Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ouster OS1-64 lidar point cloud of intersection of Folsom and Dore St, San Francisco.png/2

File:Ouster OS1-64 lidar point cloud of intersection of Folsom and Dore St, San Francisco.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2020 at 10:31:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Ouster OS1-64 lidar point cloud of intersection of Folsom and Dore St, San Francisco.png/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ouster OS1-64 lidar point cloud of intersection of Folsom and Dore St, San Francisco.png/2

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Streets
•  Info created and uploaded by dllu - nominated Benh (talk) 10:31, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I'm surprised the first attempt at FPC failed the way it failed. We are lucky to have a nice rendering of Lidar data which really helps registering the potential of that technology in my opinion. I like the projection and color scheme. -- Benh (talk) 10:31, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support, and I also supported the first nomination, which is traditional to link in renominations. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:44, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Why not, it's interesting even though it gives you a bit of a headache to decipher it visually. --Cart (talk) 13:21, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Killarnee (T•1•2) 18:08, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:01, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 06:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support per nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 18:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Question is it me, or is this slightly tilted CW? Otherwise excellent.--MB-one (talk) 11:04, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

• It is tilted. I'm not sure author is around at the moment, but if he is not, I'll fix it myself, given that this is a PNG - Benh (talk) 17:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

• You are welcome to rotate it but bear in mind that rotation will incur generation loss even for lossless file formats like PNG. Each point is rendered exactly to a 2x2 square and strange artifacts may occur if you try to rotate it (even with nearest neighbor rotation option), for example a small minority of points may end up turning into the skew tetromino. The best solution is to re-render this. However I might not have time to do that right now... dllu (t,c) 22:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

• Yes, that's why I pinged you. I guess it's better to render it again. I'll attempt something myself and will let you know on your talk page then. Thanks. - Benh (talk) 06:08, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

• @Dllu: I'm afraid rotating it would crop too much of it (I tested with 3° CCW). So I guess you are the only one who can fix it. - Benh (talk) 06:23, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support-- Bijay chaurasia (talk) 12:45, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 14:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support. Meiræ 21:26, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for nominating! dllu (t,c) 22:16, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support I found this interesting the first time, but didn't really feel equipped to evaluate it (some things are neat the first time you see them regardless of the relative quality). I'm no more knowledgeable now :) but I still like it, and since it's here, I'm content to err on the side of supporting. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  00:54, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Diversity is always welcome. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:17, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:31, 9 April 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Streets