Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Untere Stuhllochscharte.jpg

File:Untere Stuhllochscharte.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2019 at 15:46:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Untere Stuhllochscharte.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Untere Stuhllochscharte.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Austria
•  Info created by Grtek - uploaded by Grtek - nominated by Grtek -- Grtek (talk) 15:46, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Grtek (talk) 15:46, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 17:06, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 18:55, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Domob (talk) 19:22, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unusual. But I can not take any information from this image, which is really inspiring me or help me to learn anything about this gap. Nothing special about the Gosaukamm. Interchangeable. It could be anywhere in the high mountains. --Milseburg (talk) 20:36, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - I like this because I really feel the cold and desolation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:45, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - Seven Pandas (talk) 23:33, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Nice candidate for BW conversion. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:08, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:29, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Bijay chaurasia (talk) 09:59, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Milsebug + I do not support BW-images in repositories like Commons. —kallerna (talk) 13:27, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

• Sorry to say, but if more people felt like you, FPC would be even deader - from an artistic / truly photographic point of view - than it already is (I've always wanted to use this comparative ). We're rapidly turning into a sterile, formalistic, pixel peeping tech forum that doesn't really care about unique perspectives - literally and figuratively - or bold approaches. Just my two cents. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:54, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

• Yep, truer words have seldom been spoken here! --Cart (talk) 09:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

• On the other side: I think lately too little attention has been paid to whether the candidates have an outstanding benefit in the encyclopedic projects. Sober, factual presentations have a harder time compared to images whose artistic aspect repress the factual. --Milseburg (talk) 14:53, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

• True, Commons serves a media repository for wikis of all kinds and scopes. But there is certainly no lack of straightforward, high quality depictions of the factual world (cityscapes, nature, animals...). Yet Commons could and should be so, so much more...! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:17, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support--Ermell (talk) 20:07, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I like the way the little motes of snow dance in the sun ... something that you can only see when pixel-peeping, and something the black and white makes better. Daniel Case (talk) 15:49, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 15:55, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. Commons should encompass all kinds of quality material, not just what is suitable for an encyclopedia. This is a high quality shot that illustrates good use of B&W very well. Cmao20 (talk) 17:15, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - Indeed, but we also don't know which good photos may serve an encyclopedia well. There have been hilarious cases of photos that had a hard time as unsuitable for an encyclopedia that ended up illustrating Wikipedia articles very well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:48, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 06:37, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:02, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --El Grafo (talk) 08:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I think it's excellent. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:59, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:35, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Austria