Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2007-11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image:Roman_Czyborra.jpg[edit]

  • 19:02, 5 November 2007 Krimpet (Talk | contribs) deleted "Image:Roman Czyborra.jpg" ‎ (vanity photo of underage nude, potential legal implications)

Totally obscure reasoning, underage nudes are nowhere illegal and this one was already five years overage. Please reinstate speedily! Roman Czyborra 19:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

restored, permission of model and photographer is stated, initial uploader at commons and user depicted both are trustworthy --Matt314 20:25, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:Niš[edit]

User:Siebrand deleted this category on 19:58, 29 June 2007, for the reason: content was: '#REDIRECT Niš' (that is no reason). This deletion was contrary to Commons policy Commons:Deletion guidelines#Categories, so I request its undeletion.

Niš is also the correct name for the subject Niš. --Juiced lemon 20:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The category was relocated to Category:Nis. I have restored it, as it appears to be standard, judging by the articles and categories about "Niš" on English Wikipedia . / Fred J 21:34, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:Okinawa[edit]

This category was deleted on 22 September 2006 for the reason content was: '{{badname|It is the same with Category:Okinawa prefecture}}' (and the only contributor was User:Alberth2).

This reason is deceitful, since Okinawa is a very notorious island, due to heavy human losses during the battle of Okinawa (Pacific War).

Category:Okinawa prefecture is an administrative division, that is a concept, and cannot be compared with a real thing like an island. Notice also that this category has a badname: the correct name is Okinawa Prefecture, according to custom English typography rules.

Therefore, this deletion was contrary to Commons policy regarding to categories with correct names. So, I request the undeletion of Category:Okinawa. --Juiced lemon 14:01, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So Category:Okinawa should be a subcat of Category:Okinawa prefecture if I understand correctly? -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Thank you for the undeletion. --Juiced lemon 12:48, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Dear Admin who delete the page[edit]

Dear Admin who delete the page of Hafar Al-Batin, this page was deleted because we changes the spelling, and the Hafar Al-Batin was redirected to Hafr Al-Batin as the latter one is the correct spelling. The correct spelling is the former one, this was discussed before and we agreed that Hafar Al-Batin is the most correct spelling, so i want from you to reopen this page again... thank you.. Drh104 01:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted. / Fred J 16:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that undeletion done is for the redirect page, which now redirects to a non-existing page. Page is deleted for being empty, and the only thing it says is "under construction". I advised user to recreate page/gallery once there are images for it. Deadstar (msg) 13:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Fernando12 21:11, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recreated to match the name of the English Wikipedia article; images copied from English Wikipedia.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:05, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

To OsamaK About my deleted works.[edit]

السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته-إلى الأخ الفاضل أسامة ك-أما بعد-فقد تم خلال الشهر الماضي حذف عدة صور لي بدون سبب مفهوم رغم أنها كلها من عملي -فهلا تمت إعادتها مع فائق الشكر وجزاكم الله خيرا- والصور هي

--زهير حرب 04:37, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it seems like I have deleted these images after OsamaK tagged them with {{No source since/ar}}. I'm sorry I can't read what you have written, but if you check {{No source since/ar}} that will tell you what was the problem with these images. Hopefully OsamaK or someone else can help you more. Samulili 10:51, 27 October 2007
He says : "Hi, to : OsamaK. in last mount some of my images was deleted, without really reason, all these work are my own work, so I want someone undelete these images:

--OsamaK 02:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why not undelete them then? / Fred J 17:21, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Let's. Samulili 18:52, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
These images appear to have been undeleted.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 19:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:Sienna Guillory.jpg[edit]

I would like to have the the image Image:Sienna Guillory.jpg undeleted. It was deleted previously because the permission I got was through private flickr messages. I have now got the permission through email and have forwarded that permission to OTRS. -Lindsey8417 18:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The file will be undeleted by a OTRS volunteer if he/she got the permission email with the required information. --GeorgHH 19:29, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done Permission received. ~ Riana ⁂ 02:33, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:Bandera_de_Huécija.jpg[edit]

Se trata de una imagen creada por mi mismo con el photoshop7 anteriormente fue eliminada por tener mal puesta la etiqueta lo cual pudo entenderse como un error. Creo que el unico problema que pudo haber en su dia es la forma de redactar la licencia ideal de la imagen Solicito que la imagen se pueda reestablecer. es una bandera de un municipio y por lo tanto forma parte de una colección de banderas de municipios de la provincia de Almería y de municipios de España. --Guillen 21:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC) This file was delete is a image created for my, same with the photoshop 7software. It was deleted by having wrong setting the etiquette which could understand like an error. I believe that the only problem that could there be in their day it is the form of editing the] ideal license for the image. I Solicit that the image is been able to reestablecer. It is to flag of a municipality and there form part of the collection of flags of municipalities province of Almería and of municipalities of Spain. --Guillen 20:45, 15 October 2007 (UTC) .[reply]

This image was deleted because it had incorrect licensing. You cannot claim copyright over a municipal flag, and so it has to be public domain or it is copyrighted by the municipality. We have no idea of what the license is right now. O2 (息 • 吹) 22:58, 15 October 2007 (GMT)

I do not claim license. The municipality nor reserves such rights. It is a symbol officer who like most of them are in the public domain .Only Need Permission to replenish the file and a recommendation for the proper license to be kept. --Guillen 10:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 18:18, 24 November 2007 (GMT)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undeletion[edit]

I would like to know why file http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=delete&page=Image:0478_-_Milano_-_San_Nazaro_-_Camillo_Procaccini%2C_Presentazione_al_Tempio_-_Foto_Giovanni_Dall%27Orto_5-May-2007._jpg was deleted, and especially why there was no warning before deleting it. Thank you. --User:G.dallorto 19:48, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean Image:0478 - Milano - San Nazaro - Camillo Procaccini, Presentazione al Tempio - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto 5-May-2007.jpg? Samulili 19:58, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If so, that image does not need undeletion; http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Image%3A0478+-+Milano+-+San+Nazaro+-+Camillo+Procaccini%2C+Presentazione+al+Tempio+-+Foto+Giovanni+Dall%27Orto+5-May-2007.jpg (without the last underscore) shows no deletion.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No need. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 18:19, 24 November 2007 (GMT)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:Haiku-logo.svg[edit]

This logo is not either copyrighed or trademarked. [1] only covers software distribution. --fryed-peach 16:51, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide evidence that Michael Lotz, who is cited as the creator of the logotype, has authorised publication of it under the terms of {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}}, as it was claimed. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of permission. Logo is presumably copyrighted. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 18:20, 24 November 2007 (GMT)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:Independence Seaport Museum.jpg[edit]

An email was sent on June 1, 2007 giving permission for the image to be used on the wikimedia commons. It was sent to the permissions email address. This was a different one form the one sent on June 25 and that was noted at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Independence Seaport Museum.jpg. Evrik 17:02, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I have restored the image, to allow you or someone else to add the permission. / Fred J 16:49, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original image deleted as no licence; please use the other image. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 18:27, 24 November 2007 (GMT)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:Electronic circuits[edit]

This category was deleted on 20 April 2006 for the reason: content was: 'Category:Electronics' (and the only contributor was User:Red Rooster) Should be Electrical schematics.

This is a surprising reason, since “electronics” is not “electricity”, and a “circuit” is not a “schematic”. More, deletion of correct categories (Electronic circuit) is contrary to Commons policy.

Category:Electronic circuits is needed for classification, so I request its undeletion. --Juiced lemon 17:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears to have been recreated independently. Do you need the one deleted edit restored now? Please advise. ++Lar: t/c 23:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I could recreate it. This request is for the preservation of the history, therefore I wish the restoration of the deleted edit. --Juiced lemon 13:55, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 18:37, 24 November 2007 (GMT)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:K13-Aufkleber.jpg[edit]

File:K13-Aufkleber.jpg appears to have been deleted without warning the uploaders nor any discussion:

The history is currently not visible and I haven't been logged in here during last month to intervene earlier but it appears that someone must have deleted the GFDL license that I had gotten from the copyright holder Dieter Gieseking <giedie2@web.de> in January 2006. Please undelete the entire so that the matter can be settled more peacefully and reinstall the image.

Sincerely: Roman Czyborra 12:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image was first tagged with {{Bild-GFDL}} and later with {{Fair use}} which is why it was deleted speedily. The image has a source, and part of the description was: "Entwurf: Dieter Gieseking, 1993. Zeichnung: Dieter X., Rechte abgetreten an die K13" corresponding (apparently, my German is limited) with what Roman C. says about the permission. It seems to me that the image can be restored but the permission must first be sent to OTRS. Samulili 10:30, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strike that. I was not aware of what the image implied. I will not undelete that image. Samulili 17:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No problem: {{Otrs pending}} Thank you! Roman Czyborra 15:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please note that Roman Czyborra is banned on both enWP and deWP for inappropriate pro-paedophile activism. No idea what this image is, of course, not being a commons sysop. JzG (talk) 17:40, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It was a photo of Roman himself, naked. MaxSem 13:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 18:35, 24 November 2007 (GMT)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:Trains of the United Kingdom[edit]

This category was deleted on 17:31, 10 February 2007 for the following reason: (empty category - ReindDeel33t).

  1. “Empty” is NEVER a valid reason to delete a category.
  2. The deletion of categories with correct names is contrary to Commons deletion policy.
  3. This category is needed to classify UK-related files, as already done for other countries in subcategories of Category:Trains by country.

Therefore, I request the undeletion of Category:Trains of the United Kingdom. --Juiced lemon 22:43, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have undeleted it. There is a large effort currently underway to reorganise a lot of railway related things which I know you are participating in, so when this comes to rest, if this needs to be deleted again or whatever, we can. Note that right now, it has a soft redirect in it for a different category so please edit it as needed to correct that, ok? ++Lar: t/c 23:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just a quick note about this one, it's probably not actually correctly named, nor is it's replacement, Category:Rail transport in the United Kingdom. The United Kingdom has two separate, self contained railway systems, the Great Britain system, with is standard gauge, and the Northern Ireland system, which together with the Republic of Ireland system, forms another, broad gauge system. In the past, Great Britain has tended to form one such category, covering the railways on mainland Britain, whilst Ireland has tended to form another such category, covering the railway on the island of Ireland. Nick 14:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the undeletion. We classify media files “by location” according to current political divisions. Such classification is subject-independent, so it leads to easy understandable structures.
Notice that most people in the world cannot distinguish between “British and English”, or “Britain, Great Britain and United Kingdom”. --Juiced lemon 22:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:Baybayin_Wa.PNG[edit]

I don't understand why this image has been deleted. It's a different letter than Baybayin_Ta.PNG, and can't be a duplicate, as long as nobody changed the original image. Is it possible to undelete it? Thanks. Same request for the svg version, if one. Croquant 16:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's been deleted as a dupe of Image:Baybayin Ta.PNG. Maybe, you did a mistake when you reuploaded Image:Baybayin Wa.PNG in march 2006 since the size and SHA1 checksum of the Wa version is exactly the same as the Ta version and Google cache show me the Ta version as Baybayin_Wa.PNG. Should be undeleted. No SVG version found. — Xavier, 17:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Image re-uploaded to Commons. Croquant 18:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:Bologna-sala_borsa.jpg[edit]

I took the picture, strange that there was something wrong with it. Time between note on my discussion page and deletion was too quick (happened other times, that's bad). Can you undelete it? Thanks --Biopresto 13:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion happened ten days after the note on your page, which says that the image will be deleted if not fixed in 7 days. I undeleted the image and corrected the license, however, please add a proper description and category. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, now I remember better this file history: it was by User:Gamballs, and HE loaded the picture here (see file history). Why you warned me instead of him? I think 10 days is little time especially when you have a clear warning in the user talk page to be contacted in my it.wiki discussion page since I do not log in too frequently here. Thanks anyway. --Biopresto 11:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete image C1rc2.PNG[edit]

I drew that image myself so there are no copyright issues (maybe I should have written that somewhere). Please restore the file. If that was not the reason why the file was deleted, please let me know it (I cannot find it in the deletion log)

Thanks, Jotego

Done: Image:C1rc2.PNG. I've also filled in the description. BTW, the deletion log entry is here. Lupo 07:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undeletion of BSicon_uexDOCKr.svg[edit]

This file has been deleted as it was deemed to be a copy of BSicon_exwhfKBFl.svg. However, it is used on a number of canal mapping pages, and is displayed on the Canal Template. These are now broken. The canal template cannot use exwhfKBF.svg, without creating a new row template, because the naming scheme is completely different. BSicon_uexDOCKr.svg has also been deleted from English Wikipedia because it was a duplicate of the one on Commons. Bob1960evens 20:42, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Closed. File reuploaded by Bob1960evens. As a side note, the request was well-founded since the images are not strictly identical, and since the name scheme is important. — Xavier, 15:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]



The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:Graph app weight.gif and Image:View 3D Accrad(Rterr,Vtang).gif[edit]

The time of a debate, could you restore these 2 pictures, automatically deleted: "Graph app weight.gif" "View 3D Accrad(Rterr,Vtang).gif". These 2 pictures are extracted (with the autorisation of the author) from the French book: "Sur les chemins de la lévitation, Vol.1 & 2, Ed. Manuscrit, 2004-2005, ISBN: 2-7481-4500-3 & 2-7481-5528-9" - Best Regards —the preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.165.201.145 (talk • contribs) 23:16, 17. Nov. 2007

 Not doneThe stated files was never uploaded to Commons. --GeorgHH 19:01, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:ShirleyMcKie.jpg[edit]

I should be grateful if Image:ShirleyMcKie.jpg could be undeleted forthwith.Phase4 23:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The stated file was never uploaded to Commons. Ask staff at English WP instead. — Xavier, 00:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

"Lucifer" aka Billy Alaimo aka "Dr.Nyce"[edit]

Im am Billy Alaimo I wrote Bio and uploaded my own picture,I am up for deleation..WHY? You can see me at DrNyce.com and MySpace.com/drfeelfine. I am also at suplex66@yahoo.com or DrNyce@DrNyce.com Please do not delete, add picture and clean up my bio so it is not deleted. Thank You . If you need more confirmation look up Lucifer Billy Alaimo on google or Dr.Nyce MySpace page myspace.com/drfeelfine on Yahoo or Google or Just Billy Alaimo. I was Lucifer and am Now Dr.Nyce and my Nurse Dixie Kupps I am listed on the Wrestlingclthesline.com site also.516-606-5302 pdself

The Commons is not your webhost. 哦， 是吗？(User:O) 02:13, 25 November 2007 (GMT)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Why this image was deleted?[edit]

There is no reason? Dnielectronico.png --Ediazrod 10:29, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hay alguna razón?

Si. Se prohíbe la reproducción total o parcial de los contenidos de esta Web sin citar su origen o solicitar autorización. User:Superzerocool escribió el 2007-03-25: "La fuente no indica que el uso de la imagen es libre o de dominio público. A pesar de que se hayan unido las imágenes, no indica si es trabajo derivado o similar. Por lo tanto se debe anular la licencia precedente." The image was tagged before that as {{Copyrighted free use}}, which evidently was wrong. The uploader was notified the same day, but didn't react, and on 2007-04-01, the image was deleted. Lupo 10:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
 Closed. — Xavier, 11:47, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

[edit]

Image discussion was closed as delete: Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Anne marie carl nielsen brodersen.jpg. However, the uploader is the owner of the material, and he was the photographer. People state that owning the piece of art does not make him the copyright owner, but it certainly seems to me that if the piece of art is granted to him, he has the right to at very least make photographs of it (as museums do all the time). And, for that matter, it seems that, if anybody, he is easily the most likely to own the copyright on the piece of work, given that it was granted to him. Patstuart (talk) 17:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's a big difference between material rights of ownership to an object in one's possession on the one hand and the immaterial rights, including copyright, associated with another person's idea on the other. Please don't get those confused.
The owner of a copy of a work of art may take photographs of it, but he may not publish or license them without the consent of the copyright holder of the original work. Museums have special contracts to be able to publish images of their collections where needed, but this usually wouldn't involve sublicensing. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, copyright laws typically include special rules that explicitly allow museums to reproduce copyrighted artworks for exhibition catalogs. For commercializations (e.g., postcards and such), museums still would need special contracts with the rights holders on the artworks. Lupo 20:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And yet, if the artwork was given to him, what are the chances that he owns the artwork, and thus its copyright? It seems just as likely to me that a court would rule in favor of him having the copyright, as for his descendants. Patstuart (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The chances? None. There is no connection between owning an object and holding the copyright to the idea behind the object. One is governed by property law and the other by copyright law. If you buy a copy of a movie, you don't get the copyright, and the law makes no difference based on the number of copies of a work are in circulation or anything like that. —LX (talk, contribs) 23:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Work protected by copyright until 2015. — Xavier, 13:53, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:World War I fortifications[edit]

This category was deleted on 07:19, 12 April 2007 for the reason: {{Speedy|Empty duplicate of Category:World War I Fortifications.}}'). This reason is invalid, deletion of correct categories is contrary to Wikimedia Commons policy.

So I request the undeletion of Category:World War I fortifications. --Juiced lemon 18:03, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Recreated by 217.186.133.41. Well-founded request so history restored as well. — Xavier, 10:31, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The Human Abstract-William Blake[edit]

Please undelete relevant notes on the poem-The Human Abstract by William Blake(Songs of Experience). —the preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.2.0.199 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please state the specific file which you wish to be undeleted and the reasons for your request. Without this information, your request cannot be processed. —LX (talk, contribs) 16:11, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:Rivetage Europe eccidentale cotte de mail.JPG[edit]

This image was deleted with the message "Dupe of Image:Rivetage Oriental cotte de mail.JPG", except that this is not a dupe, and moreover is used on a page to show the differences betwwen the 2. --Tardiff JF 12:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. They were not duplicates. Now, you will have to revert the changes done by the Delinker. — Xavier, 17:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2007-11&oldid=113103956"