Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vizcacha de la Sierra (Lagidium viscacia), Desierto de Siloli, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 31.JPG

File:Vizcacha de la Sierra (Lagidium viscacia), Desierto de Siloli, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 31.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2016 at 21:28:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vizcacha de la Sierra (Lagidium viscacia), Desierto de Siloli, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 31.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vizcacha de la Sierra (Lagidium viscacia), Desierto de Siloli, Bolivia, 2016-02-03, DD 31.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
•  Info Close-up of a wild exemplar of Southern viscacha (Lagidium viscacia) in one of its habitats, the Siloli Desert, one of the driest in the world, Potosi Department, southwestern Bolivia. This candidate should have the sharpness and focus that was missed in the previous one. All by me, Poco² 21:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 21:28, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment I will support if it's cropped. Charles (talk) 21:51, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

  Charles: can you please elaborate your comment or add a note wirh the suggested crop? Poco² 06:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

   Done Charles (talk) 08:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose - Cropping from the top will help, but it doesn't look like it will eliminate the disturbing bokeh in the background behind the viscacha. That degree of blurriness tends to make me dizzy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral for now. As much as I'd like to support, the background is too distracting. Cropping might help. But why didn't you stop up a bit? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:44, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

  What do you mean with "But why didn't you stop up a bit?", Martin Poco² 19:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

  Well, a larger aperture than f/11 would have resulted in a smoother background --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment Charles: new (cropped) version uploaded Poco² 19:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Better now. Charles (talk) 19:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 13:42, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan. I still love the animal, but I can't get past the bokeh. INeverCry 22:53, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Ikan and INC. Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:29, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:48, 22 April 2016 (UTC)