Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Hanomag Kommissbrot (05), 500 cm³, Bj. 1927 (2007-06-17).jpg

Image:Hanomag Kommissbrot (05), 500 cm³, Bj. 1927 (2007-06-17).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2015 at 20:15:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/Image:Hanomag Kommissbrot (05), 500 cm³, Bj. 1927 (2007-06-17).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Hanomag Kommissbrot (05), 500 cm³, Bj. 1927 (2007-06-17).jpg

799

783

61

269

3456

2304

orange fringe to be corrected

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles

 I withdraw my nomination

•  Info created by Spurzem - uploaded by Spurzem - nominated by Spurzem -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Info Three of those small cars started at the first race on Nürburgring in 1927.
•  Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 20:15, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 21:02, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 02:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral High value, but quality could be better (not that sharp), IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 15:04, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't think it's all that special compositionally, and that aethetic judgement is compounded by the clipping in the image (I did, however, add an English description and more categories, for those who factor that into their !votes). Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak support The quality isn't very good but this car is very rare,accetable wow for me--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Light is not very appealing, sharpness is quite bad despite strong sharpening. — Julian H.^✈ 10:04, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

I see that's for people like me with a low-price camera is not efficient to canvass here. I withdraw. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:41, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

• Nobody said anything about a low-price camera... The opposers only mentioned quality and sharpness and composition. Diliff (talk) 11:28, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
  • I think there are two sides to this: One one hand, the photo could be improved in many ways that have nothing to do with the equipment (composition, light, quality to some extent). On the other hand, it is true that shooting fast moving objects with good sharpness is indeed among the things in photography that probably benefit most from good (and yes, expensive) eqipment. This means that some subjects are not or only with a lot of trickery and experience within the realm of what can be captured at FP quality, with the given eqipment. Now the image doesn't have any EXIF info, so I don't know where that limit may be, but I'm pretty confident that there are things that you can capture with your tools at a sufficient quality level. Your user page mentions an EOS 550D, which is a great camera and I'm pretty sure we have many FPs from similar and much cheaper cameras. If that's what you were referring to as being a "low-price camera", I'm actually confused. — Julian H.^✈ 12:25, 20 August 2015 (UTC)