Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Praposhchik deputy shoulder straps

Praposhchik deputy shoulder straps, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2016 at 00:45:19 (UTC)

• 
  Zaurjad-praporshchik on Wachtmeister position of Squadron of Russian His Majesty's Cuirassier Guards Regiment
• 
  Zaurjad-praporshchik on Wachtmeister position of Squadron of Russian His Majesty's Cuirassier Guards Regiment (horizontal version)
• 
  Zaurjad-praporshchik of Russian 1st Grenadier Artillery Brigade
• 
  Zaurjad-praporshchik of Russian 1st Grenadier Artillery Brigade (horizontal version)
• 
  Podpraporshchik (Junior-praposhchik)on assignment «Wachtmeister», 3rd Horse artillery battery
• 
  Podpraporshchik (Junior-praposhchik)on assignment «Wachtmeister», 3rd Horse artillery battery (horizontal version)
• 
  Podpraporshchik (Junior-praposhchik) on assignment «Senior unteroffizier» – Kashirsky 144th infantry regiment
• 
  Podpraporshchik (Junior-praposhchik) on assignment «Senior unteroffizier» – Kashirsky 144th infantry regiment (horizontal version)

•  Info Set of images (Computer-generated Category, Insignia) are part of rank insignia and world shoulder straps collection. Сreated by Alexey Khudiakov (Semiryak) (designer) — uploaded by Alexey Khudiakov (Semiryak) — nominated by Niklitov — Niklitov (talk) 00:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support — Niklitov (talk) 00:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment - There's been debate at COM:QIC about whether these, as non-photographic images, should be at least 2 MP. I think that on FPC, we pretty much ignore minimum sizes if an image is truly outstanding. But where we've ignored minimum sizes, I don't think they've been this small, and the question in this case is whether a larger size would make the details more visible. For my part, I'd love to be able to zoom in and look more closely at the stitches. These certainly are useful as VIs, but whether they merit FP designation is a question that gives me some pause. What do you all think about this question? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose They are technically well executed, but too small for today's requirements -- either on a high-DPI display/phone or printed. But more generally, I don't think it reasonable to feature, as a set, every tiny detail of a uniform. What next? Featured buttons? The approach taken at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Types of epaulette of the Russian Empire (1855).png (which links to individual images) is more appropriate I think. Is this set complete? -- Colin (talk) 18:21, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 00:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Colin. lNeverCry 08:23, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Mile (talk) 14:41, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Absolutely wonderful work, but way too small. And per Colin's last question.--Jebulon (talk) 16:00, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

 Comment Dear frends! Please find Commons talk Quality_images_candidates#2_MP_for_non-photographic_media. Your opinion? — Niklitov (talk) 08:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• I will  Oppose as well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:09, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination. The set may not be a complete. Thank you for attention! — Niklitov (talk) 21:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /lNeverCry 02:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC)