Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vilnius Cathedral Chapel of Saint Casimir, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg/2

File:Vilnius Cathedral Chapel of Saint Casimir, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Sep 2017 at 16:48:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vilnius Cathedral Chapel of Saint Casimir, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vilnius Cathedral Chapel of Saint Casimir, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg/2

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Pofka -- Pofka (talk) 16:48, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:48, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - Very strange perspective, and is that rainbowy area on the upper left a lens flare? I don't think I'll be supporting this one, and I may oppose. Give me a counterargument, please. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

• @Ikan Kekek: Not really sure about that rainbowy area. It might also be due to marble as there also are other shining areas (f.e. near right lamp). There is no other way to capture the whole chapel as it is one of the Vilnius Cathedral side rooms and it has quite small gates, so centered image is not possible here. -- Pofka (talk) 07:31, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks. That seems to me like a good argument for VIC, but not for supporting a feature. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

•  Oppose No, such a distorted image may be interesting but not excellent. That's my opinion. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:02, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose The distortion is one thing but there's also that light disturbance in the upper left section.--Peulle (talk) 07:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
  • It's a lens flare, difficult to avoid with strong light coming in through the window. And as Pofka said, it's a very small room so unfortunately this angle of view is needed to see enough of it. I can understand the criticisms though, it is not ideal. But the compromises are necessary in this case. Diliff (talk) 10:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose I understand that compromises were necessary, but in this case I do think they mean the picture could not be featurable. Daniel Case (talk) 14:44, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--cart-Talk 07:52, 20 September 2017 (UTC)