Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Türlersee panosphere 20200730.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Türlersee panosphere 20200730.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2021 at 09:24:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Switzerland#Zürich
- Info created by Domob - uploaded by Domob - nominated by Domob -- Domob (talk) 09:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment There are not too many spherical panoramics featured, and among those, most are cities / buildings and not nature. There is not much extraordinary on this picture, but it is a nice and peaceful place. --Domob (talk) 09:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Domob (talk) 09:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment It is a very large file, not possible for all users to download, and the ZoomViewer is not compatible with Panoramic Viewer. Would it be possible to have a smaller version attached to this? Like in this and this. Futhermore, the file exif lacks any data about camera-related parameters and it has no defined color space, it would be great if you could add these. --Cart (talk) 10:12, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Done Thanks for the feedback, I've uploaded a 70% version of this file, and also added some more EXIF data to the image (they usually get lost in the stitching process, but I added some fields back manually). --Domob (talk) 12:01, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support Buidhe (talk) 18:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Pedalito (talk) 19:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support with the qualification that this !vote is based on the smaller version since the nominated one never loaded into the pano viewer. Daniel Case (talk) 14:21, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support.--Vulphere 06:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support --StellarHalo (talk) 06:33, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose I see a good candidate here but the image is tilted (trees in the center are not aligned with their reflexion). Otherweise there is a stitching issue with one of the wood boards (10th board beginning from the end) RolfHill (talk) 18:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for the feedback! I will take a look at the tilt, which should obviously be easy to fix. I'm aware of the stitching error, but there is not much I can do about it unfortunately; I already tried many different configurations for stitching, and this is the best I was able to produce. IMHO the error is quite subtle and does not disturb the viewer too much. --Domob (talk) 04:10, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Oppose not because of the projection but because the composition doesn't quite work for me. Maybe if the dock were longer on the right.-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I see what you mean. When looking at the picture directly (not with a viewer as real spherical panoramic), then it would indeed be nicer to have the dock extend on the right as well and be more symmetrical. But I think the main focus here should be on viewing the panoramic as an "immersive" sphere, in which case the dock is fine at least for my taste. --Domob (talk) 15:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment My mistake; I missed that this is a 3D panorama. However, in spite of having a cable modem, the 3D viewer isn't working for me. So unless it eventually shows up for me, I'll simply abstain. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I believe there is a bug with the viewer, which gets triggered if the image is updated at some point (just my guess). You can view it with the downscaled version if you want. --Domob (talk) 04:21, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, it's very peaceful but I think I will continue to abstain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I believe there is a bug with the viewer, which gets triggered if the image is updated at some point (just my guess). You can view it with the downscaled version if you want. --Domob (talk) 04:21, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment My mistake; I missed that this is a 3D panorama. However, in spite of having a cable modem, the 3D viewer isn't working for me. So unless it eventually shows up for me, I'll simply abstain. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:05, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I see what you mean. When looking at the picture directly (not with a viewer as real spherical panoramic), then it would indeed be nicer to have the dock extend on the right as well and be more symmetrical. But I think the main focus here should be on viewing the panoramic as an "immersive" sphere, in which case the dock is fine at least for my taste. --Domob (talk) 15:08, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Switzerland#Zürich