Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pont de Bir-Hakeim and view on the 16th Arrondissement of Paris 140124 1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Pont de Bir-Hakeim and view on the 16th Arrondissement of Paris 140124 1.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2014 at 19:20:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by me, -- DXR (talk) 19:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Support Although this bridge is fairly well known, and imo one of Paris' nicest bridges, few images are around that manage to show its character well at night. Especially the metal construction at the bottom often gets lost in images that capture the entire bridge since it is very dark. The image presented here is not an HDR, but has been reworked in LR to an extent that I would consider appropriate to its actual appearance. The color of the sky is true to the reality of the evening, the light line above is a metro train crossing the bridge. -- DXR (talk) 19:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)- Support --A.Savin 20:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Brilliant bit of work. Saffron Blaze (talk) 20:04, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Mega Support Woaaeiuoiaeaeoiow Superb! ;D ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 20:16, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Great! --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 21:02, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Very nice, still I'd do some denosing in the darker areas below the bridge Poco2 21:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Comment Thanks a lot for the nice reviews! I have tried to address Poco's comment and done a bit of selective denoising --DXR (talk) 22:35, 27 February 2014 (UTC)- Support Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 22:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Excellent, except the blurry water at right, which is a bit disturbing, in comparison of the rest of the water. Is it improvable ? -Jebulon (talk) 23:13, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Well, it is a 13 second exposure and the river is flowing, so no, I guess, sorry. I have no clue why it would be different for the different parts of the river, though, but it is consistent for all images I took there. Not an expert on fluid dynamics, unfortunately ;-) --DXR (talk) 23:24, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- Probably due to the retouche you mentionned. Anyway, no matter.--Jebulon (talk) 20:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- No, I swear not! I only retouched a mini bit at the very right. It must be due to moving waves. --DXR (talk) 20:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 06:23, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- -donald- (talk) 11:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:38, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Arcalino (talk) 12:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support —Blurred Lines 13:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Superbe. --Claude Truong-Ngoc (talk) 15:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support Very good. You could try to further denoise the sky, but nonetheless FP for me. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support A great one.--Jebulon (talk) 20:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:05, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support per Jebulon! --mathias K 05:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Really great image! Halavar (talk) 00:29, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:37, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment For me it doesn't work, the sky is ugly. This happens with night long exposure when you missed the blue hours. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:50, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support The sky is offset by the light on the bridge and buildings. For me, anyway. Daniel Case (talk) 14:36, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 22:12, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges
