Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Three wheeler in Pingyao.jpg

File:Three wheeler in Pingyao.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2016 at 12:17:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Three wheeler in Pingyao.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Three wheeler in Pingyao.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
•  Info created by Luo Shaoyang - uploaded by Chin tin tin - nominated by Thennicke -- Thennicke (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Thennicke (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Neutral interesting but very small --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 16:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support It's a NIKON D200, size is fine for my. --The Photographer (talk) 17:05, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 19:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - It's small, but I like it and it has a lot of human interest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jiel (talk) 22:34, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 23:34, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support INeverCry 23:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment We have a real lack of FPs from mainland China: we don't even have an FP of the Great Wall! -- Thennicke (talk) 04:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

I also think this should go into the People category. Is there a way to put it under both people and vehicles? Thanks -- Thennicke (talk) 05:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Thennicke It can be done manually after promotion and bot handling. The bot can only handle one destination in the FP galleries. I agree it would be relevant to have both places. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:48, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

I've struggled to get a wide enough angle lens or far back enough to get the whole wall in the picture. -- KTC (talk) 16:17, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:53, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Conditional oppose No color-space metadata and no embedded color profile: Windows and Mac browsers and apps treat colors randomly. If fixed, I am ready to support. -- Slaunger (talk) 19:51, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

• @Slaunger: Colour profile now embedded. -- Thennicke (talk) 07:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Thanks, Thennicke. I do wonder though how come the file has increased from 388 kB to 1.23 MB by adding the color space? -- Slaunger (talk) 12:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

• @Slaunger: I noticed that too, not sure why. I just exported it with the default darktable export settings. I should probably have just added the colour space with a command line tool. -- Thennicke (talk) 01:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Thennicke, Slaunger, I've uploaded a new one with an sRGB profile embedded + ColorSpace tag set to sRGB using exiftool. I used the public domain sRGB profile from ArgyllCMS. FYI the command line is exiftool -ColorSpace=sRGB "-icc_profile<=sRGB.icm" MyFile.jpg, where "sRGB.icm" is the name/path of a *.icm or *.icc profile. -- Colin (talk) 20:55, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

@Colin: is a hacker --The Photographer (talk) 11:57, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Very weak support I like the National Geographic quality of it; I think it would be better with a squared-off crop. Also, the limitations of the small size are not completely hidden; I note the (small, admittedly) blown areas on the hats. Daniel Case (talk) 06:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:42, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles