Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Table-cloth 2008-1.jpg

Image:Table-cloth 2008-1.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2008 at 09:17:30

•  Info Detail of a crochet table-cloth, around 1970. Handwork by Júlia Figueiredo, Lisboa. Created & nominated by -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Simple and elegant Muhammad 11:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Simple and elegant, yes --Böhringer (talk) 12:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Simple and good --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 14:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support The same as Massimo Catarinella--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 18:46, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR (talk) 21:12, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too simple for FP. --Karelj (talk) 21:52, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

So only pictures with spectacular subjects may from now on become an FP? Sometimes the most simple of things are the most beautiful. This same phrase can be applied to photography. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 23:00, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

•  Neutral Due to progressive JPEG, shadows, CA, and it not being completely in focus. --Dori - Talk 02:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
  •  Question -- And could you please show us those faults? My eyes aren't as sharp as they used to be. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 07:51, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
    • The progressive JPEG and shadows are obvious, the rest is minor (purple fringing, and loss of detail here and there). Just the use of progressive is enough for me to oppose as I see no reason for using that format. --Dori - Talk 01:06, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
    • Thank you for noticing, I had no idea the image was encoded in that format. That is fixed now (I hope). Anyway, I wonder if that is a valid reason for opposing, as the issue is not mentioned in the guidelines and the final image quality is the same. As for the other flaws, well ... we really have to look hard! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:37, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
      • Well, it is valid for me (more important than the ever vague and elusive wow guideline), and it's now in the guidelines :) (let's see if someone disagrees). A more extreme case would be if someone encoded a photograph as a GIF or PNG. --Dori - Talk 12:03, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
      •  Info -- The change was reverted by me, waiting for a consensus to be reached. A discussion topic was created here -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

•  Support -- DarkAp89  Commons 11:13, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support I see no technical problem as mentioned by Dori. Agree with Muhammad --Simonizer (talk) 16:16, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support very strongly. I see no technical problems and this is so perfect you could cut it out and put it on your table. Daniel Case (talk) 13:50, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Support I don't see technical issues either. Durova (talk) 17:02, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

result: 10 supports, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. --Massimo Catarinella (talk) 00:24, 19 October 2008 (UTC)