Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Cuthbert's Church Philbeach Gardens Reredos, London, UK - Diliff.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:St Cuthbert's Church Philbeach Gardens Reredos, London, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Mar 2015 at 11:05:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff. Please view at full size, it unfortunately looks unimpressive at thumbnail size but the carved wooden rederos details are a feast for the eyes. The amazing thing is, this is not a grand English cathedral, it's just a local parish church in London, and not particularly well known at that. -- Diliff (talk) 11:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Diliff (talk) 11:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)- Support First thought when seeing this picture: "It simply looks like a 100 years old bottle of wine!". Such impressive wooden altar... -- Pofka (talk) 16:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 18:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support Yes, the details are incredible. - Benh (talk) 20:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful --Baresi F ([[User talk:Baresi franco|talk
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- KTC (talk) 10:01, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support Tu solus Dominus, Diliff. Many symbols, many stories, and a wonderful woodcarving. One can stay here for hours, saying "oh, did you notice this ? Do you see that ? And here, and here ?". Really a treasure, worth to be known. Thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 16:59, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support -- Christian Ferrer 17:45, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support Amazing woodcarving, stupidly sharp. --DXR (talk) 18:46, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, I went up to the 85mm f/1.8 lens at f/10 to maximise detail on this one. The one downside is the much more limited DOF (as you can see by the foreground quickly going OOF), but I think it was worth it. The view from further back taken with the 50mm lens is not nearly as detailed. The composition in that image is also not great, but it was an awkward position to shoot from as I couldn't get any higher, vertically, because the rood screen would interfere, and I couldn't get further back because then the front seats would get in the way. Diliff (talk) 16:42, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Agreed, I really sup'ed this as an artwork, not as a church interior. Yeah, the 85mms are mighty tools. I tried something comparable some time ago, but it just looks shabby in comparison. Perhaps I missed the focus a bit. --DXR (talk) 21:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, I went up to the 85mm f/1.8 lens at f/10 to maximise detail on this one. The one downside is the much more limited DOF (as you can see by the foreground quickly going OOF), but I think it was worth it. The view from further back taken with the 50mm lens is not nearly as detailed. The composition in that image is also not great, but it was an awkward position to shoot from as I couldn't get any higher, vertically, because the rood screen would interfere, and I couldn't get further back because then the front seats would get in the way. Diliff (talk) 16:42, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Love it — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:12, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 22:37, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --fedaro (talk) 18:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors
