Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tykadlo.jpg/2

File:Tykadlo.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2016 at 10:29:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tykadlo.jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tykadlo.jpg/2

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
•  Info created and uploaded by Pavel Kejzlar - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 10:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Info This is a renomination. Problem has been fixed.
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 10:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:30, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Description is somewhat better now, but it still lacks essential information. I can see two distinct types of structure there: Five round ones and many wrinkled ones. What's the difference between them? What are they for? How are they called? It's not even clear whether the image depicts a section of the scapus, pedicellus or the flagellum section of the Antenna. I'd support this in a heartbeat if the information was complete, but at the moment it's like having File:Red White Blood cells.jpg with the description "human blood cells" instead of "From left to right: erythrocyte, thrombocyte, leukocyte". --El Grafo (talk) 13:17, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

:* Comment - I agree with this. Once this is addressed, I'll be happy to support this fascinating photo, but I will provisionally  Oppose, pending resolution of this question. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Info It seems to me that the "wrinkled ones" are just the normal scaly surface. The round ones are probably some kind of sensilla, but there are so many different types that also can look different among different species … I guess we need an expert here. --El Grafo (talk) 08:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Support INeverCry 17:24, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per above comments. I also would like to know how much magnification is done here. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality, and high EV with the info. Yann (talk) 11:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Done Description updated. Kruusamägi (talk) 22:06, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Kruusamägi, thank you for updating the description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:16, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support as promised. --El Grafo (talk) 07:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 18:33, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:09, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Per my !vote at previous nomination. Daniel Case (talk) 21:23, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:21, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera