Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Puno y el Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 64-72 PAN.JPG

File:Vista de Puno y el Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 64-72 PAN.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jan 2018 at 06:46:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Puno y el Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 64-72 PAN.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Puno y el Titicaca, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 64-72 PAN.JPG

27630

28

3812

3276

33390

3332

less sharp part

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
•  Info Panoramic view of the city of Puno next to the Lake Titicaca, in the Peruvian Andes, not far from Bolivia. Puno is the capital city of the Puno Province and has a population of approx. 150,000. It was established in 1668 by the Spanish nobleman and viceroy Pedro Antonio Fernández de Castro. The lake is, by volume of water, the largest in South America and, with a surface elevation of 3,812 metres (12,507 ft), it's considered the highest navigable lake in the world. The lake has a max. lenght of 190 kilometres (120 mi) and width of 80 kilometres (50 mi) and a surface of 8,372 square kilometres (3,232 sq mi), whereas the water volume is 893 cubic kilometres (214 cu mi) with a max. depth of 281 metres (922 ft) and an average depth of 107 metres (351 ft). Poco² 06:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Poco² 06:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support. Amazing panoramic view. --Gnosis (talk) 08:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Gnosis. Most impressive! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Per above. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Oh, very nice! -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:48, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment Impressively large and detailed. How many pictures are there? The second-to-last picture seems a bit less sharp than the others (see note). Maybe you can exchange it. --Milseburg (talk) 19:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

  Milseburg: You can always figure out the amount of frames out of the image title, in this case I used 9 frames. I cannot easily swap that frame as I don't have a similar one, but I can try to stitch something out of series with different focal length I took from that spot. I don't believe though that I can look into that until Saturday. --Poco² 20:35, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry I have to oppose for now. It´s very good but not perfect. The mentioned transition is too obvious for me. It doesn't matter anyway, except of delaying the promotion a few days. --Milseburg (talk) 21:07, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Pugilist (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support outstanding!--Ermell (talk) 07:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --cart-Talk 09:49, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 12:17, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 13:23, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--PumpkinSky talk 11:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes