Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zicht op de Piz S-chalambert vanuit Val Sinestra (d.j.b) 01.jpg

File:Zicht op de Piz S-chalambert vanuit Val Sinestra (d.j.b) 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2020 at 12:28:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Zicht op de Piz S-chalambert vanuit Val Sinestra (d.j.b) 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zicht op de Piz S-chalambert vanuit Val Sinestra (d.j.b) 01.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Grisons (Graubünden)
•  Info created by Famberhorst - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:28, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose A sub-10 MP landscape without perfect noise/sharpness at the pixel level just isn't going to cut it these days, sorry. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I get KoH's point, but it seems pretty good to me. I like the gentle light, and I don't find the noise severe. Cmao20 (talk) 16:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I'm not so bothered by the softness (although KoH of course has a good point), but for me also the composition and view is not that special for FP (but it could certainly be a VI of this mountain depending on the scope and competition). --Domob (talk) 07:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Might work under different lighting conditions. Daniel Case (talk) 23:32, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 09:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)