Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives July 02 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Temple_of_Apollo_Sosianus_at_Night.jpg[edit]

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Hubertl 14:30, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heyra - 3.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination female Bengal --Medium69 12:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Insufficient quality. not sharp, not fixable IMO --Hubertl 12:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support --Billy69150 16:03, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Bad composition: Too much space at the top and not enough space at the bottom. --Code 05:27, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Nice cat but others as Code. -- Spurzem 14:45, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others --Jebulon 10:09, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --C messier 10:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Spinne_Bratental_Ps.jpg[edit]

  • Thanks for the new info. I know species level can't be always asked, but Araneae was just like saying "spider". --Kadellar 20:20, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support I think that the species of the spider or of the bee has nothing to do with the quality of the image. It it's enough to read what happens. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 18:47, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Kadellar. @Spurzem: Properly categorisation is a requirement of QIC. The user is categorizing in the top category which is considered to be bad practise. All taxonomic classification trees have for this purpose a sub-category like "Unidentified XXX". --Cccefalon 05:13, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sp. level identification is not necessary for Arthropoda as it is impossible in many cases without microscopic examination. So such a requirement will force people to make wild guess which simply means false information. But a lowermost possible identification of main subject (either one) is appreciated. We've a lot of experts here; please utilize it before proceeding to FP/QI/VI. (In this case, I made a request at User_talk:Kaldari#File:Spinne_Bratental_Ps.jpg.) Jkadavoor 06:19, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support and avilable info added. Jkadavoor 06:55, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 Comment @Jkadavoor: I agree and as I already proposed the "Unidentified .." category complies with the QIC requirements of proper categorization. --Cccefalon 07:14, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I just look into the details out of subject interest, and it seems from a new contributor through Wiki Loves Earth. I don't know the nominator too. We can help the beginners, and hope they pick the procedures soon. :) Jkadavoor 08:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 14:32, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

==[edit]

  • Nomination Jakarta, Indonesia: A group of sport students in Merdeka Square listening to their instructor while relaxing in front of Monas, the National Monumente. --Cccefalon 04:17, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Fustian. QI for me.--Johann Jaritz 05:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose for me not a QI, the impression is very dusty, the main object and it's spire is not really sharp --Taxiarchos228 05:57, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
     Info Might be you focussed only on the background. The motif here is a group of sport students sitting in front of Monas ... For an image of the monument, I had choosen other settings. --Cccefalon 06:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me -- Spurzem 12:01, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Hubertl 06:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 14:33, 1 July 2015 (UTC)