Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 31 2021

• 
  • Nomination Harlingen. coil springs old train carriage. NS D 6066.
    --Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:21, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rear light of a Toyota GR Supra (in the showroom of Auto Bertels) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:17, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Fallow field with wildflowers (Thistle) in Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Herzensstern-Boulevard (in the Beginengasse) in Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:19, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Volvo PV544 B18 (built in 1961) in the parking lot of the barbecue area in Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 03:45, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lapidarium at the parish church Saint Donatus in Sankt Donat, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Romanesque portal, stoup and lapidarium at the porch of the parish church Saint Donatus in Sankt Donat, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stoup at the porch of the parish church Saint Donatus in Sankt Donat, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roman stone relief with one woman and two men, (CSIR II/2, 162) at the porch of the parish church Saint Donatus in Sankt Donat, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lapidarium at the porch of the parish church Saint Donatus in Sankt Donat, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 02:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Parliament Hill, Quebec --Wilfredor 02:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nikon Z7II provided --Wilfredor 02:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Remparts --Wilfredor 02:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Police cars --Wilfredor 02:03, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 03:51, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination One Battery Park Plaza --Rhododendrites 01:39, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:01, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination 1 New York Plaza viewed from the Hudson River --Rhododendrites 01:39, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City Pier A viewed from the water --Rhododendrites 01:39, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Bumble bee on a purple coneflower in the Brooklyn Botanic Garden --Rhododendrites 01:39, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eastern amberwing in the Brooklyn Botanic Garden --Rhododendrites 01:39, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 02:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arnhem-Meinerswijk NL, view to the uiterwaarden near the Meginhardweg during high water in the Rhine river --Michielverbeek 20:31, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:53, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Arnhem-Meinerswijk NL, view to railway bridge Oosterbeek during high water in the Rhine river --Michielverbeek 20:31, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of the Greding gliding site, Germany --Carsten Steger 20:04, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of the Hetzleser Berg airfield, Germany --Carsten Steger 20:02, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Sorry! Too soft. --Steindy 23:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial image of the Herzogenaurach airfield, Germany --Carsten Steger 19:59, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:48, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination South side of the Grade II* listed St Michael's Church, Huyton. --Rodhullandemu 19:20, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:43, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roof works on a building in Hof, Germany. --PantheraLeo1359531 15:04, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. The leafes on the top should be cutted. --Steindy 23:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tokyo Metro Ginza Line 1000 series train and Shibuya cityscape. --MaedaAkihiko 12:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Chiba Urban Monorail Type 0 --MaedaAkihiko 12:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rapid "Aizu Liner" by 583 series train running on Ban-Etsusai Line --MaedaAkihiko 12:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 16:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hokuso Railway 7300 series train --MaedaAkihiko 12:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Mosbatho 16:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Historic farmhouse in Fahrenholz
    --F. Riedelio 09:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:08, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Historic farmhouse in Fahrenholz
    --F. Riedelio 09:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:08, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dome of S. Giorgio in Braida in Verona, Italy --Lo Scaligero 07:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality. --MaedaAkihiko 12:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tower clock of St. Nicholas Church in Alladorf --Ermell 07:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:15, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aerial view of the landscape between Hallerndorf and Haidt --Ermell 07:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:15, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Rocks in Nankendorf. --Ermell 07:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:15, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal figure of St. Kunigunde at the Martinus Church in Nankendorf --Ermell 07:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:15, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Wiesent in Nankendorf. View downstream. --Ermell 07:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:15, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Eclectic buildings, Place de la Gare 14 to 20, Lille, France --Velvet 06:57, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:44, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Triumph TR4A --JoachimKohler-HB 06:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:09, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Portal of the St Maurice church in Moissannes, H Vienne, France. (By Tournasol7) --Sebring12Hrs 06:00, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Right valve of an Asian green mussel, Perna viridis --Llez 05:49, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Harlingen. Saint Michael's Church. Sacrifice block.
    --Famberhorst 05:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Llez 05:51, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nature reserve Hangwälder Ritzlhof (n158) on the left bank of the Krems river in Ansfelden --Isiwal 05:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:05, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Gierer meadows, Upper Austrian nature reserve, Roßleithen --Isiwal 05:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:47, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Snake knotweed (Bistorta officinalis) in nature reserve Gierer meadows, Upper Austria --Isiwal 05:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:22, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Way of the Cross, Sierning and natural monument Kuhschellenwiese --Isiwal 05:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:38, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Zwieballen (size of two clenched fists) is a double bread roll and a specialty of the Almtal, Upper Austria. --Isiwal 05:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:06, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Laschgbach brook in the Tauern Valley near Mallnitz, High Tauern National Park, Carinthia, Austria --Uoaei1 04:06, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --XRay 06:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Niche containing statue of St Michael on top of Huyton Cross. --Rodhullandemu 18:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good quality, but please remove those three spots in left top corner (btw: two spots are probably birds) --Michielverbeek 20:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
     Done Thanks for the tip. Rodhullandemu 20:48, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
    Ok --Michielverbeek 05:41, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Drage-Fahrenholz
    --F. Riedelio 15:46, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose This one is bit blured, sorry. It makes the text on the plague hard to read. --Nefronus 18:55, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 09:17, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination War memorial in Drage-Fahrenholz
    --F. Riedelio 15:46, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Oppose Not sharp enough, and low contrast on the lettering. The left side seems to be softer than the right; not sure exactly why, is this a crop from a larger frame or is there a smudge on the lens? --Lambda 02:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
     I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 09:17, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Clay Cooking stoves. --RockyMasum 15:02, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 06:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Town hall of Verneuil-Moustiers, Haute-Vienne, France. --Tournasol712:14, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
     Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: Rivotorto Church, left side altar and tabernacle, Perugia, Italy. --Tagooty 15:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Castle Hohenbrunn in St. Florian / Upper Austria --Hans Koberger 08:17, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Visible red and green chromatic aberration should be removed. --F. Riedelio 15:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
    CA corr. done --Hans Koberger 08:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 09:19, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination: C-130J Super Hercules at the Dyess AFB Air Show in May 2018. --Balon Greyjoy 08:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Review needed
• 
  • Nomination Building at Reichsstraße 2 in Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. --Tournasol7 06:37, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Promotion
    Photograph of identifiable people. --F. Riedelio 17:48, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
    It's anonymous person in a public place who is not the subject of the image. Okay for me. --Zinnmann 15:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
     Support Good quality. I added personality rights warning. --Sebring12Hrs 11:21, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Consensual review

File:Aerial_image_of_the_Gunzenhausen-Reutberg_airfield.jpg

• Nomination Aerial image of the Gunzenhausen-Reutberg airfield, Germany --Carsten Steger 19:21, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Sorry! Too noisy for me. --Steindy 00:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
   Comment @Steindy: Thank you very much for your review. To learn for future nominations, I would be grateful if you could describe where exactly in the image you perceive the excessive noise. --Carsten Steger 05:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support One could possibly criticise that the photo could have been a little sharper overall and that the blue cast could have been corrected a little. But I don't see any (disturbing) noise. Good enough, I think. --Smial 17:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support Just good enough IMHO --Robert Flogaus-Faust 18:24, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:53, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Dough-Donut-Dulce-de-Leche.jpg

• Nomination Dulce de Leche donut. (by Evan-Amos) --GuavaTrain 16:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
  

Uncalibrated color space (sRGB recommended) --F. Riedelio 15:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality imo regardless of the color space (other nominations were promoted + the nominator is not the author). --Nefronus 22:07, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  
•  Oppose IMO the color space is required according to the image guidelines. Maybe this can be clarified in the discussion? --F. Riedelio 06:17, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  

 Comment My bad, you are right, so I remove my support vote. --Nefronus 08:05, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

I disagree. The photo uses Adobe RGB, this is no doubt not a reason for a decline. "JPEG, Adobe RGB (1998), quality: 98, subsampling OFF" --Smial 10:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

 Comment The metadata of the file shows "Color space Uncalibrated".

 Comment Whoever wrote the comment: You should not rely on the commons image description page to display correct or even complete metadata in every case. --Smial 18:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Fantastic photo. If the color space is no problem, it should be promoted. Maybe an FP, too? -- Ikan Kekek 06:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 16:05, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Zlatý_kůň,_Houbův_lom_TK_2021-07-23_1.jpg

• Nomination Houbův lom quarry, Český kras PLA, Czechia --Nefronus 20:28, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose The rocks on the left side aren't sharp. --Steindy 23:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  Thank you for the review. Well, I could have used f/11 or f/13 since the left side is further away, but I think the loss of sharpness is rather unnoticeable. Let’s discuss. --Nefronus 00:05, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  If it were indeed imperceptible, why did I notice it? --Steindy 00:11, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  Your eyes are extraordinarily sharp. --Nefronus 00:22, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  No, my calibrated monitor ;-) --Steindy 00:35, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support Could be sharper overall but good enough. English description is missing in the infobox, we don't get what is to see if we don't read the notes. --Selbymay 09:52, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Thank you, I expanded the description. --Nefronus 10:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Not the best sharpness, but acceptable. --XRay 17:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support per xray. --Smial (talk) 10:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not really sharp at all --Commonists 16:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:49, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

File:FC_Admira_Wacker_Mödling_vs._FC_Red_Bull_Salzburg_(Cup)_2017-04-26_(052).jpg

• Nomination Cican Stankovic, goalkeeper of FC Red Bull Salzburg. --Steindy 00:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:58, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
   Oppose hands cropped --Charlesjsharp 15:57, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
   Oppose ditto. Rodhullandemu 08:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The important things to me are his facial expression and stance. We don't need his hands, though I certainly wouldn't have complained if they had been included. -- Ikan Kekek 21:05, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 16:09, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:47, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

File:FC_Admira_Wacker_Mödling_vs._FC_Red_Bull_Salzburg_(Cup)_2017-04-26_(034).jpg

• Nomination Rubén Martínez, assistent coach of FC Red Bull Salzburg. --Steindy 00:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose arm cropped --Charlesjsharp 16:00, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  I disagree. Let us hear what other user says. --Steindy 00:23, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Charlejsharp + the face/cheeks of the person look flattened by noise reduction. --Nefronus 07:52, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The arm is not a problem for me, nor the "flattened cheeks" (???) --Palauenc05 14:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Seems OK to me, too. -- Ikan Kekek 19:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose Face and hair too soft. --Tagooty 02:48, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support This crop seems like a compositional choice to me. The rest is OK. --Peulle 11:06, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Weak support --Commonists 16:10, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:46, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Neunkirchen_am_Brand_Kirche-20210411-RM-161219.jpg

• Nomination Holy water font in the Catholic Church of St. Michael in Neunkirchen am Brand --Ermell 07:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
• Where does the red dot on the floor on the lower right corner of the photo come from? Editing error? --Hillopo2018 08:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

• In a way you are right. It is a hotpixel from the sensor and is removed now. Thanks for the review. --Ermell 10:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 18:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. Hillopo2018, did you oppose? If you did, it's not necessary to oppose nor to change the status of a nomination to "Discuss" in order to have a discussion with the photographer. The best way to do that is simply to post a comment, which then is shown as "review". -- Ikan Kekek 05:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:16, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Commonists 16:11, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:45, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Église_Saint-Maurice_(Ebersmunster)_(5).jpg

• Nomination Saint-Maurice Church in Ebersmunster (Bas-Rhin, France). --Gzen92 08:41, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
   Oppose Best version has been promoted, see File:Église Saint-Maurice (Ebersmunster) (3).jpg. This one's inferior to the promoted ones. --Hillopo2018 08:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
  I believe that we can name similar photos. Gzen92 12:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment So what if it's inferior to the others? The sky is a little noisy, though, so I'm not sure about how to vote. -- Ikan Kekek 05:46, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done Noise ok, I think it's better. Gzen92 15:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Much better and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support QI for me --Moroder 13:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Steindy 00:17, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Spondias mombin (Fruit) sur un papier blanc au Bénin 03.jpg

• Nomination Spondia mombin (Fruit) on a White paper in Bénin --Adoscam 16:33, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion  Support Grainy at full size, but I'll support because per w:Spondias mombin, the fruits are only 4 cm long. Note the spelling, though, and please rename after the nomination is over. -- Ikan Kekek 17:42, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
   Oppose Too grainy at full size. --Hillopo2018 08:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose. Pros: Advantageous lighting, apparently natural colours, certainly a useful, informative photo. Cons: Unfortunately too much image noise, too shallow depth of field, at the same time nowhere really crisp. The photo seems to have a slight motion blur. --Smial 11:11, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support by Ikan Kekek. I removed the vote by User:Hillopo2018 because this new user is not allowed to vote yet. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Steindy 00:16, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Rechberg_NDOÖ_423_Pammerhöhe-3578.jpg

• Nomination Pammerhill (696 m), natural heritage, Upper Austria --Isiwal 07:34, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion I feel that the main subject is small compared to the screen.--MaedaAkihiko 10:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
  I disagree, Subject is the hill in whole not only the stone with the cross --Isiwal 10:33, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
   Support I do not find the reason for MaedaAkihiko comprehensible. This is a great photo in the best quality. --Steindy 12:35, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment I think that the composition makes it hard to tell what the subject is. If it's the whole hill, I'd want a wider shot, something showing that it's a hill. If it's the rock with a cross, I'd want it tighter and better framed. Right now the viewer is left wondering what the focus of the shot is. I actually think that the other image posted by Isiwal, File:Rechberg NDOÖ 423 Pammerhöhe-3585.jpg, is a better composition as you can see multiple rocks, the trees provide a frame, and you can tell it's a hill from the distant background. --Lambda 06:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

   Oppose Decided to be w:BOLD and change my comment to oppose. Composition is one of the criteria listed in the image guidelines, and while we're not looking for FPC level of "wow" in composition, the very basics of composition say that you should be able to tell what the subject is. --Lambda (talk) 05:55, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

•  Support Very good quality, and I don't believe in opposing unless the composition is really bad. This is not FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 06:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support --Milseburg 11:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Lamda. --GRDN711 16:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Steindy 00:14, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Blankenheim_Castle_03.jpg

• Nomination Blankenheim Castle, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. --Tournasol7 08:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
• Promotion
   CommentPerspective correction required, left side is leaning out a bit --Uoaei1 04:41, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
  
•  Support It's very minor. Almost not visble. --Sebring12Hrs 07:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Uoaei1. Should be solved IMO.--Ermell 20:48, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
•  Support The house in the middle looks wrong at first sight. But as everything around it as well as its vertical window lines are OK if measured with a ruler, this might be a problem of the house, not of the perspective correction. --JRff (talk) 20:19, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Steindy 00:13, 29 July 2021 (UTC)