Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2013-07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Francisco Serrano - Mexico.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: CC-BY-SAed by photographer Paulina Lavista via OTRS LFaraone (talk) 19:20, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Please add OTRS ticket. INeverCry 23:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Joel Courtney 20120112.jpg[edit]

I'm not sure why this picture is flagged for deletion. I took that photo personally on my iPhone before a red carpet event.

it's my own work! I fully released that photo into public domain.

Please tell me what else I have to do?

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 09:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sample Adjisaka.png[edit]

At the time, I didn't add appropriate license to File:Sample Adjisaka.png as I were new to commons. Before I could change the license, the file has already been deleted. In restoring the fie, I would change the license to PD-font as the file in question is a sample of a typeface. --Alteaven (talk) 23:03, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done added license Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 00:28, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Krant addressing wci mumbai1584.jpg[edit]

To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

I hereby affirm that I, (User:Krantmlverma), am the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of File:Krant addressing wci mumbai1584.jpg

I agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Krantmlverma (talk) 06:34, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(User:Krantmlverma)
[SENDER'S AUTHORITY (copyright-holder)] 30-06-2013 [DATE]

Once OTRS processes the email(s) you claim to have sent, they will restore the files. Please note that OTRS is extremely busy at the moment, so it may be some time before they are able to attend to your request. Thanks for your patience -FASTILY 09:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wolf_spider_on_white.jpg[edit]

I am requesting undeletion for this photo.

As I stated in the file info, I took this picture myself. I posted it to my Flickr account and uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons, and put it on the Wolf Spider page of Wikipedia. I released it to be free for everyone with the checkbox.

I don't see what the problem is, but if there is something else I need to do, please let me know. I am attempting to give away this original content for free to everyone.

Thank you!

Yyyikes (talk) 13:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote you a flickr mail. With your answer I will undelete this. --Martin H. (talk) 16:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Per our flickr mail. --Martin H. (talk) 03:54, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:חיים נדל תמונת דיוקן.jpg[edit]

An OTRS permission was received Ticket:2013062710003643. Thanks Hanay (talk) 16:15, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done License still needs to be added. INeverCry 17:30, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aron Marton Cluj.JPG[edit]

The photography is my own work. --Mihai Andrei (talk) 16:25, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See #File:Episcop Marton Cluj.jpg below. --Martin H. (talk) 16:34, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per Commons:FOP#Romania. INeverCry 17:35, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Episcop Marton Cluj.jpg[edit]

The photography is my own work. --Mihai Andrei (talk) 16:26, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The sculpture isnt your own work and the sculpture has a copyright too and the copyright law of Romania not allows reuse of photographs of copyrighted artworks for commercial purposes. Thats what the "FOP" in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Episcop Marton Cluj.jpg means. See Commons:FOP#Romania and Commons:Derivative works. --Martin H. (talk) 16:34, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per Commons:FOP#Romania. INeverCry 17:35, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ihor Yavorsky.jpg, File:Konkov.jpg, File:Prytula comm.jpg, File:Fagot.jpg, File:Oleksandr Kemenyash.jpg, File:Kaletnik free.jpg, File:Ihor Svayka.jpg, File:Eduard Stavytskyi.jpg[edit]

These files are screenshots of videos, uploaded on YouTube under a Creative Commons CC-BY licence. All uploaders of these files seems to be their copiryghters (uploaders of most of these files are YouTube channels of TV-companies or websites which make them). Please make additional explanations about these deletes. --Qcumber (talk) 17:41, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done -FASTILY 06:10, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wiseman-infobox.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission maybe granted in ticket:2013063010003593; need to see image to confirm appropriateness. LFaraone (talk) 03:06, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The image can be seen here - File:Wiseman-infobox.jpg is a tight crop of the old man with the book. INeverCry 03:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am reasonably confident that the permission grant is correct and valid given that context. LFaraone 03:42, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done INeverCry 03:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

PD Maps by user:Digital1[edit]

All are PD and so labelled. Rich Farmbrough, 03:22 1 July 2013 (GMT).

But there were no license tags. You may re-upload the files, but be sure to specify a license tag -FASTILY 06:10, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating the zip.
All were tagged "license = PD", though, converting this is trivial (PD => {{PD-user|Digital1}}). Far more trivial than me going and re-downloading the files and going through the upload process for each one. Let's not make work shall we? Rich Farmbrough, 07:30 1 July 2013 (GMT).
Hi Rich, I have done these for you. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 07:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks! Rich Farmbrough, 07:52 1 July 2013 (GMT).

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AleskerovFT.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi, This is a photo I captured couple years ago and posted to http://www.famous-scientists.ru/10549/ This is photo of my scientific tutor Aleskerov Fuad in Higher School of Economics in Moscow and I would like to give away this original content for free to everyone. Could you please undelete it? In addition I am now creating his own page and I need it. Thank you very much! VadimKostomarov (talk) 19:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 20:07, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Miss Lauren Jones.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission granted in ticket:2013063010004369 LFaraone 00:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done -FASTILY 00:29, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kongeflagg.png[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The deletion discussion really don't make any sense as I know the people involved. Undelete the image and I'll will urge the involved person to send necessary information to OTRS.

That said the uploader probably know more about history of Oslo, the royal family and heraldic symbols than most people involved in Commons. If he has uploaded this image I'm sure he know the file history quite well. Jeblad (talk) 22:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Asked the uploader to respond to the Norwegian OTRS queue. Jeblad (talk) 22:44, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks for doing that. Once OTRS verifies the email that was sent, they will restore the file -FASTILY 00:29, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but this doesn't really make sense. The one that reads and answer the Norwegian OTRS queue is me. What I say is that the deletion discussion is crap. Unless someone can verify that the image is an actual copyvio undelete it and we go on from there. Jeblad (talk) 12:37, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This whole deletion request and how it was closed doesn't make any sense. The copyright status was not "unclear". Exactly one user claimed that the image was "probably a violation grabbed off some website", without any evidence whatsoever. It should never have been deleted. I know mistakes can happen (I have probably erroneously deleted many files myself over the years when I was a Commons admin!), but we should then deal swiftly with the mistakes we make and undelete when appropriate. Regards, Kjetil_r 16:00, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, the file still remains deleted?? As Kjetil_r points out, there was no reason to delete the file in the first place, please, could an uninvolved admin please review the closure of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kongeflagg.png. Please note that Fry1989 (talk · contribs) who made the unbased claim of likely copyvio there also has made this nomination : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Royal Standard of Norway as of 19 July 2009.svg, this time stating "Historically inaccurate and unsourced", notwithstanding all the sources given by Roede (talk · contribs) for this design in the discussion concerning Kongeflagg.png Finn Rindahl (talk) 20:09, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is the strangest deletion discussion I've ever seen on Commons. Everyone, except one user with no valid arguments, voted for keeping the file, it was deleted (!) and there is still no response to this request. Where are the admins? Haakon K (talk) 20:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, please include File:Kronprinsflagg.png in this undeletion request. Haakon K (talk) 20:27, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Send the email to 'permissions-commons@wikimedia.org', not the Norwegian OTRS queue. For the record, I really couldn't care less about how much y'all are complaining. Policy is policy. Files without adequate evidence of permission are deleted. OTRS will restore the file once they can confirm that permission was explicitly granted in the email by the appropriate party. If OTRS has not responded within a week of the email being sent, I suggest you inquire about the matter at COM:OTRS/N. -FASTILY 20:41, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There are millions of images on Commons with no other source than "Own work" (photos, svg flags, maps, etc.). Does this mean that all of them will be deleted if they are nominated? Haakon K (talk) 20:49, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For instance, how do you know Dbenbenn is the real author of File:Flag of Norway.svg and that Szczepan1990 is the author of File:Coat of arms of Norway.svg? As far I can see, they haven't sent any permission to OTRS neither. What is the difference from this case? Haakon K (talk) 20:55, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fastily, please behave professionally. "I really couldn't care less about how much y'all are complaining" type comments are not exactly helpful.
Why is it that you distrust User:Roede's "own work" statement? I know him personally from the time we were both members of the Wikimedia Norway board, and I would be extremely surprised if he lied about how he created the picture in question.
As for your "Files without adequate evidence of permission are deleted" statement: Does this mean that you don't trust that I am the author of the thousands of "own work" photos I have uploaded since 2005, and require an OTRS email where "permission was explicitly granted in the email by the appropriate party"? Best regards, Kjetil_r 22:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
How curious, there is an incredible amount of coordinated resistance towards using OTRS, and this is becoming rather suspicious. Is there something you aren't telling us? If Roede is in fact the copyright holder, he should have no problem at OTRS. And if he isn't, well then, this file is going to stay deleted. The solution could not be simpler. Your efforts are better spent encouraging Roede to email COM:OTRS. -FASTILY 23:14, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, I can do that. What do you expect Roede to write in the email? "I, Lars Roede, confirm that commons:File:Kronprinsflagg.png is my own work, that I am the sole copyright owner, and I hereby license it under the free license so-and-so"? That would basically be the same thing that he wrote in the DR and on the file description page; I'm not sure what we would gain by forcing him to do that. Regards, Kjetil_r 08:50, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see this section is marked as closed, and tagged "do not make any edits to this archive." However, it was closed by the same admin who closed the DR. Did everyone else leave (like I did a few years ago) leaving Fastily alone in charge of Commons. This is getting ridiculous. What exactly should Roede write in an e-mail to OTRS that hasn't already been written. Finn Rindahl (talk) 00:09, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Advanced_Test_Reactor.jpg [edit]

Why was this deleted? The DR I found says it was kept. But Fastily (talk · contribs) has deleted it. --Elvey (talk) 17:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was vandalized -FASTILY 20:36, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

How so? Have you deleted the evidence? (Thanks for undeleting.)--Elvey (talk) 01:12, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hassan Nasrallah grafitti.jpg [edit]

This file has to be undeleted, due to the decision finally made concerning all Demeure du Chaos grafitti files, wich can be seen here: [1]. Regards, --HCPUNXKID (talk) 23:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done -FASTILY 23:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Shimotsuke Tochigi chapter.JPG [edit]

Same reasoning as at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Japan_coa_kiku.png ?

✓ Done, but not per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Japan_coa_kiku.png. The file meets PD-simple -FASTILY 00:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Poster Metegol.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I own the rights to include this file in wikipedia. www.metegolpelicula.com/images/Afiche-METEGOL-Wikipedia.jpg The authorization can be checked by writing to webmaster@100bares.com; webmaster@metegolpelicula.com; pablo.claisse@100bares.com or accessing authorized for distribution link www.metegolpelicula.com/images/poster-foosball-Wikipedia.jpg Pmolfi (talk) 07:08, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's not good enough I'm afraid. Please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 00:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mostar Sevdah Reunion 2013.jpg[edit]

I own the photo and giving it for free-I just don't understand all the rules how to apply all of my photos -they are for free usage !!! I don't get your upload files- really don't understand. Please make them avaiable :)

Please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 00:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:El poblado medellin.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: la foto fue tomada por mi y subida por mi.aparece en algunas paginas por que les preste mi foto pero esta con licencia libre Yair Lms (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 00:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nils Vesk Smiling.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Granted in ticket:2013062510001685. LFaraone 03:56, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done -FASTILY 21:54, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Raul Labrador 113th Congress.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This is probably {{PD-USGov}}, from http://labrador.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=123. (motivated by non-permission-granting OTRS ticket) LFaraone 04:08, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems legit -FASTILY 21:54, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Perovo solar station.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission pending in ticket:2013070110006419 LFaraone 04:12, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done -FASTILY 21:54, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SPRITZ Capamy.jpg[edit]

The image is the cover of the CD Spritz of the Italian Singer that I produced in 2012 by my independent label MAMA Prod. Art. I confirm that the image is my property because it was regularly paid e authorized by the graphic design that realized devenloping my project. Thank you for your attention. --Wertgab (talk) 01:42, 5 July 2013 (UTC) july, 04th 2013[reply]

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 09:18, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:Neckar-Ursprung Tafel.jpg[edit]

de:Urheberrechtsgesetz (Deutschland) and COM:FOP#Summary_table include texts in German FOP. The deletor didn't provide an explanation why he disregards them. Ikar.us (talk) 15:23, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done -FASTILY 06:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Edward Snowden.jpg[edit]

I don't think the closing admin read the DR fully. He mentioned it was a work by The Guardian or Reuters in his closing statement. I think we decided that it wasn't The Guardian and Reuters wasn't mentioned in the DR. It is either the work of Praxis and VOA erred in their license mark, or Praxis was financed and/or used VOA equipment. Details at: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Edward Snowden.jpg.--Canoe1967 (talk) 21:37, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What you mean with "license mark" is a simple technical feature that VOA is using. You refer to http://gdb.voanews.com/BDC5DFD9-EFB7-4CCD-AC7E-CE6136B84C8B_mw1024_n_s.jpg - I remove the "_s" from the filename and get http://gdb.voanews.com/BDC5DFD9-EFB7-4CCD-AC7E-CE6136B84C8B_mw1024_n.jpg. What I mean: Its pretty obvious that VOA not created the original work but only a screenshot. A discussion if they use a watermark correctly or not cant help us because the watermark says nothing about the copyright. --Martin H. (talk) 08:27, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think the point was brought up that VOA normally uses that mark to indicate works 'authored' by them and being in the public domain. We still don't know whose equipment was used and who financed the film. Either of those parties could be considered as rights holders. w:Laura Poitras and w:Glenn Greenwald may not have had equipment in town an the time and used VOA equipment which would make it a PD work by VOA. They could have used a VOA cameraman as well as VOA financing. The closing admin says it is The Guardian/Reuters, neither of which may have had equipment there. Poitras doesn't work for The Guardian. Greenwald is a columnist for The Guardian but is also a freelancer. For the closing admin to state that the rights are held by The Guardian or Reuters indicates that he didn't understand the DR points correctly. I have emailed the DR link to The Guardian, Praxis, and VOA but have yet to receive a response. We normally accept works marked by the VOA as authored by them and assume their good faith that they are marked correctly. Until we are contacted by someone claiming differently then we should either continue to host this image on that good faith or DR all of the other VOA images we have as being in question. We had a similar case with Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:The Motherland Calls where we kept only the images of a source that we trust. The license is still in question on those images but we assume good faith and continue to host them.--Canoe1967 (talk) 17:26, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Many speculations.
«And used VOA equipment which would make it a PD»... why? Copyright initially belongs to the author of the work, not the owner of the equipment, so this speculation not makes much sense.
Wait for answer from VOA and then ask again here for undeletion.
At the moment it is obvious that VOA not created it. We can claim almost every news agency the author of similar depictions of Snowden because news websites using watermarks only for the distributor or they use it wrong. Including VOA! At some pages they credit it "Youtube screengrab" http://www.voanews.com/content/leak-hong-kong-extradition/1678904.html, elsewhere they credit it AFP and The Guardian the same time http://www.voanews.com/content/snowden-applies-for-asylum-in-russia/1692883.html and now the russian version of VOA takes the AFP credited file and overwrites the AFP watermark with a VOA watermark. You can still see the AFP behind the VOA watermark at your file http://gdb.voanews.com/BDC5DFD9-EFB7-4CCD-AC7E-CE6136B84C8B_mw1024_n_s.jpg. You see, the watermark is used carelessly and is meaningless. --Martin H. (talk) 00:28, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
"Carelessly and meaningless"? When did we start assuming that the VOA is careless and watermarking their own works as meaningless. AFP has never claimed to be the rights holder. VOA put their mark overtop. This seems more like a correction to me than an careless error. Should we go through all of our VOA images and see how careless they were with those?--Canoe1967 (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Section 4 "Limitations on Rights: article 22 In the following cases, a work may be exploited without the permission from, and without payment of remuneration to, the copyright owner, provided that the name of the author and the title of the work are mentioned and the other rights enjoyed by the copyright owner by virtue of this Law are not infringed upon:
(4) reprinting by newspapers or periodicals or other media, or rebroadcasting by radio stations or television stations or other media, of the current event article s on the issues of politics, economy and religion, which have been published by other newspapers, periodicals, radio stations or television stations or other media, except where the author has declared that publication or broadcasting is not permitted; (my bold)
It seems like their is no copyright protection on most news of current events unless the creators specify it. I have not seen any of the creators specifying it.--Canoe1967 (talk) 01:43, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I answer here before you start uploading chinese material based on that rational: Thats fair use for the media, but "reprinting by newspapers or periodicals or other media" is NOT free for any purpose and therefore not in scope of Commons. --Martin H. (talk) 12:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just got an email from Laura and she is going to email OTRS with a CC-by license for us on this image.
Resolved--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like this is now being handled at OTRS -FASTILY 21:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Karfilm.jpg][edit]

--shreeraj (talk) 14:22, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No reason given to undelete. Please make a new request with a reason if you still wish to see this file restored -FASTILY 21:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Doubrava (Karviná) část Kozinec 1.jpg and File:Doubrava (Karviná) část Kozinec 2.jpg[edit]

There is OTRS permission for these files - ticket:2013070310009243 in info-cs queue. --Harold (talk) 19:56, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done INeverCry 20:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Berenika Ovčáčková.jpg [edit]

There is OTRS permission for this file - ticket:2013070410004424 in info-cs queue. --Harold (talk) 20:06, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done INeverCry 20:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kubišta Cirkus.JPG and File:Schikaneder Stmívání.JPG [edit]

en:Bohumil Kubišta (author of Cirkus) died in 1918, en:Jakub Schikaneder (author of Stmívání) died in 1924, so both works are PD-old. --Harold (talk) 20:18, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Please update both file description pages to reflect this fact. -FASTILY 21:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Smoke Plume from Asiana Flight 214.png[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I took this photo myself and can give you a full resolution uncropped photo. Justin14 (talk) 22:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and upload the full res photo then -FASTILY 00:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:Moldovan_FOP_cases [edit]

Per Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama#FoP_in_the_Republic_of_Moldova. --Elvey (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate request (see above). --Stefan4 (talk) 09:29, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:FiN (band) LA, USA 2012 photo.jpg[edit]

File:FiN (band) LA, USA 2012 photo.jpg

i am requesting the undeletion of this file as i own the rights to it and therefore can use it as i please.

--Musicfan1983 (talk) 13:39, 9 July 2013 (UTC)LAKJ 9/7/2013[reply]

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 20:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

billythunderkloud3.jpg [edit]

My mother Ruth Primus Billings Owns the images in the collage, that I have posted here I have the actual photographs and negatives here at my home. the images in this collage belong to me. This is for information fpr people to be able to see the image, and it is to correlate the band and the lead singer.

Luchs32 (talk) 04:14, 8 July 2013 (UTC) Kim Primus[reply]

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 23:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Steven Marshall 220x250.jpg[edit]

The 2 images for undeletion are (File:Steven Marshall) and (File:Steven Marshall 220x250.jpg)

One is the high res version and the other is resized to go onto the Steven Marshall page.

These images were deleted when I was challenged about the licence. I could not get the copyright owner, who released the image to me for wikipedia, to put the licence text on the website of Steven Marshall.

Now if you go to http://www.SALiberal.org.au/MembersCandidates/StateHouseofAssembly/StevenMarshallMP.aspx you can see the creative commons licence under the image.

Does anything else need to be done to get this image undeleted?

Philiashasspots (talk) 09:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored, permission now given. But only the large size version, there no need to downscale images. See the notification Template:No scaled down dupes/en. --Martin H. (talk) 15:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kalinyavorov.jpg [edit]

Hello,

Please undelete File:Kalinyavorov.jpg since it is my own property and I am using it with the knowledge and agreement of the subject on the photo - Kalin Yavorov.

Regards kdyd12 Kdyd12 (talk) 14:42, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 23:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Adelshirazy.png[edit]

این فایل مشکل کپی رایت ندارد و own هستش ! لایسنس رو هم مشخص کردم .

نمیدونم دلیل پاک کردن چیه ؟

The file was deleted as missing a verifiable source. You may re-upload, but please cite a verifiable source on the file's description page -FASTILY 23:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cornelia Ardelean Archiudean.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The pictures is owned by the artist Cornelia Ardelean Archiudean and she agrees to give full rights with the right Creative Commons license. The artist can be contacted through the her's facebook page https://www.facebook.com/corneliaardeleanarchiudean. Tziparu (talk) 19:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 23:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nyancat1.gif[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Too simple to be not in PD-shape, that's a derivative work of File:Nyan Cat.gif, which is definitely too simple to be not in PD-shape (same like this). Rezonansowy (talk) 21:40, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated File:Nyan Cat.gif for deletion. PD-shape only applies to things like circles or triangles -- a crossbreed of a cat and a Pop-Tart is clearly too complex to be a "simple shape". --Carnildo (talk) 23:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Blatant copyvio -FASTILY 23:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

My userpage[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I just want to take the info that was there and move it somewhere else, then I'll take it off here. --TheShadowCrow (talk) 02:14, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[2] -FASTILY 03:43, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undelition request for Guy Baudelle[edit]

Hello,

I would like to do an Undeletiion request for "Guy Baudelle" article on the French Wikipedia. This page was suppressed - without a debate-- by Lomita. Guy Baudelle is quite a well-known geographer in Europe and there are a lot of sources about his work, his admissibility seems quite clear - or whatever - we should organize a debate on its admissibility.

Thanks a lot.

--Yvs Lavared (talk) 09:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong project. This is Wikimedia Commons, not Wikipedia French. --Martin H. (talk) 15:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Please make this request at fr.wiki. INeverCry (talk) 16:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AxB.jpg [edit]

This file may seem unnecessary, but it can still has to be one bit of interest. The Wikipedia article on which it was at that time had no images or other files. Hence. Therefore I made an image with the Paint program, all the states nothing else for a few coefficients.And it can not hurt? Even though it may not fit at Wikimedia Commons. Thank you. TamerGozubuyuk12 (talk) 15:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Simply writing "AxB" in large letters in the center of a box/table in Wikipedia has the same effect. No need to have that text in jpg. --Martin H. (talk) 15:24, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Out of COM:SCOPE. INeverCry (talk) 16:05, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ambrosia212[edit]

Please undelete the files. The argument that these files "are unlikely to be own work" is not valid. They are obviously cropped. Most software strip out EXIF-tags when you crop picture (f.ex. Irfanview). This doesn't constitute "significant doubt" about the freedom of the files. --Saint-Louis (talk) 15:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it is. The burden of proof is placed upon the uploader to prove that his/her files belong to her and are freely licensed under a commons-compatiable license. If this cannot be done beyond reasonable doubt, then the files are deleted. -FASTILY 20:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, there is no reason to doubt that the files are not from the uploader. The guideline you link to doesn't mention a burden of proof. --Saint-Louis (talk) 09:30, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The first is a small size version of http://stlouisreview.photoshelter.com/image/I0000MNV_fZHHgcg. The second is an exact copyv from http://www.sconews.co.uk/opinion/12894/bishop-tartaglia-pastoral-letter-marriage/. The third is an exact copyv of http://www.strobertbellarmine.org.uk/PlainText/PlainText.aspx?SectionId=6be70c7b-a6d7-4355-9acb-31b9becf2446 ([3]). The fourth has 187 google similarity hits, so I cant say the exact source. Just enter "Cardinale Burke" to google, its the photo with the Galero. My first hit is http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2994030/posts. Its obvious. --Martin H. (talk) 00:37, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done These are copyright violations. Unless the uploader can prove that they're not (which should be done via COM:OTRS), these files are not going to be restored -FASTILY 22:43, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My userpage (2)[edit]

Can I get my user page restored too so I can get my edit history back? --TheShadowCrow (talk) 16:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored, I see no reason to delete it in the first place. Remove the unecessary content and warn the user to not inappropriately use the userpage. --Martin H. (talk) 17:06, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:2006-05-16 at 10-49-02.jpg[edit]

I see no reason to delete the photo of a monument that I took with my own camera? This should be undeleted!ISasha (talk) 05:21, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done There is no freedom of panorama in Russia, making this file a non-free derivative, which is strictly prohibited on Commons, no exceptions -FASTILY 07:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Humanoid robot produced at Balikesir University, its front view.tif[edit]

Humanoid robot produced at Balikesir University, its front view.tif

It is my own work,as I mentioned. Why it was deleted.

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 07:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ljubljana Ljubljanski Grad-Ljubljana Castle - jug south.jpg[edit]

Licence was sent through email/admins were warned again through email that one file (this one) from batch was missed and not equipped with licence. brg--ModriDirkac (talk) 13:21, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to be resolved via COM:OTRS. Most admins don't have access to the OTRS queue. Send them another email and let them know. -FASTILY 22:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

(File:Vitaly Novich.JPG), (File:Vitaly Novich 1.jpg), (File:Vitaly Novich 2.jpg), (File:Vitaly Novich 3.jpg), (File:Vitaly Novich 4.jpg), (File:Vitaly Novich 5.jpg)[edit]

Solicito restaurar los siguientes archivos borrados, que son de mi propiedad:

- (File:Vitaly Novich.JPG) - (File:Vitaly Novich 1.jpg) - (File:Vitaly Novich 2.jpg) - (File:Vitaly Novich 3.jpg) - (File:Vitaly Novich 4.jpg) - (File:Vitaly Novich 5.jpg)


Por la presente declaro que soy el titular de los derechos de autor exclusivos de OBRA [ - https://sites.google.com/site/fantasifanta/fantasifanta2/Vitaly%20Novich%20%281%29.jpg?attredirects=0 - https://sites.google.com/site/fantasifanta/fantasifanta2/Vitaly%20Novich%20%282%29.jpg?attredirects=0 - https://8c38907d-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/fantasifanta/fantasifanta2/Vitaly%20Novich%20%283%29.jpg?attachauth=ANoY7cr-nKohvxQZPDETpNDKAknnFZlqDTTXQjIHOVEnmTi1v_XlXCzb5v6hcPFihcv2bqvPFCh9Wqewo64UFDfZ2XC48BeHAqAK0iD05AXUTXerYvPAg3qdhM_A7rnfsqq3xiWP2PBPXDY2kWeBMo_0jw2hMd3yEvWra38D2djGEqCv8Deatc3GO317GuX0ePIuhUxcHkHOkcxdCbMnbUWrRvvoWDSRUGhvtG7ZBpmy15ZMVYUCMKXfSMG87j-lzAobUChvjvD2&attredirects=0 - https://8c38907d-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/fantasifanta/fantasifanta2/Vitaly%20Novich%20%284%29.jpg?attachauth=ANoY7cpH2iI9onxnKcXC97hOhzGKtVytg7PNc6UXqaLiGbcCu-7mkwh1YqfwBDsSf0w31h5vp4mkUyDS-SsMEZ9Kt7FgW8RKeK9HSdI0zdnLrOVWz0e6bxgAfnRwKNP6xssYJMa6SfT9ZgZ6JFOIagTBuwxUDaKTzyriCi28fGAeRPqZpE6NY7nqBhxJluzEbY1esLGjbXHD-Im2kZfd_gN41GySARy_rGJ3Fug-NiQQCRjIbxNRBSXcp5v7RisvZQ197ns5wq5w&attredirects=0 - https://8c38907d-a-62cb3a1a-s-sites.googlegroups.com/site/fantasifanta/fantasifanta2/Vitaly%20Novich.jpg?attachauth=ANoY7cp1v4F1iT48Xpb9Xr221nZjhAC95zL4RnYlJz437uKbKyQdc00eEdDUuKgUETvD_f_VBgp--qs62mK36DWJbiuNZ83mQ3q6hdOaaxHCP2GJ-7I4TeNw18LeUTUiEotr1xgNavKUr3iwlfiCDXm4BTCADpcr6X_EpoikhilwBVv-GuvTp0cIYwTklEBtl8GheuU3cIWGJyoKfvCTIRpy2OKXuNHDPqXAboTzawJEdKZ5SV4vtZw%3D&attredirects=0 ].

Consiento publicar dicha obra bajo la licencia libre LICENCIA Trabajo propio <copyleft>: Multilicencia GFDL y creative commons CC-BY-SA en todas sus versione

Reconozco que concedo a cualquiera el derecho a usar la imagen en un producto comercial, así como a modificarla de acuerdo a sus necesidades. Soy consciente de que siempre retendré los derechos de autor de mi imagen, así como el derecho a ser reconocido como autor según los términos de la licencia elegida para mi obra. Las modificaciones que otros hagan a la imagen no me serán atribuidas. Soy consciente de que la licencia libre sólo afecta a los derechos de autor, y me reservo del derecho de emprender acciones legales contra cualquiera que use esta obra violando cualquier otra ley, como restricciones de marcas registradas, libelo o restricciones geográficas específicas. Reconozco que no puedo retractarme de este acuerdo, y que la imagen puede o no ser almacenada permanentemente en un proyecto de la Fundación Wikimedia.

12 de Julio del 2013 - Vitaly Ewrwinovich Mogrovejo Mogrovejo PROPIETARIO DE LOS DERECHOS DE AUTOR

--~Vitaly Ewrwinovich Mogrovejo Mogrovejo~12 de Julio del 2013~~ --Yesicaflores (talk) 21:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 22:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Stanvac superon group (talk · contribs)[edit]

Dear Sir,

These all files was designed by Superon People So Please remove deletion.

Not done. Spam. User blocked as per en.wp block. --Martin H. (talk) 15:33, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Musee_Herge.JPG[edit]

Please undelete this file, which is a photo of the Hergé Museum in Belgium, a building to honor the creator of The Adventures of Tintin comics. I am certainly unclear on why this photo of a building must be deleted. I read a statement saying "the architect hasn't been dead 70 years yet" which is so silly of course; if we followed that logic, very few photos of buildings would exist. I seem to remember the owner of the photo, the photographer, give up rights to the photo, donated the photo if you will, so I don't see a reason for deleting there. I am asking because I am working on the large, featured article Wikipedia:The Adventures of Tintin and I added this photo to the "Legacy" section. It was quite beautiful there, and naturally am upset that it is gone. Thank-you. Prhartcom (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Belgium we cant host photos of architecture in Belgium for our purposes unless the architects copyright expired, thats 70 years following the architects death. --Martin H. (talk) 16:54, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can we temporarily undelete the photo so that we can move it to Wikipedia? Prhartcom (talk) 16:55, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Request temporary undeletion Explanation: To move the file to the English Wikipedia which allows Fair Use of the photo. Prhartcom (talk) 17:28, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Temporarily restored. Please notify me when you are done. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:18, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank-you Jastrow for your assistance. I have completed moving the file, you may proceed as you must. Prhartcom (talk) 22:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Transfer complete per above. INeverCry (talk) 22:49, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lá Cờ Hoà Giải Của Nước Việt Nam.jpg [edit]

I would like to have many Vietnamese discussing about the Reconciliation Flag of Vietnam. They'd better discuss it in Vietnamese, that's why I created the page Lá Cờ Hoà Giải Của Nước Việt Nam in Vietnamese. It's helpful, isn't it? Please, tell me. Thanks.

Not a job for this noticeboard, given the file is still there. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:24, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wally.jpg [edit]

File:Wally.jpg

el usuario Ecce Ralgis ha solicitado su solicitud de borrado debido a que quiere molesatrme y esta acosando mis ediciones y ademas no tiene pruebas de violacion de derechos de autor , es mas el nisiquiera es el autor .--Eliluu (talk) 22:13, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That is clearly a copyright violation. Esto es claramente una violación de derechos de autor. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:18, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Copyvio. INeverCry (talk) 22:47, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Wake_Shingo.jpg [edit]

I know the boxer personally as we go to the same boxing gym. He gave me his permission.

The author must send the permission to COM:OTRS using corporate/recognizable email. --Alan (talk) 00:21, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Trojan wavepacket.gif [edit]

This file is used as a reference. --Mattcomm (talk) 05:08, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The files were deleted as missing evidence of permission. The reason you specified in this request is not a valid reason to undelete anything. -FASTILY 06:07, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pastrengo-forte-degenfeld.jpg [edit]

opera di mia produzione, fotografia scattata da me Pierpaolo Betta, utilizzo il nickname "Gardatourism" per tutte le mie fotografie che sono pubblicate sul mio sito. Le condivido con la politica Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license. --Gardatourism (talk) 07:25, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Betta Pierpaolo 14/07/2013[reply]

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 06:07, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Datei: Maueropfer Klaus Schulze mit Beschreibung.JPG[edit]

Das Foto wurde auf einer öffentlich zugänglichen Informationssäule aufgenommen, die sich in Berlin-Staaken an der Landesgrenze zwischen Berlin und Brandenburg befindet. Die Säule ist dort dauerhaft installiert, Quelle angegeben. Damit ist m.E. die Grundlage für die Panoramafreiheit gegeben. Grüße --Assenmacher (talk) 05:40, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I don't believe close-up photographs are covered under FOP. FWIW, this might as well be a scan of a copyrighted poster -FASTILY 22:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Datei:Kirche Oberwölbling.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: {{PD-self}} Bitte wiederherstellen, gelöscht wegen fehlender Lizenz - dürfte ich übersehen haben, hat aber sonst immer über Uploader funktioniert F.Higer (talk) 11:27, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to re-upload, but please include a license tag -FASTILY 22:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ippm34.jpg [edit]

Dear Wikimedia Commons and the editors,

I am requesting of undeleting the file File:Ippm34.jpg from Wikimedia Commons because it does not violate any copyright issues known to day. The image was scanned by my self from a magazine that was published in Malaysia back in the 1980s. The image is a fairly free usage for all.

Thank your for your time and concern.

--Fansuri (talk) 14:20, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done non-free derivatives are strictly prohibited on Commons, no exceptions -FASTILY 22:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Denmark_road_sign_A12.1.svg[edit]

Was deleted by Bidgee with the reasoning "Nonsense: Doesn't exist http://www.daluiso.dk/pdf/tavleoversigt.pdf". It appears this was a speedy. If you actually look at the PDF, it's missing many signs in the A series. It starts at A11, skips to A16-27, then skips to A31 and so-on. The reasoning is invalid and this was a completely inappropriate speedy deletion. Fry1989 eh? 04:55, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done then -FASTILY 08:09, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aishwarya abhishek marriage.jpg [edit]

This is the image which is discuss in the page of Aishwarya Rai and Abhishek Bachchan. This is the marrige photo of them So please its a request to undelete this

 Not done This appears to be a copyvio -FASTILY 18:59, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Metrohegn Solbjerg Plads 3.JPG[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Artwork released under CCBY Palnatoke (talk) 10:44, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Permission sent to OTRS. No ticket number yet. --Palnatoke (talk) 10:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ticket#: 2013071810004667 --Palnatoke (talk) 11:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have patience please. OTRS is rather busy at the moment, but once they process your email, they will restore the files -FASTILY 19:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ufop_logo_small.jpg[edit]

This file is a logo of Federal University of Ouro Preto. It is a public image (because it is a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY). The others Federal Universities (UFMG, UFV, UFRJ, Ufu, and so many other) has their logo uploaded here in Wikimedia. So i may request undelete. If you cannot undelete it, please tell-me how i do to upload this logo, because Ufop is the only federal university doesn't have a image in Wikipedia.

PS: This logo was caught in a public site (http://www.ufop.br) and can be founded in others governamental sites. PS2: http://www.ufop.br/logomarca/ Here you can see that this logo is public and can be used if we dont distort the image (This site is in portuguese)

Thanks

The file was deleted as missing a valid license tag. You may re-upload, but specify a license tag -FASTILY 19:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Junge Welt vs. Junge Gemeinde 1953.jpg[edit]

Nightly deletion without statement of grounds and opportunity to comment. --Heinz-Josef Lücking (talk) 09:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Copyvio -FASTILY 19:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. What means "not done" and "Copyvio"? --Heinz-Josef Lücking (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Info --> User_talk:Marcus_Cyron#Hinweis zur bereits vollzogenen Löschung zu der man erst im Nachhinein Stellung beziehen kann. --PigeonIP (talk) 21:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anne Marie Geisler Andersen Officielt.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Reason: The photo is the official photo of politician Anne Marie Geisler Andersen. It can be found on her webpage http://www.radikale.net/anne-marie-geisler-andersen. She owns the right to it, and she has asked me to upload it on her wiki-page for her as I am part of her campaign. I can assure you that all copyright laws are in order. You can verify this information by contacting her on amgeislerandersen@gmail.com. Please let me know if you need further information. It is my first time on Wiki. Yours sincerely. MiePetersen (talk) 12:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 19:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:South_Armagh.JPG[edit]

I am the copyright holder of the image who uploaded it under a different identity. I have the original and the negative. It has been incorrectly deleted. SonofSetanta (talk) 16:20, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 19:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Victoria Memorial By Saprativa.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Unfortunately this file was deleted without community consensus and with a rational that is wrong (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Victoria Memorial By Saprativa.jpg). The file is in use at wikivoyage. I left a message at the talk page of the admin who deleted that file, but he hasn't been active for the last 5 days. Isderion (talk) 23:30, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment, there is hundred of files in Category:Victoria Memorial, Kolkata, do you really need this one ? (against the will of the uploader ? which is usually a good rational and often used ; the license is irrevocable − in the sens, can't be revoke by the author itself − but nonetheless can be revoke − in the sens, the author did a mistake, we're all human). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 07:54, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's up to the projects which images they want to use, not a Commons Admin. And it is the long-term practice not to courtesy-delete images that are in use. The uploader made several other requests and I supported some of them because they were not in use and better alternatives exist. However the quality of this image was quite ok. --Isderion (talk) 14:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. It was uploaded for about six months. It looks like the author did a mass deletion request on all of their Commons images (8 or so), all of which were deleted. Part of the rationale was it was not in use, which turned out not to be true. It does not look like the upload was a mistake, just made a request to have it taken down, which is a community decision. Not sure the user made any edits on en-wiki other than to put a gallery of their own photos on their user page. Given that it was in use, I'm somewhat inclined to restore it. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:36, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: As it was in use, the file shouldn't have been speedy deleted. Bidgee (talk) 04:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Uploaded from Acrofan and a friend[edit]

Hi! Can I request undeletion from the files below? I added all the necessary information, but didn't add "acrofan.com" in the licensing section because I read that it should not be put manually. It says[4]: {{Image template notice|acrofan.com}} If ever I misunderstood the instructions, then I guess I'll just have to add those manually, or you could help me add them.

  1. File:SS501URMan.jpg
  2. File:HyunJoongMnet cropped.jpg
  3. File:BOFcasts.jpg
  4. File:PlayfulKissYoutube.jpg
  5. File:HyunJoongCenterpole.jpg
  6. File:HyunJoongMnet.jpg
  7. File:HyungJunClock16.JPG
  8. File:JungMinNotAlone.jpg
  9. File:GlowingSheStars.jpg
  10. File:SS501Photo501.jpg

In the same way, the files below are uploaded with the permission of my friend. I didn't know about OTRS before so now I am asking her to mail her permission to Wikimedia mail, and hopefully it will be fixed soon.

  1. File:KimHyunJoongFMTour2012 1.JPG
  2. File:KimHyunJoongFMTour2012 2.JPG
  3. File:KimHyunJoongFMTour2012 3.JPG

Thanks!

Feel free to re-upload, but be sure to add the text "{{Acrofan.com}}" somewhere on the file description page of each file you upload from acrofan.com -FASTILY 21:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:احداث الحرس الجمهوري , اطلاق النيران من تجاه المؤيدين.webm Shooting of protesters file[edit]

Why was this removed? I asked the owner to upload it to commons and he released it as cc-by-sa.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 15:43, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If that is indeed the case, please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 21:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Shenkeng.jpg[edit]

The picture is from a government agency - New Taipei City Shenkeng District Office Regional Emblem, now make up copyright information, hoping to recover the picture, thank you.Qazwsx34 (talk) 05:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC){{Coatofarms}}[reply]

I've repaired the file description page for you. Please take more care in the future to select an appropriate license tag at upload time -FASTILY 21:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gedenkstein für die Opfer des Todesmarschs.JPG[edit]

hallo

ich bitte darum das die datei File:Gedenkstein für die Opfer des Todesmarschs.JPG wieder hergestellt wird. ich habe das foto selber gemacht und werde die lizenz bzw das urheberrecht nach wiederherstellung berichtigen.

danke für diesen hinweis

mfg björn zachert

✓ Done Bild ist wiederhergestellt, bitte die Lizenz innerhalb 7 Tage eintragen, da es sonst danach wieder gelöscht wird. --A.Savin 13:44, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Yi Munyol.jpg [edit]

Hello! The picture has not violated any copyrights. It was obtained from the web page of the Korean goverment oganization, Literature Translation Institute of Korea at http://eng.klti.or.kr/ke_04_03_011.do?method=author_detail&AI_NUM=296&user_system=keuser. The website clearly put the CCL notification on the bottom saying that I'm free to share it. Is there any formal structure I should have kept? Thanks for your help. --Theresa Pak (talk) 07:57, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose. Please go back and re-read Commons:Project scope/Summary#Must be freely licensed or public domain. {{Cc-by-nc-sa-3.0}} is not a free license. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:52, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Files whose copyright restricts commercial use are prohibited on Commons -FASTILY 20:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:EscudoIUA.png [edit]

The file depicts the actual institutional seal of the argentinian public university. There are no copyrights related to it. --Nec1966 (talk) 16:13, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done They're almost always copyrighted. Cite a reference proving that it isn't and we'll restore it -FASTILY 20:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files under Category:Moldovan FOP cases[edit]

Files in this category should be undeleted per changes made @ COM:FOP#Moldova. Thank you. //  Gikü  said  done  Saturday, 6 July 2013 11:57 (UTC)

Closing what appears to be a stale request. IMO, this should be reposted at COM:VPC so community consensus can be obtained on which of the files are actually eligible for restore -FASTILY 19:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Linguistic flags[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Incosistent administrative decision. This page was decided to be kept on 11:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC) by Jim and re-nominated 19 days later by someone who obviously just wanted to make trouble. This is not the proper procedure, according to COM:DR#Appeal; Jim should have been asked. (Also, not to forget, it has 66(-4) authors, who are not just the trouble-maker.) Rillke(q?) 07:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If someone asks me to, I will restore the page immediately with consent by the deleting administrator. However, if no one misses this page, there is no need to. -- Rillke(q?) 23:40, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Xbox360 modern homescreen.JPG[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I create this image. I don't copy it from anywhere. I own it. Why it was deleted? Theblues (talk) 12:46, 23 July 2013 (UTC) Please restore the following pages:[reply]

Derivatives of non-free content are prohibited on Commons -FASTILY 19:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Smew (Mergellus albellus).JPG[edit]

This file was inappropriately deleted with the rationale Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. It was uploaded in 2011 under free licenses (GFDL and cc-by-3.0). Licenses are irrevocable. A request by the uploader does not change this principle. --Leyo 22:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

done, but only because I don't care enough to fight over this. -FASTILY 23:25, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Shme.jpg[edit]

This picture is from New Taipei City Members Chen Yongfu blog, and now make up copyright information , hoping to restore the picture, thank you.Qazwsx34 (talk) 11:05, 22 July 2013 (UTC){{cc-by-sa-2.0-tw}}[reply]

If that is indeed the case, please feel free to re-upload. However, on the file description page, please include a reference to the website URL which indicates that this file is available under the cc-by-sa-2.0 -FASTILY 23:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1912Big-4.JPG[edit]

From the content of the image, there was extremely strong reason to believe that it was first published in the United States before 1923. No one ever adduced the slightest indication or reason to believe that it was not first published in the United States before 1923, and my commonsense suggestion of inquiring at the talk page of still-active en.wikipedia user en:User talk:Rjensen does not seem to have been followed up. Instead, there was semi-pointless obsessing over bureaucratic details which are less relevant to historical images of this type... AnonMoos (talk) 07:20, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be re-uploaded iff someone can provide a source link for it. -FASTILY 23:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Parteiadler der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (1933–1945) (vector version).svg - the old one, that is[edit]

The Parteiadler from the Nazi Party "manual" (Oganisationsbuch). The SVG representation of this, far more accurate and more commonly used version, was deleted for no reason on the whim of an IP.
The deleted, accurate version of the Parteiadler is identical to this image in every respect - but with the eagle looking over its left shoulder. Note the swastika stays the same. (This is the "Reichsadler" the emblem of the state rather than the party.)
A Nazi Party document featuring the Parteiadeler. Note its the deleted version.

Ugh, what a mess.. How do I even explain this without going into TLDR territory? I know the link in the title is blue, that's because the file that (desperately) requires undeletion carried that name. The file you can see there now (the more "stylized" version of the Nazi Parteiadler) was moved to that name after the deletion a couple months ago.

The original file named "File:Parteiadler der Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (1933–1945).svg" was an image identical to this one, with the eagle (but not the swastika!) facing the other way (as is historically accurate for the Parteiadler).

That file was deleted for no reason when a silly IP posted a random deletion request claiming the file isn't an "accurate" Parteiadler, which is patent nonsense [5]. It is precisely the deleted version that's omnipresent on Nazi documents (e.g. the official handbook of the Nazi Party [6]).
Then the other, more stylized version, which the IP claimed was the only "accurate" one (the one you can now see in the title link), was moved to the location of the deleted file. In actuality both are probably accurate - but if any the deleted one was certainly historical and actually far more common.

The deleted file (this image with the eagle facing the other side) should be restored forthwith, preferably to its previous name, with imo more caution exercised regarding unsupported claims by random IPs. Apologies for not being around to say something back then. --DIREKTOR (TALK) 10:49, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done -FASTILY 23:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Google-glass-ban.png [edit]

As stated in the site http://stopthecyborgs.org/google-glass-ban-signs/, the Google Glass Ban Sign are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.

Thus, their use on Wikipedia does not violate the copyright rules.

As the file was uploaded as Creativ Common file, I wonder why I did receive a warning messenge.

--Stefan-Q (talk) 21:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons and Wikipedia don't accept Creative Commons licenses with "Non Commercial" or "No Derivatives" parts. Those are not considered truly free licenses; commercial use and publication of derivative works must be allowed. See Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses. --Rosenzweig τ 23:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done per the above. --Rosenzweig τ 23:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

We all Togueter para restaurar jpg [edit]

la cucaracha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lewis Wolf (talk • contribs) 02:44, 25 July 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose. No valid reason for restoring. Presumably, you're referring to File:We all Together.jpeg, which is a copyright violation. Please read Commons:Project scope/Summary to understand what you can and cannot upload to Commons. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Copyvio. INeverCry 18:21, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ira Glass Senior Year.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: After discussing it with the Wikipedia Help Desk and the Media Copyright Page, I believe this file was deleted because my original source description was not comprehensive enough, not because it violates copy right. The photo is from a yearbook that was published in 1977 without copyright information, which means that it is a PD-US-no notice. I would like to undelete the file and enhance the source description, so it can be put back into the Wikipedia Ira Glass article. Judgmentalowl (talk) 03:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and re-upload the file then -FASTILY 20:27, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Foto_Vladislava_Hujová.jpg [edit]

The photo is the picture of Mrs. Vladislava Hujová — Preceding unsigned comment added by Knenicky (talk • contribs) 09:42, 25 July 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

Please read the instructions for making an undeletion request. You need to provide a reason why you think the deletion was wrong. In this case, since the file was deleted as a copyright violation, that means you need to explain why you think the file was not a copyright violation. Describing what the file depicts (which was already pretty clear from the file name) does not accomplish that. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:55, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done per above. No valid reason given to undelete anything. -FASTILY 20:27, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aishwarya walks for Manish Malhotra at HDIL India Couture Week 2010(2).jpg[edit]

If I recall correctly (which I'd be a lot less confident in if it weren't for my note at User talk:Manavkailu143#File:Aishwarya walks for Manish Malhotra at HDIL India Couture Week 2010(2).jpg), it was only the last revision of this file that was problematic. I thought I made a note of that in the speedy deletion tag, but perhaps I wasn't clear enough. Or were there other problems with the original revision as well? —LX (talk, contribs) 16:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. At first I'd thought these were the same frame, but on closer inspection she's in a slightly different position in each. I've restored the first revision. INeverCry 18:16, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Banque audio format abadie.jo [edit]

Bonjour, j'ai créé une page wikimedia portant le titre : Banque audio format abadie.jo Cette page a été supprimé sans explication par Motopark. J'ai créé cette page en respectant au mieux les règles de wikimedia, la page correspond aux règles, j'ai indiqué les sources et la preuve de la notoriété en accord avec les règles imposées par wikimedia.

Est-il possible de restaurer la page ? Cordialement — Preceding unsigned comment added by 9temps (talk • contribs) 11:25, 26 July 2013‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Out of COM:SCOPE. INeverCry 16:17, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Leonard-Rotter.jpg[edit]

There is OTRS permission for this file (ticket:2013072210005489 in info-cs queue). --Harold (talk) 14:57, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Please add OTRS ticket to file. INeverCry 16:20, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:30 dni dlouha noc CZ.jpg[edit]

There is OTRS permission for this file (ticket:2013072310004764 in info-cs queue). --Harold (talk) 15:21, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Please add OTRS ticket to file. INeverCry 16:22, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gilbert LaFreniere.jpg[edit]

Apparently this image was deleted due to Flickr usage by another. However, this photo is indeed the property of subject's family, specifically Pamela LaFreniere, who has authorized its use on Wikimedia. OTRS permission Ticket#2013060310004473. Please restore the image. sblafren@yahoo.com--Sblafren (talk) 16:06, 22 July 2013 UPDATE: Photo originated in May 2007, Canon non-digital camera, was scanned and re-sized by owner on 12/24/07 and was uploaded to owner's personal blog on that same date. http://gilbertlafreniere.blogspot.com/2007_12_01_archive.html. One can right click and view properties of the photo on some systems to see details for confirmation. Sometime in 2009 the author gave a presentation at Oregon State University. At that time an OSU staff or intern uploaded the photo to their Flickr photostream. However, the photo remains the property of the author's family, who has approved its use here on wikimedia (wikicommons/wikipedia). OSU, via their Help Desk, has been notified of the conflict and asked to remove the photo. UPDATE 2: OSU has agreed to remove the file from their flickr feed. can confirm here... http://www.flickr.com/search/?w=33247428@N08&q=gilbert%20lafreniere --Sblafren (talk) 15:40, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose Permission to use an image on Commons or Wikimedia is not sufficient. Commons (and most WMF projects) requires that images be free for all use anywhere, including commercial use and derivative works. OTRS ticket 2013060310004473 is in response to a request that the image be used in an article on WP:EN and says only "Yes. You can use the photo provided. Gil LaFreniere" That is not a general license. Also, the cited e-mail is signed by the image's subject. Generally, copyrights are owned by the photographer, not the subject, so that will also have to be clarified before the image can be restored. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Insufficient OTRS permission. INeverCry 18:13, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Shme.jpg[edit]

This photo is from the Republic of China, New Taipei City Members Chen Yongfu blog retrieve down, and now will fill before the copyright information is missing, hoping administrators can directly restore photos, I do not know the process of re-upload, thank you.{{Cc-by-sa-2.0-tw}}　Qazwsx34 (talk) 11:06, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Its required that the license comes from the copyright holder of the file. Not from someone who reuses the file in a blog and publishes the blog under a CC license. The license of the blog can not apply to third party content. --Martin H. (talk) 01:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Per Martin H., blog license is insufficient. INeverCry 18:16, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mostar Sevdah Reunion 2013.jpg[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The reason being that the OTRS Team has recieved a ticket giving permission for usage of the images, under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned) license OTRS users may read the ticket here #2013072310004997. Thank you. Clarkcj12 (talk) 20:13, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done -FASTILY 20:24, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roberts stream 83i.JPG[edit]

Habe folgendes Bild File:Roberts stream 83i.JPG, selbst gemacht und nun wird es mir gelöscht, weil angeblich keine Lizenz vorliegt. Wieso sollte ich für meine eigenes Werk eine Lizens benötigen? Ich bitte um Wiederherstellung.--Wilske (talk) 22:38, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild ist noch nicht gelöscht, also falscher Ort. Du musst den Anweisungen auf deiner Benutzerdiskussion folgen und einen Lizenz-Baustein auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite ergänzen. Es geht nicht darum das du eine Lizenz brauchst. Du musst eine Lizenz GEBEN, d.h. die Bedingungen kenntlich machen, unter denen Jeder dieses Bild weiterverwenden kann. --Martin H. (talk) 23:29, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Das Bild war gelöscht, ich habe es jedoch nach Anfrage auf meiner Benutzer-Talk-Seite vorläufig wiederhergestellt. --JuTa 23:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

picture of dareysteel radio interview in amsterdam holland[edit]

THIS PICTURE OF DAREYSTEEL RADIO INTERVIEW IN AMSTERDAM HOLLAND IS A FREE WORK, UNDER CREATIVE COMMONS Attribution-shareAlike 3.0 license , THAT PICTURE HAS TO BE RESTORED BACK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidzicoman (talk • contribs) 15:10, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The user seems to be talking, erh, SHOUTING about File:Dareysteel picture on his radio interview in Amsterdam holland.jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:37, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, that's the one. I deleted the file according to Com:EL. Suddenly this happened on my talk page: i have plead with the original owner , DSMUSIC PHOTOGRAPHER , to personally send the email permission to you by himself File upload (without proper information} occured 7. Jul. 2013. Stefan4 (correctly) tagged missing permission on 8. Jul. 2013. I deleted 25. Jul. 2013. There was plenty of time to bring the permission, obligation to provide such information rests with the uploader, not the Commons Community. And no, nothing has to be restored back. Proper information first, then we'll go from there. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:36, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please send an email to COM:OTRS and explain your situation to them. If everything checks out, they will restore the file for you -FASTILY 00:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dresden, Altar aus der Kreuzkirche von Hans Walther (1574—79), später Annenkirche in Dresden.jpg[edit]

Information wurden nachgereicht --Messina (talk) 14:30, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Blätter_für_Architektur_und_Kunsthandwerk_1888, Tafel 30 a
Author	Unknown
Permission
(Reusing this file)
pd
Das ist jetzt nicht dein Ernst, oder? Bitte nochmals ordentlich aufbereiten, danke. -- 32X (talk) 16:00, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ich möchte dem insofern beipflichten, dass der Benutzer in der de.wp offensichtlich auch in der Lage ist, Quellen vernünftig anzugeben (z.B. [7], mit dem Wechsel nach Commons diese Fähigkeit aber scheinbar vollständig verloren geht. Bitte auch hier mindestens de:Hilfe:Einzelnachweise#Formatierung einfacher Einzelnachweise anwenden. Erg.: Betrifft scheinbar alle Uploads des Benutzers, die Qualität der Quellenangabe ist beschämend. --Martin H. (talk) 16:53, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Betriebsblindheit + Erschöpfung --Messina (talk) 18:07, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may re-upload, but please include verifiable source information, or the file will be deleted -FASTILY 20:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Out of process deletions by User:Hedwig in Washington[edit]

There is no "shoot on sight" or speedy deletion policy with respect to "Special or fictional flags" or proposed flags, and de facto practice has been fairly tolerant of them, as long as they are not hoaxing or hatemongering. Therefore the following unilateral deletions should be reversed (to be possibly converted into ordinary deletion nominations in some cases, but not necessarily all):

-- AnonMoos (talk) 08:45, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even have a look at the uploader's talk page? How about checking the history of this page first? Last action was blanking the page and inserting a welcome message so it looks clean and poor little uploader is getting harrased by those stoopid admins. I reverted the last edit (if one wants to call it an edit) so it's easy for everybody to verify. Now for the content. One example: The flag of Faroer 19th cent. is bogus, see article about the history on wikipedia. And no, I am not on a witch or gay hunt. Proposal flags are out of scope on commons. We are not a blog or forum to propose anything to anybody at anytime. If the uploader wants his flags on the internet, I'd suggest Imgur. So called language maps are copyvios in the first place, lousy in the second. Commons is not a Kiddy-Crayon-Collection. I suggest using Imgur as well. And yes, the deleted images are hoax, nonsense, and out of scope. Just compare the uploader's behavior and actions to these so called images. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:38, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The deletes as out of scope/nonsense seem fine to me. The uploader is a vandal and disruptive user, now turned sockmaster, editing to make a point. -FASTILY 20:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Frank Duff.png[edit]

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: User provide a better explanation about OTRS permission and the permission is valid. Superzerocool (talk) 15:23, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done -FASTILY 20:47, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2013-07&oldid=697713230"