}

 Oppose Only the copyright holder (usually the photographer) can release a photograph under a free license. Were you the photographer? Please have the photographer confirm the license by following the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 12:08, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose "Source: Google". Thuresson (talk) 12:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: we can not help you regarding Wikipedia as we are on Wikimedia Commons, and you can not put copyright tags on these files if you are not the copyright holder, or/and if we don't have evidence(s) that the copyright holder(s) agree. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cannabinoid CB1 Receptor.png

I obtained an image and made it myself using a pdb file which is free of all copyright restrictions. There was no option stating that the picture was free from restrictions, so I could not include this in my upload.

From the file source:

Data files contained in the PDB archive (ftp://ftp.wwpdb.org) are free of all copyright restrictions and made fully and freely available for both non-commercial and commercial use. Users of the data should attribute the original authors of that structural data. By using the materials available in the PDB archive, the user agrees to abide by the conditions described in the PDB Advisory Notice.

http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/static.do?p=general_information/about_pdb/policies_references.html

Jpecquex (talk) 16:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

  •  Support, probably with with {{PD-ineligible}}. Could you clarify how you made the image? I'm trying to figure out what fulfilling "Users of the data should attribute the original authors of that structural data" entails: it may be as simple as crediting them as Authors as you did during upload, or it might be using {{Attribution|Hua, T., Vemuri, K., Pu, M., Qu, L., Han, G.W., Wu, Y., Zhao, S., Shui, W., Li, S., Korde, A., Laprairie, R.B., Stahl, E.L., Ho, J-H., Zvonok, N., Zhou, H., Kufareva, I., Wu, B., Zhao, Q., Hanson, M.A., Bohn, L.M., Makriyannis, A., Stevens, R.C., Liu, Z.J.}}. Storkk (talk) 17:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

I used a software called PyMol. It allows me to view and modify protein molecules. I also referenced it when uploading. This is my first time uploading anything, so any tips would be appreciated.

The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8 Schrödinger, LLC.

https://www.pymol.org/citing

Jpecquex (talk) 17:47, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

 Support If I understand this correctly, I agree that since it was created by a computer algorithm using structural data that it is not eligible for copyright..     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:06, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: {{PD-ineligible}} as per Storkk & Jim. Daphne Lantier 19:10, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Photo wikiwipedia ej.jpg

Destinataires: Taivo, Daphné Lantier, Jcb Je ne comprends pourquoi ces deux photographies de moi-même (Emile Jalley) ont été supprimées, et au surplus sans aucun débat. L'image d'Emile Jalley a disparu du site Emile Jalley Wikipédia, où elle avait été installée apparemment sans problème. La première image a été fabriquée par le Studio Filmage Express Tel 09 54 68 73 35, au cours d'une excursion organisé par le CCAS (Comité et Centre d'Action Sociale) de la Mairie d'Antony (92160)chez Gégène à Joinville-Le-Pont le mercredi 7 juin 2017. Ce studio autorise la reproduction par les clients de tous les travaux effectués à leur propos. Ils le confirment par téléphone. Faut-il de plus une autorisation spéciale, et laquelle? Cela devient vraiment très compliqué. La seconde photographie est un découpage adapté fabriqué par moi-même à partir de la première. On aimerait beaucoup que les réponses soient faites de manière plus personnalisée,, et en français s'il vous plaît. Merci. J'ai 82 ans, ai publié 20 000 pages dans ma vie, mais je ne comprends rien aux nouvelles procédures requises par les exigences de la communication moderne. Je demande la rétablissement de la seconde photo au moins dans les Archives, et sa restauration sur mon site Emile Jalley Wikipédia. Emile Jalley, le 20-6-2017 (EJ2067) auteur de 101 titres chez L'Harmattan. EJ2067 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jalley Emile (talk • contribs) 06:13, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jalley Emile: Le titulaire des droits d'auteur de la photo (normalement le photographe) doit confirmer la license en suivant les instructions →ici←. Après avoir reçu et accepté la license, l'agent OTRS demandera la restauration de la photo. L'image avec la bordure ne sert à aucun but pédagogique évident en plus de celui sans bordure, et ne sera probablement pas restauré. Storkk (talk) 09:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Storkk, lacks of permission from the copyright holder. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC) Comme l'a précisé Storkk, pour protéger les droits d'auteur, nous requerrons que que l'ayant droit nous envoit une autorisation explicite, et nous restaurerons la photo lorsque nous aurrons accès à cette permission. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:13, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

SkypemareReleasePoster.jpg

The file in question does NOT violate copyright laws. It was made for free use and used by multiple film festivals publicly around the world, online bloggers, as well as on social media when promoting the film.

Because of that, it fits into the context of 'fair use' and does not require permission from the creator of the marketing art. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MasonWaterworth (talk • contribs) 21:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: We require that anybody be free to use the file for any purpose including commercial derivative works. We require an actual license that states those freedoms. We do not allow fair use. --Storkk (talk) 07:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files nominated at Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Australianblackbelt

The OTRS for File:2017 Australian GP security team.jpg permission processed however it was deleted fine but the OTRS for these was sent before so it was skipped.

The Journalist for Latin Australian time's OTRS was not substantial, the Official photographer for Latin Australian Times will send the OTRS, if that is still not enough then the editor of Latin Australian Times will email the OTRS, if that is still not enough then the director will email the OTRS.(Australianblackbelt (talk) 16:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC))

Relevant tickets appear to include Ticket:2017032910003414 and Ticket:2017061310020232, other relevant tickets can be found by searching the system for that customer's email. Storkk (talk) 16:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
  • The one which was processed was deleted since the background was problematic. It would probably be possible to undelete a cropped version. The other tickets haven't been processed yet, and should probably be merged together. I can't take this ticket or look much deeper at the moment, unfortunately. @Ruthven: could you please take a look at these and render an opinion on the rest? Storkk (talk) 16:53, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Storkk: The ticket was in permissions-es queue, which appears to be quite left to its own destiny lately... I restored File:Terry Lim hall of fame.jpg, but the speedy deletion happened even if it wasn't accepted by @Taivo: ; so what happened? BTW, the files in the tickets have seen the OTRS permission added (I undeleted them when necessary) --Ruthven (msg) 09:42, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Robert Downey Jr with Master Eric Oram.jpg

The same person who sent the OTRS for File:Corvey_Irvin_and_Anthony_Arnett.jpg also sent an OTRS for File:Robert Downey Jr with Master Eric Oram.jpg. (Australianblackbelt (talk) 16:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC))

I'm afraid I can find no evidence that they did so. The only ticket in the system from that address is the one that covers File:Corvey_Irvin_and_Anthony_Arnett.jpg and File:Corvey Irvin, Maurice Novoa Ruiz and Anthony Arnett.jpg (they are covered by the same ticket). No ticket in the system contains the string "Eric Oram". Storkk (talk) 16:33, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
thanks but that's odd and this File:William Cheung and Anthony Arnett.jpg has OTRS sent by the same photographer(Australianblackbelt (talk) 16:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC))
There is no ticket in the system that matches the string "William Cheung" either, so while I don't dispute that you are under the impression that someone sent in an email, that email was not received. Emails to the OTRS system get an immediate reply with a ticket number. Furnishing this number would help figure out if something went wrong on our end or yours. Storkk (talk) 16:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. Daphne Lantier 20:23, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Set Photograph Scary Endings Welcome to the Circus.jpg

This photograph has been used on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook and was used to tease the audience before the episode was released. I also am the photographer on set who took the photo so have given permission to the producers and anyone else to use the photo as they see fit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MasonWaterworth (talk • contribs) 21:59, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Please follow the instructions on OTRS to confirm that you were the photographer, you retained the copyright, and you do indeed license the image. We cannot verify the identity of your username without the use of OTRS. Thank you. Storkk (talk) 07:06, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. Daphne Lantier 20:23, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Djjd.jpg

official logo of the college. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gauravsinghmpi (talk • contribs) 07:13, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. Daphne Lantier 20:23, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Neil Mistry.png

I am the author of this photo as I was the one who had taken the photos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Celebritystats (talk • contribs) 01:32, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Please send us a statement confirming that, by following the instructions on OTRS. Note that you may be asked to demonstrate your authorship by, for example, furnishing the original. This would be kept confidential. Storkk (talk) 07:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. Daphne Lantier 20:22, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Russell Drago.png

This is a photo that I took and give my permission to be used. I stated that but the original file was deleted anyway. Most articles have a picture of the subject and that is all I am trying to do. Sometimes the Editors make it very hard to produce an article and are inconsistent. I look at other similar articles and they all have photos of their subject. Please reconsider and add the photo back to complete the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Genie Ology (talk • contribs) 14:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose First, please note that it is a violation of Commons rules to upload an image a second time after deletion outside of due process. If you do it again, you may be blocked from editing on Commons.

Second, I think there is very little to add to my closing comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Russell S. Drago.png which was

"Deleted: In that case, please scan the paper photo again at much larger pixel size and upload it using the same file name. This size is not useful."

Following that instruction will both give us an image of a useful size and give better proof that you have the right to freely license it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim. Daphne Lantier 20:22, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kodak Black, arrest photo, May 2016.png

In summary:

  • A vandal deleted a link to the source of the photo.
  • An editor then nominated the article for deletion here.
  • When nominating editor wanted confirmation of the source, I accidentally linked to this page instead of this page, at the nomination for deletion. The nominating editor then listed it as a speedy delete, and faster than a sneeze through a screen door, the image was gone.

That's about it. Oh and...the article was fully sourced and licensed before, during, and after deletion. Thank you! Magnolia677 (talk) 19:15, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Restored to before the IP vandalism. Daphne Lantier 20:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Road across shore.png

sir my file has been unnecessarily nominated for deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mitali14 (talk • contribs) 19:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

The place to discuss that is Commons:Deletion requests/File:Road across shore.png. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:15, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: procedural close -- file hasn't been deleted. Daphne Lantier 20:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Skypemare posters

Poster art was created for free use by film festivals and social media pages. The image has been included in press releases, featured in numerous horror online blogs, IMDB, facebook, Twitter and falls under 'Fair Use' just like any other movie marketing poster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MasonWaterworth (talk • contribs) 19:36, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

MasonWaterworth (talk) 19:38, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per COM:FU. Daphne Lantier 20:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Skypemare onesheet screen.jpg

Poster one sheet was created by producer and included in all online social media content and within the press release that was made to use for online reviews, Film Festival websites and for fan use on social media too. I believe this falls under 'fair use'. If not, please advise what category this image falls under and how one would go about seeking acceptable rights for the film's page.

MasonWaterworth (talk) 19:45, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Please read Commons:Fair use – or at least the big, friendly letters in the pretty red box at the top of it. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:14, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. Daphne Lantier 20:19, 21 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Shatteredfaithog

This file image is an image that represents the band. I have been in contact with the band themselves and they approved the usage of this media for inclusion on their wikipedia page.Please un-Delete as soon as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Earl E. Smith (talk • contribs) 19:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose File:Shattered faithog.jpg is a non-free album cover. Album covers are usually copyrighted to the graphical artist or the record label, and the band is not in a legal position at all to license the re-use of a cover image. Moreover, a permission to use a file for a Wikipedia article only is neither sufficient at Commons nor at Wikipedia. We need a permission from the copyright holder that anyone can use this image for any purpose including commercial activities. That is why we need an email from the copyright holder to restore the file. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. De728631 (talk) 20:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission from the copyright holder is needed. Daphne Lantier 20:19, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aldrin Gemini XII 1.jpg, File:Aldrin Gemini XII 2.jpg, File:Aldrin Gemini XII 3.jpg and File:Aldrin Gemini XII 4.jpg

Filing this on behalf of DM18WM (talk · contribs). This is what he/she wrote on my talk page:

Badzil - Following up on our discussion late last month. I'm requesting that you undelete all of the files that you deleted, and restore the subject article to the status that it was in before you deleted all of the photos.

The following list of photo files that you deleted are historical artifact property owned by my brother and myself, based on inheriting the photos and digitized files from our father, G. Samuel Mattingly, upon his death in November 2014.

Cernan Gemini IX 1.jpg Aldrin Gemini XII 1.jpg Aldrin Gemini XII 2.jpg Aldrin Gemini XII 3.jpg Aldrin Gemini XII 4.jpg

My use of "historical artifact" terminology is no exaggeration. Smithsonian published a video presentation on 19 March 2015. At 8:30 into the 40-minute video, the presenter, Dr. Michael Neufeld, discusses the accomplishments of my father, Sam Mattingly, and his company, Environmental Research Associates. I hope you will take a few minutes to review part or all of this video.

https://airandspace.si.edu/events/training-underwater-walking-space

Bottom line: My father, brother, and I never established ownership of these photos and digital files based on our assumption that these photos are/were physical and intellectual property of my father and his company. My father was still alive when we chose to make our photos available in the public domain and uploaded our photos to Wikimedia in early 2012 and used them to support the subject article.

I hope this information provides sufficient rationale for you to undelete each of the photos that you deleted.

Thanks. Badzil (talk) 19:16, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Hmm. It is not entirely clear who owns the copyright to these. Since the note speaks of "my father and his company", they do not appear to be works of US government employees. Most technical companies have work for hire agreements in place with all of their staff, so it seems most likely that the copyrights are owned by the company, Environmental Research Associates. In that case, an authorized official of the company must send a free license using OTRS. If that is not the case for some reason, then it needs to be explained here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

- - - - -

Hi Jim - I hope you're able to read this text insertion. My name's Dave. I'll look into the OTRS process. Before doing that, my brother (Randy) and I plan to meet with a copyright lawyer in early July with intent to clear all of this up. My dad is/was Sam Mattingly (half-owner of Environmental Research Associates (ERA)).

I just received a (hopefully helpful) update from the guy who worked as the official photographer for ERA. His name is Donald Lloyd. I'm inserting all content from Mr. Lloyd's email here:

<email content redacted. do not paste private emails here—use OTRS >

Back to Dave, wrapping up - We "get" the importance of demonstrating ownership. In the meantime, these photos are not controversial, political, or provocative. They are important historical artifacts that support the story that my dad wrote and I uploaded successfully into Wikipedia. I hope you'll consider a temporary period for us to complete our efforts to establish legal ownership and/or do the OTRS process. In the meantime, since we had barely a week's notice before our photos were deleted, we hope you'll consider undeleting all of our photos for the rest of the month of June and July 2017.

Thanks for considering -

--DM18WM (talk) 19:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

I have redacted the email you pasted above, which contained both private email addresses and personal information. This is precisely what we have the OTRS system set up for, please use it. Please do not paste email addresses or private correspondence on the (very) public and high-traffic wiki again. Storkk (talk) 20:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
No, sorry, it doesn't work that way -- it is up to you to prove that you (and not ERA) have the right to freely license the images or, in the alternate, to get an authorized official of ERA to send a free license using OTRS. When and if that is done, the images will be restored automatically. We get 10,000 new images every day and must delete 1,700 of them. We have no mechanism for keeping images while waiting for a license which may or may not ever come. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 01:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lars Fjeldsoe-Nielsen.jpg

Hi - See link below for the image creators permission to use this image:

Permission Email

Thanks.

--BaldertonIT (talk) 08:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose I am sorry to say that we see too many forgeries to accept permissions in this way. Please have Peter Matthews send the message directly using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 01:11, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Prof. Dr. Eugénia da Conceição-Heldt.jpg

Picture was taken by photographer of the Technical University of Munich. The photographer has given the copyright to Eugenia da Conceicao-Heldt to publish the picture on wikipedia and any other website that provides information about her.--HfP E&GG (talk) 08:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

In Germany the copyright is not transferable. --Magnus (talk) 09:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Kiek mol hier: w:de:Urheberrecht (Deutschland)#Übertragbarkeit des Urheberrechts und OTRS --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 10:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 01:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rydefit 24hrs Spin Marathon For Charity.jpg

This image was taken by me as i was privileged to be a part of the remarkable event. I have permission from Rydefit to publish here on Wikipedia. Thanks AGCSL --AGCSL (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose The image appears at https://www.bellanaija.com/2017/05/rydefit-24-hour-spinning-fitness-marathon/ with the same watermark across the bottom and an explicit copyright notice. If you are actually the photographer, policy requires that either you (a) get Bella Naija to mark your image as CC-BY or CC-BY-SA on the web page or (b) send a free license using OTRS. The former will allow the image to be restored immediately; the latter will take several weeks or longer, since OTRS has a significant backlog. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is needed or a change of license at the source. Daphne Lantier 01:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Wiki has already received my Official Copyright Authorization Letter in 2016 File:雷晴雯 Winnie.jpg and the page 雷晴雯

This is Morgana Lok, 雷晴雯 Ms. Lui's assistant. I really wanna know why B dash can / has power to delete the page of Ammathy Winnie Lui 雷晴雯 and the photo File:雷晴雯 Winnie.jpg ???????

As same as the message I just left on B dash's page, as below:

Re @B dash： - about "Infringement of Copyright" '--Morganalok（留言） 2017年6月21日 (三) 21:52 (UTC)'[编辑]

Please visit "https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Poem" and take a look of my replied " Re @Poem ：" which I posted in August 2016, and the content as same as below : 【Hi Poem, Thanks for your notice. I've already sent the Official Copyright Authorization Letter to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, and received reply email and got the no. [Ticket#: 2016081210011528]. Thank you for your kindly help. (from Morgana Lok)】 

to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on 2016.08.13, and received the reply email details as below and content as the print screen attached:

寄件者： Permissions - Chinese Wikimedia <permissions-zh@wikimedia.org> 收件者： morganalok@gmail.com 日期： 2016年8月16日 下午9:14 主旨： Re: [Ticket#2016081210011528] Official Copyright Authorization Letter 寄件人： wikimedia.org 簽署者： wikimedia.org 加密： 標準 (TLS) 瞭解詳情

File:OfficialCopyrightAuthorizationLetter2016b.jpg
email print screen of the Official Copyright Authorization Letter sent in 2016

Re @B dash: - about "Infringement of Copyright" --Morganalok (talk) 01:48, 22 June 2017 (UTC)



Please visit "[[11]]" and take a look of my replied " Re @Poem ：" which I posted in August 2016, and the content as same as below :

Hi Poem,
Thanks for your notice.
I've already sent the Official Copyright Authorization Letter to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org,
and received reply email and got the no. [Ticket#: 2016081210011528].
Thank you for your kindly help. (from Morgana Lok)


Ms. Lui and I are the copyright owner of the article. We wrote in May 2016, that was an official article for introduce Ms. Lui, and Ms. Lui also signed the Official Copyright Authorization Letter and sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on 2016.08.13 12:12am, we received the reply email which sent out from "Permissions - Chinese Wikimedia <permissions-zh@wikimedia.org>" by Jimmy Xu is "我們已經收到了您對文本的授權信" and "感謝您提供文本授權" ! As we are the copyright owner and wiki media also received our Copyright Authorization Letter, so please explain what's the meaning of "您創建的條目雷晴雯可能侵犯版權" that you left on my page?

Besides, I'm also the copyright owner of the photo File:雷晴雯 Winnie.jpg which on the list of "Deletion requests" ! Please give me a reason why the photo need to delete as that was a snap of Ms. Lui which I taken on 2016.04.21 at a Drama Premiere, the name of the programme is "Welcome to My Next Life"? Are you kidding me? I'm the writer and the photographer, Wiki received our Official Copyright Authorization Letter since 2016.08.16, we also got the replied email by Jimmy Xu,and he wrote that "Thank you for providing the text authorization to Wiki" I'm really sorry for I never heard that the copyright owner using her/his articles/photos is "Infringement of Copyright" ! It's absolutely unreasonable and outrageous !!! This is the most ridiculous that I never heard before !!!!!

You said we Infringement of Copyright from others just because you didn't and never check the official authorization document between Wiki and us, "Infringement of Copyright" was only just you mind, you "think" but that's not the truth, as you are an administer, I absolutely cannot accept your "delete decision" as that's too injustice ! Please double check the document and copyright authorization for Wiki, all evidence can prove that Ms. Lui and I are the copyright owner ! If necessary, I can show you the print screen of Jimmy Xu's replied email, the full set document, and the whole set photos which I taken for Ms. Lui at "Welcome to My Next Life" Premiere to you anytime to clarify and prove that it's your misunderstanding !!! WE ARE THE COPYRIGHT OWNER and the copyright authorization for Wiki . Please note and understanding that infringement of copyright is a very serious accusation. Thanks for your kindly attention !

Ms. Lui and I absolutely cannot accept this most ridiculous, unreasonable and such injustice case has been happened !!!!!!! Please help to follow up this weird, shockable and illogical case as we both felt that the one who left message to me , one of the administer of Wiki who named "B dash" , we are willing to provide the same Official Copyright Authorization Letter which sent to Wiki on 2016.08.13 at 12:12am and received by Jimmy Xu of Wiki to you again by email for you all double check again !

Please note and understanding that as Ms. Lui is working as a Chief Editor and Writer for over 20 years, "infringement of copyright" is the most terrible, the biggest and the most serious accusation and insult, it can completely ruin her professional and slander on her good reputation.

Thank you so much for your kindly help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Morganalok (talk • contribs) 01:48, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Ticket:2016081210011528 is likely invalid. No specific work is being licensed in that ticket, and if I am reading correctly it purports to cover works authored by numerous distinct authors. @Jimmy Xu: could you please correct me if my understanding is wrong? Storkk (talk) 07:38, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose regardless of the validity of the ticket, since File:雷晴雯 Winnie.jpg has not been deleted, and this page is for undeletion requests. Note also that owning a copy of a photograph does not make you the copyright holder: we need authorization from the photographer in the ticket. Note also that using <big> tags, bold italics and multiple exclamation marks does not lend your argument any credence! (!!!!!!!!) Storkk (talk) 07:41, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Image has not been deleted, so this request is not valid. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Two files, OTRS

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate tickets that allege permission for the following files (unrelated to each other):

Can you please ping me they are up? Cheers seb26 (talk) 02:38, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Seb26: Restored. Daphne Lantier 03:40, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Daphne Lantier, I confirmed WillaSchneberg.jpg but Spirage-panorama.jpg should be re-deleted, I have taken what I needed from it and responded to the ticket but I don't expect a reply on that one for a while and given it was deleted through a DR I'd prefer to respect that for the time being. seb26 (talk) 04:15, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

More: Request temporary undeletion to evaluate tickets that allege permission for the following files (unrelated to each other):

seb26 (talk) 04:55, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Seb26: Restored. Daphne Lantier 06:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: all taken care of. Daphne Lantier 15:45, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Truly Madly Deeply.jpg

The above file is a valid file of the 2010 novel of which I am the author and also the creator/designer of the visual cover that has been approved on my request. I have also written to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org from my official e-mail ID, authorising use of this image in the Wikimedia commons domain.

--Far303 (talk) 13:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC) Faraaz Kazi, Author of Truly Madly Deeply


  •  Oppose If a free license has been sent to OTRS, then the file will be restored automatically when and if the email is received, processed, and approved. Note that OTRS, like Commons, is entirely staffed by volunteers, and, also like Commons, is shorthanded, so it may be close to 7 days before the email is processed and the file is restored.
If the message was sent to the English language version of OTRS and the email has been properly received there the sender will receive an automatic reply with the ticket number. If the sender has not had a reply, please check that it was sent correctly and try again. Other language versions may or may not provide the automatic reply..     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: wait till OTRS permission is processed. Daphne Lantier 15:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Last Raja of West Pakistan (Cover Photo).jpg

Hi, User:SpacemanSpiff has taken something personally against me. He is at this moment misusing his administrative powers. The image was uploaded in consent with the publisher such that the publisher sent a written declaration was received via OTPS in May 2016. Still it is deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhinav619 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

CC: User:Daphne Lantier, this wasn't supposed to be deleted. --Abhinav619 (talk) 16:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: rostored -- has OTRS permission. Daphne Lantier 16:56, 22 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rajabai Clock Tower 2.jpg

Another case of User:SpacemanSpiff mis-using his powers. It is an image clicked by me. The place is a public place what is wrong is difficult to reason. --Abhinav619 (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

But you agree to lying on numerous other own work tags? —SpacemanSpiff 16:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
User:SpacemanSpiff Again you started it. I was busy uploading hence didn't see the notification bar. The idea of Wikimedia is that everyone is on the same platform where one helps the other. The certificate of lying could lead to anything but not cooperation.

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 16:58, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Myriam Moscona Portrait.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017061610003362 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: ✓ Done --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 11:45, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: otrs ticket added. Daphne Lantier 01:34, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fafard horses Ottawa.jpeg

Image file, although my own work, was deleted because of no license tag on 15 June 2013. I uploaded it using the wizard and had thought that I had specified a tag but obviously that was not reflected in the Commons entry. Unfortunately, I did not become aware of the deletion until a year later. I hadn't realized that undeletion was possible or I would have asked sooner. I would like to repair the Commons entry. Big iron (talk) 01:34, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

 Support Looks OK to me. Big iron, what license do you want to use -- CC-0, CC-BY, CC-BY-SA? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:37, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

I think that I would prefer CC-BY-SA. --Big iron (talk) 11:55, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Per request, thank you. I added the license to the file. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gerda Steiner.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket#2017062210018139 Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 10:48, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 13:58, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Olga Ivinskaia.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017050110012355 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:40, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 13:56, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Endulen Logo.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017062210018381 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 23:41, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: otrs ticket added. Daphne Lantier 18:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LogoRugbyIrun.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Permission provided with Ticket:2017062410004677. Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 13:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ralf Dittrich 4.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS Ticket#2017060710020735 Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 16:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:48, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

"City of London" images

All the images from this Flickr photostream have been uploaded to Commons at some point, but for some reason most of them have been deleted. Below is a list of the ones which I think ought to be recovered.

  1. File:The_George_and_Vulture,_Castle_Court_-_City_Of_London._(4793266343).jpg on Flickr (best image of this pub; cf. Category:George and Vulture)
  2. File:The_Gothic_Porch,_St_Michael_In_Cornhill_Church_-_City_Of_London._(4793903320).jpg on Flickr (best image showing the church's porch in the context of the surrounding streetscape; cf. Category:St Michael, Cornhill)
  3. File:The_Harrow_Pub,_Whitefriars_Street_-_City_Of_London._(4856951782).jpg on Flickr (best image of this pub; cf. Category:The Harrow)
  4. File:Tudor_Gatehouse_of_St_Bartholomew_the_Great_Church-_City_of_London._(4866411480).jpg on Flickr (best image of the building viewed from this side; cf. Category:St Bartholomew-the-Great's Gatehouse)
  5. File:The_New_Tardis_Arrives_In_The_City_Of_London._(15943469911).jpg on Flickr (only image of this police box; needed for this Wikidata item)
  6. File:Paul_Julius_Reuter_Statue_-_City_Of_London._(16031913973).jpg on Flickr (best image of this sculpture; see Category:Reuter Memorial, London)
  7. File:Beyond_Tomorrow_Statue_Outside_The_Guildhall_-_City_Of_London._(33061294941).jpg on Flickr (best image of this sculpture; cf. Category:Beyond Tomorrow by Karin Jonzen)
  8. File:The_Guildhall_Art_Gallery_-_City_Of_London._(32373830793).jpg on Flickr (good image of this building; cf. Category:Guildhall Art Gallery)
  9. File:Glass_Fountain_Statue_Ouside_The_Guildhall_-_City_Of_London._(33061283341).jpg on Flickr (only image of this sculpture; needed for a future, updated version of en:List of public art in the City of London)
  10. File:The_Charterhouse_-_City_of_London._(33282828336).jpg on Flickr (only image of this detail of the building; cf. Category:London Charterhouse)
  11. File:Lovat_Lane_-_City_Of_London._(33364978761).jpg on Flickr (best image of this street; cf. Category:Lovat Lane)

Ham II (talk) 22:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Ham II, the reason given for deletion was "Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file". Have you tried contacting the admin User:Jcb for more information first? seb26 (talk) 22:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Yes they did. And I sent them here. Jcb (talk) 22:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Comment These were transferred from Flickr by @Davey2010: and requested to be deleted by him. I could restore these pretty quickly if there's no objections. Daphne Lantier 23:22, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
    • I have no objections, but please be aware that there were probably better pictures around. @Davey2010: had probably a reason to request for deletion. If restored, please make sure they are excluded from his maintenance category to avoid unpredictable actions. Jcb (talk) 23:28, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Support Competent images, well worth having. Note that all those I looked at need {{Flickrreview}}. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:21, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I had these deleted as IMHO these were crap (I only upload images that I personally believe will be used and or of use to the project), Ofcourse I we all judge things differently here I understand that but during my time here I've seen many people blocked for uploading crap images hence my "standards",
That all being said I've only just found out that images that are deleted cannot be reuploaded with Flickr2Commons so I've raised the issue at BitBucket,
if there's a way of reuploading this that isn't under my name then I'd be more than happy to support,
Also just want to state that from now onwards I shan't be requesting images to be deleted instead I'll somehow have to individually pick them - Had I realised F2C didn't reupload then ofcourse I wouldn't of done it this way in the first place but it's common sense - You'd think they can be reuploaded without any problems....
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Restored. All they need now is categories. Daphne Lantier 17:24, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Doctor Who Experience photos

These files were deleted due to "No license". I imported them using the Flickr2Commons tool, which normally takes care of the licencing. Obviously it didn't. All of these images are public domain, which can be verified with the below links:

Is it possible to get these restored? I'll do the proper licencing on the pages. Also, shouldn't I have got some notification if they were going to be deleted? Could've prevented all this to begin with  The Windler talk  14:46, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

It needs to be clarified why 2011 photos are in the public domain. The public domain mark in itself is not acceptable. Thuresson (talk) 15:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Ahh, OK then, thanks for pointing that out. Happy for this to be closed then  The Windler talk  15:40, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Thuresson. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hanno fischer sat in RW-3.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS Ticket#2017062210021189 Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 18:02, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Olaf Kosinsky: Please add the ticket. Daphne Lantier 18:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS requests

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate the following files with their respective tickets:

Request normal undeletion of the following as permission was confirmed by their respective tickets:

seb26 (talk) 15:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Seb26: Restored. Daphne Lantier 15:51, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 19:11, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Chainsmokers-1046x588.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017062210003994 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:04, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 17:12, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 Daphne Lantier --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 19:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Louise Carrin.jpeg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent ( verify ) request: Ticket:2017062110028541 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, and ping me. If the permission looks good for me, I'll remove {{Temporarily undeleted}} and add {{PermissionOTRS}}, otherwise, {{OTRS received}}. Thanks ! Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:57, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

@Framawiki: Restored. Daphne Lantier 23:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 19:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Robert twain

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hello, I think that the images has the needed rights, since are taken from the owner's Flickr page, who's also the owner of the paintings shown. The pictures are under Creative Commons that allow their use in this context, and moreover the artworks are clearly credited as made by the artist/owner. Robert twain (talk) 14:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)robert_twain Robert twain (talk) 14:50, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose There are two sets copyrights here -- those for the photographs and those for the artworks. In at least two cases, artists are in the photograph, so they cannot be the photographer and therefore cannot generally have the right to freely license the images. I think we need evidence that both the photographs and the artwork are freely licensed by their actual creators, using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Jim -- OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 19:13, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS requests 21:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate the following files with their respective tickets:

seb26 (talk) 21:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

More for temporary undeletion:
seb26 (talk) 23:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
@Seb26: Restored. Daphne Lantier 23:19, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your consistent help with these Daphne Lantier it is appreciated seb26 (talk) 00:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 19:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LFA5577ws.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS Ticket#2017060610007323 Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:02, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Olaf Kosinsky: Please add the ticket. Daphne Lantier 19:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Knabenkraut EO5P6385-2.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS Ticket#2017062310004428 Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Olaf Kosinsky: Please add the ticket. Daphne Lantier 19:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Starship-troopers-german-division-03.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS Ticket#2017060410010957 Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:27, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Olaf Kosinsky: Please add the ticket. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo Vogelpark Heiligenkirchen 2017.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS Ticket#2017060710016482 Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:34, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Olaf Kosinsky: Please add the ticket. Daphne Lantier 19:43, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Holger siebert.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS Ticket#2017061210011011 Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 20:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Olaf Kosinsky: Please add the ticket. Daphne Lantier 21:07, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS requests 00:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate the following files with their respective tickets:

Request normal undeletion of the following as permission was confirmed by their respective tickets:

seb26 (talk) 00:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

@Seb26: Restored. Daphne Lantier 00:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: temp restored & re-deleted -- 1 normal restore. Daphne Lantier 02:38, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg Are you saying this isn't my family photo? This makes no sense. This is Rear Admiral Edward Middleton. this photo has been in my family for almost 150 years.

Here is another photo of him https://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=70715135 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leeburbage153 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

This appears to be in reference to the following file, see also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Admiral Edward Middleton.jpg

seb26 (talk) 01:12, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored and proper licensing added. Daphne Lantier 02:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Zamiatin WE.jpg

These processes went very quickly, and I did not have the chance to respond before the above file was deleted and the discussion closed. So I'm trying again. If I'm not doing this correctly, apologies. I'd be grateful for guidance on communications through Talk or whatever the preferred platform it.

Anyway, I just reviewed your comments regarding File:Zamiatin WE.jpg at

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive

A few responses:

1. There is only one book pictured here. The black thing behind the book is a slipcase.

2. Zilboorg renewed the rights to his translation, which is not relevant here. The photograph is of the physical book, not of the text. Similarly, I think photographs of the covers Ernest Hemingway's early books are fine, reprinting a Hemingway story is not. Hemingway did not own the copyright to the covers of his books.

3. I think you're right that copyright to the image on the cover probably rested with the artist, or more likely the publisher. But the artist is uncredited, and the publisher surely failed to renew copyright on a book that lapsed out of print in 1924.

4. Later reprints had totally different cover art.

5. Although I think the editorial decisions were hasty here, I recognize the importance of your efforts to protect both the rights of copyright holders and the legal position of Wikimedia commons, and salute you for that.

Best regards,

--Bverter (talk) 15:08, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

@Bverter: The copyright in the cover design might have belonged to the publisher or an artist, and might not have been registered or renewed. To be honest, we do not know (and it's probably undeterminable). The book is recent enough that it is still possibly under copyright, and the check for registration and renewal I did was simply to see if we could establish that the formalities were not complied with... if the book had entered the PD, that would be an indication that the cover art might have as well.. As it stands, however, we don't have any evidence that the artwork is in the PD, and it's recent enough to possibly still be under copyright in the US. Please read COM:EVID: "In all cases, the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained..." - Reventtalk 17:04, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Hmm. Interesting question. As you say, the copyright was renewed by Zilboorg in 1952 (R101210). In that era, there was typically only one copyright notice in a book, which had to be on the verso of the title page. That notice covered the entire work -- text, translation, and any art in the book, on the cover, and on the dust jacket. The renewal refers to the original 1924 registration by EP Dutton (A815379). I would think, therefore, that the 1952 renewal covers not only the translation, but the entire book since it renews the original registration. I could certainly be wrong in that, but, as Revent has pointed out, the burden of proof is on you to prove that the 1952 renewal did not cover the whole work, including the cover.
The good news is that the renewed copyright lasts for 95 years after publication, so it will be PD on 1/1/2020. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:23, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
@Jameslwoodward: Exactly. The possible caveat that might arise here is that the translator (who filed the renewal) might not have been the proper party to have filed for a renewal of the copyright in the cover art. We would need much more information to establish this, however. - Reventtalk 22:48, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
I agree that there is a question of whether the translator could renew the copyright. However, since the Copyright Office accepted the renewal and referred to the original registration, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we must assume that the renewal was valid for the whole book, including the cover art. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: This has been here for ten days without a further comment. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:43, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wakil Gubernur DKI Basuki TP (cropped).jpg

Previous deletion nomination is not making sense, it is in public domain because it published by the Government of Republic of Indonesia. See the Government of Republic of Indonesia. See Template:PD-IDGov. Hddty. (talk) 11:16, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose I suggest you actually read {{PD-IDGov}} which says, in part,

"(2) publication and/or reproduction of anything which is published by and/or behalf of the Government, except if the Copyright is declared to be protected by law or regulation or by statement on the work itself or at the time the work is published;" [emphasis added].

The page which this was taken from has an explicit copyright notice, which is also linked at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wakil Gubernur DKI Basuki TP (cropped).jpg. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

@Jameslwoodward: {{PD-IDGov}} is actually outdated; its from 2002, there is a new one in 2014 which basically speaks about how governmental portraits are exempt from the copyright law (there is also a discussion about this in Template talk:PD-IDGov. Here is the translation to English from here:
Article 43
Act which is not considered a violation of Copyright include:
e. Doubling, Announcements, and / or distribution of Images President, Vice President, former President, former Vice President, National Hero, heads of state institutions, leaders of ministries / non-ministerial government agencies, and / or head area with regard dignity and fairness in accordance with the provisions of legislation.
Hddty. (talk) 12:59, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Also can you undelete File:Wakil Gubernur DKI Basuki TP.jpg? It also deleted in the same deletion requests. Hddty. (talk) 14:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

I don't think we can use that provision of the law. See my comment at Template talk:PD-IDGov. Until the issue is resolved there, we cannot use it here. Changes in Commons understand of specific laws must always be done at the policy level before trying to apply it to individual cases. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: This has been here almost a week without comment. The cited clause clearly prohibits certain derivative works, so cannot be used for Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tumblr Personality, David Olshanetsky.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017050610002188 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me. Ty Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:34, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Done. --Yann (talk) 12:49, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jari.cyde.hyttinen.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017050510016504 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:36, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Done. Please add the license. --Yann (talk) 12:48, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pe. Leal.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017050510013598 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Done. --Yann (talk) 12:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Christian Lu photo.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Permission sent with Ticket:2017062310016504. Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:51, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done @Arthur Crbz: please add the final OTRS template to the file page. De728631 (talk) 12:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:WLM India 2016 28.jpg

I was simply making a report to uploaded on meta for my rapid grant project. The canvas image was a winning image of Wikiloves monument 2016 in India, hence uploaded in Commons. User: SpacemanSpiff deleted it for no reason. --Abhinav619 (talk) 16:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored. Daphne Lantier 16:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Reopened. Daphne, Abhinav619, if I understand correctly, the large images in the photo are Wiki images, so they have free licenses. However, unless the licenses are CC-0, we can't use them without attribution. In order to keep this, Abhinav619 needs to find the file for the image on the right and, unless it is CC-0, add appropriate attribution. Even if it is CC-0, it is polite to credit our colleagues when we know who they are.

And, by the way, SpacemanSpiff's action was entirely appropriate. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Attribution added. The image depicted in this photograph is File:Tirumal Naicker Palace 1.jpg (CC-by-sa-4.0). I have added an appropriate attribution at File:WLM India 2016 28.jpg. De728631 (talk) 13:17, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bas integration image.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Permission sent with Ticket:2017050410016766. Arthur Crbz (talk) 08:53, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Done. --Yann (talk) 16:04, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

@Yann: Peux-tu supprimer l'image File:Bas integration image.jpg ? En tant que collage utilisant des logos qui ne sont surement pas publiés sous licence libre, je ne pense pas que le client soit en capacité de fournir les permissions nécessaires. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:57, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Yann (talk) 17:18, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS requests 16:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate the following files with their respective tickets:

seb26 (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

@Seb26: Restored. Daphne Lantier 16:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: tickets added. Daphne Lantier 17:15, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ISticker Logo.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Permission sent with Ticket:2017050910006268 Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:10, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Please add the ticket. Daphne Lantier 17:12, 25 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Isfahan International Conference Center - 4.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Permission sent with Ticket:2017050910005321. Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:12, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Please add the ticket. Daphne Lantier 17:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Western Bulldogs player libby Birch.jpg

OTRS agent: please undelete this file as a message under ticket 2017060710011183 was finally received that confirms permission for this specific photograph. I confirmed that it was the correct photo, because I saved the attachment and attempted to upload it via Special:UploadWizard and was informed that my upload matched it as being previously uploaded. Kindly ping when finished and I will update the appropriate tag and attribution.

seb26 (talk) 01:35, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Seb26: Please add the ticket. Daphne Lantier 03:40, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Sani Resort

Sani Resort is a historic location, open to all visitors Sani Resort is located on the magnificent Kassandra peninsula, stretching over more than 1000 acres of fragrant pine forest, olive groves, golden beaches and crystal clear waters. It was the dream of two men almost 30 years ago, and today ownership remains with their families, who have a stronger than ever commitment to protect the beautiful environment for future generations. It has a marina with shops and restaurants open to everyone to visit and generally is the only place of entertainment in the whole area. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sofiapapad123 (talk • contribs) 09:57, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Closing, no administrative action called for, no deleted contributions. Thuresson (talk) 10:41, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Stopislamofobia-octaveta wp.jpg

Hola, la imagen es una octavilla para difusión de unas jornadas contra la islamofobia celebradas en Barcelona (2017) organizadas por Unitat Contra el Feixisme i el Racisme (UCFR). Su uso es de libre difusión. Gracias! Caracole123 (talk) 09:32, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Closing, this image has not been deleted. Thuresson (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SOH Alex Vermeulen in concert, 2016.jpg

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate a ticket (2017051810000998) that alleges permission for the following file:

seb26 (talk) 00:36, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Closed: File was restored temporarily to examine image and EXIF data, now re-deleted while the ticket is pending. seb26 (talk) 13:17, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cover of the third issue of GROUND, edited by Ismael Ogando.png

This was an act of vandalism by user:[Boing! said Zebedee] who besides that used a derogative tone in its text explaining me things that weren't unrequested, such as "I will punish you for not obeying me". That was crossing the line for me, and I feel offended. I am contributing the work of a relevant artist which is, ironically target of a similar behaviour in the real word, a asylum seeker in Germany. This user actions are low and merit proper punishment by administrators. Thanks. Cocainaenvenenada (talk) 16:13, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

You are contributing the work of a relevant artist who did not give you permission to do so. It is NOT yours to give away / relicense. No vandalism by Boing! said Zebedee but several copyright violations on your part. IF you have WRITTEN permission from the magazine to relicense their work and livelyhood, please send it to OTRS or better, have a representative of the magazine send permission to OTRS. In the meantime you may want to read a little about a) the project scope b) licensing, and c) Copyright rules before making unfounded allegations. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:35, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Erm, exactly where did I say anything remotely like "I will punish you for not obeying me"? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:43, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
For the record: User, IP, and meat puppet blocked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:14, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 17:44, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TorrentPier.svg

There is no copyright violation. It's my own work posted on my repository https://github.com/torrentpier/torrentpier/blob/master/styles/images/logo/logo.png and my own site https://torrentpier.com/forum/styles/default/xenforo/bull-logo.svg on MIT license https://github.com/torrentpier/torrentpier/blob/master/LICENSE It's absolutely free and i did't know why you want to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exile 37 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done file is not deleted. Ankry (talk) 20:58, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sechkies yellow balloon.jpg

This was deleted as a 'social media picture', but it was used in a draft about South Korean fandom culture at en:User:Yunseon Choi/sandbox3, which seems to suggest it was in-project scope and had educational value. Requesting restoration (and please re-add it to the draft in question). --91.226.39.185 11:54, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose The same image was posted here in 2016 without a free licence while the Commons upload was from June 2017 as "own work". So File:Sechkies yellow balloon.jpg over here was apparently a copyright infringement. De728631 (talk) 15:41, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done in-project scope is not an evidence of free license. Basically, there are copyright ptoblems not scope problems with this image. Ankry (talk) 21:04, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ServicentroBanda.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017050510018539 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Undeleted, please mark is for speedy if it should be redeleted. --Mates (talk) 11:36, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wfm 91.7.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017050910018095 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:34, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Undeleted, please mark is for speedy if it should be redeleted. --Mates (talk) 11:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SkypemareReleasePoster.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Permission sent with Ticket:2017062110027952. Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Please add the permission template to the file. --Mates (talk) 11:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:EuropebySatellite.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS agent (verify) request: Permission sent with Ticket:2017060310007294. Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:51, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Please add the permission template to the file. --Mates (talk) 11:29, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Fantazio (photo Dom Garcia).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017062710008855 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Please mark it for speedy if it is to be redeleted. --Mates (talk) 11:40, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wiki bd 3.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017062510010766 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Please mark them for speedy if they are to be redeleted. --Mates (talk) 11:43, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Peter Pan (1986).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017062510007351 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 11:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Please mark it for speedy if they are to be redeleted. --Mates (talk) 11:44, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Andrew Benjamin Conner.jpg

Please undelete this photo. I own the rights and am the Communications Manager for team in which Mr. Conner plays, this photo belongs to me.

I am even listed on this page: https://www.chicago-fire.com/club/staff

This photo was flagged by an overzealous user who is monitoring with no knowledge of the subject matter.

Thanks,

Eunice — Preceding unsigned comment added by Euniceskim (talk • contribs) 19:53, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

One option is that you log into the team's Flickr account and change this photo's license from "All Rights Reserved" to an acceptable free license. Thuresson (talk) 20:35, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose I am afraid that I don't much like it when someone who has a total of 29 edits on all WMF projects comes here and complains about "an overzealous user who is monitoring with no knowledge of the subject matter". The person who deleted your image, one of our most active and productive colleagues, was simply following our standard policy when we see an image on Flickr with "All Rights Reserved". There was nothing "overzealous" about that.

We have no way here of knowing who you are and whether you actually have the rights to the image. Please do not criticize our colleague for simply following policy. Policy requires that either (a) the ARR must be changed on Flickr to an acceptable license or (b) the actual photographer must send a free license directly using OTRS. The former can get the image restored immediately; the latter will take several weeks or more as OTRS has a significant backlog. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. I don't think a license change on Flickr would necessarily be sufficient. --Storkk (talk) 12:16, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TheEtherealPlanePosterCreds.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017050210023181 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:05, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done @Arthur Crbz: I have restored this pending the OTRS check. De728631 (talk) 12:23, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

@De728631: File can be deleted because the uploader doesn't want to send permission anymore (Wikipedia page deleted/refused). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 09:35, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Redeleted per above. --Mates (talk) 12:26, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:VVS Laxman with his family at Teri University, receiving the doctoral degree..jpg

I don't understand what's the problem with this. I was personally present at the event, clicked the picture and uploaded it. Their is no copyright violation whatsoever. --Abhinav619 (talk) 12:12, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose The description states, I quote: This is clicked by my friend. I received it via Email Seems your statement above isn't truthful. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:34, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Plain and simple not true. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:39, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS requests 17:00, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate the following files with their respective tickets:

Extended content

Request normal undeletion of the following as permission was confirmed by their respective tickets:

seb26 (talk) 17:00, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

@Seb26: Restored. Daphne Lantier 17:43, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Closing: all were eventually approved, except for File:MSRDC Top Logo 0 0.png which was not confirmed as I thought, but will remain up awaiting a user response, with {{OTRS received}} until 30 days passes. seb26 (talk) 14:50, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Yuen Kay Shan.jpg

RE: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yuen Kay Shan.jpg. The deleted is image is right here in this collage=> File:Wing Chun Collage.jpg uploaded a year ago. If I was a good as you on wikimedia I would have found this pretty quickly... Maybe deleting is your forte @Taivo: *wink*(Australianblackbelt (talk) 00:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC))

Thank you, Australianblackbelt! I'll nominate it for deletion. Taivo (talk) 06:19, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
If the photo taken in 1930 (for example) was first published in 1979 (for example), it would be copyrighted until 2030.  Oppose without information regarding the original publication. Storkk (talk) 07:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: information regarding the original publication is needed. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lost - Garden of Error and Decay at Wifredo Lam Havana by Richter and Bielicky 02.jpg (please undelete)

Please undelete

File:Lost - Garden of Error and Decay at Wifredo Lam Havana by Richter and Bielicky 02.jpg

File:Lost - Lost at Wifredo Lam Havana by Richter and Bielicky 01.jpg

File:Lost - Garden of Error and Decay at Wifredo Lam Havana by Richter and Bielicky 03.jpg

.

I have the permission by the artist to grant the upload now, please see the link

https://we.tl/HXIWtM8O21

for the signed *.pdf as required by

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Textvorlagen#Einverst.C3.A4ndniserkl.C3.A4rung_f.C3.BCr_Bild.2FFoto-Freigaben

Thank you for your time and effort,

MPhilMKBielicky (talk) 11:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

@MPhilMKBielicky: You should forward this information to OTRS, in order to have a ticket number to place in the file pages. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 21:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Franz R. Klainsek headshot 2017. Contemporary Art. Performance Art.jpg

The image has been taken by the author. The image was deleted because it stated all rights reserved. The image can be used online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdv06 (talk • contribs) 04:47, 27 June 2017‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Please read COM:L - that it "can be used online" is not sufficient for us to host it here. We need an actual license from the copyright holder (almost certainly the photographer) stating that anybody can use it for any purpose, including commercial derivative works. The photographer should follow the instructions on OTRS to communicate this license to us. Storkk (talk) 12:21, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission for a free license is needed. Daphne Lantier 18:10, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dames of Darkness (5).jpg

Ich, besitze das Urheberrecht auf dieses Bild. Ich habe mich mit dieser Band zusammengetan, und sie haben mir die Erlaubnis gegeben, es weiter zu verwenden, falls es Probleme geben sollte, können Sie diese E-Mail gerne bei mir anfordern. HeavyMetalFreak03 (talk) 12:32, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Right, and that's why there is a big, fat watermark stating the name of the photographer while you claim his work as your own? IF you can get a real permission from the copyright owner have him send permission to OTRS. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 12:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Diane Lemieux Commission de la construction du Québec.jpg and File:CA Diane Lemieux.jpg

Hi. Picture of Diane Lemieux on French and Englsih bio page have been deleted. I have the rights for this photo. How can I get it up there without it being remove.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandralev (talk • contribs) 13:07, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose Doesn't seem to be correct. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Diane Lemieux Commission de la construction du Québec.jpg. Don't re-upload a duplicate and then ask for restoration. Your latest upload has been deleted as well. IF you really have the rights, send permission to OTRS. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:34, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 18:09, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Antony Micallef bailey.jpg

Hi,

Sorry its taken me so long to reply I'm very new to wikipedia and i thought placing the images would be fine. I myself am not the copyright holder but I do have permission from the artist. I am the PA to the artist and on his request am writing his biography.

How can I get all the deleted images of his artwork back on the page of 'Antony Micallef'? in Lamens terms would be greatly appreciated,

  • File:Thumbnail Antony-Micallef-self-studio.jpg
  • File:Washinton DC Trump Protest.jpg
  • File:Placebo trump.jpg
  • File:MARCH LA.jpg
  • File:Trump Antony Micallef Posters.jpg
  • File:Antony Micallef Fake News.jpg
  • File:Antony Micallef, 'Donald Trump', 2016.jpg

Many Thanks, Alex.

27th june 2017 --Alexander Weaver (talk) 17:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Please have the copyright holder/s follow the directions at OTRS. Daphne Lantier 18:07, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kent Hovind.jpg

The image is a free-to-use content. Many sites(including those that make profit)use images that are almost identical(I added black dots on the southeast corner of the image because I couldn't upload the original image)to the one I uploaded.

You can check the types of sites that use images that are near-identical to the one I uploaded. https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZisoFZhQmYoDxQNPSZC-6i-otu-iPUbKazvCa3Q_1ZtHy9qHeKXt0fq4Efdyu39Oh9kAfT1FP3MD54HMxRvNkryRWbXfR6EHjGVilkPp1CPBOl_1JzQLNztVLTDgD_1-ekw4WP6Y0YUIIFd09rq42ZwbK47phvPdN1iTOyHWwubJNiHfqU9aAYGkdE8hhlUHd4PsUHgUDulkaiwZVkVGewSArSXQ_1Zcbb93tY7Zj2NX1pGbx7llgTqJJgclxgyf9MYF7XFWIWWNjMezW0tYaNjvrcEgdCGDx7HU-ctx2F8jil6cOyOjKkgJShJ41EMtG_1h70xLAVawg7Vbn37d4WVqem6H0G1oj5g&bih=616&biw=1239&ved=0ahUKEwjR9dKT7t7UAhWEG5QKHci2C5gQiBwICQ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjkimcl (talk • contribs) 20:37, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose The image is widely used, but there is no evidence that its copyright owner has freely licensed it. The uses found in the Google search you cite have explicit copyright notices. In order for the image to restored to Commons, the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer, must send a free license directly using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:21, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done Uploader has not provided a source, an author or a copyright license. Thuresson (talk) 02:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Leire Cano (13)

Hello! Some files uploaded by Leire Cano (Wikimedian in Residence at Children Library) has been deleted because there was a misgiving of Flickr washing. Yet, all the permissions had been requested and I add them here in order to undelete these files. Thank you! --Xabier Cañas (talk) 12:47, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


Permissins should be sent following COM:OTRS instructions; not uploaded co Commons. Ankry (talk) 21:01, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
We will try with COM:OTRS afterwards even if we know that we are going to lose some little publishers (would be asking to much to them). Anyway, for these 13 images, isn't it enough having the publishers permission? The correct licensing is proved as well as with OTRS. Moreover, it was accepted here by @Yann: . --Xabier Cañas (talk) 09:33, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
I don't remember this case, but it was probably an error. Permissions should be sent to OTRS, not uploaded to Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:38, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission needed. Daphne Lantier 04:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Palo Duro Canyon State Park Panoramic.jpg

This is an my own original work that I have chosen to share under Creative Common licensing. I'm new to commons, did I upload it incorrectly? Is the file too big?

Also available here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/joncutrer/21328093760

--Jcutrer (talk) 16:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

 Support Tagged as copyright violation because it is used in this article, but below the photo in the article is a link to Flickr where this photo is licensed as CC-BY-SA. Thuresson (talk) 02:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jcutrer: I've restored it and adjusted the licensing so that it matches the Flickr source. I've also passed the license review. This will help to avoid any possible confusion in the future. Daphne Lantier 04:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Queer (musical logo).png

I am the owner of the image and I keep getting harassed with it being removed. Please undelete it immediately!

--MissHazelJade (talk) 08:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose First, please note that uploading an image a second and third time after it has been deleted is a violation of Commons rules and a waste of time and resources. Don't do it again.

There is no evidence that this musical is in scope. Images on Commons must serve an educational purpose. The subjects must be notable, which generally means they have a WP article. This musical is not mentioned at Category:LGBT-related musicals and gets no hits on Google.

If you can prove here that the image actually is in scope, then policy requires that an authorized official of the musical's production company must send a free license using OTRS. We do not accept unsubstantiated claims of "ownership" of images. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:58, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Once again, I will repeat to you that I am the creator/producer of this musical. Feel free to view our website at Queer: A New Musical and the Broadway World announcement article, and please stop harassing me! If you need further proof, tell me where I can email it to, and I will do that. --MissHazelJade (talk) 11:00, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Please note my first paragraph above. Anyone can create a web site. Yours says that the musical is "in development". Until the show actually appears and lasts more than a few nights, it probably does not meet our standards for notability.

Also, please understand that all we know for certain here is that you are an anonymous user who repeatedly claims to be the creator of the musical. We get many fans and vandals who make similar claims in order to post images on Commons. Therefore, as I said above, "policy requires that an authorized official of the musical's production company must send a free license using OTRS". OTRS is linked for a reason. However, don't bother to send a license to OTRS until you have convinced this community that the show is in scope.

I also note that you got exactly the same response at User_talk:Hedwig_in_Washington#STOP_BLOCKING_.2AMY.2A_PHOTOS -- both with respect to scope and with respect to copyright -- a few minutes before you posted here. Please don't expect that when you do things that are outside of policy that you can shop around and get an answer that you like. Although some of our colleagues may disagree with me and Mattbuck on the scope issue, the copyright issue is long and firmly established policy. Shopping around for different answers simply wastes your time and ours. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

You obviously are a simple, egotistical, entitled individual, who has an issue being told he's incorrect. If you bothered to take any time to see Queer: A New Musical, you would see that there are licenses on there for both of the images I posted, which has already been sent to OTRS. You are also not allowed to determine which projects are in scope; but you like control.

I validate that for you, and recommend that you get counseling for it; it can be worked through, sweetheart. --MissHazelJade (talk) 03:05, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

MissHazelJade, I understand you are new to the project but it is important that all users follow the guidelines of civility and ensure they do not make negative statements that personally target other individuals. Commenting that a user 'needs counselling' is not at all a kind of remark that would be acceptable here. I suggest you turn your interest back to the matter at hand. User:Jameswoolward is an administrator on this project and is also not the only user who is suggesting that this musical doesn't fit the scope of our project, so please, make your argument stronger with evidence and after a good thorough reading of COM:SCOPE and then comment back with actual points, otherwise the image will stay deleted. seb26 (talk) 03:21, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
seb26, I'm simply curious why you believe it :doesn't fit the scope of your project. And I'm also curious how you can ignore and negate the rude attitude of your colleague. Please respond accordingly. --MissHazelJade (talk) 03:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
seb26, What I don't appreciate is an aggressive male individual harassing me online (as (Jameslwoodward) tried to do to me), and attempting to make use of his "male privilege" in order to get his way. I am a very educated young woman, and I highly appreciate people who can to speak to me and not at me. Please recommend that your colleague focus on behavior modification to users, as opposed to trying to bully them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MissHazelJade (talk • contribs) 03:34, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
(edit conflict) MissHazelJade, I understand you may feel taken aback by the manner of his comments. You are at liberty to raise any concerns directly with him on his discussion page, found here. One important thing: I think you need to acknowledge that I am not a "colleague" of any user here in the sense that I have any authority or joint cooperation of them like in a workplace. As I have said above, this is a community of volunteers, all completely unpaid, with equal voice, and equal responsibility for own comments. I trust you will actually read the links I have taken my own personal time to include and adjust your comments. This is the end of my remarks on topics that are nt related to the discussion about the logo and Commons' scope. I encourage you also to focus on the issue at hand on this page, there are other pages where you can raise concerns if you had any. seb26 (talk) 03:57, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
(edit conflict) MissHazelJade, I trust you consulted the page I linked, but in any case I will summarise it from my perspective. COM:SCOPE explains that images hosted here need to be for an 'educational purpose'. It says, "The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative"." But then the guideline goes on and remarks that the educational purposes need to be realistic. Wikimedia Commons is a free file repository but we also support the Wikipedia projects, and so one part of the defined scope remarks that the subject material on Commons then needs to be notable enough for a Wikipedia article. That's a valid argument, and it has been mentioned several times here so as a new user for your interest, I provide you a link to the Wikipedia guideline on notability: en:Wikipedia:Notability. If the musical is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article (yet), then photos related to it on Commons cannot be used for any realistic purpose, other than to advertise the musical. The logo for example cannot feature in an article because no articles mention it. The logo cannot realistically feature in articles about musicals in general and cannot be used anywhere. In that case, the logo would exist on our project but would not be used anywhere. It is essentially free hosting for the logo. That is not really an acceptable use for them here. If you want to release your images or logos under Creative Commons licenses, please feel free to do so. Creative Commons is another entire organisation unrelated to us (except with some partnerships). Nothing is stopping you from licensing your files according to their licenses, and distributing them on your website with a note letting everyone know they are CC licensed and can be used freely. But there are valid suggestions in this discussion made by experienced and informed members of our community that the project should not host these files. Also: this is not "my" project, it is ours and I include you in that because you are a registered user here who is contributing to a community discussion. Jim's comments are of his own decision and whether or not you interpret his attitude one way or another, he has been considerate of the terms of use and has not made any personal attacks. seb26 (talk) 03:45, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
seb26, thank you for taking the time to write that. I truly appreciate it, and you've done to lessen my anxiety here. There is an article I drafted about the project, in which I would have included the logo, but it was declined because it did not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. If I submit a question on the Articles for creation help desk, would you be willing to help me sculpt the article in a more neutral point of view, along with User talk:KGirlTrucker81? I would greatly appreciate that! --MissHazelJade (talk) 03:54, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
MissHazelJade, I don't contribute on that project much so I wish you luck instead with the article. seb26 (talk) 03:59, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
seb26, please excuse me for being lost, but when you use the word project, do you mind explaining to me if that means the article itself or that particular section of the Wikipedia website? --MissHazelJade (talk) 04:11, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Continued on their talk page. seb26 (talk) 04:21, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Discussion moved to talk page. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:15, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Daniel Habif.jpg

File:Daniel Habif.jpg
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Manolo Ruiz (talk • contribs) 21:30, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose Twitter profile photo of subject Daniel Habif. Thuresson (talk) 02:50, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Web grab, no indication of permission, no new information. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:15, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo Travellink.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission sent with Ticket:2017062710010315. Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:52, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Please add the ticket. Daphne Lantier 16:13, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ritratto del Barone rosso.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This file was deleted because it was "created by [an] abuser". This might be true, but there was nothing wrong in uploading this particular file. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 19:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: Creator:Henry Luyten -- pd-old-70-1923. Daphne Lantier 19:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Армянский вопрос энциклопедия (Armenian question encyclopedia in Russian).djvu

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission sent with Ticket:2017051010011722. Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:53, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Arthur Crbz: Please add the tickets. Daphne Lantier 20:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Bosbaanroeiers.jpg

The photographer personally granted me written permission to publish this photo on wikipedia years ago.

Bosbaanroeiers.jpg

The photo supports the lemma very strongly - rowers in a boat.


28 june 2017

Sibo68

Sibo68 (talk) 20:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Sibo68, Wikimedia Commons needs media files to be released under a free license which allows people other than Wikipedia to use the photo. A permission for just Wikipedia is not sufficient. We need a free license release, which allows more people and permits more uses for the work. If the photographer granted you a permission for something, it also means he still holds some rights, which means we cannot accept any permissions from you, and instead need an explicit free license statement from them. You can contact them and ask them to use the text from this template here, put their name on it, and send it to us directly (not forwarded) at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. This template releases the file under a license called Creative Commons BY-SA-4.0, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose. Once we receive the permission, only then can the image be restored. Cheers, seb26 (talk) 12:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS permission is needed. Daphne Lantier 23:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:George Baldanzi 3.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission sent with Ticket:2017062310006622. Plus, all these pictures are under PD according to information provided by the uploader. I thought I had added the permission template on these files but perhaps I'm wrong. Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:31, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored -- the OTRS tickets are there, I just spaced it and missed them somehow. Daphne Lantier 23:15, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Daphne Lantier. I forgot File:George_Baldanzi_4.jpg (same issue), can you restore it? --Arthur Crbz (talk) 10:16, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS requests 04:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate the following files with their respective tickets:

seb26 (talk) 04:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

@Seb26: Restored. Daphne Lantier 04:49, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done seb26 (talk) 04:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS requests 05:09, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate the following files with their respective tickets:

seb26 (talk) 05:09, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

@Seb26: Restored. Daphne Lantier 16:21, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done seb26 (talk) 04:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS requests: 16:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Request temporary undeletion to evaluate the following files with their respective tickets:

seb26 (talk) 16:39, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

@Seb26: Restored. Daphne Lantier 20:08, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done seb26 (talk) 04:09, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:R.N.X.S LapelBadge.jpg

This is a picture of the RNXS lapel badge They are About 4,980 image results when searched for and (about the same in actual badges issued)

The badge was given to members of the RNXS of which i was a member i am authorised as a member to use RNXS images i have a badge in my possession.its my badge ,any photo i took would look exactly the same. Although i understand the need for copywriter protection, and applaud your diligence i think in this case perhaps A tad over zealous.


Many thanks Andrew Johnston(Ex-L.N.X)Rosyh

Dixon hill (talk) 18:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Please clarify who made this design and if you have permission from him or hear to distribute copies. Thuresson (talk) 19:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
From what he told us on the IRC help channel for en.wp, this may be covered by Crown copyright. Jéské (v^_^v) 19:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 Support The badge definitely has or had a Crown Copyright. The Royal Naval Auxiliary Service was formed in 1963. Crown Copyright lasts for fifty years, so if the badge were designed and "published" (in the technical, copyright sense of the word) before 1967, then it is PD. Although it is unproven here, I am prepared to assume that it did not take four years after the creation of the service for the badge (and the the RNXS ensign, which has the badge on it) to be created. I think it is almost certain that the badge was actually created before the official start of the Service because otherwise vessels that were added to the RNXS at its inception would not have had an ensign. (note to Americans and others who are not familiar with UK flags -- unlike the USA, which has one national flag, and many countries which have two or three, the UK has dozens of official national flags and the flag that is flown depends on the organization flying it and, in some cases on ships, on the person in command). That would make this PD four years ago, but not on the URAA date. I think that the URAA does not apply to Crown Copyright, but I could be wrong on that. Carl? Anyone else?
I should add that I see nothing over-zealous in this deletion. Ownership of one of these badges does not give one the right to freely license copies of it. The fact that Andrew was a member of the Service says nothing about his right to license its images. I don't know offhand who is authorized to freely license Crown Copyright images, but I doubt very much that it includes ordinary members of the Services. So, at best this is OK by four years and at worst it is still under copyright in the USA because of the URAA. Certainly a case that required discussion.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose I was about to undelete myself and apply {{PD-Art|PD-UKGov}} but the phrase in the undeletion request "any photo i took would look exactly the same" would strongly imply that the photograph was not created by the uploader. The badge appears to be a 3D object, and as such {{PD-Art}} would not seem to apply. Lighting, background, and other creative choices were made, and the photo would likely have copyright separate from the underlying work. Storkk (talk) 15:13, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 Oppose Oops. My apologies. I focused on the DW issue and completely ignored the fact that this is not own work -- the stated source is "various web sites". Good catch, Storkk. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS needed. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Director Agathiyan and Ameer at Mooch Movie Audio Launch Event.jpg

This file is from a external website and the caption clearly states that image is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 International [12] Perumalism Chat 07:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Oppose That's correct, but I think it is license laundering. Note that other images shot at the same time are ARR. How did silverscreen.in get the right to license only this one? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:52, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

I have mailed the silverscreen.in administrator to release that particular image in creative common license like following images [13],[14] and [15]. Perumalism Chat 10:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS needed. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dan_Wagner_-_UK_Serial_Tech_Entrepreneur.jpg

I uploaded this image of Dan Wagner that I took in 2007. It is my copyright and I am surprised it was deleted. Can you please restore it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Techtrek (talk • contribs) 10:14, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Techtrek, if this is your own work, it was likely deleted because it was suspected of having been uploaded by someone who was not you. If you are the photographer, we will need an explicit free license statement from you (copying the text from this template here and putting your name on it) to be sent to us at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. If you are not the photographer, but own the *full* rights for the image (and not just the right to use as you wish), please also explain in the email how the rights were transferred/purchased. Cheers, seb26 (talk) 12:18, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Available on the web @ https://www.dan-wagner.com/home/category/Corporates --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS needed. --Yann (talk) 16:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted by Hedwig in Washington

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I do have the copyrights for this photo. How to prove this? Please explain how to proceed and restore. Alexandralev (talk) 14:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Deletion rationale: Needs better evidence for the uploader's claims of authorship and of copyright ownership. It is not a photo from 2017. Versions of it have been published in 2016 in the annual report of the Commission de la construction du Québec (page 12 of [16]) and in a newspaper [17]. This suggests that the copyright may be held by the Commission de la construction.
Please read and follow OTRS. If everything checks out the file will be restored. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:14, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS needed. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ABA.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Ticket:2017062710017407 alleges permission for this file. Request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

@Arthur Crbz: Restored. Daphne Lantier 16:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: Permission not OK. --Yann (talk) 16:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Img world.jpg

I didnt know exactly what is happening, what is the reason of the deleting my image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nvssafu (talk • contribs) 18:19, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

@Nvssafu: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Img world.jpg. --Ruthven (msg) 08:29, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS needed. --Yann (talk) 16:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

the cover of the book

The Author gave me the permission to upload on comon the cover of his book

--Évanéos (talk) 18:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC) Évanéos

I suppose you request undeletion of File:Antiquité critique et modernité le rôle de la pensée critique en Occident.jpg (next time please use more descriptive headline containing the correct link). Still I  Oppose this request, if you have got a permission it has to be sent to OTRS system. Best regards --Mates (talk) 18:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS needed. --Yann (talk) 16:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Weasels team logo.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: hi there. it`s my team and my own logo. I can proof it anyway, so please, don`t delete this file. Gunners 27 (talk) 05:24, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

@Gunners 27: Can you please send a confirmation message from an "official" email address to COM:OTRS? Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 08:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS needed. Ruthven (msg) 16:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GillesFargier.jpg

Bonjour, je souhaite mettre en ligne un article retravaillé avec les modifications nécessaires pour permettre sa publication. Nous avons les droits pour l'usage de la photo. Merci beaucoup ! --Mlapeyre (talk) 07:08, 29 June 2017 (UTC) 29/06/2017

@Mlapeyre: Bonjour, vous devriez envoyer la confirmation de l'ayant droit au service COM:OTRS, en particulier à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org. Merci --Ruthven (msg) 08:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS needed. Ruthven (msg) 16:06, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ZeratoR_Twitter.jpg

I have upload many time this file without permission or right. Of course it was delete. The last version of the file who I had import, had a permission. In the permission field I have put link who redirect on the autorisation of the person who ahve the right on the image. ZeratoR HimSelf. So, please restore the image, thanks you !--Foenyx (talk) 07:41, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

@Foenyx: Can you please forward this authorization to the OTRS service please? The file will be recovered when the ticket will be processed. --Ruthven (msg) 08:33, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

 Not done: OTRS needed. Ruthven (msg) 16:06, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kodur-1.jpg

Hi, I'm Prof. Kodur's post-doctoral student. My name is Mohannad Naser, https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=pM2bfrMAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra. I'm trying to setup a Wikipediapage for him. I work under his supervision at Michigan State University. How can I make sure that I can successfully start his page? I also have the rights and references to all content.

--Msufire (talk) 15:51, 29 June 2017 (UTC) MN

 Not done: Try asking on Wikipedia. Ruthven (msg) 16:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2017-06&oldid=618271553"