Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:USA Kalifornien Geisterstadt Bodie, Foto von 1987.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:USA Kalifornien Geisterstadt Bodie, Foto von 1987.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Feb 2022 at 20:30:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United States
- Info This photo was shot 1987 with Nikon camera on Kodachrome 200 film. Therefore you can see the real noise of that photo film, which was scanned recently - created by Marc-Lautenbacher - uploaded by Marc-Lautenbacher - nominated by Marc-Lautenbacher -- Marc-Lautenbacher (talk) 20:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Marc-Lautenbacher (talk) 20:30, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I like the motif and the colours but the blurry foreground is too distracting for me to support, it doesn't add anything to the composition for me. Cmao20 (talk) 23:15, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see the potential for a great composition in the non-blurry part, either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:16, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Too grainy for an exterior shot, even at the period, distracting out of focus foreground, and low wow-factor in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:23, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 05:51, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per IK. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:44, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment To give this photo a little love: What I really like are the film colours – they are somewhat off, but that gives the photo a somewhat unreal, ‘out of time’ feeling, which is perfect for a photo of a ghost town ;–). I can also understand that you included the unsharp foreground in the photo – I have done this often myself, in the hope for a nice effect; but most times this does not work as expected … Anyway this is a valuable photo, it documents the state of these buildings at that time and it’s very interesting to compare it with the newer photos. --Aristeas (talk) 17:13, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I agree that this could be a useful Valued Image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)