Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St. Nikolaus in Mittelberg und Schlern.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:St. Nikolaus in Mittelberg und Schlern.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2014 at 20:47:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:47, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic --LivioAndronico talk 20:55, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support. Beautiful. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:53, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support--Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:11, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:34, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support I would like to be able to complain that it's a little oversharpened in some areas and distorted at the lower right. I would like to, but the picture is too beautiful otherwise to let me. Daniel Case (talk) 03:30, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support Dman41689 (talk) 06:44, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Comment 3 dustspots (see notes) -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Images 07:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- fixed Thanks Christian --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:45, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know what you did Wolfgang, but you did not upload anything on this file, look at the file history. -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Images 16:40, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: . Ooops, something went wrong, thanks for the hint --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support ok -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Im. / Fav. 07:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- @Christian Ferrer: . Ooops, something went wrong, thanks for the hint --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- I don't know what you did Wolfgang, but you did not upload anything on this file, look at the file history. -- Christian Ferrer Talk / Images 16:40, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl (talk) 08:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:28, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:31, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support Sharpening halos should have been avoided, acceptable though. -- Smial (talk) 13:41, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:17, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support --.snoopy. 21:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
- still Neutral – Nice image! Pity it looks slightly oversharpened but worst part of that is the bright halo around the left edge of the tower top, keeping me from supporting. Should be fixable by cloning. --Kreuzschnabel 19:50, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. Because of Daniel Case + Kreuzschnabel comments...--Jebulon (talk) 23:47, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral I will support once the white halo in the sky around the tower and also the mountains will have been removed (clone stamp, c. 2 px). --Cayambe (talk) 16:58, 7 November 2014 (UTC)~
- Support --Halavar (talk) 23:26, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Jar.ciurus (talk) 9:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support --P e z i (talk) 18:07, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Ram-Man 02:31, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 18:55, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings