Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Päikesetõus Pärnu jõel..jpg

File:Päikesetõus Pärnu jõel..jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2015 at 20:20:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Päikesetõus Pärnu jõel..jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Päikesetõus Pärnu jõel..jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
•  Info created and uploaded by Aiver Oja - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 20:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 20:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 21:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Tilted. --Mile (talk) 05:43, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment Tilted clockwise 0.6° --Laitche (talk) 10:03, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral per others. --Tremonist (talk) 12:45, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment There is nothing that refers to tilt. It is not tilted. --Donninigeorgia (talk) 21:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Laitche is right, Donninigeorgia, it´s tilted cw. Pretty obvious.--Hubertl (talk) 09:16, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Tilt fixed. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support @PetarM, Laitche, and Tremonist: I uploaded a new version with the tilt fixed. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I suggest You just overwrite older file, no need for Alternative, its corrected image. --Mile (talk) 18:58, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I think Mile may be right but some creators don't like the overwrite so before then you can ask the creator or you can revert anytime, I don't care which but in this case overwrite might be better. And did you upscale this image after rotation? If so upscaling is not allowed here(FPC). --Laitche (talk) 21:11, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Additional comment:@ArionEstar: If you upscaled the image size, you should revert the size, after that I would support this :) --Laitche (talk) 22:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
• The coastline doesn't have to be horizontal. Don't be fooled. It's just the composition that leaves the impression that it is tilted. --Donninigeorgia (talk) 21:26, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Well luckily, there is a water reflection in the photo, so you can check if the reflection is vertically aligned with the corresponding object. That being said, I think it's more important that it looks right, at least in this case. — Julian H.^✈ 21:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈ 21:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Info @ArionEstar: I reverted (processed from the original image not downscaled yours) the original size. --Laitche (talk) 23:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 23:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Question The original nominator of this photo is Kruusamägi but alternative nominator is ArionEstar, in this case alternative nomination is counted as nominator's nomination? if so this one is ArionEstar's third nomination thereby this should be put on FPD. Or if an alternative nomination for others nomination is not counted as nomination, it's no problem. Does someone know about that? --Laitche (talk) 23:40, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
  • I don't know, but if that becomes a problem, I'd gladly adopt the nomination. We could just ignore it, too. It's not like you can reasonably bombard FPC with countless alternative nominations. — Julian H.^✈ 07:46, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
    • @Julian: Yes, that's right. @ArionEstar: Currently you have two active nominations this and this. This nomination is an alternative but the third nomination of yours if we accept this because of the alternative then that becomes we have to accept countless alternative nominations as Julian mentioned. I think this nomination will expire soon by rules of the 5th day unless get an oppose vote, so would you please postpone (withdraw) this nomination till then and you can reopen (unwithdraw) this nomination, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 08:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
      • Under my interpretation of the rules, I have always considered the original nominator the sole nominator, even as alts are added. I guess this issue has never come up before, so feel free to raise it at Commons talk:Featured picture candidates. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
        • @King of Hearts: OK, I added new topic, thanks. --Laitche (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
          • This matter is confirmed (Alternative is not counted as nomination.). No problem. --Laitche (talk) 03:25, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support, but I would prefer overwriting the original, as this is really just a very slight rotation. --El Grafo (talk) 18:31, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support as El Grafo.--Hubertl (talk) 09:17, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:08, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 04:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena

The chosen alternative is: File:Päikesetõus Pärnu jõel (edited).jpg