Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sant'Agnese in Agone (Rome) - Dome HDR.jpg

File:Sant'Agnese in Agone (Rome) - Dome HDR.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Sep 2015 at 18:53:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Sant'Agnese in Agone (Rome) - Dome HDR.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sant'Agnese in Agone (Rome) - Dome HDR.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  I withdraw my nomination All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:53, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose too dark, and the WB is way too blue. - Benh (talk) 07:00, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:00, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose as Benh. Yann (talk) 08:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose idem--Jebulon (talk) 11:49, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose The white of the windows is blown. --Tremonist (talk) 14:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Support--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

 Reworked Christian Ferrer,Jacek Halicki,Benh, Jebulon and Yann better? Merci.--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:07, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Better. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Moderate support Still not perfect but a lot better. Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

• In Italy the people say:"God is perfect,but I'll go close" --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

• We don't have to judge an improvement in comparison of a previous nomination, but a picture alone, by itself...--Jebulon (talk) 11:32, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry Livio, it's still far from optimal. It looks too purple now. The image you replaced looks much better in this respect. As a side note, I'm not quite sure about the replacement and will likely revert your change. The old one has a better composition and comprehensive view. Your picture is a nice complement though. @Jacek Halicki, Christian Ferrer, ArionEstar, and Daniel Case: , can you double check? - Benh (talk) 07:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

• OK Just to be clear, I intend to keep both pictures in the article. Please no drama ;) - Benh (talk) 07:57, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Purple, indeed.--Jebulon (talk) 11:29, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose as per Benh, again. --Yann (talk) 11:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

 Done Less purple Benh,Jebulon and Yann --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 12:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

• Livio, to me it's still not good enough as simply being faithful to reality colourwise (and therefore not good enough for display in an encyclopedia article). Before asking if it's good enough, simply compare to the picture I referred to. And of course, feel free to seek help if you can't fix it yourself. If you seek advices, don't forget to share what settings you've changed. It's always free to ask ;) - Benh (talk) 16:49, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

• Well ... if you think you can do better, for me you can give to the crazy joy. --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:20, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

• I'm busy processing my own pictures :) but I'll do my best to help since I did criticise your picture. Feel free to mail me a link to your RAWs, and I'll do the necessary. - Benh (talk) 11:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

• Who want can find the files here thanks --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:31, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

•  Done - Benh (talk) 22:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose As above. --Tremonist (talk) 14:23, 1 September 2015 (UTC)