Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Staircase of the National Museum of Slovenia.jpg

File:Staircase of National Museum of Slovenia.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Sep 2015 at 14:41:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Staircase of National Museum of Slovenia.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Staircase of National Museum of Slovenia.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info View on staircase with ceiling of National Museum of Slovenia
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 14:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support More good pictures from Slovenia! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

• Thanx ArionEstar, there would be even more but we don't have Freedom of Panorama here. --Mile (talk) 14:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

• Neither in France, my friends...--Jebulon (talk) 22:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Frankly, this might be one of the best composition with a fisheye I've seen in a while. I see some strange artifacts, maybe more in darker areas. Maybe wrong combination of sharpening and NR? Hard to tell for sure. - Benh (talk) 19:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
• All true. I put it on Flickr in few groups, counter went mad, 3000+ and 100 favorites in a day, still going. Never had something similar. OK, that you saw, mentioned cccephas I think first, for other image of Samyang 7.5 fisheye (which is very quality lens, per reviews), but there were some jpeg like artefacts in darker areas in places where projection is most significant (edges). Seems like sharpening. But no sharpening was undergone. Really no need. Also no NR, no need neither, unless that few corners, which should not play any major rule, I suppose. I think fisheye can give you so much interesting view and more rich picture than doing matrix with rectangular lenses. --Mile (talk) 20:33, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

 Comment It is the way Olympus software deals with noise. --C messier (talk) 20:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Don't you shoot RAW and go through something like LR or PS for demosaicing Mile ? - Benh (talk) 20:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry no. The fisheye lense choice does not work for me.--Jebulon (talk) 20:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

• Fisheye is only what is works here. Forget matrix. --Mile (talk) 20:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

• I don't understand what "forget matrix" means. To be more precise (@Benh: ): I oppose just because this kind of picture does not give (to me) any idea of what this staircase looks like in real (I mean: "my" real). Sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 22:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Support I like, for once, seeing a symmetrical interior built around curvatures. And it looks like they were curved to being with, so I don't see the fisheye as problematic here. Daniel Case (talk) 05:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral I have my very specific problems with fisheye perspectives. Therefore neutral. --Hubertl 19:59, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support, as per Daniel Case. — Yerpo ^Eh? 08:50, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Info Noise removed. Better now. C messier so far i didn't have problems with noise, maybe because Olympus lens are in-body corrected and this was Samyang. Benh, I mostly shot jpeg, unless some harder situation. This one was shot in RAW, because I knew temp coorection will take place, but now also the noise was easier to correct. I use Oly software for base. Never get same colors in Adobe converters. --Mile (talk) 10:04, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:52, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --M★Zaplotnik ^(edits) 14:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 08:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 16:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors