Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laanemaa järv Orkjärve looduskaitsealal.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Laanemaa järv Orkjärve looduskaitsealal.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2014 at 00:35:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Heino Ruiso - uploaded and nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 00:35, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 00:35, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support That is exceptionally beautiful. Saffron Blaze (talk) 02:04, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support per above! --mathias K 05:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support marvellous! --Ivar (talk) 07:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --XRay talk 10:16, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Urmas Haljaste (talk) 12:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Rutake (talk) 12:35, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:51, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Wow! Poco2 20:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Though I would prefer slightly less black clipping. — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 21:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Very, very good. --Karelj (talk) 22:28, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Fantastic! Halavar (talk) 00:35, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Wow! --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:34, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support--JLPC (talk) 08:11, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support-- -donald- (talk) 08:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support —Blurred Lines 13:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 14:32, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --DimiTalen 16:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Per Julian. --DXR (talk) 18:43, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support--Arcalino (talk) 19:02, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support - - Alborzagros (talk) 06:53, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment Colors and motive are impressive, but there are stiching errors (?) / HDR fusing errors of the blade of grass in the foreground, I guess easily fixable via stamping. Although it is a very nice photo, the composition is imho only average. The three compositional elements (trees / bushes) are placed somehow random on the photo. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:47, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:08, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose - A very nice sunset, but not very illustrative. Kleuske (talk) 10:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - Very nice is a commodity in short supply around here and something we celebrate @ COM:FPC. This isn't WP, but even there this would be quite illustrative of a sunset :-) Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:21, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose The sky/reflection are nice but the trees and bushes in the lake are dark and not interesting enough in silhouette. I think it would have worked better with a clearer uninterrupted patch of water or with a more interesting foreground to the sunset. -- Colin (talk) 10:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 04:27, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Taken in the right moment of the day. However, it lacks a subject that catches the eye. Barcex (talk) 20:11, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena