Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Webysther 20160331120144 - Monumento a Ramos de Azevedo.jpg/2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Webysther 20160331120144 - Monumento a Ramos de Azevedo.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2017 at 00:41:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • I'll weakly  Support again because I like the monument and the feeling of upward movement. But though I understand the reason for the tight crops from last year's thread, I don't love the construction on the right and wonder what this scene looks like now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Daphne Lantier 03:50, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support Per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support because I really like the image, although I too have to say I really don't like renominations just because a photo didn't get enough votes last time, especially when no changes have been made to the image.--Peulle (talk) 08:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per tight crop as KoH noted last time. Distracting background makes for a cluttered base -- some subjects are just handicapped by this and nothing you can do but accept it is just a QI. Also agree that the reason for renomination isn't valid -- no wow is often expressed as no vote, and that should generally be respected. My bluebell photo was renominated (by a different person) for the reason that they believed the community view on such images had changed in two years (but didn't appear to as it turned out), not just because we were unhappy with the lack of votes or disagreed with the result. -- Colin (talk) 11:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose per Colin--Ermell (talk) 13:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose, even though I !voted support last time, per Colin's critique and also because on further observation it seems a tad overexposed. Daniel Case (talk) 16:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support, It seems that colleagues judges the image based on quality than wow, I recommend watching the other pictures and see the reason for the cut and angle, I tried harder to perform a better image, but the lane around and the buildings did not help. --Webysther (talk) 16:47, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:23, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose I've looked at the other contents of the Category and it seems you've put a lot of thought into this. It might well be the best image we have of this monument, but that alone doesn't warrant the star for me. As Colin pointed out above, sometimes the surroundings of an interesting subject simply prevent taking a picture of it that's astonishing rather than "just" very good. Might be worth giving it a try over at VIC, though. --El Grafo (talk) 08:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:37, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Webysther_20160331120144_-_Monumento_a_Ramos_de_Azevedo.jpg/2&oldid=255394996"