Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rådhuset metro station June 2015.jpg

File:Rådhuset metro station June 2015.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 12:17:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Rådhuset metro station June 2015.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rådhuset metro station June 2015.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info Rådhuset metro station, Stockholm. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 12:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I thought something like this exist only in Helsinki --Ralf Roleček 12:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 12:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support This is amazing Sakhalinio (talk) 13:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Great work! --Yann (talk) 14:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support sure --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Maire (talk) 15:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

*  Support interesting --Mile (talk) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC) --Mile (talk) 08:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Would support 2nd version, since reverted.

•  Support Like from the best science fiction movie. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 17:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support DoF a little bit too small, may be tilted CW. But: Very nice and wonderful composition. --XRay ^talk 17:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

*  Support interesting --Mile (talk) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC) I think its too much tilted. Nothing so problematic what couldn't be easily corrected...some minimal requirement for future FP ? --Mile (talk) 14:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support POTY finalist of course --The Photographer (talk) 18:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support my vote is superfluous, but I do it anyway --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 20:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- wow! Amazing station! Great composition as well! Nikhil (talk) 05:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
•  weak support Yes it's an amazing place, but a bit spoiled by execution. Architectural subject shall have "horizontal lines" not skewed IMO. Still a great wow. - Benh (talk) 11:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose the new version introduced even more horizontal "trapeze skewing" distorsion, which I don't like. - Benh (talk) 13:57, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Not perfect—the man on the escalator is a little motion-blurred—but so what? +1 to Johann's comment. Daniel Case (talk) 18:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Wow! --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose Unbalanced compositon.--Verde78 (talk) 12:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Unbalanced composition ? --The Photographer (talk) 12:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Love the pic, but I see his point. While the lines on the ground are level with the "horizon" the escalator is not. Moreover, that massive pillar on the right does give the impression the composition is weighted to the right as well. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

• I see it now. As XRay mentioned, its tilted. I suppose ArildV will rotate it. Can be best seen on horizontals of elevator roof. --Mile (talk) 18:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
  •  Info Thank you all for voting. Mile, XRay, Saffron Blaze, Verde78 new version uploaded. --ArildV (talk) 20:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Frankly, in this instance, I think you should just choose which you'd rather featured. There are merits to both versions and the differences are not sufficient to derail this great image. Saffron Blaze (talk) 01:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

I sorry but after giving the new version a second look, I have restored the original version (also considering comments from Saffron Blaze and Benh). I dont really like the new version.--ArildV (talk) 14:14, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

• Yes, I suppose its better now. For balancing this kind of crop maybe, next time. --Mile (talk) 07:11, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion, but I dont want to crop the pillars. It also reduces the educational value (less informationabout the station's architecture). --ArildV (talk) 14:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Outstanding! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support. Great picture and great station. I'll borrow this project for underground stations in Russia. :) --Brateevsky {talk} 10:25, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 26 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture