Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paraboloide circular 02.jpg

File:Paraboloide circular 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2018 at 19:12:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Paraboloide circular 02.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paraboloide circular 02.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/objects
•  Info All by Rodrigo.Argenton -- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 19:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 19:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support HalfGig talk 21:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Pleasing shapes and colors. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:35, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful mathematics. --cart-Talk 08:53, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:27, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:51, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wolf im Wald 12:35, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support--Peulle (talk) 12:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:52, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 20:22, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Samuele2002 (talk) 20:24, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 21:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Clever! and very nice, also. --Harlock81 (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Isn't it odd that humans make an imperfect physical representation of an abstract shape, and then try to photograph it as perfectly as possible? dllu (t,c) 03:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

• I don't find it odd at all that such mathematical objects are made for educational purposes. We 'apes' still learn things faster if we can combine theoretical knowledge with a tactile experience. --cart-Talk 15:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

• It's not the making of the object that's odd... it's that the fact that we try to photograph the said tactile object with an intense studio setup (rather than, say, generating a perfect rendering of it) that strikes me as being somewhat whimsical. dllu (t,c) 21:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

•  Support --Llez (talk) 11:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Per dllu: a photograph of an actual object that looks like computer graphics – usually it's the other way round ;-) --El Grafo (talk) 13:37, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /PumpkinSky talk 21:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects