Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Hereford Cathedral Nave

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2019 at 12:54:05 (UTC)

Hereford Cathedral's nave looking towards the choir, viewed from the west.
Hereford Cathedral's nave looking towards the western entrance and stained glass windows, viewed from the east

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info Two images of the nave of Hereford Cathedral, from opposite ends of the nave. Originally a Norman church, the cathedral has been heavily restored, not least after the collapse of the west tower in 1786; much of the original Norman architecture remains, however. The images are already featured on the English Wikipedia. I felt a set nomination was appropriate here, following the precedent of the York Minster nomination. Created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The usual high standard others try to meet. Though I think File:Hereford Cathedral Choir, Herefordshire, UK - Diliff.jpg is the best of the photos, which is presumably why Diliff nominated that one earlier. -- Colin (talk) 13:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I guess the architecture of the choir is a little more distinctive. Worth noting that Diliff did nominate both of these at English Wikipedia FPC though, I'm surprised he never got round to them here. Cmao20 (talk) 20:48, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 23:35, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 23:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support As always. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:05, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:12, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:36, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:41, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:04, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:53, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pile-on support Daniel Case (talk) 17:45, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:31, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:52, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:41, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think only one would have been "featurable". To nominate two is problematic: nobody noticed the differences of colors of the ground/pavement ? One of the two is wrong.--Jebulon (talk) 16:48, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jebulon: I see what you mean, but I don't think it necessarily means one of the two is 'wrong'. Look at the EXIF data - the first image was taken at 3:43pm, the second at 4:05pm. Most probably the lighting conditions within the church had changed slightly between the two pictures - but I don't think that's an avoidable problem given the amount of time it takes to produce these pictures. Both images are still faithful depictions of the church as it was on that day - just at slightly different times. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Light will also alter colors depending on camera angle to it. These two photos are taken in different directions = different light = different colors. --Cart (talk) 07:41, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 14:26, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Navigation menu