Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruby-throated hummingbird (Archilochus colubris) female Palopo.jpg/2

File:Ruby-throated hummingbird (Archilochus colubris) female Palopo.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 May 2023 at 11:15:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ruby-throated hummingbird (Archilochus colubris) female Palopo.jpg/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruby-throated hummingbird (Archilochus colubris) female Palopo.jpg/2

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Trochilidae (Hummingbirds)
•  Info Previous nom withdrawn because of banding. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:15, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:15, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay 💬 08:05, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment postprocessing is imo too strong, the feathers are not looking natural. -- Ivar (talk) 08:08, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

• Oops! Wrong processing model used. New one uploaded. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:47, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

• Better, but I think it's still too aggressive. Perhaps more conservative Topaz settings can do it, but have you tried alternative algorithms e.g., DXO's PhotoLab/PureRaw or Adobe's Denoise AI? In my experience they produce far better results. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 16:45, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose --This image of the bird is sharp, but there is too much filtering (looks unnatural, even in color), the composition is spoiled by the branches in the background - it's like "Ж"(опа). 3 leaves play an important role, but they have a motion blur. Too little space around the object. Dion Art (talk) 08:14, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

• Revenge votes are not a good thing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:45, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 08:20, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:37, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quite good image but the leaves ate too prominent to make the photo outstanding IMO. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:06, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
• Weak  Oppose: I'm torn, because the bird is very well photographed but I agree with Christian about the leaves. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:57, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Support--GeonwooLee (talk) 07:52, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

• not a valid vote. -- Ivar (talk) 08:41, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

•  Weak oppose postprocessing result is still overwhelming. -- Ivar (talk) 12:01, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. -- Karelj (talk) 14:06, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Weak support The processing could be natural but doesn't affect the image too much. The leaves would be more of a distraction if they were a less subdued color. Daniel Case (talk) 17:56, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose I had looked at it several times and wasn't sure how to vote, but I agree with the comments above Poco a poco (talk) 19:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC) --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:25, 27 May 2023 (UTC)