Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mechanical-calculator-Brunsviga-15-01.jpg

File:Mechanical-calculator-Brunsviga-15-01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2015 at 15:54:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mechanical-calculator-Brunsviga-15-01.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mechanical-calculator-Brunsviga-15-01.jpg

•  Info A Brunsviga 15 mechanical calculator with serial number 202550. The shrouds had been removed to reveal the internal mechanic. Produced by Brunsviga-Maschinenwerke Grimme, Natalis & Co. AG, Braunschweig between 1934 and 1947.
  All by -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:54, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support — Julian H.^✈ 16:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 16:19, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 16:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Top. Uwe, do you have a picture of the machine with the shrouds? it would be great to have in the description a thumb of that version. Poco² 17:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

 Info I'm just working on that and also on an alternative view from a 45° angle. Unfortunately, the shrouds are worn out and it will take some efforts to restore the surface. Getting all the dust out of the mechanic took me two hours. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 Done Same light settings, same position, you can make an animated gif of it :) A shame, the shroud is so badly scratched. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 21:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support D kuba (talk) 18:20, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Big wow factor to me. Love these kind of interesting old objects and it's beautifully shot. There's a stain that I've pointed as a note. - Benh (talk) 19:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

 Done I removed the stain; it was a scratch in the canvas. Thanks for the hint. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

•  Support High educational value and technically sound shot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Nikhil (talk) 07:36, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --BlackIceNRW (talk) 11:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Great! Really love it! Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 12:21, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support} --Tremonist (talk) 16:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Ausgezeichnet! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support impressive, high ev and some wow--ArildV (talk) 15:35, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Nice picture of a historic object, the sort we don't see here very much. Daniel Case (talk) 03:59, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very good. --Baresi F (talk) 22:34, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:38, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Lmbuga (talk) 16:02, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Hubertl (talk) 19:06, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /KTC (talk) 12:26, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects