Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Państwowe Muzeum Historyczne w Moskwie 01.JPG

File:Państwowe Muzeum Historyczne w Moskwie 01.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2014 at 12:15:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Państwowe Muzeum Historyczne w Moskwie 01.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Państwowe Muzeum Historyczne w Moskwie 01.JPG

•  Info all by Halavar -- Halavar (talk) 12:15, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Halavar (talk) 12:15, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'm always grateful for FP suggestions from Moscow, but we have certain quality standards and there are notable flaws: chromatic aberrations, detail loss on highlights, noise on shadows, overall lacking crispness. I'm sorry, --A.Savin 13:04, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Well, I knew that as always with my images, you will be opposed. Even so, thanks for the review. Halavar (talk) 13:13, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

I feel misunderstood. --A.Savin 14:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Halavar, The question you might want to ask yourself is whether his comments have merit. I haven't checked to see if they do, but wouldn't it be better to know and then you can complain from a stronger position? For me I love the building but not sure you captured it from its most flattering angle. The angle chosen also resulted in some complex perspective issues that are yet to be addressed. Saffron Blaze (talk) 15:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

•  Info New version uploaded. Halavar (talk) 14:18, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
•  Info Oversaturated. --Mile (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

 Oppose Dear Halavar, I've no personal conflict with you, as you know, but I'm afraid I agree with A.Savin...--Jebulon (talk) 16:22, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

•  Oppose Overstaurated, overpolarized sky. Daniel Case (talk) 01:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Jee 15:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)