User talk:Nikride

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Nikride!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Вікові дерева груші і дуб (пзф)

Трям.Як сіє розвидіти, плз -обидві ваші фото пзф 71-231-5011 "Вікові дерева груші і дуба" зроблені очевидно в різних локаціях? Чекаю, ібо мандрую тутачки, шпс. https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D1%96%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D1%96_%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%B3%D1%80%D1%83%D1%88%D1%96_%D1%96_%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%B0 --Мокрицький Павло (talk) 15:00, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

А можна по-людськи, бо нічого не зрозумів --Nikride (talk) 16:00, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Так, у різних локаціях --Nikride (talk) 16:56, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Чечелівка. Братська могила радянських воїнів.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 20:03, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вікторівка (Маньківський р-н). Пам'ятник воїнам-односельцям.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Скала. Річка Роська.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:56, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Молодецьке (Маньківський р-н). Вулиця Центральна.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 08:54, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Маньківка (смт). В'їзд у смт.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:10, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Березівка (Маньківський р-н). Млин.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 00:09, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Подібна. Центр села.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Романівка (Тальнівський р-н). Млин.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine but it needs a more specific category apart from the place --Poco a poco 15:56, 9 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 16:18, 9 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:23, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Юрківці (Немирівський р-н). Центр села.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Білки (Іллінецький р-н). Пам'ятник воїнам-односельцям.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Копіївка (Іллінецький р-н). В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Дзензелівка. В'їзд у село (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Маньківка (смт). Пенсійний фонд.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok then,  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 16:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Маньківка (смт). Перехрестя вулиць Шевченка і Зоряної.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need perspective correction too, otherwise good. --Plozessor 04:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 08:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Росоховата. Пам'ятник воїнам-односельчанам (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now. --Berthold Werner 09:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Жадани (Іллінецький р-н). Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Торчиця. В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Hints of CA but good quality. --MB-one 19:52, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Джуринці. Вид на село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality would be ok but it's somehow tilted/distorted, none of the buildlings are vertical. --Plozessor 05:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)  Done, perspective correction and horizontal alignment --Nikride 08:28, 15 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 12:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ситківці. Центр смт.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the picture but it also has CA (see the right side of the church) and needs slight perspective correction. --Plozessor 05:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 08:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 12:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Юрківці (Немирівський р-н). Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This has a dust spot above the right tree, and in general has some slight CA at the trees. It was made with a quite good camera so I guess the CA could be fixed with better raw conversion. --Plozessor 05:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)  Done, dust spots and CA have been removed --Nikride 08:34, 15 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 12:59, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Зелений Ріг. Річка Конела.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Нагірна. Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Маньківка (смт). Церква.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments perspective correction needed --MB-one 21:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 08:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:50, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Кислин. Вулиця Шевченка.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Одай. Автобусна зупинка.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A cat related to bus stops would be good --Poco a poco 09:41, 17 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 10:09, 17 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 18:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Мала Ростівка. Палац.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments perspective correction needed. Otherwise good --MB-one 11:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 19:02, 15 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:08, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Цибулів. Пам'ятник воїнам-односельцям (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Shougissime 13:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Кислин. Річка Гірський Тікич.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add an English description and use also an Enlish file name. --Ermell 09:51, 16 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 13:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Thank you. --Ermell 06:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Вербівка (Іллінецький р-н). Вулиця Центральна.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Moiree on the fence left. Could also use some sharpening --MB-one 09:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 10:20, 18 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good enough --MB-one 21:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Галайки. В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Тульчин. Старий палац (Потоцьких).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Кути (Маньківський р-н). Вулиця Центральна.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Олексіївка (Іллінецький р-н). Вулиця.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs to be sharpened a bit --MB-one 09:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 10:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:04, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ситківці. Вознесенська церква.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment You need to remove the CAs and you should correct the perspective correction. --Tournasol7 19:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 17:58, 11 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Маньківка (смт). Будинок культури.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:56, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Синиця. Кам’яний міст.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 13:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Червоний Кут (Жашківський р-н). Пам'ятник Т.Г.Шевченку.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Маньківка. Пам’ятний знак жертвам Голокосту.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Тимошівка (Маньківський р-н). Пам’ятний знак жертвам Голодомору.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, but it needs a more specifc cat --Poco a poco 11:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 11:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Софіпіль. Георгіївська церква.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:29, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Синарна. Церква святого Димитрія.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Богатирка. Михайлівська церква.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right side is leaning in, CA --Poco a poco 19:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 20:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Better --Poco a poco 18:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Кислин. Пам'ятник воїнам-односельцям (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you offer more crop on the top, it's too tight right now --Poco a poco 19:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 08:23, 21 February 2024 (UTC) That's not the way, the perspective was better before. In Lr you can move the images in the Y axle to show more from the top --Poco a poco 19:03, 21 February 2024 (UTC)  Done thanks for the advice! --Nikride 19:50, 21 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:51, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Джуринці. Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:37, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Василиха. В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 15:58, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Торчиця. Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Neoclassicism Enthusiast 19:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Дмитрушки. Пам'ятник Тарасу Шевченку.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 08:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Зелений Ріг. Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Hints of CA and noise, but good enough --MB-one 10:22, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Крачківка. Сільрада.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Любча (Ставищенський р-н). Вулиця Каштанова.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Гостра Могила. Вулиця Центральна.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 11:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Гостра Могила. В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Кислин. Річка Гірський Тікич (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Русалівка. Річка Гірський Тікич.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Нова Гребля (Жашківський р-н). Центр села.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ситківці. Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments please remove the leaf up right (with CA). Otherwise ok --MB-one 15:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 15:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 12:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Криштопівське. В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you perspective correct (see left posts) and sharpen? --Mike Peel 22:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC) * @Mike Peel Fixed --Nikride 16:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC) Sharpeness is better, but I think the perspective went the wrong way - the poles on the left lean more now, but should be vertical? --Mike Peel 10:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)  Done does that look better? --Nikride 11:40, 25 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 13:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Тимошівка (Маньківський р-н). Річка Кищиха.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:35, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Тимошівка (Маньківський р-н). Вулиця Шевченка.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:12, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Володарка. Школа №1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support There is a bit of purple CA (as in most of your pictures) but still ok --Poco a poco 17:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Березівка (Маньківський р-н). Вулиця Благовісна.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 10:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Володарка. Знак.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some CA at the towers, but for me still ok as the subject is the sign. --Plozessor 05:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Володарка. Адмінбудівля.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Жадани (Іллінецький р-н). Пам'ятник воїну-односельчанину.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor of Zabotin family in Mala Rostivka, Palace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Place name sign in Mankivka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Володарка. Ресторан "Тоніо".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment lots of uninteresting road surface in the foreground. --MB-one 11:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)  Done @MB-one: Thanks --Nikride 09:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:13, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Іваньки (Маньківський р-н). В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CA should be removed --Ermell 14:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Nikride 14:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Китайгород. Пам'ятник воїнам-односельчанам (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The verticals should be corrected and the CA removed. --Ermell 18:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)  Done @Ermell: Thanks --Nikride 19:03, 1 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Synytsia Stone Bridge in Synytsia Park.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• There are better images to illustrate the bridge. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Yes, but here you can see the park and the lake better, which as a whole is a park-monument of garden and park art, which is an object of the nature reserve fund, and the bridge is an architectural monument of national importance. Nikride (talk) 13:08, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Зрайки. Центр села.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:50, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ратуш (Володарський р-н). Автобусна зупинка.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Рачки (Володарський р-н). Головна вулиця.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Іваньки (Маньківський р-н). Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Іваньки (Маньківський р-н). Центр села.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Юрпіль. Вулиця Центральна.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Березівка (Маньківський р-н). Вид на село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:37, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Любча (Ставищенський р-н). Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:39, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Винарівка (Ставищенський р-н). В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:39, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Зрайки. Автобусна зупинка.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Potocki Palace in Tulchyn - Central entrance - facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Looks VI but best to mention orientation e.g. South-Western facade. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
• Many thanks, but the other side could also be considered Central (Main) facade! Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

• That's better? --Nikride (talk) 18:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks; I've altered slightly Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Пархомівка (Іллінецький р-н). Пам'ятник воїнам-односельчанам.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some CA left to remove. --Ermell 18:16, 29 February 2024 (UTC)  Done @Ermell: Thanks --Nikride 13:24, 2 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 11:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Лопатинка. Вулиця Жовтнева.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mass grave of 49 Soviet soldiers in Chechelivka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 14:57, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Мервин. Головна вулиця.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 21:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint George church, Sofipil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Завадівка (Володарський р-н). Автошлях Р-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Володарка. Вулиця Армійська.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 01:03, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Demetrius church, Synarna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War II memorial in Rosokhovata.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope

•  Comment the voter's signature missing. The first vote cannot be validated--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Кашперівка (Тетіївський р-н). В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Чагів. Вулиця Заїки.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine but can you please remove the shadow at the bottom? --Poco a poco 13:47, 8 March 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Nikride 14:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to 66 Soviet soldiers-countrymen, Parkhomivka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Капустинці (Володарський р-н). В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Кашперівка (Тетіївський р-н). Цукровий завод.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Синарна. Вулиця.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:48, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Тетіїв. Площа Героїв Майдану.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky is a bit noisy and it needs more relevant categories --MB-one 10:42, 8 March 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Nikride 11:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:35, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Бабин (Іллінецький р-н). Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice reflection. Seems overexposed. Reducing the exposure would bring out the colours better. --Tagooty 03:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)  Done Thanks --Nikride 12:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 12:47, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Чепіжинці. Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Черепин (Тетіївський р-н). Центр села.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Kytaihorod.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Дібрівка (Тетіївський р-н). Сільрада.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael church in Mankivka - rear facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:22, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

• P.S. Does the church also have a name?--Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
   Done --Nikride (talk) 18:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

• Dank u wel.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Красилівка (Ставищенський р-н). Вулиця Центральна.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
House of culture in the village of Mankivka - Central entrance - facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Чернявка (Оратівський р-н). Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 10:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Скибин (Жашківський р-н). В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Розумниця. Вулиця Миру.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Станіславчик (Ставищенський р-н). Вулиця Садова.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:23, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Пугачівка (Уманський р-н). Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 18:58, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Кам'яногірка (Оратівський р-н). В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sign "I love Volodarka".
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Косівка (Володарський р-н). Косівське водосховище.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments CAs on the trees - fixable? --Grunpfnul 12:01, 14 March 2024 (UTC)  Done, thanks --Nikride 18:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 07:57, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Дмитрушки. Амбулаторія.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Старі Бабани. В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, but there is purple CA, look a the branches on the right --Poco a poco 19:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)  Done, thanks! --Nikride 19:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Розкішна. Вулиця Віталія Галянта.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:51, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Іванівка (Уманський р-н). В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Брилівка (Ставищенський р-н). Вулиця Вишнева.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Маньківка. Пам'ятник Б.П. Бугаєву.jpg

File:Маньківка. Пам'ятник Б.П. Бугаєву.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 14:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Маньківка. Пам’ятний знак воїнам-інтернаціоналістам.jpg

File:Маньківка. Пам’ятний знак воїнам-інтернаціоналістам.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 14:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Вікторівка. Пам'ятник В. С. Близнюку.jpg

File:Вікторівка. Пам'ятник В. С. Близнюку.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 14:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Цибулів. Меморіальна дошка на честь воїна-інтернаціоналіста В. Корченюка (2).jpg

File:Цибулів. Меморіальна дошка на честь воїна-інтернаціоналіста В. Корченюка (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 14:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Сарни (Монастирищенський р-н). Меморіальна дошка М.М. Борецькому.jpg

File:Сарни (Монастирищенський р-н). Меморіальна дошка М.М. Борецькому.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 14:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Жашків. Пам’ятник “Жорна”.jpg

File:Жашків. Пам’ятник “Жорна”.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Микола Василечко (talk) 14:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tsybuliv Ministry School - Central entrance - facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Трифонов Андрей (talk) 16:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ascension Church in the village of Sytkivtsi (1826).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

To illustrate the category of a temple (it has not been created) - good, to illustrate an entire settlement - not enough --Трифонов Андрей (talk) 16:24, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Intercession in the village Letychivka, Ukraine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment a correction of perspective would be desirable. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done --Nikride (talk) 07:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Пархомівка (Іллінецький р-н). Вулиця Миру.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Massive CAs at the white edges all over the photo, imho slightaly overexposed, some burnt highlights. Fixable? --Tuxyso 12:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 13:59, 24 March 2024 (UTC)  Support remarkable better, imho QI now. --Tuxyso 17:51, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Telizhyntsi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 18:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:01, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Tainytsia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 17:58, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 12:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Sofipil.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Dormition, Piatyhory.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Perspective correction necessary. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done --Nikride (talk) 14:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Nenadykha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:08, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War II memorial in Piatyhory.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 08:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

QI Reviews

Hi. As already said on QIC. If you cannot accept criticism and you reaction is bullshit feedbacks on those reviewers that don't promote your images, please, don't participate on QIC. If you continue down this path you will be banned. Thank you for your understanding. Poco a poco (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Good evening. I calmly respond to constructive criticism (unlike you). But there were only nitpicks on your part, not criticism. And now there are threats and insults. Nikride (talk) 20:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

There is no objectivity in your judgements. I haven't either insulted anybody here and what you call thread is a warning. I'd rather warn before blocking, I think that's fair. You know that your feedback on my pictures is nonsense and just motivated by revenge (otherwise you are not ready to review on QIC), and we don't need such disruptive reviewers that frustrate others. Poco a poco (talk) 08:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

There is no need to scare or warn me by blocking me, because there is nothing to block me for. Moreover, you cannot block me, because you are a party to the conflict and are not acting objectively. Nikride (talk) 10:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

At the end, through the reviews of third parties, you'll see which pictures get promoted and which not. I've seen over the years many people like you on QIC. There are people I invest time in but you are none of them for what I've seen. Good luck and good bye. Poco a poco (talk) 11:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Mykhailivka (Bila Tserkva Raion).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 10:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 02:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Dibrivka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Denykhivka - front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done --Nikride (talk) 07:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers and partisans in Holodky - front view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

 Done --Nikride (talk) 07:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Дмитрушки. Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too bright IMO --Ermell 22:20, 27 March 2024 (UTC)  Done --Nikride 07:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC) Overall still too bright IMO --Ermell 10:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC) The photo was taken in the summer at 12 PM. Naturally it will be bright, but without overexposure --Nikride 12:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC) Good quality. --Tobias ToMar Maier 23:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Holodky.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Halaiky.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Yurkivka, Bila Tserkva Raion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cenotaph for Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Burkivtsi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War II memorial in Chervone, Stavyshche Hromada.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Contributers2020^{Talk to me here!} 10:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War II memorial in Stanislavchyk.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War II memorial in Rozumnytsia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mass grave of 150 Jews, killed by nazis in Rozkishna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mass grave of 50 Jews, killed by nazis in Rozkishna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Is this the mass grave or a memorial? Many moree than 50 jews were shot. Better to use German rather than nazis. Can Ukrainian collaboration with German forces be ruled out here? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Inscription on the monument: "Here lie the ashes of 50 Jewish men, old men and children of Soviet citizens who were brutally killed by the German fascists and their policemen in September 1941 from Stavysche" Nikride (talk) 14:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Support Ok thanks Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Rozkishna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Розсішки. Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Михайлівка (Тетіївський р-н). Ставок.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War II memorial in Rozkishna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 08:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Коритня (Монастирищенський р-н). В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 16:39, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Popruzhna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Krasylivka, Bila Tserkva Raion.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment it would be useful to have an English translation in the caption. We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus:  Done --Nikride (talk) 07:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Windmill in Heisykha - entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War II memorial in Heisykha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial sign to Soviet soldiers-countrymen at Vasylykha cemetery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Vasylykha.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Жашків. Універмаг.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War II memorial in Brylivka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Кочубіївка. В'їзд у село.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 10:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial sign to victims of Holodomor in Besidka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mass grave of Soviet soldiers in Besidka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Usefull and used,--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World War II memorial in Besidka.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 22:00, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial sign to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Chepizhyntsi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 19:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mass grave of the victims of Holodomor in Rude Selo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 14:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:56, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grave of Red Army officer Oleksandr Budarin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 09:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)