Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Newag Impuls (31WE-004A) - Wrocław (Breslau).JPG

File:Newag Impuls (31WE-004A) - Wrocław (Breslau).JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2015 at 21:24:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Newag Impuls (31WE-004A) - Wrocław (Breslau).JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Newag Impuls (31WE-004A) - Wrocław (Breslau).JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles
•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 21:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 21:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely composition --LivioAndronico talk 22:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:28, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support though a bit small. I feel like it's sharp enough to do without downsampling; any chance you could upload a full-resolution version? --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:39, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support —Bruce1ee^talk 04:50, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support D kuba (talk) 08:18, 4 June 2015 (UTC) But why this "Breslau" in the title?

  w przypadku miejscowości które mają ugruntowane nazwy w innych językach (czy to historyczne, czy nadal urzędowe) zawsze staram się podawać je w tytule lub w opisie. Raz, że z przyczyn historycznych, dwa - jest łatwiej później szukać po nazwach --Pudelek (talk) 08:46, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose I feel this composition narrow and cramped with that cutting shed, needs a little more space and that blue light reflection on the train is a bit distracting. --Laitche (talk) 16:26, 4 June 2015 (UTC) added comment. --Laitche (talk) 17:26, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 17:42, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:30, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:54, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 17:15, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very, very well-done. But still ... it's just a train in a station, and I don't feel any wow over that. Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose yes, per Daniel Case: a simply train on a station. Missing a wow factor. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:01, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. --El Grafo (talk) 21:10, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technically good, but nothing more fore me. Here is FPC, I miss something "else".--Jebulon (talk) 21:39, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very good --Σπάρτακος (talk) 10:28, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Technically good, but I'm not a fan of platforms obstructing parts of the train (esp. since this picture focuses on the train and not the station). --Kabelleger (talk) 21:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jebulon Poco² 20:01, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose It's technically okay (not particularly great, but alright); but as others have said, it's "just" a train in a station. I would have surely supported if this was a rare rolling stock, or if it was out in the beautiful outdoors, but as it stands, it does not seem that amazing. Perhaps, if the Wikipedia article on the subject were expanded, it would have an okay chance in the Wikipedia featured pictures. Dllu (talk) 01:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:17, 13 June 2015 (UTC)