Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Cristóbal de La Laguna.jpg

File:San Cristóbal de La Laguna.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2015 at 19:24:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:San Cristóbal de La Laguna.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Cristóbal de La Laguna.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
•  Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 19:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 19:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 19:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- KTC (talk) 21:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support - impressive! Óðinn (talk) 22:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Very strong support Definite WOW ... my kind of FP. Daniel Case (talk) 22:32, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment - I can't view this picture above the thumbnail size, because when I try, I get the message that it has errors. Is there a way you can set up a zoom feature for the thumbnail? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:57, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

  Most browsers have problems with images above 100 Megapixels. Nevertheless there are some opportunities, to view these images in high resolution. Opportunity 1: You can download the file (right click on the 800px preview and "save target/link as"). Opportunity 2: You can click on the resolution links below the 800px preview (but not the full resolution link!) und then p.e. you will reach the URL https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3c/San_Crist%C3%B3bal_de_La_Laguna.jpg/1280px-San_Crist%C3%B3bal_de_La_Laguna.jpg Now you can replace the parameter "1280px" with a higher value, p.e. "5000px" (maximum is about "7000px", above: server error). Your third opportunity is to use the interactive large-image-viewer linked above the description (red box). I hope I could help... :-) -- Wolf im Wald 15:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. The view at the link was big enough for me to judge the photo better, and I'm happy to  Support featuring it, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 23:13, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl 00:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:38, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment The left part is clearly leaning out. --Code (talk) 09:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

  I think this is perspective distortion because the photo was taken downward. The vertical lines on the right are also leaning out to the other side. Besides the terrain is sloping. Wolf im Wald 15:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 09:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 12:08, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Very nice, but per Code. --Ivar (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment @Iifar: @Code: I uploaded an new version with perspective correction and little different crop. -- Wolf im Wald 02:59, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support now --Ivar (talk) 06:17, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Hockei (talk) 19:44, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support It is a pity that the highlights on the buildings are blown out but the view is remarkable indeed. dllu (t,c) 00:39, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
•  Support A bit brighter than I would prefer, but the landscape in the background is spectacular. — Julian H.^✈ 13:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places