Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Protests opposing Bolivarian Revolution in São Paulo, Brazil.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Protests opposing Bolivarian Revolution in São Paulo, Brazil.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2019 at 01:54:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1990-now
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 01:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)- Would like to support this, but there look to be a few stitching errors (in a couple of the flags, background on the right...). I can't annotate now, but will tomorrow if you haven't fixed them first. — Rhododendrites talk | 05:53, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Comment I’ve pointed out the most obvious ones. --Kreuzschnabel 21:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Oppose No wow to me, sorry. Just a group of people on a political mission, nothing special. --Kreuzschnabel 07:43, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - It's well composed, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:29, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment There aren’t many ways to miscompose a frontal shot of a lined-up group of ppl. They could have agreed before if the red or the yellow is the top side :) On the other hand, there are numerous stitching flaws, some of them deforming people. Not the best idea to take a multi-shot panoramic of a non-still subject. --Kreuzschnabel 14:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- That definitely makes sense about the problems of stitching photos of a moving subject. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:38, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel. Indeed a good composition, but not a FP for me. --Domob (talk) 10:58, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose There is no wow for me. A group of people but visually nothing remarkable. --Dinkum (talk) 18:55, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Support conditional on the stitching errors being fixed. I've learned that photos of protests/demonstrations/marches don't typically fare well at FPC. This is probably a better attempt than those I've nominated, but I'm not surprised by the opposition. Still, it's something I'd like to see more of here. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)- Support per Rhododendrites. Cmao20 (talk) 21:23, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Compositionally, too random and chaotic. Daniel Case (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose per Dinkum --Fischer.H (talk) 18:00, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Since the two supporting votes have been given on condition of the stitching errors being fixed, which has not been done yet, this nomination may be considered failed because of no valid support after five days --Kreuzschnabel 15:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- I think that this photo is very important for me because of the greatest diaspora of Venezuelans and that there has been in any country in Latin America and in the world, surpassed only by Syria. However, I think that I will not have the time to correct this week the stitching errors. --Wilfredor (talk) 15:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Please keep in mind that an oppose vote does not mean your picture is bad, or unimportant, or something like that. Furthermore, we do not judge the political importance of an image or the event it shows. We just judge image quality and originality, so any oppose just means the voter is not convinced that it’s one of the very best, finest, most breathtaking, cream-of-the-crop images we’ve got on Commons, the topmost 0.1 percent. --Kreuzschnabel 16:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- I think that this photo is very important for me because of the greatest diaspora of Venezuelans and that there has been in any country in Latin America and in the world, surpassed only by Syria. However, I think that I will not have the time to correct this week the stitching errors. --Wilfredor (talk) 15:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
