Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives January 06 2019
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Charnel house on the cemetery in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Charnel house on the cemetery in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Saint Vincent church of Blois, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 00:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Interior of the Castle of Montrésor, Indre-et-Loire, France. --Tournasol7 00:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Chenonceau, Indre-et-Loire, France. --Tournasol7 00:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cher river in Montrichard, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 00:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Seven Pandas 03:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Visitor centre in St-Aignan, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 00:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Szrenica, Krkonoše, Sudetes 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:06, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Szrenica, Krkonoše, Sudetes 4 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Szrenica, Krkonoše, Sudetes 5 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:03, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the glacier at Reinoksfjellet --Frankemann 22:22, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. It seems ok for me. --Tournasol7 00:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Madagascar stonechat (Saxicola sibilla) male, Andasibe --Charlesjsharp 22:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of the Brunswick Lion on the Burgplatz, Brunswick/Germany --PtrQs 18:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 23:16, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Burgplatz by night, Brunswick/Germany --PtrQs 18:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 21:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schlossarkaden, replica of the original 'Braunschweiger Schloss', Brunswick/Germany --PtrQs 18:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 21:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Saslonch and Sella group from Resciesa in Urtijëi, South TyrolI, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Moroder 18:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fairweather vessel, Seward, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 16:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Special.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Resurrection Bay, Seward, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 16:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:06, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Allianz Arena, Munich, Germany --Poco a poco 16:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Denali National Park, Alaska, United States --Poco a poco 16:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vue de la Rue Baraban (partie en sens unique).En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante : --Benoît Prieur 16:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 23:15, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Boulevard Jules Favre (Lyon) - vue en janvier 2019.En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante : --Benoît Prieur 16:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 19:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A "chalet" at a scenic overlook in Mohonk Preserve. --Grendelkhan 15:47, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shawangunk Ridge as seen from a hiking trail in Mohonk Preserve, facing away from Lake Mohonk. --Grendelkhan 15:47, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 21:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Skytop Tower in Mohonk Preserve as seen from the far side of the lake. --Grendelkhan 15:47, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose It lacks sharpness IMO --Poco a poco 17:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Landscape Arch in Arches National Park, Utah, USA. -- Der Wolf im Wald 15:23, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good as is, but I would suggest somewhat lesser sharpening and compression settings. --Smial 16:19, 3 January 201,9 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Basilica di Superga (Turin) at night --Paris Orlando 11:34, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --GT1976 12:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roman Aqueduct of Ansignan, France.--Palauenc05 09:29, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Paris Orlando 11:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque du Boulevard des Brotteaux (Lyon) et panneau des bières d'un bar.En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante : --Benoît Prieur 08:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Plaque en hommage à Maurice Flandin et plaque de la rue Maurice Flandin, à Lyon France.En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante : --Benoît Prieur 08:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality, --Horst J. Meuter 22:36, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Quai du Mont-Blanc à Genève.En tant que détenteur du droit d’auteur, je publie cette œuvre sous la licence suivante : --Benoît Prieur 08:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gartur Stitich Farm with trees along a paddock (B&W), Scotland --Podzemnik 07:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:56, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 1019-1041 Cathcart Road and 3 Stanmore Road, Glasgow --Podzemnik 07:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:56, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination New Victoria Hospital, Glasgow --Podzemnik 07:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:56, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:57, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination VW Bus T1 at the Oldtimer Meeting Ebern --Ermell 07:37, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support A bit too dark, but good quality IMO. --Tournasol7 07:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Thessaloniki, Trigoniou Tower --Berthold Werner 07:09, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:32, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 2018 UCI Road World Championships Innsbruck/Tirol Women Juniors Individual Time Trial. Picture shows: Marta Jaskulska (POL) --Granada 06:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 07:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality and FP potentially IMO. --Tournasol7 08:06, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination General R.K. Cemetery "Vitushof". Vitus chapel. (wooden door).
--Famberhorst 06:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:32, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination General R.K. Cemetery "Vitushof". Vitus chapel. (wooden door).
-
- Nomination Breil/Brigels direction Val Frisal. Rapids in the upper reaches of Flembach Creek. F-getal f /5.6.
--Famberhorst 06:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:32, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Breil/Brigels direction Val Frisal. Rapids in the upper reaches of Flembach Creek. F-getal f /5.6.
-
- Nomination Breil/Brigels direction Val Frisal. River basin of the Flembach brook.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Breil/Brigels direction Val Frisal. River basin of the Flembach brook.
-
- Nomination Mountain road from Burleun, to Ladinas, Andiast. View from the mountain road.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:03, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain road from Burleun, to Ladinas, Andiast. View from the mountain road.
-
- Nomination Breil-Brigels. Lag da Breil. Fountain on the village square. (Detail).
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC) - Promotion Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 07:32, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Breil-Brigels. Lag da Breil. Fountain on the village square. (Detail).
-
- Nomination Panorama road between Waltensburg/Vuorz and Breil/Brigels. Carved out passage.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC) - Promotion
Support Lovely --Podzemnik 07:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Nomination Panorama road between Waltensburg/Vuorz and Breil/Brigels. Carved out passage.
-
- Nomination Parish church Saint George in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:53, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Provincial Jupiter head (CSIR II/1, 22) in the rose window at the western facade of the parish church Saint George in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ancient Roman relief of a scrivener (CSIR II/3, 252) at the western facade of the parish church Saint George in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:49, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Charnel house on the cemetery in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grave inscription for the slave Quartus, endowed by his wife Quinta (CIL III 4960), exposed at the sacristie's west wall of the parish church Saint George in Hörzendorf, Sankt Veit an der Glan, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pan de jamon --The Photographer 01:38, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hallacas con pan de jamon\ --The Photographer 01:38, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Granada 09:14, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle of Selles-sur-Cher, Loir-et-Cher, France. --Tournasol7 00:03, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Szrenica, Krkonoše, Sudetes 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Szrenica, Krkonoše, Sudetes 4 --Jacek Halicki 00:01, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Heidelstein in the Rhön Mountains, seen from southeast--Milseburg 21:51, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vihorlat, Vihorlatské vrchy --Milan Bališin 16:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Milseburg 10:57, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Three-eyed lizard (Chalarodon madagascariensis) female, Toliara --Charlesjsharp 12:17, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, IMO. Head isn't tack sharp, but sharp enough. If you know how big the species is, please add the info to the Wikipedia article. -- Ikan Kekek 23:59, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Done about 200mm. Charlesjsharp 09:47, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Laboratory of the englishmen, Guadalajara, Spain --Poco a poco 10:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Tilted, and very distorted at the edges --Daniel Case 04:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Clay elephant statues --Fitindia 17:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Statues not sharp enough, unfortunately --Daniel Case 20:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Queen's Park Baptist Church, Glasgow --Podzemnik 07:58, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Interesting angle, pulled off without too much of a problem --Daniel Case 20:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mercedes Benz 280 CE-8 at the Sachs Franken Classic 2018 Rally, Stage 2 --Ermell 07:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Probably doesn't need so much of the top, though --Daniel Case 20:54, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Renault Clio, Mondial Paris Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 10:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Slightly too dark IMO --Ermell 13:47, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Done --MB-one 13:41, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Support Works now --Daniel Case 20:47, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Watusi cattle in Friguia park, Tunisia --Dyolf77 22:42, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice earth tones --Daniel Case 20:42, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dataran Lang or Eagle Square that situated in Langkawi, Kedah, Malaysia --SNN95 13:28, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice detail and symmetry, even if the image as a whole is a little pale --Daniel Case 20:42, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Los Fayos, Zaragoza, Spain --Poco a poco 11:57, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Center is unsharp --Daniel Case 08:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Buildings in Arholma, Stockholm Archipelago. --ArildV 21:48, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
Contrast could be handled better --Daniel Case 23:08, 27 December 2018 (UTC) DoneSorry Daniel, I forgot this images. I agree, new version uploaded (also a small crop).--ArildV 15:26, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Support Better now --Daniel Case 07:49, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: All Saints Church, Gloucester Street, Leamington Spa --Vauxford 21:32, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Review Comment Pronounced perspective distortion. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:10, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Comment I did try and correct the perspective because it was at a angle but I couldn't do it anymore without distorting the picture entirely so I don't know how to fix it. --Vauxford 15:22, 22 December 2018 (UTC) Comment Did you try the program "hugin" with different settings? Apart from that the light at the right looks as if it were not upright in reality. But the fence and the church should be, of course. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:15, 22 December 2018 (UTC) Comment I have tried it with PS and VP3 (DxO) unfortunately the plugin can´t read exif data (that´s important for lens correction) not one of the easiest ones but there is enough space in the sky. Try by yourself or overhand an DNG-File. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:31, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Restored Grave of Sylwester Kusionowicz --Scotch Mist 16:18, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
Oppose Unsharp and too dark in too many places --Daniel Case 22:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Considered proposing for ‘Consensual Review’ but difficult to counter "unsharp" and “too dark” comments given DOF requirements and the environment of a cemetery location surrounded by high trees! --Scotch Mist 13:48, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:2018_Migrujące_ptaki_nad_Mokrą_Przełęczą,_Karkonosze,_Sudety.jpg[edit]
- Nomination: Migrating birds over Krkonoše, Sudetes --Jacek Halicki 09:14, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Review
- Oppose "Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels" --Podzemnik 10:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Podzemnik: Done--Jacek Halicki 12:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry but it's still too small for me. We're getting here less than 10 % of your camera's megapixels. Let's see what other people think --Podzemnik 07:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- This photo is a small section of the frame, I did not have a lens with a longer focal length. The size of the photo complies with the rules. --Jacek Halicki 20:22, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry but it's still too small for me. We're getting here less than 10 % of your camera's megapixels. Let's see what other people think --Podzemnik 07:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- SupportSmall, but good enough for QI in my opinion. Tournasol7 00:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support per Tournasol7. -- Ikan Kekek 06:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support per others.--Ermell 21:11, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose This is really small. If the lens was too short, then it was too short. --Smial 18:07, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose to many unsharp areas --Fischer.H 15:43, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 01:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Ford_Taunus_P7b_26m_Hardtop_Coupé.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Ford Taunus P7b 26 Coupé (very rare) --Jacek79 23:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
- Question Is this HDR? The picture looks unnatural.--Jacek Halicki 00:16, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment This is not HDR, just the outcome of a RAW workflow. --Jacek79 17:15, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support The image has some very minor flaws indeed, especially a little bit noise, probably due to editing (shadows lightened? image sharpened? color saturation enhanced?). But the general impression is positive nevertheless: interesting subject, good composition, lighting, sharpness etc. So for me it's QI. -- MJJR 17:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment darktable isn't very good at raising shadows, it tends to expose strange halo-kind effects around color edges and this is one of those examples. That's why it looks like a badly processed HDR. btw: there's some quite ugly color noise in the shadows and darktable isn't good at denoising as well ... --Granada 15:58, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose (for now): CAs on the license plates and serious chroma noise throughout. Probably both fixable. --MB-one 11:36, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Noise reduced. OK now? --Jacek79 13:33, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose CA is disturbing and should be fixed. The color of the car looks strange. Is it painted that way or is that a result of pp?--Ermell 08:59, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Unnatural colors. --Jacek Halicki 22:04, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose overloaded photo, Vanneau Asocial 18:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined --Peulle 01:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Paris_Motor_Show_2018,_Paris_(1Y7A2067).jpg[edit]
- Nomination Fountain at the central square of Paris Expo Porte de Versailles --MB-one 13:38, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. Brightness should be reduced in the middle a bit. --Ermell 14:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose It's not only a bit too bright. Especially at the left side it is much too bright. I don't think that it can be corrected. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 17:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support - Not so bad, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 23:56, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support - As per Ikan Kekek.-- Fitindia 10:05, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Basotxerri 15:24, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
File:ဗတ္တိဇံ.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Yardenit Baptismal Site, Israel/Palestine --E.3 05:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Comment You should add some categories. --Ermell 08:20, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Yes can I have some help with the categories as they are very contentious in the area. I added "Jesus Christ" "Christianity and other religions" "Baptism" but this of course is very contentious urgent help request --E.3 01:37, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Jesus Christ is too general, baptism is already right. I recommend here more categories about the location and the name of the river. --Ermell 13:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC) - Oppose Posterization through aggressive noise reduction at full resolution, as it is typical for a mobile phone camera. --Johannes Robalotoff 08:47, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Worth a discussion I think. --Ermell 10:15, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment Worth a discussion I think. --Ermell 10:15, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support - Maybe I'm missing something, but it looks OK to me. -- Ikan Kekek 06:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- That's something you have to explain to me. You say that my image File:Amthof-Bad-Camberg-JR-G6-6316-2018-09-02.jpg is not sharp enough, but this one is OK? Look at the plants, look at the ground of the wood, look at the woman's neck, look at the wet planks. What you consider as sharp here is pure software edge sharpening. All fine structure is lost and replaced by painting-like brushstrokes, because the phone has to hide the natural noise level from its tiny sensor. I could process my image in the same way by increasing noise reduction over any sensible limit and by appying brutal software edge sharpening. Would that be better? Detail would be lost. Good images should preserve fine detail as good as possible, not just produce sharp edges on high-contrast lines and kill any other detail. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think a river as a subject requires as much fine detail as emblems carved in wood. Anyway, I'm just one person, and I'll look forward to other views on this photo and on that one. -- Ikan Kekek 12:00, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell 09:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 01:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Paris_Motor_Show_2018,_Paris_(1Y7A2134).jpg[edit]
- Nomination: Audi TT 45 TFSI quattro Roadster at Mondial Paris Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 10:31, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
- Review
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:30, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Oppose The picture looks pretty bleak. In addition, the many spots on the hood and in the windshield are disturbing; a problem that I know from museums. For me it is no QI. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 16:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Support - Good quality, in my opinion. The spots of light on the hood don't damage the composition for me; if anything, some of the people do, but this isn't FPC, so it's OK. -- Ikan Kekek 22:33, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Oppose OK with Spurzem, Vanneau Asocial 09:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Support -- As per Ikan Kekek -- Fitindia 06:41, 28 December 2018 (UTC) - Oppose Appears underexposed and contrasts too high due to poor illumination. --Smial 11:40, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 01:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Porsche,_Paris_Motor_Show_2018,_Paris_(1Y7A1090).jpg[edit]
- Nomination: Porsche 911 GT1 at Mondial Paris Motor Show 2018 --MB-one 15:14, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Review
- SupportGood quality--Armenak Margarian 17:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose The image is too bright and pale. Look at the red and yellow colors. Further the car is a bit distorted. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 16:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Oppose OK with Spurzem, Vanneau Asocial 09:54, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Spurzem: could you describe further, where you see distortion? --MB-one 10:18, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Durch die kurze Brennweite und den geringen Abstand zum Objekt wirkt das Auto leicht „verzogen“ und das Hinterrad sieht fast aus, als hätte es positiven Sturz. -- Spurzem 18:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Weitwinkelaufnahmen von Autos sehen eigentlich immer irgendwie verzogen aus und wirken dadurch stets etwas unglücklich und unvorteilhaft. Ausnahmen sind natürlich bewußt eingesetzte krasse Weitwinkel mit spezieller Perspektive, hier sieht es aber wie leider sehr oft eher wie ein zufälliger Schnappschuß, um nicht zu sagen wie ein fotografischer Unfall aus. So ein Ausstellungsauto läuft ja nicht weg, da sollte Zeit sein, sich eine trefflichere Ansicht zu suchen. Und wenn nicht, dann kann es eben kein QI sein. --Smial 00:54, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I'll stick to English, so that others can understand me too: The camber angle of the rear wheel observed by Spurzem is consistent with the lean of the vertical lines in the background. So one should probably try to correct this. Concerning "bright and pale": I think this is mostly the fault of the arrangement, not so much the fault of the image, although exposure is hard at the upper limit. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:30, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Durch die kurze Brennweite und den geringen Abstand zum Objekt wirkt das Auto leicht „verzogen“ und das Hinterrad sieht fast aus, als hätte es positiven Sturz. -- Spurzem 18:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Spurzem: could you describe further, where you see distortion? --MB-one 10:18, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support Taking everything into consideration, I think this one passes the bar for QI. We have promoted worse.--Peulle 17:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support As per Peulle. -- FitIndia 03:43, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective, background, lighting, burnt highlights, per Spurzem. There have been images of buildings declined because auf small disturbing waste bins... --Smial 15:27, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days --Peulle 01:01, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Schloss-Idstein-JR-E-2637-2018-08-19.jpg[edit]
- Nomination The château at Idstein, seen from its reconstructed garden. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Horst J. Meuter 14:35, 24.December 2018 (UTC)
OpposeNice composition, but not sharp enough for QI. --Palauenc05 10:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)- Not crisp but better than before. --Palauenc05 09:35, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Palauenc05. --Peulle 12:04, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- Comment After looking for some time on the image I cannot see what your problem might be. The flowers in foreground are sharp as they can be. The pole on the top of the chateau is also as sharp as it can be. Therefore I think that what you mean is not a focus problem. It's a matter of micro contrast. If this is so, I can try to fix it. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC) --JRff (talk) 11:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Done Reprocessed the image from the raw file with parameters that preserve more detail, as there was no focus problem with the raw file itself. If this does not appear sharp, what is sharp then? Please revisit. --Johannes Robalotoff 11:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support Seven Pandas 03:57, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - I think the Schloss is still not sharp enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 16:17, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ikan Kekek --Fischer.H 15:50, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Peulle 01:00, 6 January 2019 (UTC)