Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orthodox Church of the Holy Spirit 2, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg

File:Orthodox Church of the Holy Spirit 2, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Oct 2014 at 01:24:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Orthodox Church of the Holy Spirit 2, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Orthodox Church of the Holy Spirit 2, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg

•  Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 01:24, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Because the two major points of interest in the image were along the same axis when looking straight down the middle of the church, an off-axis position was required. As such, the composition is a bit unorthodox (ba-dum-tish). Although there is no symmetry in the composition, I think it's still an interesting view.

•  Support -- Diliff (talk) 01:24, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 06:02, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I know it's unorthodox (haha) to criticize a "Dillif" but still: aren't the highlights (especially the topmost window) almost blown? Not that it would matter much, given the general excellence of the image... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:08, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes, but there's no useful information in the highlights to recover when it's just a clear glass window. I have enough information in the HDR file to recover it but white light, when recovered, appears grey anyway (in effect, the same result as when you artificially rescue completely blown highlights). Grey highlights often look worse than white. In those cases, I just try to find a luminosity very close to white that looks reasonable in the scene. Diliff (talk) 07:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 09:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 13:19, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:33, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support. Good vantage point off the center line. --Kbh3^rdtalk 21:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --DXR (talk) 22:55, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Chrumps (talk) 00:54, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Looking at this in full size is like opening a Christmas present. Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice, especially the wooden contruction in the middle comes out very well. BTW: There is a tiny object at the very top left. Probably you can stamp that out, even visible in thumbnail size. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:29, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  • It's just the cornice edge from the top of the pillar which is partially visible at the bottom left of the image. I've removed it. Diliff (talk) 09:39, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I´am really impressed!--Hubertl (talk) 19:54, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Basik07 (talk) 21:38, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:40, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:59, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Halavar (talk) 08:28, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:24, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 05:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors