Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nave scuola Amerigo Vespucci a Venezia museo navale.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2017 at 07:13:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport
Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:13, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Comment beautiful but in need of minor perspective correction. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:51, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Done Fixed, thanks for the hint --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:28, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:13, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Very regretful neutral I would so have like to support this since it is a beautiful ship with the moon at the top of the masts an all, but the light makes the scene rather flat and uninteresting. --cart-Talk 08:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)- Support - Why didn't you put the moon higher above the boat? :-P Seriously, the composition may not be ideal in all aspects, but it's quite good, and there's a plus to a cloudless sky: No hindrance in moving the eye through the sky around the ship, down the group of buildings, bridge and sidewalk, across the water and past the motorboats to the far side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Oppose - It's a beautiful scene but the light is simply too flat and harsh for me. Sorry. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:05, 31 January 2017 (UTC)- Support --XRay talk 17:44, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Per cart and Julian; in addition I think it would work with a tighter crop to the ship. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose, unbalanced composition. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose Photo was made from the wrong corner, 10 meter to the right would have been much better (but I doubt if this possible) --Michielverbeek (talk) 08:12, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, if you rent a very expensive gondola ;-) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:35, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose--shizhao (talk) 13:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Shizhao: You're required to give a reason why you oppose, even if just "per User" when you agree with User's remarks – LucasT 15:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
- too many people--shizhao (talk) 12:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
