Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skäralid in Söderåsen National Park 121020 01.jpg

File:Skäralid in Söderåsen National Park 121020 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Aug 2017 at 14:21:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Skäralid in Söderåsen National Park 121020 01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skäralid in Söderåsen National Park 121020 01.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Sweden
•  Info created and uploaded by Auquamitzi - nominated by W.carter -- cart-Talk 14:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support One of the great photos from this year's WLE Sweden. This is the lake at the bottom of Skäralid ravine in Söderåsen National Park. -- cart-Talk 14:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support The colour, the sharpness! :D Despite having fairly flat light, I really like this shot due to the good reflection. Big wow factor.--Peulle (talk) 14:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:17, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Daphne Lantier 19:03, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 21:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Great scenery, but the geocode seems not quite accurate. --A.Savin 23:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

• I agree that the coordinates seem a little off. They were obtained from the camera's exif since this is a Commons newbie and this is the user's only upload, so not used to our forms and templates here. I have left a message on their talk page with a question about the coords. In the meantime I have at least moved the geotag down to the lake shore. --cart-Talk 07:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

• I have to say that I have the same problem with the built-in GPS receiver of my camera (DSLR). On most photos, I have to adjust the geocode afterwards. About 5-10% show completely wrong (!) geocode and/or altitude. In general, I wouldn't rely on camera GPS and "wait for the bot" :) --A.Savin 11:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

• A.Savin, the user has left the right coords at their talk page and I have added them to the file. --cart-Talk 14:36, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

• Fine. --A.Savin 14:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:11, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:10, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 07:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 10:26, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Per above --A.Savin 11:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Colin (talk) 13:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

* Support -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

• Sorry, invalid vote. The rules are: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote." This vote was your 28th edit. Welcome back later when you have made more edits. :-) --cart-Talk 14:43, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Now this is a fall-color picture that stands out. Daniel Case (talk) 14:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:20, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support An impressionist feel to it. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:38, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Question Do the colors in the trees seem oversaturated to anyone else than me? HalfGig talk 23:39, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support striking - Benh (talk) 08:08, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - Am I the only viewer who doesn't love this or see it as an obvious FP? What I see is that in significant parts of the picture, such as the background toward the upper left, the trees are too white. HalfGig could be right that some of the others are oversaturated, but it's the undersaturation that's bothering me. And in terms of composition, I feel like the movement is too much to the right with no countervailing movement to the left, so I question whether this particular view is well-chosen. Sure, it's pretty because it's fall foliage with a reflection, but I don't feel it's particularly great. However, I won't vote against it and don't feel bad that it will be featured. But I don't really share the overwhelming enthusiasm for it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:56, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 10:15, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 17:13, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Laitche (talk) 19:52, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Sweden