Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Superfície - Bordo Trifolio Não Orientável.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Superfície - Bordo Trifolio Não Orientável.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2017 at 08:11:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mathematical non-orientable surface which the boundaries are the trefoil knot, object is part of the Matemateca (IME/USP) collection.
The Photographer trying to annoying me
  •  Comment I'm not expert in this area, however, I can read in the description that the first one is a Mathematical surface which the boundaries are the trefoil knot and the seccond one is Mathematical non-orientable surface. Maybe there are hundreds of mathematical representations of a trefoil knot and basically this kind of representation not change too much in form and color. BTW, could be nice see more description about this representation like how was it done (computer generated, for example). --The Photographer 11:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is a photo, and no, there is this two. And you don't need to be a expert to compare and see how great the difference is... and why you complaining about that? We may have hundreds of sea shells, churches, mountains ... -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 16:08, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Joalpe:
English: The image description comment that the "object is part of the Matemateca", please, could you tell us who is the author (not the image but the object). Thanks
Português: O comentário da descrição da imagem fala que o "objeto é parte da Matemateca", por favor, você poderia nos dizer quem é o autor (não a imagem, mas sim do objeto). Muito obrigado
--The Photographer 19:05, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This a mathematical object, so the form is not suitable for copyright, and the author attribution is not necessary.
I know that you are in this hunt for my head, just because I don't pet you, however you should calm down, you starting to shame yourself lying, inventing rules, and ignoring well know copyright bases...
So take a break and be content that you stop this candidature using the previous flaws pointed in the last round by Colin, even using a fallacious suggesting that the object was the same, the photo was computer made, as Colin pointed that was bad, live this moment of happiness and go find better things to do. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 07:01, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support ... and church interiors. Well captured and it belongs to be together with the previous nomination – feel free to make a group nomination next time for similar photos where there aren't many of the same kind. – LucasT 16:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm editing a huge volume of pieces, and this ones they stood out, that's why I didn't put together, I just edited it, and the other 2 weeks ago. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 00:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Charlesjsharp ??
This is not the same object, you just vote in favour of one church? One painting? -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 23:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I gave my opinion. So far, I did not oppose. So how many similar images, with the same artistic concept, but with slight differences and different colours, do you think should be promoted? 50? 100? 1000? 09:47, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Around 80.... The difference is not subtle, similar names don't make them equal... Panthera tigris, Panthera leo... And from 20 with the same quality I selected only 2... And how many Mathematical objects do we have in this quality? -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 18:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Case, Fixed. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 18:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 18:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Superfície_-_Bordo_Trifolio_Não_Orientável.jpg&oldid=241146896"