Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/February 2023

File:Caucasus, Ingushetia, Ингушские боевые и смотровые башни на закате, горы Кавказа.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2023 at 11:59:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Russia
Info Fortified Ingush military towers of Erzi in Armkhi Valley, Ingushetia, Central Caucasus. The height of the medieval towers is around 29 metres (95 ft), circa 16th century. The Armkhi mountain valley is illuminated by the rays of the setting sun glimpsed through the broken cloud cover. Created, uploaded, nominated by --Argenberg (talk) 11:59, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 11:59, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe the crop on the left is questionable, but this photo is sharp, the light is beautiful, and the layered composition is otherwise excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek, thanks for review. When I decided to do a second take on this image before posting it here, I initially felt the same way as you, that the left crop should be addressed. So I spent a few minutes trying different crops on the left, and every time it felt like the mass/geometrical/spatial balance of various elements in the composition and in relation to each other, with important space above the leftmost building, got somehow lost or affected. So after some playing around I ended up with just leaving it as is. --Argenberg (talk) 15:17, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you upload any of the alternate crops? It would be interesting to see them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:13, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, I was trying different crops on the go while re-developing this image in Adobe Lightroom. Working on framing a shot is very much like practicing w:Feng shui in real time. --Argenberg (talk) 22:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Rosalina 🍵 459755 05:10, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, though I wish the crop on the left was better. Still, I like the photo's sharpness. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SHB2000 (talk • contribs) 06:22, 27 January 2023‎ (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking dramatic weather with special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:56, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting subject and nice light Poco a poco (talk) 08:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:51, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think a little bit lower temp would be good. A bit too yellow despite sunset. --Mile (talk) 14:33, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mile, it could be. But I don’t see any color casts here. Do you? There are all shades of green on the slopes, and clouds on the left seem sure enough blue. It says that the color balance is technically correct at the least. Please mind the very complex lighting conditions in the scene. With so many reflections and refractions and light scattering in and through the clouds it is almost impossible to decide what’s right in this type of light, even if you’ve seen it with your own eyes, so I guess it all comes down to a taste. I personally like the warm mellow tones here, and wanted to have them even warmer, albeit with some red hues, but I never apply any colorwork except for minor correcting changes to global white balance (temperature/tint). --Argenberg (talk) 15:17, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 23:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:25, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 10:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 16:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tempered support The highlights on the smaller tower might be tamped down a bit. Daniel Case (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Russia

File:Bothe-Napa Valley State Park (01811).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Feb 2023 at 02:11:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family_:_Fagaceae
Info Moss and lichen-covered blue oaks in Bothe-Napa Valley State Park (California). I've toyed with nominating this since I uploaded it. I find the layers of this forest beautiful, with bushes below, moss-covered trunks in the middle, and lichen-covered branches at top. There are obvious technical problems (mainly DoF, with some blurry branches in the foreground), but perhaps others find the scene special enough. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:11, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual but fascinating (works in full screen mode); it seems like a scene from a scary movie. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:10, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. Imagine this photo as a wallpaper in a bar … --Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin -- Jakubhal 15:17, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 00:31, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating at full size --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry, it isn't working to me. I don't find the composition good. Maybe a focus on the top of the trees would have looked better, but like this it lacks wow to me without anything else than compensates that. Poco a poco (talk) 15:59, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't get the composition. And why the blurred leaves in the foreground? Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:22, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charlesjsharp and Poco a poco. Looks like a random picture to me, very messy. Sorry. Je-str (talk) 16:36, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Looks like something you'd see in a fantasy TV series, film or videogame. What's imperfect about it as a photograph makes it work as an image. Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 454344 05:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I do think it should be a featured image just from the atmosphere it radiates, but the focus doesn't lie well on anything in particular. Nothing is super sharp. --Explodingcreepsr (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 10:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charlesjsharp and Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 16:46, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 16:21, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco. --StellarHalo (talk) 05:11, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:16, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've given myself time to react to this composition, but in the end, I get it, and it works both as a linear arabesque and a three-dimensional composition. The mossy tree limbs produce their own lines that contrast with and interact with the rest of the picture frame. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:15, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Fagaceae

File:Restant van een aardappelbovist (Scleroderma citrinum). 21-01-2023. (d.j.b) 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2023 at 05:37:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Sclerodermataceae
Info Remnant of one Scleroderma citrinum in beautiful earthy colors between fallen leaves. Location, De Famberhorst. Focus stack of 20 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:37, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question What are those white bead-like things on top? Drops of dew on spiderwebs? --Explodingcreepsr (talk) 17:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
:*Answer: Those are indeed threads of cobwebs covered with dewdrops.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In that case, absolutely Support. It's a very good photo and the dew-laden spiderwebs seal the deal. Explodingcreepsr (talk) 18:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Explodingcreepsr. For a brief moment, my first thought when sorting the recently promoted QIs was to see something very creepy. The morbid fascination of passing is aptly achieved with this image. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:48, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice details and colors, well composed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 23:00, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:51, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk)
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 13:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The impression I get from Commons FPC is that nearly all of Europe is coated in fine water droplets. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 14:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Sclerodermataceae

File:Venezuelan Kitchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2023 at 12:17:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Others
Info Photograph of a typical kitchen in a poor rural area of the Isla de Margarita, Venezuela -- Wilfredor (talk) 12:17, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Recognizable order in the disorder. For me the quality is not enough, especially the right blurred frame.--Ermell (talk) 22:29, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Both the left and right sides have noticeable blur, but I do quite like the visibility this brings to the conditions in poor rural areas. Not many photos like this out there. --Explodingcreepsr (talk) 17:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality problems. Some frames are blurred. Also narrow DoF. We had full 360° panoramas nominated here with better sharpness and without blown highlights, like for example File:Waste hall - in Iru Thermal Power Plant.jpg or File:Fire extinguishing system.jpg. This picture in comparison is technically awkward in my opinion. Interesting image but not FP quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I could have chosen to downsize the photo and it would have been a clear photo that meets the requirements but I preferred to upload the whole photo. It was a very dark kitchen so the depth of field was not sufficient in some areas (this is not blurriness). There are also circumstantial factors such as the difficulty of taking photos in these regions, very different from taking a photo in more accessible places for trave --Wilfredor (talk) 13:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"it would have been a clear photo that meets the requirements" =>

Disagree. When downsized at 4000 pixels large only (that is not big, considering the ratio with horizontal orientation), the blur is already visible, and oddly distributed. The foreground at the right is in focus, then we have a blurred frame isolated in the middle, at the left the foreground is out of focus. Sorry, technically not okay -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:04, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The minimal requeriment of FPC is 2000 pixels, not 40000 pixels --Wilfredor (talk) 14:15, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The minimal requirement is Length x Width > 2 megapixels, though at this size without mitigating reason, the nominations are traditionnally considered "too small". Lots of examples available in the archives. 4'000 pixels is not big but not "dramatically small" either. It is a static subject, so no difficulty with a tripod. I don't understand why using F/3.5 (from the exif), as if the blur was intentional. Anyway, that's the resolution offerred, with its advantages and drawbacks, hence the resolution we judge. At full size it looks like a patchwork with some squares in focus and others with a different DoF, and I also notice several stitching errors at multiple locations of the image.

Apart from that, I find the cylindrical projection with distorted perspective unappealing. I would have preferred either a full 360° composition compatible with the panoramic viewer, or a rectilinear perspective with an ultra-large angle lens. Regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support I don't think the argument that "I could have (violated usual guidelines and) downsized the photo" is a good one, but I also don't think it's essential to have a DoF that makes every part of the picture in focus. Enough is in focus, IMO, and it's an interesting photo. Whether you support it or not is a matter of taste. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:11, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan Kekek. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:58, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile, the mixture of focused and out-of-focus frames (e.g., foreground pan on the right; background right corner, just below the dish rack) spoils the image, best to lock focus (and exposure) when shooting panoramas --Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan Kekek. --Wieggy (talk) 16:14, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I don't blame you in the slightest for wanting to throw your arms around this scene, and capture all of it ... I tarried through lots of it, looking at parts in closeup, feeling the life in this place, letting the pots and pans on the wall at right evoke the opening scene of One Hundred Years of Solitude. But nonetheless, I agree that doing it with this sort of projection overdoes it. I'd love to see it as a 360º panorama if that might be possible someday in the future. Daniel Case (talk) 04:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your feedback. It is heart-wrenching to see that it is not possible to bring the magical realism of that novel to life in Venezuela, a country that is not only the most dangerous in Latin America, but also a dictatorship. For those of us who are Venezuelan, it is difficult to escape once we enter and carrying a professional camera is almost a death sentence. This country is the antithesis of Macondo, instead of being destroyed by wild capitalism, it has been destroyed by patriotic socialist conservativism (the easiest ideology to use at the moment, but any excuse is feasible for corruption). I apologize for going off topic, but this is a subject that touches me deeply at the heart due to a decade without being able to visit my parents. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry; that's really painful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thank you all for the feedback, especially the negative ones, I will take them into account in the future --Wilfredor (talk) 19:28, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:B-LAE - Cathay Pacific - Airbus A330-342 - MSN 850 - VGHS.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2023 at 16:17:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Airliners
Info created by Md Shaifuzzaman Ayon - uploaded by Md Shaifuzzaman Ayon - nominated by Vifvuv -- Vifvuv (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Vifvuv (talk) 16:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Quality of the image is far below what we expect here for FP. Please, try first to bring some images over QI to gather here some experience. Poco a poco (talk) 19:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Sendero con río y árboles en Aquilpo.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2023 at 15:48:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Peru
Info created by Maël Martin - uploaded by Maël Martin - nominated by Cbrescia -- Cbrescia (talk) 15:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cbrescia (talk) 15:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant Oppose I am very sorry. This is certainly an impressive place, I can imagine that the members of the expedición fotográfica felt like the first explorers. However it is hard to take good photographs under these difficult circumstances, and I fear the result is not on the level we expect from a featured picture. I really wish it would; I have tried to improve the photo a bit, but with limited success – I could recover some dark areas and some of the branches in the sky, fix the stronger CAs etc., but I can’t invent details which are not there. (And even if I could, I should not do that.) If there is a raw image file available for this shot, I offer to try it again, probably we could get better lights and shadows; but even then I fear that in many areas the level of details is unsatisfying. Sorry again, --Aristeas (talk) 09:00, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks @Aristeas for your comments and effort, helps us learn. Cheers, Cbrescia (talk) 11:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you for your understanding, Cbrescia! As said before, I am really sorry not being able to support this photo. This was certainly an impressive expedition and I admire your commitment – the photographs are very interesting and useful, and the same is true for your other caminatas. --Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Cbrescia (talk) 13:43, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, X neutral → not featured. /--Cbrescia (talk) 13:47, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morus bassanus - Wilhelma 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2023 at 07:55:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Sulidae (Boobies and Gannets)
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:55, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:56, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unique face, very good quality and pleasant rainbow-colored water. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 09:42, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:37, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I like its face; the wow factor is why I'm supporting, despite the poor crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:28, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:28, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Sulidae (Boobies and Gannets)

File:Catedral, Perugia, Italia, 2022-09-20, DD 42-44 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2023 at 11:39:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info Interior of the Perugia Cathedral, Umbria, Italy. The current cathedral dates from a project of 1300, was initiated in 1345 and completed in 1490 but wasn't until 1587 that it was consecrated. The gothic church is dedicated to Saint Lawrence and built with marble and travertine. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 11:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 11:39, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support The background could be brighter and - sorry - the camera bag is disturbing. --XRay 💬 13:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback, XRay, I addressed your concerns Poco a poco (talk) 16:31, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Wieggy (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good and atmospheric! Thank you very much, Diego, for your recent photos from Tuscany and Umbria (not to mention Rome)! I have been often in these lovely provinces in the 1990s and admired there the superabundance of wonderful artworks even in the smallest towns as well as the painterly landscapes and citscapes. On Commons, just as on Flickr and Co., we have countless photos of Florence, Siena, Assisi and Rome, but only a fraction of these pictures is good; and we totally lack good photos of many smaller towns. So it’s really wonderful that you close some of the big gaps with your new photographs, both regarding the famous sites and the not-that-famous ones. I can only encourage others who have the luck to travel these blessed provinces to join in and to take more solid photographs also of the smaller towns and villages which nevertheless often contain wonderful churches, palaces and monuments. Just some arbitrary examples: even small villages like Montefioralle (FI), Lucignano (AR), Monterchi (AR), Monteriggioni (SI), San Quirico d’Orcia (SI), Spello (PG) etc. would allow several FPs if one finds the right places, time and light … not to mention cities like Arezzo, Perugia, Montepulciano, Cortona … and there are so many more. --Aristeas (talk) 10:31, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FPs of the cloister and choir of Abbey of Monte Oliveto Maggiore in Chiusure would be great, too, and we have only two FPs of San Gimignano so far. Cortona is another great spot.-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Your work continues to be an inspiration for me. --Nheyob (talk) 14:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Need a perspective correction, I added notes directly to the image. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Poco a poco (talk) 22:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The other correction (on the horizontal note) is missing. One column is higher than the other --Wilfredor (talk) 20:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done I did apply some horizontal perspective correction, but I applied another one --Poco a poco (talk) 22:37, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Without the Rucksack.--Ermell (talk) 22:36, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 14:20, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 16:22, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy

File:Catedral, Arezzo, Italia, 2022-09-17, DD 77-79 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2023 at 12:01:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Ceremony in the Arezzo Cathedral to honour the knights from Porta Santo Spirito as winners of the 2022 Saracen Joust (in Italian Giostra del Saracino) of Arezzo. In the event, that takes place in June and September, participate the four quarters of the town of Arezzo: Porta Crucifera, known as Culcitrone (green and red), Porta del Foro, known as Porta San Lorentino (yellow and crimson), Porta Sant'Andrea (white and green) and Porta del Borgo, today called Porta Santo Spirito (yellow and blue). c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 12:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support You did a bunch of interesting things on that trip to Italy. Would it be worth considering a crop that gets rid of the cellphone on the left? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The smartphone doesn’t bother me as much as the in-motion blurred arm, but I do think that a crop to get rid of the phone or the arm would inevitably disturb the symmetry of the scene a little too much. I personally prefer the image as is. :) UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I got rid of that cellphone, I agree that it was distracting. To avoid a significant crop I mostly cloned it out. I balanced it on the right and, above all, I improved the crop on the top to keep the central arch. Poco a poco (talk) 19:51, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 18:44, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 21:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:33, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:17, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 06:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:20, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 16:25, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Leucistic squirrel in Prospect Park (85569).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2023 at 18:47:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Sciuridae_(Squirrels)
Info A white eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis), an extremely uncommon variation in an extremely common species, this is either the first or second I've ever seen (probably the same individual I saw a couple years ago). There are two causes of white squirrels: albinism and leucism. You can tell this one is leucistic by the dark eye. It's unknown exactly how rare they are because it's assumed that they don't live very long in the wild (the ones with albinism because of vision problems, and the rest because they may be more conspicuous to predators), but I saw one guess of 1 in 100,000. I just uploaded several shots of this one, and while this image obscures part of its body, I like the composition. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:47, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Cute, very typical squirrel behavior. Is this stitched? There's one hard line above the squirrel's head that marks a boundary between a brighter tan and a blue and darker tan. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ikan Kekek: Ah! No, not stitched, but there was a tiny branch sticking out there that I removed [poorly]. Fixed now, I think. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, it's good now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:10, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light, composition and background -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 10:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:33, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 16:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 07:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:07, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:39, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 17:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 10:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 10:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:50, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of our cockatiels is like this ... thanks for showing me the word for "all-white but not albino". Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:22, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Sciuridae_(Squirrels)

File:Low sunlight at Øksfjorden in Loppa, Troms og Finnmark, Norway, 2022 August.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2023 at 20:07:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Norway#Northern_Norway_(Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)
Info created and uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 20:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 20:07, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 21:15, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic! Great find, IamMM! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:13, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support +1 -- Radomianin (talk) 23:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Spectacular encapsulated sun. The lower right corner is a bit busy with the out-of-focus plants of the foreground, though not too distracting in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 10:36, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 07:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:26, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fischer.H (talk) 10:34, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 16:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Norway#Northern_Norway_(Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)

File:Ausweis Puy-de-Dôme 1847.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Feb 2023 at 08:46:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Others#Historical
Info Reproduced from the original document, uploaded and nominated by -- Palauenc05 (talk) 08:46, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 08:46, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment not much to complain about from the technical side, but I don't feel very wow-ed by this. Maybe if someone could transcribe the handwritten parts ... --El Grafo (talk) 08:24, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose While certainly interesting, I do not think this brings enough to the table to warrant being a featured image. --Explodingcreepsr (talk) 17:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support To give a little love to this picture: IMHO its really interesting to see how different a passport was in 1847. I knew these old passports from descriptions and (bad) photos in books, but it is impressive to study an excellent reproduction of a well-preserved specimen. --Aristeas (talk) 08:33, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Explodingcreepsr. -- Karelj (talk) 16:21, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is a great document, a VI and a QI, but I don't find it beautiful in this condition. If it were subjected to a difficult digital restoration, that would be a different story. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:14, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Unfortunately some of the handwritten text isn't easily readable. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:00, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. --Wieggy (talk) 16:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Ikan Kekek As a matter of fact, I was thinking about restoring the scan, which of course would take several hours. But IMO seeing the signs of age, presents the document in an authentic way. In my opinion the authentic version as it is now, with all its spots and wrinkles, is preferable to a restored version. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:23, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I wouldn't suggest replacing this file with a restored one, only nominating a restored one at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:40, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral per Ikan and Aristeas. Daniel Case (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good for QI/VI per others, but IMO does not have enough wow to stand on its own pictorially. It would be helpful for long-term Commons value if the type and purpose of this passport was further described in image description. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 476467 04:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 09:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mute Swan at High Park 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Feb 2023 at 23:00:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Cygnus
Info Tried to take a portrait of a Mute Swan. All by --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 23:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 23:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Background is too distracting. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 07:32, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ermell: Should I try making the bg blur manually?--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 22:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The effort is not worth it.--Ermell (talk) 19:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose ... and the eye should be sharp. Oversaturated. Crop is too tight. Cannot make any helpful suggestions without EXIF. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:05, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp: Tried following your suggestions is it better now? Also is there any manual way to include the exif? Camera manufacturer NIKON CORPORATION

Camera model NIKON D3500

Exposure time 1/1,000 sec (0.001)

F-number f/6.3

ISO speed rating 100

Date and time of data generation 03:45, 22 July 2022

Lens focal length 300 mm

--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 22:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BigDom: Thanks for the review, tried to fix the area. Is it better now?--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 22:19, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See my new note - you've introduced an artificial line during editing. I really don't think you should spend hours trying to work on this. Swans are common but it is tricky to photograph white feathers. With the light you had F8 and ISO 400/800 would have possibly worked better. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:58, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Fabian Roudra Baroi: Sorry, realised I left the note and forgot to write a comment here the first time around. It's better although like Charles says there's now an artificial grey line instead. I think there are definitely positives in the picture (I quite like the crop that focuses on the "interesting" parts of the bird, like the neck and head) but given the quality issues and the other votes so far, I don't think it has much chance of being promoted to FP this time, sorry. BigDom (talk) 12:22, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose poor crop and background. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:23, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good photo but claustrophobic crop. --Explodingcreepsr (talk) 17:11, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distracting background and tight crop -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Explodingcreepsr. --Wieggy (talk) 16:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The exposure is decent for an all-white bird, the sharpness is good enough, and I'm more tolerant of some others when it comes to backgrounds, but there are some artifacts (which may be fixable), and most importantly I can't get past the crop/composition, sorry. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:57, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't mind the composition that much; unfortunately I think the other opposes understate the extent to which the technically deficient areas (the back and front of the head) are irremediably overprocessed. Daniel Case (talk) 05:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 09:27, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Найкращі миті життя.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2023 at 16:05:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info Rhododendron flowers in the Carpathian Mountains, Western Ukraine. Created and uploaded by Misha Reme, nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A beautiful landscape photograph from the Carpathian Mountains with flowering Rhododendron bushes in their natural habitat. At the first glance the photo may seem a bit dark, but IMHO it’s quite realistic for a contre-jour photograph with a sinking sun; I love the atmosphere which is both dramatic and tranquil. --Aristeas (talk) 16:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautifully captured. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:34, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:39, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 07:15, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the relatively unknown jewels of Ukraine. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful -- IamMM (talk) 10:38, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:26, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The lighting, but also the composition, make this one. Nice find Aristeas :) - Benh (talk) 09:34, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 10:00, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 10:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMHO the shadows have been lifted too much, so that noise is visible and the result overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 19:21, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mosbatho (talk) 20:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /----A.Savin 20:57, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Ukraine

File:Λίμνη Στυμφαλίας 5.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2023 at 16:37:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Greece
Info Lake Stymphalia (Peloponnese, Greece) in winter. Created and uploaded by Nojos88, nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 16:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A somewhat different landscape photograph from Greece – instead of the usual coasts and cliffs, islands and ruins the photographer shows us Lake Stymphalia, well-known from mythology, in winter. Snow covers the summits of the mountains, the sky features marvellous Greek blue and the low sun gives a golden shine to the trees and the reeds. The symmetry of the reflections completes it. --Aristeas (talk) 16:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition, beautiful motif. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love this view and the mirror image --Kritzolina (talk) 19:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I find File:Λίμνη Στυμφαλίας 6.jpg (taken 4 minutes later) even better, I accept this version -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:00, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yes, it is a hard choice ;–). Both versions have their merits – File:Λίμνη Στυμφαλίας 6.jpg is even more painterly, but I found this one to be more “concentrated”. Thank you for nominating both at QI! --Aristeas (talk) 07:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 07:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:37, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Remarquable ! --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:58, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 10:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:49, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 16:18, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:44, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:16, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /----A.Savin 20:58, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Greece

File:Saint Francis de Sales Oratory (St. Louis, Missouri) - vault at the crossing.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2023 at 14:40:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings
Info created by Nheyob - uploaded by Nheyob - nominated by Nheyob -- Nheyob (talk) 14:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nheyob (talk) 14:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Perfectly fine but too small to be an FP in 2023. Compare the resolution of the church ceiling nominees that we have voted to feature in the last few years. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:12, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the reality check. I always appreciate your advice and perspective! --Nheyob (talk) 12:29, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Ikan Kekek. --SHB2000 (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Kudos for the composition – it is difficult to achieve a satisfying photo of such vaults from a slanted angle, you have found a beautiful solution. However this vault is so wonderful that (like Ikan) I would wish for more resolution. In addition I also see a problem with the level of details, sorry: at “only” 2,560 × 1,600 pixels I would expect the photo to be perfectly crisp, but it is a bit soft. Probably this results from the camera settings. The D5300 uses a 24 megapixels APS-C (“DX”) sensor, so using ƒ/22 is too much, diffraction eats the fine details. Even on my FF (“FX”) camera I avoid aperture values > ƒ/11, and in theory at 18mm focal length on a APS-C (“DX”) sensor ƒ/8 should give enough DoF to get most of the vault in focus while maintaining a high level of details. In addition using ƒ/8 should also make it easier to use the base ISO value (100, I guess) instead of ISO 400, this should further improve fine details. --Aristeas (talk) 08:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the encouragement & good advice! I'll keep this in mind for future projects. --Nheyob (talk) 12:28, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Well, it would be great if you could repeat that photo some day. This beautiful vault is certainly worth a FP. --Aristeas (talk) 16:39, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan ... I kept thinking, well, I'd like to see this at higher resolution, but then realized I'd already clicked for that. Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 17:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hooded Robin female 0A2A5956.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2023 at 06:44:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Petroicidae_(Australasian_Robins)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 06:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:08, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think the male is prettier and the photo of the male that I linked is a better picture than this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:14, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek: males are more colorful or ornamented than females in most bird species. That doesn't mean we should nominate only the pretty ones. -- Ivar (talk) 08:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:16, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:24, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unfortunately, with JJ Harrison, sometimes he is competing with himself. While this is an excellent image, there is another one taken by him that IMHO is better (closer, very sharp) that is already FP on English Wikipedia and used to illustrate the Wikipedia topic of w:Hooded robin. At the moment, my preference as a Commons FP would be this earlier one. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Better close-up at the same focal length, and the background color is darker -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:02, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 17:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Petroicidae_(Australasian_Robins)

File:Melanodryas cucullata - Glen Davis.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2023 at 10:29:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Petroicidae_(Australasian_Robins)
Info created and uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 10:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:29, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:40, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 14:51, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:59, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:55, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:28, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 17:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Petroicidae_(Australasian_Robins)

File:Campanula cervicaria - Keila.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2023 at 06:48:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Family_:_Campanulaceae
Info all by Ivar (talk) 06:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:48, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The first version has no spider on it and looks completely different? Shouldn't the spider deserve a category? --Ermell (talk) 07:49, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment category added, though I can't identify it at species level. It's the same plant and location taken with better camera. -- Ivar (talk) 07:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:41, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another great closeup, and I love the little bonus white spider. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:56, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:44, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:14, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:53, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 17:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Family_:_Campanulaceae

File:Станіслав-Аджигольський маяк з висоти (edited).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2023 at 09:22:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Ukraine
Info The Ukrainian Stanislav Range Rear light in the Dnieper estuary, about 30 km (19 mi) west of the city of Kherson. Created by Oleg Marchuk, edited and nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The Stanislav Range Rear light was built in 1911 in what was then a brand-new, sensational design: a hyperboloid construction invented by the ingenious Vladimir Shukhov. This drone shot shows the tower’s situation and elegance very well: a light construction between sky and water, bright red between endless blue and the greenish shallow waters. The technical quality is good for a drone shot. I have edited the original photo to improve the image balance, to tone down the saturated colours a bit and to fix several minor issues; I hope you like the result. --Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 12:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful --Kritzolina (talk) 17:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice picture of the tower. Are parts of the sky a little dark for that time of day and year? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agree this version is over-saturated. The reason is certainly because the color space of the original version was uncalibrated. Aristeas fixed the color space of this derivative version, but the saturation of the colors was probably wrong during the process. Oddly, the colors of the original are just fine when viewing them on Photoshop / Windows, whereas they appear too bright on Chrome (the difference is very obvious). And that's the contrary when viewing the retouched version. The intention to "reduce the saturation" was legitimate, but unfortunately unsuccessful -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you for your reviews! I will look into this, but unfortunately I have no time today, so it will only be on Tuesday. Sorry for the delay, --Aristeas (talk) 05:45, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Rosalina 🍵 475395 06:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 06:44, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I said I will look into it … but people can’t wait a single day, it seems. Will renominate it if I find a proper solution. --Aristeas (talk) 08:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In my opinion, the image has a strong FP potential, thanks to its great central perspective. It's a pity that the nomination is closed, I too would have wished for some patience. For threatened Ukrainian cultural heritage it's particularly important to get a special appreciation. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Giraffe - Bremerhaven[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2023 at 10:55:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

View from west
View from east

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info This extraordinary container crane is located at the southern end of the Columbuskaje Bremerhaven and is nicknamed "Giraffe". It was built in 1976 by the Peiner Träger company. Since the area of the Columbuskaje where this crane is located is not built on solid ground but on wooden poles, the ground cannot support a normal solid construction container crane. To save weight, the crane was erected in a lattice construction. It is a full-fledged container crane with a height of 54 m and a jib length of 93 m. It can carry loads of up to 38 tons.
These shots may possibly be the last photos of this crane on Wikimedia as the crane is scheduled to be dismantled sometime in 2023.

Created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Llez (talk) 10:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The view from east is just a QI for me because the light is so bad -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support the view from west, but Oppose the view from east - like Basile says, the light isn't great, but also I just don't get the "giraffe" from the second version, it just looks like any old crane to me from that angle. BigDom (talk) 09:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination According to the above comments I withdraw the set and will nominate the view from west alone --Llez (talk) 10:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cape Raoul from Lookout.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2023 at 10:56:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Tasmania
Info created and uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 10:56, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support should also point out that this is an FP on enwiki – see its nomination here. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:56, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's pretty, but I think it's too small to be a new Commons FP in 2023. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dull light. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 20:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wedding Party Photo at Meiji Shrine Tokyo.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2023 at 03:53:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
Info created by Sgroey - uploaded by Sgroey - nominated by Sgroey -- Sgroey (talk) 03:53, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sgroey (talk) 03:53, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Arbitrary crops. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per IK. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Microscopic image of crystals growing from melted sulfur.jpg (delist), delisted , delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Feb 2023 at 22:57:34

Info This proposed version was uploaded by Aristeas during the original nomination and has improved the composition by removing the mismatched elements from the bottom of the image. (Original nomination)
Delist and replace -- IamMM (talk) 22:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace For FP, this is a nicer composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace For a WP article, I would use the original photo, but for FP the cropped version seems more appropriate. --Aristeas (talk) 09:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:23, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace per others --Kritzolina (talk) 20:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Daniel Case (talk) 16:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --GRDN711 (talk) 19:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace -- Rosalina 🍵 457679 12:26, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I actually prefer the first one - despite the imperfections it seems more true-to-life. BigDom (talk) 06:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 delist, 1 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--Aristeas (talk) 05:51, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Göttingen asv2022-06 img37 Altes Rathaus.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2023 at 16:13:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
Info Interior view of Old Town Hall Göttingen, all by me --A.Savin 16:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 16:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:05, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 451932 12:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:43, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:18, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:56, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Germany

File:Flims Waldhaus in Graubünden 17-09-2022. (actm.) 25.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2023 at 05:43:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)
Info Waldhaus Flims, upper Rhineschlucht, view of the Rheinschlucht natural monument from uitzichtplatform viewing platform (Natural phenomenon/Natural monument)
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:43, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:43, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive view; the train is the cherry on the cake. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question Sorry, why is the image so grainy? Is it oversharpened? -- -donald- (talk) 09:51, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I just checked, but the histogram of the photo looks good and the photo processing is set to normal contrast. The bare steep rock walls are covered with fine crushed stone which is constantly moving.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very impressive. At first, I thought it was taken from a drone. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Vertiginous perspective. --Aristeas (talk) 10:39, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 16:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support User:Kabelleger would have been proud to take this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:54, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support though it's grainy, especially on the background. Reducing contrast might help. -- Ivar (talk) 06:55, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 07:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:39, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 10:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 10:34, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose Noise is too much for me; also many of the tree-covered areas look unnatural. Daniel Case (talk) 05:52, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. @Daniel Case: Noise Reduction Thank you for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Rosalina 🍵 467146 04:42, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:03, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:52, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)

File:Iglesia de Santa María sobre Minerva, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-15, DD 08-10 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2023 at 17:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Italy
Info Ceiling of the Church of Santa Maria sopra Minerva, Rome, Italy. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:34, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:10, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 455987 04:41, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:54, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:23, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:06, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:22, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Italy

File:Yellow-bellied sapsucker juvenile (85726).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Feb 2023 at 03:29:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Picidae_(Woodpeckers)
Info Juvenile yellow-bellied sapsucker (Sphyrapicus varius). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support In all its beauty. --Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 09:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:51, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 477443 12:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:41, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:10, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 19:41, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 21:37, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:51, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:55, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:22, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:14, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Moderate support It would be ideal if you could do something about that weird-looking light fringe on the bird's breast below its beak, but it's too small to not consider it an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Moderate support per Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:01, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 12:44, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Picidae_(Woodpeckers)

File:Église Saint-Ignace-de-Loyola.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2023 at 02:15:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Canada
Info all by -- Wilfredor (talk) 02:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Teeny bit of purple fringe on one of the ceiling light fixtures that might be worth trying to address, though. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 13:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Rosalina 🍵 453953 06:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:15, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:45, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Canada

File:Rügen asv2022-08 img27 Lauterbach Mole Bahnhof.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2023 at 08:52:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info Passenger train with steam locomotive (DRG Class 99) of Rügen narrow-gauge railway at Lauterbach Mole terminus (combined track for narrow+standard gauge), Island of Rügen. All by me --A.Savin 08:52, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 08:52, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:58, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 13:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 456258 13:32, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:19, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 12:43, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles

File:WTB 20220723 Ulrichsberg Aussichtsturm Alpenblick 9792.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2023 at 10:00:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Austria
Info The stairs of the observation tower Alpenblick in Ulrichsberg, Upper Austria, seem from the basement of the tower. Created and uploaded by Z thomas, edited by Ailura, nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support We have some featured picures of staircases, but most of them belong to castles, churches or expensive office buildings. This one is different: I was fascinated by this view of the stairs of an observation tower, a solid construction from mighty beams. When looking at it in detail, please consider that because of the extreme differences in depth it is impossible to get everything tack sharp. The symmetry of the original photo was diminished a bit by that board at the right, therefore I have nominated this cropped version, because here at FPC we usually love symmetry; but if you prefer the original, please just state so, we can switch the nomination to the original. --Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's another great find. But I actually prefer the original because of its wider format and the fact it fills your vision better, especially since most now have widescreens. The board isn't that ~~detracting~~ distracting in my opinion, so maybe it should be offered as an alternative. - Benh (talk) 10:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The original metadata would be interesting but are unfortunately not included. I also like the original version of the image better.--Ermell (talk) 11:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Info Thank you for your reviews, Benh and Ermell. As both of you prefer the original, it seems that my concern about lack of symmetry was superficial ;–). We are still in an early state of the nomination, so I have just switched the nomination to the original (uncropped) version of the photo and hope this is OK for everybody. If somebody prefers the cropped version, we can still offer it as an alternative version. Sorry for the confusion and thanks, --Aristeas (talk) 13:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:11, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:30, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like both versions, can I get both? ;) --Kritzolina (talk) 17:56, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Well, actually you can, both files are readily available for you here on Commons … ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 05:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Despite the disclaimer, the sharpness is actually impressive to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:05, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The original meta data had to be stripped: they contained my name as the photo was shot using my camera. --Granada (talk) 19:20, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you for the explanation! --Aristeas (talk) 05:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
exiftool, Lightroom or probably any other decent editing software lets one remove only the author :) - Benh (talk) 09:51, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:42, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking view. The material and colors have charm. Agree with Benh and Ermell the original is more impressive, due to the left part that gives volume / relief in my opinion, in addition to the attractive center. The DoF is excellent. Too bad the exif had to be stripped, otherwise it would have been interesting to know the focal length and F-number (if not stacked image) -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 455528 06:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Suggests the climax of Vertigo. Daniel Case (talk) 06:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:16, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:37, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:31, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:36, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very special to me. --Yann (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 05:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:40, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:43, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 27 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Austria

File:Mazafati dates - whole, halved and seed.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2023 at 16:07:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 16:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:07, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:26, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another great closeup. I love dates, but I'm unfamiliar with this type of date. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Educative with high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 469132 06:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 11:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:18, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:05, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Fruits (raw)

File:Mt. Auburn Cemetery (00417p).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2023 at 19:46:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United_States
Info I just liked the motif here, with the ash tree in the background framed by the columbarium, sort of growing "out" of it. Taken in the Mount Auburn Cemetery in Cambridge, MA. Three-frames stitched. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:46, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:46, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me. This perspective on the tree turns the columbarium with its rather conventional architecture into an impressive monument. (I hope they don’t prune or fell that tree. I have seen such stupid things too often here in Germany – that trees which were the main attraction of a park, a cemetery or an avenue have been mutilated oder cut down for “practical” reasons or questionable security reasons.) --Aristeas (talk) 18:34, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mt. Auburn is known for starting the trend of garden cemeteries in the US back in the early 19th century. They wind up being at least as much about horticulture as burials/interments, and I dare say more people use them for parks/walks/birdwatching than because they have loved ones there. In other words, I think this ash is safe as long as it's healthy. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:00, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s very reassuring to hear this ;–). Thank you very much! --Aristeas (talk) 09:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a National Historic Landmark as the first American rural cemetery. Once churchyard cemeteries started getting too full, someone got the idea that maybe cemeteries should be a pleasant place to spend your time, so it should have the same features as a park.

As a result of its heritage status I, too, doubt that one could take that tree down unless there were valid safety reasons (like, it was dead and posed a risk of collapsing on someone). Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That’s good to know. Thank you for the insights! --Aristeas (talk) 08:48, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 462369 04:41, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:37, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition is nice, but the lighting not so much (distracting shadows and washed out colors). Since there's not much sky in the picture, I think a cloudy day would be better to bring out the lush greens. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:42, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King of Hearts. -- Karelj (talk) 16:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree... Poco a poco (talk) 22:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#United_States

File:Hunter baby chameleon.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Feb 2023 at 16:03:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Chamaeleonidae_(Chameleons)
Info created & uploaded by Mkrc85 – nominated by Ivar (talk) 16:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 16:03, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not that sharp, but an interesting action shot and very impressive by the chameleon! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Off topic, but I think this photo is what inspired me to listen to this recording and other renditions of the tune and work on it with play-along tracks. Thanks! :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:59, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per Ikan, just at the right moment --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:16, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support as above. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The kind of picture that benefits from mitigating reasons for an average quality still acceptable at FP in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 465839 06:41, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:40, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:59, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:18, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile.--Ermell (talk) 11:42, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:43, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:35, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan and Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:04, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 12:43, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 10:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:32, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bullseye. --Peulle (talk) 09:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family_:_Chamaeleonidae_(Chameleons)

File:Forte Príncipe da Beira e seus detalhes.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2023 at 00:13:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Israelvalejr - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 00:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 00:13, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of these beautiful aerial images which seem to reveal hidden graphical structures – the bastion (?) looks like a spearhead. --Aristeas (talk) 09:10, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 12:41, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:14, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 470862 05:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:57, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:03, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Brazil

File:Три коні.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2023 at 00:07:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)
Info created and uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 00:07, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 00:07, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice picture, but I miss the metadata.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 477083 04:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support As a teenage girl I collected postcards with horses ... I was one of those girls, I know ... this one I definitely would have loved to own. And the quality is well good enough I could have had it as a big poster. --Kritzolina (talk) 08:33, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support As Kritzolina has mentioned, this is the kind of image which would make a good poster – on the one hand it is a realistic photo, on the other hand it has that somewhat dreamy atmosphere which makes us dream (not only teenagers ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:08, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:45, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 12:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little soft, but I think that makes it work better ... in fact, if, per Kritzolina, we want to make a poster version that teenage girls all over the world will pay good money (some of which we can, of course, donate to the WMF) to put up on their bedroom walls, we could give it a little bit of soft focus. Daniel Case (talk) 22:10, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Last night, I was visited by a stunning blue horse in my dreams. I couldn't shake off the feeling that it was somehow connected to the breathtaking image of a blue horse that I saw before drifting off to sleep. Horses, with their grace and beauty, have always captivated me, igniting a burning passion and endless fascination within me --Wilfredor (talk) 12:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:36, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Equidae (Equids)

File:Zuidflank van de Vorderrhein 18-09-2022. (d.j.b) 04.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2023 at 05:39:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)
Info View of the south flank of the Vorderrhein from Waltensburg/Vuorz (Graubünden).
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:39, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A nice view, I just wonder about the white balance. The sky looks a bit too red/magenta to me, and the landscape would probably benefit from warmer tones. So wouldn’t the whole photo look even better when you would (in Lighroom) shift the colour balance a bit from blue to yellow and from magenta to green? I don’t know the current values, but maybe 500 to 1000 more on the colour temperature (blue–yellow) axis and maybe 5 to 10 less on the green–magenta axis … just guessing. Just try it, and if it doesn’t look better, forget it. --Aristeas (talk) 09:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. New version, WB warmer as you suggested. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 12:34, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you very much, Famberhorst, for trying it! However I am sorry, now it seems a bit too warm and the sky too grenish. The changes from blue to yellow and from magenta to green have been a bit too strong. Could you try a setting right between the two photos? I am very sorry for making you so much work … but sometimes processing photos is trial and error, and finding the best white balance is often (as here) not easy. Sorry again, --Aristeas (talk) 16:30, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Now in between. Thanks for all the tips.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you very much for all the work! --Aristeas (talk) 09:35, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Impressive to me, the veil of clouds makes the image special. Thanks a lot to Aristeas for his constructive advice :) -- Radomianin (talk) 19:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 454570 05:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Big improvement. I like it now. Very nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Daniel Case (talk) 18:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)

Just a remark: this is indeed a beautiful picture, but why has nobody bothered to find out what is really displayed here? It's in fact the south-exposed, i.e. north flank of Vorderrhein, looking into the Glarus Alps (Crap Ner, Crap Surtscheins). Unfortunately, it's not possible to correct the caption, so the wrong caption will be displayed as long it's the Picture of the Day. --Kuhni74 (talk) 10:37, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giraffe - Columbuskaje - Bremerhaven 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2023 at 10:47:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info This extraordinary container crane is located at the southern end of the Columbuskaje Bremerhaven and is nicknamed "Giraffe". It was built in 1976 by the Peiner Träger company. Since the area of the Columbuskaje where this crane is located is not built on solid ground but on wooden poles, the ground cannot support a normal solid construction container crane. To save weight, the crane was erected in a lattice construction. It is a full-fledged container crane with a height of 54 m and a jib length of 93 m. It can carry loads of up to 38 tons.
These shot possibly may be the last photo of this crane on Wikimedia, as the crane is scheduled to be dismantled sometime in 2023.
Created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 13:07, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 477529 04:28, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:03, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 12:41, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:01, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition and light are fine in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:00, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines

File:At Sudbury Hall 2023 085.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Feb 2023 at 21:20:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_Kingdom
Info The south-west facade of Sudbury Hall, a country house in Derbyshire, UK.

Created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 21:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 21:20, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant oppose Processing looks weirder at the edges and corners. Daniel Case (talk) 05:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: Thanks for the feedback, I've backed off the sharpening and noise reduction and uploaded a new version, does that help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike Peel (talk • contribs)

It's better, but it's still not up to the standards technically of other FPs of buildings. Not for me (I can still see some magenta CA near the water table at the lower left). Daniel Case (talk) 03:07, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 12:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Masks in the rain.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2023 at 18:39:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created and uploaded by Michol Sanchez - nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose poor crop on the right. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support That crop is unfortunate, but it would have been hard to find a better one. I don’t mind it because this is such an impressive photo, really National Geographic stuff. The tight crop takes us mid into the centre of action. Due to their costumes and the blurring effect of the rain the dancers appear somewhat ghostly, dancing like weightless apparitions through the rain; despite the difficult situation the colours are vivid (but not overdone), the frontmost person is astonishingly sharp, and the photographer has taken the right shutter speed to make the raindrops appear as rain – you can count them, but still see their motion. --Aristeas (talk) 09:27, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support in line with Aristeas' convincing analysis. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Colorful costumes but the feet are cut off -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:15, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 459506 03:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support No, the crop isn't perfect - but everything else is pretty close. BigDom (talk) 06:57, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas and BigDom. -- IamMM (talk) 15:26, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Cutting out the photo is a bit unfortunate. However, the photo is sufficiently engaging to be an FP, IMHO. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 12:46, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events

File:Iglesia parroquial, Arezzo, Italia, 2022-09-17, DD 83-85 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Feb 2023 at 18:03:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info Romanesque belltower of the church of Santa Maria della Pieve, Arezzo, Italy. The construction of the 50 metres (160 ft) high belltower started end of the 13th century and was finished in 1330. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 07:01, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is also a beautiful nocturnal street scene, very typical for Arezzo. It shows the remarkable situation of the bell tower: surrounded by solid buildings which must have been very high for the time in which they were built, the tower itself towers above all of them to an immense hight, allowing the ringing of its bells to resound freely over the whole city. You can depict this in a photo only when taking it (like here) from the depth of an alley. --Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 463239 12:24, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy

File:Tramway de Strasbourg - Rame 3021.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2023 at 16:29:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info created by Amaury67 - uploaded by Amaury67 - nominated by Le Commissaire -- Le Commissaire (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Le Commissaire (talk) 16:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Quality far below the expected standard here (specially in terms of noise), please, try first to make out of your noms a QI here Poco a poco (talk) 21:31, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Panoramic view of air pollution in São Paulo city, Brazil.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2023 at 12:36:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Brazil
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 12:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Please add the {{Panorama}} template to the description page. I am impressed by the obvious pall of smog over the city, but also by the contrasting state of the buildings, from obviously wealthy to rather poor buildings even in a single quarter … this depicts social inequality well. --Aristeas (talk) 18:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops – see the comments below about the stitching errors. I had checked the horizon and the upper buildings before voting, but as I now realize I should have checked the nearest ones instead, because parallax errors are more likely to show up in the foreground. --Aristeas (talk) 12:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done São Paulo is a vibrant and lively city, especially at night, but it is also a city steeped in chaos and insecurity. With a population of 40 million (Greater São Paulo) inhabitants, pollution is a constant threat, which feels suffocating and falls on the city in the form of drizzle almost all year round. I remember having to clean the windows every day and there was always a black dust. The streets are chaotic, filled with traffic and beggars especially in the center, and the contrast of social classes is overwhelming. However, despite all that, the people of São Paulo are friendly and charming, they seem happy and work hard to improve their lives. They look beyond the pollution and chaos, and find beauty in diversity and in the strength of their community. I consider portraying these things, even though they are unpleasant, to raise awareness, because for the developed world, these realities seem unknown and they seem to want to ignore them --Wilfredor (talk) 20:09, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Reminds me of when I was younger and we'd drive in to New York City from our home in suburban New Jersey. There's a stretch of I-78 just north of Newark Airport where the Lower Manhattan skyline comes wondrously into view right ahead, and under the right circumstances in wintertime, there was a similar inversion layer visible over the city, albeit a much fainter shade of beige. Daniel Case (talk) 21:44, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Very extensive panorama and long sight lines in spite of the smog. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Dominating view point -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Oops. While I noticed the stitching errors on the previous nomination, I did not expect to find those here -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 469800 08:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Come on guys. Did you even look at the photo ? How can this get this many supports when the stitching error are this obvious even on the thumbnail? The buildings look like Picasso's cubism - Benh (talk) 10:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Benh. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It needs indeed a lot of rework + the sky looks overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 11:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wilfredor, feel free to drop me a line if you get stuck while reworking this image. I'm a far cry from being a panorama expert, but looking to improve :). In this case, I'm curious to understand if tools like SmartBlend can minimise these parallax issues, or if you would need to reshoot the image with the lens rotating around its nodal point. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:00, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Julesvernex2 Thanks for your help, however, the problem is that I don't have the individual images to try to make a better union --Wilfredor (talk) 21:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded a new version --Wilfredor (talk) 14:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not fixed Still obvious stitching problems at multiple places. -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Technically inadequate, I'm also not overwhelmed by the motif. --Milseburg (talk) 16:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I do see some problems, especially on the building that's 2nd from left in the foreground. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I would like to apologize for wasting your time by submitting this photo with issues that appear to be unfixable. I genuinely did not realize this as it is a photo I took a long time ago and I failed to notice the obvious flaws in the foreground. Thanks for the feedback --Wilfredor (talk) 03:44, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Julesvernex2 offered to help, and I could give it a go as well. Up to you. - Benh (talk) 19:50, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your notice --Wilfredor (talk) 21:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Basílica del Santo Marino, San Marino, 2022-09-20, DD 27-29 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Feb 2023 at 21:33:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings
Info Basilica of Saint Marinus, San Marino. The construction of the neoclassical temple was finished in 1838 and is the main church of the City of San Marino. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:33, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:18, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 09:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 453407 03:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 09:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:06, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 16:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 10:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings

File:Rice paper butterfly (16709).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2023 at 16:19:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Nymphalidae_(Brush-footed_Butterflies)
Info Rice paper butterfly (Idea leuconoe) with light shining from behind, illustrating why it has its name. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:19, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 18:21, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:57, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:45, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 454768 03:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:23, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support And that's 10. :) --Peulle (talk) 09:31, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, excellent, and not oversharpened, unlike so many butterfly photos. --Aristeas (talk) 10:33, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:06, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:41, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:41, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 12:28, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:29, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Species identification seems correct -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:50, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:41, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Nymphalidae_(Brush-footed_Butterflies)

File:Window and door on weathered garage wall.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2023 at 05:14:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info created by Daniel Case - uploaded by Daniel Case - nominated by Daniel Case -- Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A nice rustic summer-afternoon scene that evokes this image of Cart's to me. -- Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple, but for me a beautiful painting.--Famberhorst (talk) 08:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 475689 09:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rustic charm of transience. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:55, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The beauty of peeling paint. --Aristeas (talk) 10:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am sure that inside that cabin there are interesting secrets to discover --Wilfredor (talk) 12:44, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I think it's used as a garage (see context here, about 1.5 km from my house) but I totally understand; that was the effect I felt at the time, too. Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exotic -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:07, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:20, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:23, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Doors

File:Copa de Campeones FMV 2023 Premiación - BugWarp 26.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2023 at 20:32:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Other team sports
Info created/uploaded by BugWarp- nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 20:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 20:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It was hard to tell what was going on here at first, not least because there's so much in the image. I didn't see the trophy for a while as a result, and at first I thought this was supposed to be some pre-match stretching session. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel Case. --Wieggy (talk) 06:53, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This or a cropped version of it could certainly be an interesting press photo, but I'm missing a great composition. I also agree with Daniel's point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lasiocampa quercus caterpillar, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2023 at 09:59:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Side view
Dorsal view

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Lasiocampidae_(Eggars,_lappets)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 09:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 16:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:26, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:11, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:15, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 471743 08:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the set. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:10, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:51, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Lasiocampidae_(Eggars,_lappets)

File:Ingushetia, Russia, Armkhi, Ingush tower.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2023 at 12:25:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Russia
Info Fortified Ingush military tower, circa 16th century, with some other towers and Olgetti village in the background. Armkhi Valley, Republic of Ingushetia, Central Caucasus. All by --Argenberg (talk) 12:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:25, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 15:34, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful but sort of busy compositionally. Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Disagree; doesn't look busy to me. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Slightly imbalanced (the tower should just a little further down and to the right), but overall the colors and layers come together to make this a great image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support It’s a nice combination to see, in one picture, a closeup of an Ingush tower, an ensemble of such towers (background at the left) and the surrounding landscape. I wish we could get rid of the ulgy modern buildings in the valley, but … they are there, after all. --Aristeas (talk) 09:04, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, houses on the right do look sort of monotonous and odd in the landscape. That is the result of urgent post-disaster planning. A huge landslide and catastrophic flooding wiped out nearly three fourths of old houses in the area in the early 2000s. A new village had to be constructed from stretch in very short amount of time, like two or three months, to accommodate all the homeless and meet deadlines before winter cold. Interestingly, first settlers in the village in the early 19th century were people from nearby Georgia, hence the Georgian name: Olgetti. --Argenberg (talk) 19:39, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the additional insights! --Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:22, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite uninteresting left side but still ok.--Ermell (talk) 10:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 473821 03:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support White cloud too bright in my view but the tower is appealing -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:40, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would like this better with a somewhat closer crop on the left, but that's not going to happen. It's a good, interesting photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:22, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:49, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Russia

File:SJN Di 4 654 Røkland - Lønsdal.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2023 at 09:50:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Norway#Northern_Norway_(Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 09:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oh, a train :-) Nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:12, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:28, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:28, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:08, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 479152 08:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:18, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:54, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:25, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would make a good advertisement for Norwegian Rail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:11, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:50, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Norway#Northern_Norway_(Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)

File:Promenade Saint-Charles 03.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Feb 2023 at 02:16:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Canada
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 02:16, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just too ordinary (And is it black and white, or very desaturated color? Daniel Case (talk) 18:05, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Incredibly it is not a black and white photo, simply the weather here is like that (maybe i added the black and white cat by mistake) --Wilfredor (talk) 23:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose per Daniel. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Been thinking about this for a bit, looking at it several times. To me it is not ordinary at all - the wooden walkway leading into nowhere has interesting details like the steps and the way it moves around that tree. I also like the subdued colors which look perfectly natural to me. I know this kind of woods and walkways, they exist in European countries as well. What bothers me a bit is that the area of focus does not extend far enough into the foreground, but the overall impression is so powerful, I still can give support. --Kritzolina (talk) 08:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree entirely with Kritzolina, except that the way I would put it is that it strikes me as a little odd that we go from an unsharp foreground to a sharp background. But that aside, I quite like the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry, I like the leading lines but I just find the out-of-focus foreground and the strong shadows too distracting. BigDom (talk) 10:32, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the sharp shadows add drama and the front is not out of focus it is a choice of depth of field --Wilfredor (talk) 13:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's maybe a choice to make the foreground out of focus, nevertheless, intentionally or not, it is indeed not in focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The level of blur of the handrail at the right in the foreground is too distracting in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel Case. -- Karelj (talk) 16:27, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina. --Wieggy (talk) 06:58, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose With a closer focus point the result would have been overall better IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 11:44, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I am going forth and back on this one since a few days. I like the wooden walkway, I like the intentionally out-of-focus foreground, I like the almost black-and-white appearance. My problem is just that I cannot find a point which is really in focus. To make the transition in and out of focus work, I need some area which is clearly in focus; but I can’t find it. This is astonishing because with f/5.6 at 70mm there should be a sufficient depth of focus to make some area clearly sharp. Maybe the autofocus failed? Sometimes AF seems to have problems to focus on areas with many fine structures; maybe this has happend here … Sorry, --Aristeas (talk) 10:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nikon Z cameras are well-known with this kind of focus problems --Wilfredor (talk) 00:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 05:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mockingbird on the North Lake Trail (36851).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2023 at 16:29:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Mimidae_(Mockingbirds_and_Thrashers)
Info Northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) on a tree branch in Palm Beach County, Florida. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The current crop is too large in my opinion. I've added a note to suggest a tighter and more appealing framing -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:49, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support this version. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:04, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:17, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support, although I agree with Basile that a tighter, squarer crop would be even better. Daniel Case (talk) 19:50, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A crop works for me, thanks. New version uploaded. @Basile Morin, Aristeas, XRay, and Daniel Case: — Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IMO OK. --XRay 💬 20:46, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:53, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great photo! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:07, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:17, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:29, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:18, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Mimidae_(Mockingbirds_and_Thrashers)

File:Microscopic image of crystals growing from melted sulfur 3.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2023 at 19:21:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Rocks and minerals#Others
Info created and uploaded by AlexmarPhoto - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:21, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:28, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another great art work by nature. -- Radomianin (talk) 23:29, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fascinating natural patterns that look like sand dunes under golden light, painted by Braque or Picasso -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:08, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 08:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:21, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 455237 08:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed fascinating. --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 12:23, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 08:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. It really does look like a print by an artist, not a photo of crystals growing from melted sulfur (but then I wouldn't have known what those would look like until now). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:08, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:44, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 01:25, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could also be the elevator doors of some really rococo Art Deco-era building . Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yeriho (talk) 11:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks and minerals#Others

File:Wide view over Hovdanvika, Selfjorden and Torsfjorden at Fredvang in Flakstad, Nordland, Norway, 2022 June.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2023 at 19:18:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Norway#Northern_Norway_(Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)
Info created and uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 19:18, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:18, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot, quality, compo, lighting... Poco a poco (talk) 21:34, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:27, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent view point, nice landscape, appealing light -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:27, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:22, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:59, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 08:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:18, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:29, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 464408 08:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:16, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 12:24, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lots of great little pictures in this one. Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:05, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful composition and lighting. --Lion-hearted85 (talk) 01:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice - Benh (talk) 16:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for uploading this masterpiece. --Terragio67 (talk) 11:16, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 13:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - --GRDN711 (talk) 16:48, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:23, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Norway#Northern_Norway_(Nord-Norge/Nord-Noreg)

File:Ptychochromis insolitus - Wilhelma 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2023 at 06:57:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Cichlidae (Cichlids)
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:56, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:05, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:09, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 466907 08:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. We have to root for this species. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:12, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:58, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family : Cichlidae (Cichlids)

File:AfricaMuseum - 2023-02-09 - 03.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2023 at 09:20:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
Info created by Jmh2o - uploaded by Jmh2o - nominated by H₂O^(talk) 09:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice, and I like the ice in the foreground, but the museum is a bit blurry on the sides. I'm not sure if you can do anything much about that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:00, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:10, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aerial image of Alicudi (view from the south).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2023 at 12:20:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily
Info created by Carsten Steger - uploaded by Carsten Steger - nominated by Carsten Steger -- Carsten Steger (talk) 12:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Carsten Steger (talk) 12:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:56, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 475422 01:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looks a bit hazy to me (which is common for this kind of shot). Check the left side of your histogram: I think it might be worth a try to bring those large shadows on the left closer to actual black? --El Grafo (talk) 08:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment El Grafo, thank you very much for the review. I increased the contrast slightly in the version I uploaded today. --Carsten Steger (talk) 14:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Without prejudice to El Grafo's remarks it looks solidly clear to me and beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support beautiful but the issues brought up by El Grafo do remain. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support now that we've got actual shadows. --El Grafo (talk) 08:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 09:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:51, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:39, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a giant shell in a gorgeous blue sea. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:08, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice subject and view but the quality could be better Poco a poco (talk) 20:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:44, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Sicily

File:Ademwortels (pneumatoforen) van een moerascipres (Taxodium distichum) 09-02-2023 (d.j.b.).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2023 at 18:23:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Cupressaceae cypress Taxodium distichum .
Info Cluster of Breath roots (pneumatophores) of a Taxodium distichum at the water's edge. Focus stack of 4 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 18:23, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 18:23, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:09, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 454038 01:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's quite nice! You have such a good eye for natural beauty that produces good compositions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:56, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although it's worth noting that it's controversial whether cypress knees are pneumatophores (see summary here). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:42, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. Do you want me to place the reference with the photo?--Famberhorst (talk) 05:46, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Up to you. Just information. :) If I saw it in use in the Wikipedia article about the species I'd probably recommend renaming to call them cypress knees, but I'm also no botanist (I just happen to look into them recently). — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed your information under the coordinates of the photo. (Hopefully well translated) thanks again for the extra info.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:50, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like ruins ... Roothenge? Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ask your; what does Roothenge mean?--Famberhorst (talk) 05:44, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He's noting a resemblance to w:Stonehenge. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your explanation. The penny has dropped.--Famberhorst (talk) 07:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:12, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simply fascinating. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:46, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:39, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:05, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Cupressaceae

File:Basílica de Santa Francesca Romana, Roma, Italia, 2022-09-15, DD 51-53 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2023 at 18:30:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy
Info Basilica of Santa Francesca, Rome, Italy. A church at the site was known by the tenth century. It was named Santa Maria Nova ("New St Mary"), to distinguish it from the other church inside the Roman forum devoted to St Mary, Santa Maria Antiqua ("Ancient St Mary"), which had fallen into ruin by then. The relics from the ancient church were moved to this church under Pope Leo. Santa Maria Nuova was enlarged in the second half of the tenth century, and then rebuilt by Pope Honorius III in the thirteenth century, adding the campanile and the apse, as well as being decorated with a mosaic Maestà, a depiction of the Madonna enthroned accompanied by saints (as seen in the picture). Since 1352 the church has been in the care of the Olivetans. In the 16th century, the church was rededicated to Frances of Rome (Francesca Buzzi), who was canonized in 1608 and whose relics are in the crypt. The interior of the church has undergone many refurbishments. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:35, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:08, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:13, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 454202 01:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, and looks quite good at 67%, which is already pretty big. At full size, the right and left sides aren't perfect, but I don't think we should judge the quality of this photo by pixel-peeping at that resolution. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:03, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:36, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:29, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:54, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Micha (talk) 08:40, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Overhelming beauty. --Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Moderate support Wish the top wasn't so distorted and noisy, but under the limitations this may be the best possible photo. Daniel Case (talk) 05:09, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case: I applied some selective denoising to the top of the image Poco a poco (talk) 20:47, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 07:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:49, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Italy

File:Wiesenflockenblume (Centaurea jacea) focus stack-20220703-RM-170027.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2023 at 11:37:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily_:_Carduoideae
Info Brown knapweed (Centaurea jacea) in a garden in Bamberg, Focus stacked from 18 frames. Size approx 3cm. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 11:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 11:37, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:19, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! --SHB2000 (talk) 08:52, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per SHB2000, beautiful is the right word. --Terragio67 (talk) 09:16, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 479488 14:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:31, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:04, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:25, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:35, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely. I love how the light hits the petals. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:16, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 06:26, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asterales#Subfamily_:_Carduoideae

File:View of Suria (2).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2023 at 20:31:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant oppose Might be a spectacular view at different times of day/year, but in this one the light is too dull. Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also oppose per Daniel Case. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel, and I'd also like to see what a wider view looks like, as I'm not so sure I love the crops on the left and right and would like to see more of the town. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:15, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karlsruhe asv2022-10 img19 Hauptbahnhof.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2023 at 16:24:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations
Info Interior view of main railway station, Karlsruhe. All by me --A.Savin 16:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 16:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose the cutted object at buttom ruins a bit the picture Ezarateesteban 20:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The cropped bench is such a small part of the image overall that I can unsee it. Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel Case. --Wieggy (talk) 06:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 472235 08:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:48, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:57, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 23:30, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:09, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I know this railway station well, it looks more attractive on your photo than in reality ;–). The right point of view, the right time and light make a difference. --Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Carsten Steger (talk) 16:05, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I find the whole and details so interesting, so I'm willing to overlook the unsharpness at the edges, understanding the reason for it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:18, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 07:21, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:31, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Transport#Train stations

File:Galería Uffizi, Florencia, Italia, 2022-09-18, DD 72.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Feb 2023 at 07:38:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Domes
Info Rich ceiling of the Niobe room, Uffizi Gallery, Florence, Italy. The room is an example of neoclassical architecture. It was commissioned by Leopold II to provide an appropriate setting for the sculptural group (known as Niobe group) found in Rome at the beginning of 1583. The architects in church of the room were Zanobi del Rosso and Gaspare Maria Paoletti, but it was Giuseppe del Moro, who created the panelled ceiling decorated with gilded roses. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 07:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 07:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Micha (talk) 08:39, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I'm lost for words here – but I did add this place on my bucket list when I visit Italy. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:04, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The only doubt that can come is the somewhat oval shape of the dome. I went there several times and I can assure you that it is absolutely right and that with artificial light and environmental conditions present there (IMO) it is really difficult to do better... --Terragio67 (talk) 09:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:20, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. --Aristeas (talk) 10:09, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 11:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 456899 14:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:09, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:27, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:37, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Peulle (talk) 13:23, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:38, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, and could also be an important VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:17, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Daniel Case (talk) 19:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Domes

File:Emaille-Kreuz DreiE Hof 20221223 HOF07310-HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2023 at 10:46:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity
Info An enamel cross created by Hermann Jünger, photo created and uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531, re-nominated by Aristeas.
You may remember this photo from the nomination in January. That nomination was successful, but when counting the votes A.Savin realized that one “pro” vote was not signed and hence invalid – and therefore the picture was not featured. And who was the bad boy who forgot to sign his vote? It was me; normally I check all my comments, but that time I was too hasty. I can only apologize for that slip and re-nominate the photo. So if you are annoyed by this re-nomination, fair enough! But please be angry with me, because I caused that failure; don’t be angry with the original nominator or with this poor photo, they are completely innocent ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good photograph of an unusual modern artwork, it’s great that the heirs allow the publication. --Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek, Daniel Case, Wieggy, Llez, Uoaei1, Agnes Monkelbaan, BigDom, Poco a poco, Renata3, and Kritzolina: Pinging the voters and commenters on the original nomination, because they may want to vote on this re-nomination. I apologize for the extra work! --Aristeas (talk) 10:50, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support as creator --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Happy to support now that the issue with the copy-right is cleared up - I missed that in the first round. --Kritzolina (talk) 15:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:37, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I've to repeat the reasons of my vote in the first nomination: I've to agree, the subject is not really beautiful to me and although the quality is really good I miss something else here (lighting, historical value,...) Poco a poco (talk) 17:06, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per my !vote in the last nomination. Daniel Case (talk) 20:28, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rosalina 🍵 459509 08:04, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per my rationale from last time. BigDom (talk) 08:12, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:20, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I still find this a well-shot, interesting cross, as I did the last time I voted on this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:27, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity

File:Напуштена скривница со Шар Планина.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2023 at 08:05:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hughly building, no wow. Yann (talk) 08:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose would've been a nice FP were it not for the building, though. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:52, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Striated Pardalote 0012.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Feb 2023 at 17:18:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Pardalotidae_(Pardalotes)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 17:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:18, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 20:19, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful bird, and very sharp. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:27, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support JJ Harrison, you've done it again ;-). --SHB2000 (talk) 06:53, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:54, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 17:43, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:57, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 457572 12:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Axel ^(talk) 19:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Pardalotidae_(Pardalotes)

File:Montserrat Abbey (6).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Feb 2023 at 20:29:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:29, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:29, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:49, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light is a bit harsh, but OK. It’s a funny sculpture: In his effort to portray all 12 apostles as venerable as possible, the sculptor has given most of them almost the same face ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 472873 14:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:24, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 16:49, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wqieggy (talk) 06:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:30, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Spain

File:Atacamite on malachite - Mt Gunson mines, South Australia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Feb 2023 at 17:21:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals
Info all by Ivar (talk) 17:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 10:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:59, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not much to say here, except - very well done! --Kritzolina (talk) 08:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 479685 12:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:44, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:36, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:32, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 02:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals

File:Iteso Homestead2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2023 at 07:58:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Uganda
Info Created and uploaded by Dixon099 - nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 07:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A picture from WikiLoves Africa that struck me. I know the sharpness is not perfect, but it is a drone image and I really love the mix of shapes and how the natural colors contrast with the colors of the clothes of people. And we need more FIs from Africa, we have nothing even close to that image in our lists. -- Kritzolina (talk) 07:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. --El Grafo (talk) 08:20, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support With their colourful clothes, the people in the centre form a wonderful ornament. --Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 471894 14:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:48, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I don't like the cropped huts. --A.Savin 14:29, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per A.Savin, plus the trees at lower left are distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 21:22, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per A.Savin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:06, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose It would be good to have more FPs from Africa, but in this case I find the imbalance in the composition a little disorienting. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I agree that the crop is problematic Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per A.Savin. --Wieggy (talk) 06:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support -- IamMM (talk) 14:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak opposeCrops and per others --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 02:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Looking east from Mt Jerusalem - Walls of Jerusalem.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Feb 2023 at 10:35:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Tasmania
Info created and uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 10:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. One of the reasons for this nomination is because of its immaculate educational detail. It's also in a location that is fairly difficult to access (part of a 43-kilometre (27 mi) walk), and I'm surprised at the level of effort that JJ Harrison has put in to take this shot. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:35, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:31, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Five stars! --Terragio67 (talk) 09:23, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support An impressive landscape. Technically not perfect — the light is quite harsh and therefore the colours look somewhat faded at the left, at least one area is blurred/out of focus (see image note), bright areas like the rocks at bottom left are a little bit overexposed –, but still decent. --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment At first glance I was captivated by the softness of the image, especially in the background. Reading Aristeas' comment I have to admit that the lower left part, seen closely, could conflict with the above, or even disturb. I don't change my opinion, the photo was successful anyway, perhaps the author could find a way to mitigate this drawback... --Terragio67 (talk) 11:40, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Maybe JJ Harrison may want to comment? --SHB2000 (talk) 11:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 472338 14:53, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is a stitching issue as per annotation, and the landscape is not that wow to compensate this. --A.Savin 14:33, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It's an interesting landscape, but this issue should probably be fixed for FP. This seems like a worthy VI, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per Aristeas. Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasantly instructive. That's an outstanding point here. --Milseburg (talk) 07:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:08, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Australia#Tasmania

File:Basílica de San Pedro, Ciudad del Vaticano, 2022-09-17, DD 44.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Feb 2023 at 20:59:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Italy
Info North Chapel, Portico of Saint Peter's Basilica, Vatican City. Center: Coat of Arms of Paul V; Top: Angels carry the Cathedra from Antioch to Rome; Left: St Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit preaches to the multitude; Bottom: St Peter receives the converted pagans; Right: St Peter writes an Epistle c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 468452 12:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support A little unsharp at the corners; again, there may be nothing we can do about that. Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support The image looks a bit distorted. The shooting position was probably not centered. IMO still FP. --XRay 💬 14:31, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support Per Xray --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:13, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Italy

Trisidos tortuosa (Propellor Ark), shell, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Feb 2023 at 06:30:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Right valve
Left valve

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Arcidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:30, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 457749 05:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:29, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:35, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:28, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Arcidae

File:First Lutheran Church in Orland, California-L1001562.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Mar 2023 at 02:21:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:21, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition is a bit too chaotic; I find the parking lines particularly distracting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per king, but if the parking lines are cropped I will support.--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good quality, but no wow --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:04, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hiddensee asv2022-08 img19 Vitte Stolperstein Wolfthorn.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Feb 2023 at 14:31:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info A Stolperstein dedicated to Julie Wolfthorn in Vitte, Island of Hiddensee. All by me --A.Savin 14:31, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:31, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think it is good to have an image of this kind of memorials as FP - and this certainly meets the necessary technical and compositional requirements. --Kritzolina (talk) 07:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 458689 12:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose QI and VI for sure, but I have a hard time finding the "wow" in a plaque like this, sorry. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Rhododendrites Poco a poco (talk) 16:31, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Rhododendrites and Poco. Also a little unsharp at the top. Daniel Case (talk) 18:25, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina --Wieggy (talk) 06:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Rhododendrites and Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and agree with Rhododendrites. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree that it would be good to have a Stolperstein FP. But this one does not manage to stand out among the hundreds of similar quality images of virtually identical monuments we have. --El Grafo (talk) 09:33, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OpposePer others. --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:33, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --A.Savin 23:56, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Northern shoveler male in Marine Park (33296).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Feb 2023 at 13:19:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Spatula
Info Male northern shoveler (Spatula clypeata) resting on one leg. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:19, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:55, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 469792 05:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:59, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both informative and amusing. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 10:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:31, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Spatula

File:A Breeze of Color.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Feb 2023 at 14:04:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
Info created by KPNO/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/T. Slovinský - uploaded by Pandreve - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:04, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:09, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Axel ^(talk) 19:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:10, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 459939 05:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 08:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 02:55, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:16, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like downscaled. --XRay 💬 14:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agree wtih XRay - if it is available at higher resolution, it should be uploaded as such. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@XRay and GRDN711: Thanks for pointing out, a higher resolution is now uploaded. -- IamMM (talk) 18:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 00:48, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:56, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cbrescia (talk) 20:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Self-explanatory. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 11:00, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#United States

File:Immature herring gull (16259).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Feb 2023 at 13:16:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus
Info Immature herring gull (Larus smithsonianus) dropping a clam (or some other mollusc). Gulls drop and re-catch a clam repeatedly to position it before flying up high and dropping it onto rocks. This young gull seemingly hasn't learned that repositioning is easier on land. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 462075 05:12, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The prey seems to be a species of the genus Glycymeris. Unfortunately the locality is not given, so the species is uncertain. --Llez (talk) 09:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Aha. I suppose there are probably multiple Marine Parks. Updated now. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think, it is a Glycymeris americana (as we have no photo of this species on Commons, could you please send me a specimen for taking photos ?) --Llez (talk) 08:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Llez: I don't get to this spot very often (once or twice a year), but when I go back (or another spot with a lot of clam shells around), how would I identify this particular type from among the others? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 12:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      - @Rhododendrites: The shell of a Glycymeris is rounded, solid, with a row of small, regular denticles on the inside at the top (see e.g. here; but I'm also interested in other species from this region). --Llez (talk) 15:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
        I'd be willing to collect some shells and send them over to you sometime. I don't have any real knowledge on the subject, though. Maybe leave a talk page message with best practices for shipping shells, and next time I'm at a beach (which might be a little while), I can try to take some. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 23:13, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:13, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:34, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus

File:Kleines Wiesenvögelchen am Morgen.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Feb 2023 at 13:46:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created and uploaded by Sven Damerow - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 13:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:10, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 17:51, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Axel ^(talk) 19:33, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Similar to this one — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ermell (talk • contribs)
Support --Rosalina 🍵 451783 05:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:26, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)

File:Ourapteryx yerburii ssp. specimens and male genitalia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Feb 2023 at 06:55:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Geometridae_(Geometer_Moths)
Info Mounted specimens and genitalia slides of male Ourapteryx yerburii subspecies, housed in Natural History Museum, London. The abdomen of O. y. yerburii was removed to extract the genitalia inside. All by Tiouraren -- Tiouraren (talk) 06:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tiouraren (talk) 06:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:07, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 479625 01:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:55, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:27, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of anotomical merit. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 10:59, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:46, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:15, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:15, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Geometridae_(Geometer_Moths)

File:Castillo de Praga, Praga, República Checa, 2022-07-01, DD 23-25 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Feb 2023 at 14:20:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Czech_Republic
Info View of the Prague Castle reflected in the Vltava river, Prague, capital of the Czech Republic. The history of the castle began in 870 when its first walled building, the Church of the Virgin Mary, was built. According to the Guinness Book of Records, Prague Castle is the largest ancient castle in the world. The castle was a seat of power for kings of Bohemia, Holy Roman emperors, and presidents of Czechoslovakia. Today it's the official office of the President of the Czech Republic and the Bohemian Crown Jewels are kept within a hidden room inside it. The castle occupies an area of almost 70,000 square metres (750,000 square feet) and is among the most visited tourist attractions in Prague, attracting over 1.8 million visitors annually. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice reflections and hint of color in the sky, but too dark overall. I think this would work better at dawn so that the (east-facing) subject is better illuminated. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:01, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe you should crop the dark part at the left a bit, so that the cathedral is in the center, see annotation --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you for your feedback, King of Hearts, Uoaei1: I've brigthen it a bit a cropped a portion on the left, FYI too, Ermell, IamMM Poco a poco (talk) 16:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 02:54, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 478792 02:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:51, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Michielverbeek (talk) 07:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:12, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support How can I say no to a shining golden castle on a hill against a sky of purple and dark blue, that bridge and the wonderful reflections? It's gorgeous! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exactly per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Czech_Republic

File:Cuolm Sura 1585m. 21-09-2022. (actm.) 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Feb 2023 at 05:37:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)
Info Cuolm Sura, canton of Graubünden, Switzerland. View (from Surcuolm) on the clouds above the mountains on the south side of the valley.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:37, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:34, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI yes, but not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A nice cusp-of-seasons image. Daniel Case (talk) 19:48, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose: I kind of agree with GRDN711, but if it were cropped closer on the left, the composition would fully work for me. I'll try to mark a suggested crop but will certainly understand if you don't decide to use it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. Alternative added.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:12, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very nice scene. I prefer the less centered composition with a bit more surrounding. --Milseburg (talk) 07:16, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one provides more context. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:54, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 472062 01:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the composition just does not work --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Uoei1, sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 17:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 22:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The view is hidden, and the tree ordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems this one is a matter of taste, but I like it for similar reasons as Daniel and Milseburg. --Aristeas (talk) 08:42, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow for me. And I prefer this uncropped version. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 13:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Support In some ways, the other photo is more interesting, but I think the composition works better this way. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sorbus aucuparia --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:17, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:34, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 472201 12:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:07, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:25, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good technical quality and certainly QI. With the square crop and Sorbus aucuparia suggestion of Archaeodontosaurus, possibly VI. Regretfully, not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:49, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per GRDN711, the composition just does not work --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per GRDN711 and Uoaei1, not a wow to me --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per others. Yann (talk) 12:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with Uoei1, sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 17:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The view is hidden, and the tree ordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:47, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons_(Graubünden)

The chosen alternative is: File:Cuolm Sura 1585m. 21-09-2022. (actm.) 02.jpg

Russalka Memorial[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Mar 2023 at 14:56:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Entire view
The statue

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments and memorials
Info The Russalka Memorial in Tallinn, general view and photo of the statue. All by me --A.Savin 14:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 22:40, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 454354 02:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tempered support Bit of a halo/sharpening line on parts of the statue and base you might want to do something about. Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Both photos are FPs to me, but what's the precedent for whether a general view of a statue plus a closeup is a valid set? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:11, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have to admit that I don't know a precedent. --A.Savin 13:29, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice, but according to the rules they doesn't qualify as a set. -- Ivar (talk) 08:36, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ivar. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:58, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 10:35, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'd support the left one as FP, not the second one, therefore not an FP set to me Poco a poco (talk) 13:34, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Oh these set rules … ;–) I would support both of them if nominated individually, especially the overview – these clouds offer such a nice background. --Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --A.Savin 14:21, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zaadpluizen grote lisdodde (Typha latifolia). 13-02-2023 (d.j.b.) 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Mar 2023 at 05:50:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Familia_:_Typhaceae
Info Seed fluffs of the large ones formed by weather and wind Typha latifolia on the water side. Location, The Famberhorst. Focus stack of 13 photos.}}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Definitely a QI, but just doesn't do it for me as an FP. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:32, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support The strangeness of the [seed fluff?]'s shape on the foggy background is odd enough (and the quality good enough) for me to support. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:HerzbergAmHarz asv2022-06 img05.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2023 at 02:30:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Lower Saxony
Info A small island of vegetation in Lake Juessee at Herzberg am Harz; all by me --A.Savin 02:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 02:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 11:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 23:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:29, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:21, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:15, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:02, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice perspective! --Aristeas (talk) 09:23, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:09, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Interesting at full resolution. However, the crop is too tight IMO, especially at the upper side -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:51, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I also felt like the top crop was a little close. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 461505 02:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 17:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Germany#Lower Saxony

File:Pterophorus pentadactyla - Keila.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2023 at 11:25:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Pterophoridae_(Plume_Moths)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 11:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 11:25, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support All white, the specimen is fascinating, and the technical quality of the photograph excellent -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:28, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really delicate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:24, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:03, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Argenberg (talk) 11:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:26, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:10, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Tiouraren (talk) 09:03, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile and Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:11, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:11, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 478235 02:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 23:56, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 17:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Pterophoridae_(Plume_Moths)

File:Église Saint-Ignace-de-Loyola 002.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Feb 2023 at 21:25:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Canada
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 21:25, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice and peaceful. I think it's reasonable that the windows are blown from sunlight, but do eliminate the CA in the ceiling lamps. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done it was done, please let me know if its ok for you. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 15:40, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's better, but I think there is still some on the viewer's left (2nd and 3rd lamp). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please add a link to the FP category above. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:52, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 15:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose blown highlights. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 22:24, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 14:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ermell, for FP the usage of HDR would have been required IMHO Poco a poco (talk) 14:33, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support After some thought, I am actually OK with the blown windows. We're in a church looking out from behind the altar. It's OK to feel like you might be seeing God. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Highlights are not such an issue for me. --Tiouraren (talk) 09:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:58, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 454609 03:00, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:09, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral It’s a pity about the blown windows, but on the other hand they are not that irritating here because the complete photo appears harmonious. --Aristeas (talk) 09:14, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ermell. -- Karelj (talk) 16:31, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 17:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Canada

File:Поглед на Шар Планина низ прозорска рамка.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Feb 2023 at 13:40:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#North_Macedonia
Info all by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:40, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:40, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is a cropped version on the sides. I can upload the wider original version as an alternative if you find this one boxed in.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I like the motif, and would probably weakly support this version, but it seems a bit washed out? Maybe highlights taken down too much or could use a small saturation adjustment (based on the sky, it doesn't look overcast)? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:08, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per above. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Wieggy (talk) 06:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Request: Kiril, please add more accurate location. -- Ivar (talk) 09:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Done Geotag added.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:44, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support May be there are minor CAs at the frame. --XRay 💬 14:27, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough wow as FP for me. Rather than bringing focus to it, the framing obscures the scenery. The background scenery does not excite. --GRDN711 (talk) 17:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per GRDN. Yann (talk) 08:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yeriho (talk) 21:47, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Its merits are both the frame of an abandoned lodge and the rugged terrain that characterises such high-altitude places, while showing the other mountain range in the background. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 10:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per GRDN and Yann. An interesting idea—reminds me of photographs of extraterrestrial surfaces taken by landers—but it just doesn't make it for me because the landscape is too dull. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per GRDN --Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 03:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 22:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A perfect cover photo for a “3–5 people in a lone hut – who’s the murderer?” thriller. I actually like the not-that-exciting landscape because it adds to the “lost world” atmosphere of the photo. --Aristeas (talk) 09:11, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Not perfect but I like the aesthetic. I think the image would be better without the very top bit of the frame though - it's quite distracting and there's nothing interesting behind it, just a sliver of sky. BigDom (talk) 09:48, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:07, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per GRDN. -- Karelj (talk) 16:26, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support the window frame tickels my curiosity and the entire composition works for me --Virtual-Pano (talk) 17:57, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 459868 02:43, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:26, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#North_Macedonia

File:University Hall, The Ohio State University (Columbus, Ohio).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2023 at 17:58:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info created by Nheyob - uploaded by Nheyob - nominated by Nheyob -- Nheyob (talk) 17:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nheyob (talk) 17:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting sky, but otherwise in no way outstanding --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:29, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Foreground spoils the composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 07:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Michiel. --A.Savin 17:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Michiel.--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 21:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I might be able to live with the foreground but the background is too distrating. Daniel Case (talk) 22:23, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:27, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:ESC2014 - Austria 04.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Mar 2023 at 12:57:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
Info created and uploaded by Albin Olsson - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 12:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 12:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support For the sake of others outside of Europe (I presume everyone there knows this :) ), this is Conchita Wurst performing at Eurovision (which she won). It should be renamed, clearly, but it's a valuable image for us to have. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful - Benh (talk) 15:52, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support A pity it's just rehearsal, but great concert shot anyway. --A.Savin 16:55, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:59, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Fabian Roudra Baroi (talk) 21:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 07:35, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --BigDom (talk) 08:24, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per A.Savin. --Aristeas (talk) 09:37, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd reduce a bit the noise specially in darker areas, but the compo and moment is great anyhow Poco a poco (talk) 11:53, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:13, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual bearded drag queen :-) Good quality Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great image that we're really lucky to be able to use on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:50, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:11, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:23, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rosalina 🍵 465892 02:42, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:02, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Musicians and singers performing