Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives December 31 2017
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
-
- Nomination Park and boathouse on Johannaweg, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:13, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bath on Johannaweg, Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:12, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Park with open-air chess on Hans-Pruscha-Weg, Winklern, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Passenger ship «Velden» with view of the Kapuzinerinsel and the Pyramidenkogel, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:13, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bridge to the Blumeninsel ("Flower Island"), part of the Promenadenbad, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria --Johann Jaritz 03:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 03:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arctornis sp --Vengolis 02:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kopsia fruticosa --Vengolis 02:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 03:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ipomea pes caprae --Vengolis 02:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 03:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tagiades litigiosa --Vengolis 02:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:14, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Strophanthus gratus --Vengolis 02:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 03:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Camellia japonica NBG --PumpkinSky 00:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Southwest corner of farmhouse at Kelvin A. Lewis farm in Creeds 2 --PumpkinSky 00:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Vengolis 02:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Porch center steps of farmhouse at Kelvin A. Lewis farm in Creeds --PumpkinSky 00:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wooden box at farmhouse at Kelvin A. Lewis farm in Creeds --PumpkinSky 00:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fishfloat remnants at farmhouse at Kelvin A. Lewis farm in Creeds --PumpkinSky 00:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:16, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 31 Market Square in Ziębice --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 00:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 42 Market Square in Ziębice 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, PumpkinSky 00:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 42 Market Square in Ziębice 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, PumpkinSky 00:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sugar refinery in Ziębice 1 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 00:03, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sugar refinery in Ziębice 2 --Jacek Halicki 00:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality, Tournasol7 00:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building at 28 Worcester Street (actually visitor centre) in Christchurch, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 00:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monkfish tail with saffron sauce, small vegetables and crumble of Cephalopod ink in an restaurant in Saint-Cyprien-sur-Dourdou, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 00:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Neubaukirche in Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany. --Tournasol7 00:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:04, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Window of the church of Our Lady of the Assumption in Belves, Dordogne, France. --Tournasol7 00:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 00:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rosa 'Gruß an Coburg' in Dunedin Botanic Garden, Dunedin, New Zealand. --Tournasol7 00:00, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Larry the cat sitting besides a wooden lawn chair in Auderghem, Belgium --Trougnouf 20:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue in front of Wat Phra Singh Temple in Chiang Mai, Thailand --Jakubhal 19:50, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Comment Verticals are not straight (see the note) --Halavar 20:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Done Poprawione --Jakubhal 20:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 21:33, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Slow boat dock on the Mekong in Pak Beng, Laos --Jakubhal 19:50, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:38, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Quebec city, Canada --The Photographer 19:12, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:16, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Quebec ville, Canada --The Photographer 19:12, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 19:35, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Quebec ville, Canada --The Photographer 19:12, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 19:35, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bas-reliefs. External gallery. Main temple of Angkor Wat. Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 19:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Armenak Margarian 19:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Devata. Main temple of Angkor Wat. Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 19:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:14, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Monkey. Causeway to the Angkor Wat. Angkor Wat, Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. --Halavar 19:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality--Armenak Margarian 19:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statue of Artyom Petrosyan ( World War II hero) in Gyumri, Armenia --Armenak Margarian 17:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Long Exposure shot of the Vidhana Soudha, the state legislature building of the Indian state of Karnataka in Bangalore. By User:DeepanjanGhosh --Bodhisattwa 13:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion NR is a little high but juuust good enough for QI since it's a night shot, IMO. --Peulle 13:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bus in Vannes --Billy69150 13:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality is just good enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 14:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Telkupi, situated on the southern banks of the Damodar near Panchet was famous once as Tailakampa, the ancient capital and riverine port of Shikharbhum and an important Jain centre of commerce and religion. First described by Joseph.D. Beglar in his Report of a tour through the Bengal Provinces...in 1872-73 and later by Dr Debala Mitra and others, the area contained more than 20 temples and mounds. In the mid 1950s, the area was inundated following the construction of the Panchet Dam and what we see today are a couple of deuls half submerged in the vast Panchet reservoir. Locals say that another peeps up during low water levels. The temples have been dated to 10th-12th century AD. A number of Jain artefacts have been recovered from the area. By User:SuvadipSanyal --Bodhisattwa 12:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Unfortunately too noisy, not sharp, and important CA in the background and foreground --Basile Morin 13:25, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Comment Where's the CA? I can't tell it from the noise. --Granada 13:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Post Tower serves as headquarters for the logistic company Deutsche Post DHL. --Martin Falbisoner 12:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hotel Conrad Bangkok --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 09:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 12:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Watchtower, Navapalos, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 08:59, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Town hall, Albalate de las Nogueras, Cuenca, Spain --Poco a poco 08:59, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Casle of Montuenga, Montuenga de Soria, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 08:59, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 09:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Castle, Rello, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 08:59, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cubilla, Soria, Spain --Poco a poco 08:59, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 09:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunset at beach “Weststrand” of Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 07:47, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Quality high enough for Q1, good composition, sharp in the front --Michielverbeek 07:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ilse falls in the Ilsetal in Harz National Park near Ilsenburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany --XRay 07:47, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunset at beach “Weststrand” of Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 07:47, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Falls at the Promenade, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 07:47, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coast at the South West Coast Path near Land's End, Cornwall, England --XRay 07:47, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Haw Pha Bang Temple in Luang Prabang --Jakubhal 07:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:45, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cliffs by the sea --Ermell 07:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tempel in the Nankai district in Tianjin, old city --Ermell 07:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion An interesting composition with a difficult perspective. Light fall is not perfect and I would make it a bit darker --Michielverbeek 07:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old bridge district in Tianjin, old town --Ermell 07:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:43, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pavillion am See i Baotu Spring --Ermell 07:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aral petrol station in the mountainous region of Bamberg --Ermell 07:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Braunau am Inn-Upper Austria, towngate: Salzburger Tor --Michielverbeek 07:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schärding-Upper Austria, Burggraben-Innlände from the bridge 9der Alte Innbrücke) --Michielverbeek 07:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Schärding-Upper Austria, Burggraben-Innlände from the bridge (der Alte Innbrücke) --Michielverbeek 07:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Münsteuer-Upper Austria, church: Katholische Pfarrkirche Sankt Petrus und Paulus --Michielverbeek 07:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Walking the Planken Wambuis from Mossel. Morning mist hangs over the Planken Wambuis.
--Famberhorst 07:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Walking the Planken Wambuis from Mossel. Morning mist hangs over the Planken Wambuis.
-
- Nomination Akan Gold Weight, Rectangular weight with indented edges --Ercé 06:58, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Statuette Karajà, 2 young women dancing. --Ercé 06:58, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blaue Lagune, Island --Ralf Roletschek 06:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blaue Lagune, Island --Ralf Roletschek 06:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lavafeld Arnarseturshraun südlich von Vogar, Island --Ralf Roletschek 06:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Sorry, but nothing is sharp --Michielverbeek 07:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Blaue Lagune, Island --Ralf Roletschek 06:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mountain trip from Tschiertschen (1350 meters) via Runcaspinas to Alp Farur (1940 meter). Settlement Alp Farur (1940 meters). Detail barn.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain trip from Tschiertschen (1350 meters) via Runcaspinas to Alp Farur (1940 meter). Settlement Alp Farur (1940 meters). Detail barn.
-
- Nomination Walking the Planken Wambuis from Mossel. Birches along forest path.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Walking the Planken Wambuis from Mossel. Birches along forest path.
-
- Nomination Mountain trip from Tschiertschen (1350 meters) via Ruchtobel towards Ochsenalp. Mountain stream.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Mountain trip from Tschiertschen (1350 meters) via Ruchtobel towards Ochsenalp. Mountain stream.
-
- Nomination Plaque in bust to Manuel Belgrano, Tandil, Argentina --Ezarate 21:46, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ponds near Phonsavan in Xiangkhouang Province, Laos --Jakubhal 20:28, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Support - Good quality and a nice scene. -- Ikan Kekek 05:45, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aschau-Upper Austria , church: Katholische Filialkirche heilige Bartholomäus --Michielverbeek 19:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Comment Needs perspective correction.--Ermell 20:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC
Thanks, I have Done a small perspective improvement --Michielverbeek 21:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Aschau-Upper Austria , church: Katholische Filialkirche heilige Bartholomäus --Michielverbeek 19:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Comment Needs perspective correction.--Ermell 20:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC
-
- Nomination Autumn carnival in Dampremy (Charleroi) --Jmh2o 18:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Decline For pictures with people always add this PR template--Basile Morin 02:04, 26 December 2017 (UTC) Oppose for composition; the hat is cut off since the left crop is too tight.--Peulle 14:58, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
The left border of the hat is not on the picture. Sorry i can not ad it.I was seduced by the opposition young-old; color-grey; but a same finger in the mouth… --Jmh2o 19:35, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
I crop the picture, is it better so ? --Jmh2o 19:50, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A snack at the Bistaar art complex. By User:Kritzolina --Masum-al-hasan 10:07, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Decline It's a close call, but I think this kind of photo should be sharper. Also, there is something disturbing at the top - a person's fingers? --Peulle 14:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kaštel fortress, Pula, Croatia. --Poco a poco 11:50, 24 December 2017 (UTC) Comment Some CA on the ladies body on the left side.--Ermell 07:50, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Done Poco a poco 11:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Ermell 07:40, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Nomination Kaštel fortress, Pula, Croatia. --Poco a poco 11:50, 24 December 2017 (UTC) Comment Some CA on the ladies body on the left side.--Ermell 07:50, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Roundabout in Sachseln, canton of Obwalden, Switzerland --JoachimKohlerBremen 20:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --PumpkinSky 02:25, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bahnhof St.Margrethen --Ralf Roletschek 13:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Red flower on small shrub in 'fynbos' type environment, Cape area, South Africa. --Prosthetic Head 15:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Not enough sharpness or detail for QI, sorry. --Peulle 18:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Martyr Habibur Rahman Memorial Sculpture --Mmrsafy 15:59, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Decline Unsharp, lack of detail, IMO not a QI. --Basotxerri 19:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A sheepherder --IssamBarhoumi 15:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Decline IMO the sharpness isn't good enought for a QI. The bottom crop is a bit tight, too. --Basotxerri 19:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Open wing position of Papilio bianor Cramer, 1777 – Common Peacock. Subspecies: Papilio bianor ganesa Doubleday, 1842 – East Himalayan Common Peacock (by Sandipoutsider) --Ikan Kekek 07:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion Question - Is there something wrong with this photo? Anyone want to review it? -- Ikan Kekek 07:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC) Comment the focus better would have been on the head and not on the bottom of the papilio (or is it even the ground?) – ~~~~
Comment - Your signature didn't show up, but thanks for the review. Sandipoutsider has so far taken no action, but I won't withdraw, just in case. -- Ikan Kekek 07:19, 26 December 2017 (UTC) Support Given other reviews of insects in the past, I think this one is good enough for QI level. Please feel free to go to Consensual Review if you disagree.--Peulle 18:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Consensual review[edit]
File:20170608_U21_AUT-GIB_Ritzing_DSC_4876.jpg[edit]
- Nomination European U21 Championship 2019 Qualifying Round, Austria vs. Gibraltar. Picture shows: Bradley Banda (1) --Granada 10:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support This one works. There is a bit of noise because of the high ISO, but you have to do that since it's an action shot. I think you could probably turn up the shutter speed even more as well. --Peulle 11:46, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I set this to CR myself! I want to know what is a good high-ISO sports photo and why. --Granada 12:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support I don't think there is anything wrong with the high ISO-value. The main person is sharp and well done. However it might have better if you would have used a shorter exposure time because the moving ball is not really sharp. But I don't know how far this is realistic, but it's good enough for Q1 (probably not for FP) --Michielverbeek 08:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- The visible motion in the ball and his right foot makes this a good sports photo (especially when enlarged), it is fully intentional. If I was shooting soccer for editorial purposes I would have shot faster at an even higher ISO, downscaled it to reduce the effects of more noise as the newspapers want sharp images. That's sth. valid for all sports images: only few shots are tack sharp at 100%, but that doesn't matter. The newspapers want a maximum of around 2MP for an image, so you can easily downscale your images to make them appear sharp. That's why it's so hard to post new QI sports photos as it is not allowed to downscale them and even higher res sensors make it harder with every new camera released. That goal keeper above was shot with the Nikon D4 (only 16MP!) and I bet if I would have shot this with the D850 now it would not be as sharp around his face as even with just 16MP it shows some blurriness. This one is made with the D850, it is huge (although cropped it still has around the full resolution of the D4) and it's no wonder it opposes some visible (motion) blur at 100%. --Granada 08:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment In case my comment above was unclear, what I meant was that while the ISO should always be set as low as possible to avoid noise, sometimes you have to set it high because of either light conditions or (as here) fast-moving objects. A good sports shot to me freezes the subject completely (which is why I suggested an even faster shutter speed), but sometimes 'action shots' like this one should not be completely frozen and instead include some movement such as wheels spinning or balls having motion blur. In such instances, the movement blur is part of the moment you're trying to capture. However, the blur must not wash out features that should not be lost, such as facial features. This one doesn't lose that and that's why this photo is good enough for QI.--Peulle 13:58, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- The visible motion in the ball and his right foot makes this a good sports photo (especially when enlarged), it is fully intentional. If I was shooting soccer for editorial purposes I would have shot faster at an even higher ISO, downscaled it to reduce the effects of more noise as the newspapers want sharp images. That's sth. valid for all sports images: only few shots are tack sharp at 100%, but that doesn't matter. The newspapers want a maximum of around 2MP for an image, so you can easily downscale your images to make them appear sharp. That's why it's so hard to post new QI sports photos as it is not allowed to downscale them and even higher res sensors make it harder with every new camera released. That goal keeper above was shot with the Nikon D4 (only 16MP!) and I bet if I would have shot this with the D850 now it would not be as sharp around his face as even with just 16MP it shows some blurriness. This one is made with the D850, it is huge (although cropped it still has around the full resolution of the D4) and it's no wonder it opposes some visible (motion) blur at 100%. --Granada 08:23, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support this is not in the photo studio --Ralf Roletschek 08:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support Sport as it should be! --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 11:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Fine. -- Ikan Kekek 17:47, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support Noise? What (disturbing!) noise? --Smial 19:30, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted As there was never a decline vote for this image and the reasoning behind the promotion has been explained, I'm going to speedy promote this one.--Peulle 14:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Церковь_Максима_Блаженного.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Церковь Максима Блаженного, г.Москва, Зарядье, декабрь 2017г. --WM wm WM 23:14, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Nightscene as it should be. Highest Contrast. I like it! --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 14:10, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Overexposed on highlights, perspective distortion --A.Savin 20:49, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roletschek 08:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not too worried about the highlights, but there's definitely perspective distortion: the left side is leaning in rather heavily.--Peulle 14:03, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 17:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --PumpkinSky 22:42, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
File:17-12-12-SXF-KEF-RalfR-DSC_2330.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Winglet of TF-GPA (WOW Air) --Ralf Roletschek 08:56, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- SupportThis image has a certain WOW factor Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
- OpposeI disagree. Poor quality. Certainly shot through a window with a big piece of glass in front of the camera and nothing is sharp. --Basile Morin 10:46, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Acceptable to me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:21, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan --Michielverbeek 08:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Too little of the vinglet is visible, IMO.--Peulle 18:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, very strange composition, sorry. Looks like an error, as when you pushed the shutter button accidently -- Basile Morin 01:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --Peulle 14:23, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
File:Monasterio_Franciscano,_Pula,_Croacia,_2017-04-16,_DD_48.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Detail of the Franciscan Monastery, Pula, Croatia. --Poco a poco 11:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Oppose WTF Ok you will test sense of humor from the community. Overexposed for 2f, drunken perspective, details lost of 75% and I do NOT talk about line leading. Can I give you a extra point about sense of humor? gravely.... --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 17:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Mr Neubert, this is the most DISRESPECTFUL and INSULTING review I've got ever in QIC and I've been here for a while. Nothing else to say. According to Lr NO OVEREXPOSURE. Details are not lost, it is normal and intentional in this kind of perspective shot. This review doesn't speak for you as a photographer, let alone as a person. --Poco a poco 18:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Can you give us a vertical line in this pic? (And a personal tip, or sense of humor, pls. check next time "Pula" before you use it...) Regards!--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 20:04, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Seems good enough to me, especially as it's a large file. It's not always a bad thing for a view to get less sharp as it goes up, especially if it's all really the same thing. And Hans-Jürgen Neubert, please be aware that Poco is one of the best and most prolific photographers on the site, so even if he screws up and nominates something far from QI level (and on rare occasions, I've seen this), it's best to have a tone that comes across as more respectful. If you indeed intended to make a joke, keep in mind that humor often translates poorly in this teletype medium. -- Ikan Kekek 05:18, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I agree with Ikan's comments. About the image, if it has a weakness it's the loss of detail as you go higher, but that's mostly to do with lens distortion, isn't it? I do think that the word "detail" should be in the file description, though.--Peulle 16:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Hans-Jürgen Neubert, I second Ikan's comment about how you use your humor and I think you could benefit form reading Commons:Staying mellow, please. --W.carter 09:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose I've had a couple of days to think about it now and while I in no way agree with the other things said by the first reviewer, I do feel that the distortion problems are covering too big an area in this image. It's about 1/3 of it from the top, leaving several of the shells completely unsharp. I'm not sure what the best recourse would be - perhaps cropping?--Peulle 23:08, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support Pretty for me. You can't have everything focused in such a composition, unless you do focus-staking. Regards, Yann 17:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
- Support As a detail shot: OK for me. --Basotxerri 08:25, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
OpposeNow with changes (from critic). Most space without details, still not one line for the viewer and still more then one EV too bright in middletones and shadows. To cut out the sky can´t hide the matters from missing colour details (Green right side).--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 13:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry Hans-Jürgen Neubert, each of us has got only one vote here. You've already opposed above. --Basotxerri 18:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Promoted --PumpkinSky 22:44, 30 December 2017 (UTC))