Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Teatro Amazonas - escadas.jpg

File:Teatro Amazonas - escadas.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2017 at 01:21:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Teatro Amazonas - escadas.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Teatro Amazonas - escadas.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created by Marcelo Camargo/Agência Brasil - uploaded by NMaia - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:21, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I like the dynamics of the composition. Very well implemented. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support It looks deformed, but it's not --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:56, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support great compo. --Mile (talk) 07:02, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral beautiful and dynamic - but the theater shouldn't be leaning to the right --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Yes, things are leaning in all the "wrong" directions, but that is what you get from such an unusual perspective and that is what makes the pic come alive. Nice, gutsy nom! --cart-Talk 08:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:18, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose as above 'theater shouldn't be leaning to the right' Charles (talk) 14:08, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Regretful oppose per Charles, I feel some effort for correction should be done to elevate this image even more. – Lucas^T 12:54, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose In addition to the issues noted above, the blown clouds do it in for me. Daniel Case (talk) 01:18, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per other opposers --Karelj (talk) 16:51, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose--shizhao (talk) 13:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

@Shizhao: You're required to give a reason why you oppose, even if just "per User" when you agree with User's remarks – Lucas^T 15:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

per Charles--shizhao (talk) 12:53, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 10:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)