Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tampa Florida November 2013-3ax.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Tampa Florida November 2013-3a.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 23:55:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info Tampa, Florida. View to downtown during the morning (subtract 4 hours from Exif time). A natural companion of this FP, taken just after sunrise. Third try! All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Comment WB a tiny bit too cold? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Info A difficult question! WB was already adjusted in such a way as to make more or less white the parts that (I believed) should look that way. But we will never know how the scene looked like to our eyes at the moment. Please check the first version: the difference to the present one is already dramatatic and I don't want to exagerate. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- I prefer the alternative --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Oppose No wow for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Weak support Nice,big,but not extraordinary LivioAndronico (talk) 19:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)- Oppose wb/tint too green. Lighting not exceptional. -- Colin (talk) 20:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose. I agree, it seems a bit green tinted to me. Also, looks oversharpened with too large a radius. Almost every edge has a sharpening halo. Diliff (talk) 23:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Superb resolution and clarity, nice composition. I moan the sharpening artefacts and a cyan color cast as well - both are fixable. --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 12:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 15:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Tampa Florida November 2013-3g.jpg[edit]
- Info New version with corrected white balance and almost no sharpening. I don't want to give up this one, it is one of my favourites! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Thennicke (talk) 05:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support much better --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Much better, but still now wow for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment. Significant improvement in image quality and white balance. Without sharpening, it is a bit soft but the resolution makes up for this. I don't find the composition ideal though as I'd like to see more foreground, but I assume you shot this through a hotel window (which might explain the green tint also?), and this would prohibit you pointing the camera downwards as it would introduce internal reflections on the glass. Not quite impressive enough for a support for me, but the major faults are now fixed. It just is what it is. Diliff (talk) 11:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support YES, this is it! I am perfectly OK with the per-pixel sharpness, given the gigantic resolution. --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 12:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 10:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 21:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
The chosen alternative is: File:Tampa Florida November 2013-3g.jpg
