Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ulm Germany Interior-of-Ulm-Minster-01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Ulm Germany Interior-of-Ulm-Minster-01.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2015 at 09:30:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings
Info Interior view of Ulm Minster which happens to carry the highest church tower of the world. I took the photo with a single shot, using a 17 mm wide angle tilt shift lense. As the minster is pretty dark inside, I created a three image HDR image. Ulm Minster is a jewel of tourism in southern Germany, hence it was not possible to get this view without people. The long time exposue created some motion blur of the people, but in my opinion, it is not disturbing within the huge image but is giving an idea of the shere dimensions of the nave
- All by -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Support -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, I don't share your opinion about the blurry persons. I find them very disturbing, in consideration of the efforts made by others to avoid people in their photographs.--Jebulon (talk) 19:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
- I agree but I'm sympathetic to Uwe in this case, because in these big cathedrals, it's almost impossible to avoid people. Usually the only way is to shoot multiple images (often as many as 10 or 20) and then merge them, masking out the people in each one and hoping you were able to capture a whole scene without people (it's impossible to know for sure until you get home and try to process it!). I do sometimes do this, but it's not a simple job and it's made extra hard when the room is so busy. Sometimes the central aisle is never empty even if you wait half an hour or more. Diliff (talk) 10:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Mild support Due to their relatively small scale overall within the image, I'm not really bothered by the people. But it would have been easier to be less bothered by them if this had been a longer exposure. If you're going to be shooting with long exposures less than a second, it might be worth the time to try to avoid having moving people in them. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support as Daniel Merops (talk) 05:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Weak support People don't bother me , the subject is beautiful and take well enough (sure the 400 iso not help) but the composition is very beautiful.--LivioAndronico (talk) 07:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support Great, and the ghost persons do not disturb that much --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 10:11, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings
