Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Newman University Church Interior, Dublin, Ireland - Diliff.jpg

File:Newman University Church Interior, Dublin, Ireland - Diliff.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2015 at 14:05:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Newman University Church Interior, Dublin, Ireland - Diliff.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Newman University Church Interior, Dublin, Ireland - Diliff.jpg

43

64

8883

5190

8947

6407

crop

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
•  Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 14:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Diliff (talk) 14:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Another large room, another pasterpiece by Diliff! --Tremonist (talk) 14:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Pasterpiece? :-) It is a real mishmash of architectural and eclesiastical styles with plenty of marble everywhere, but not in a classical Roman/Baroque style. I think it's an interesting interior though, in a sort of ugly duckling way! ;-) Diliff (talk) 17:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks a lot for the explanations, Diliff! You always do everything so nicely, my appreciation for that! And, of course, I meant "masterpiece" with "m", a worthy term for the artwork of a real master of photography. I think we are all looking forward to seeing lots more of your beautiful photos. --Tremonist (talk) 13:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
• Please add a category above. Yann (talk) 16:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Done, sorry about that. Diliff (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ralf Roleček 16:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hockei (talk) 17:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
•  weak support I think you've extended the vertical field of view too much to little benefit. The nearest light-ring looks ridiculous (let's agree to disagree on the wide-angle-perspective argument here) and the nearest row of pews could be safely removed. A 16:9 crop starting along the nearest ceiling beam creates a stronger composition imo and avoids the worst of the perspective distortions. -- Colin (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Hooray for ugly ducklings--Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Should be cropped to note, use bottom diagonals and get rid of bench. They are of no significance, just spoil it. PD correction is pretty heavy. --Mile (talk) 07:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
  • While I'm not opposed to cropping it slightly if the image is too wide (maybe it is), I don't think cropping the bottom as much as you have suggested is a good idea as it unbalances the composition and spoils the 'rule of thirds' composition that this image currently has. I think any cropping should be symmetrical. Diliff (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈ 18:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 09:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Feat. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings