Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives April 12 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Ruta29-GralBelgrano-1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination View of Provincial Route 29 in General Belgrano, Buenos Aires province, Argentina --Ezarate 00:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Overprocessed, sorry --Nikride 18:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Nikride, strange combination of noise and blur and halos. --Plozessor 05:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment fixed overprocessing Ezarate 21:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Looking better but still weird to me, especially the trees in background. --Plozessor 06:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Pörtschach_Johannes-Brahms-Promenade_Lake's_morsche_Brückenträme_28032024_0962.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Rotten wooden beams at the lido of My Lake`s on Johannes Brahms Promenade, Pörtschach, Carinthia, Austria -- Johann Jaritz 01:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry but lack of DOF (there's nothing sharp but the very front of the woden beams). Otherwise would be a really nice composition. --Plozessor 03:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support I don't see a problem with DOF. Good enough for an A4-size print. --Smial 13:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Claustro_de_San_Gregorio_Armeno,_Nápoles,_Italia,_2023-03-25,_DD_98.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Claustro de San Gregorio Armeno, Nápoles, Italia, 2023-03-25 (by Poco a poco) --Sebring12Hrs 17:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 19:52, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CA in the upper right corner, near the window --Nikride 19:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
  • There is no CA here, revenge vote, nonsense review. Will still move to CR. --Poco a poco 20:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Please calm down. Purple CA near the window in the upper right corner where there is a cross on the balcony --Nikride 21:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
  • I cannot see any trace of CA at 100%, if I have to look at 300% this is definitely a case of pixel peeping, have you realised the size of the file. You should take that criticism back and so close this matter. It would be funny that you see here CA when most of your images have visible CA. --Poco a poco 08:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Just because you don't see CA (or don't want to see it) doesn't mean they don't exist. This is 100% clearly visible. Nothing funny. Yes, my photos have CA and now I’m forbidden from noticing them on others? --Nikride 10:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  • No, that's not the point as long as it is fair and you don't pixel peep, like here. Revenge is never a good companion when it comes to review. --Poco a poco 11:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Are you saying that there was no pixel peep here? --Nikride 11:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good picture, unable to spot any CA. --Plozessor 14:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good picture, and yes I can see an itsy bitsy tiney hint of purple on the female statues head. But if I'd judged other parts this hard, I'd decline b/c of lacking sharpness.--Tobias ToMar Maier 23:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support By far good enough for an A4-size print, or even larger. --Smial 12:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Füttersee_St._Laurentius_Tür-20230906-RM-160753.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Door of the Protestant Church of St Laurentius in Füttersee --Ermell 05:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose CA --Nikride 11:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment CA means chromatic aberration, there is no such thing on this picture. Poco a poco 07:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Do you think I'm a fool and don't know what CA is!? Violet CAs are clearly visible at the bottom of the doors and at the top at the border of the shadows. --Nikride 10:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  • I only think, that you are embarrassing yourself opposing images with a resolution of 43 MPx where you can hardly see CA and at the same time to try to push your images with less than 10 MPx and visible CA at regular monitor size. I hope that from now one you are not nominating such images anymore. Poco a poco 08:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
  • I don't agree with you, but I'm tired of proving something to you. And please, I will do what I consider necessary --Nikride 10:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I have to agree on the CA thing. That is a bit too much.--Tobias ToMar Maier 23:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Weak oppose Indeed there is 4 pixels wide purple CA at the bottom of the door. Not too disturbing next to the brown door, but would be better (and should not be hard) to fix. --Plozessor 04:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support. Good image. -- Spurzem 15:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done @Nikride: @Tobias ToMar Maier: @Plozessor: Fixed that problem. Have another look.--Ermell 13:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Very good now! --Plozessor 18:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Per Plozessor --Nikride (talk) 19:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Excellent --Tobias ToMar Maier 22:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Total: 6 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

File:Kruger_National_Park_(ZA),_Krokodil_--_2024_--_0498.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Crocodile in the Sabie River in Kruger National Park, Mpumalanga, South Africa --XRay 03:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
  • Decline
     Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The head of the crocodile is blurred. --Bgag 13:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Yes, blurred. Charlesjsharp 07:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. Also somewhat overexposed. --Smial 12:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 23:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)