Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La vallata di Poggiorsini vista nel dettaglio.jpg/2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:La vallata di Poggiorsini vista nel dettaglio.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Sep 2021 at 13:10:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Italy
- Info created and uploaded by Fishmax77 - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:10, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 13:24, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful light. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:48, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 16:21, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
NeutralLight, shapes, colors and composition voting for a clear wow.But regrettably, I miss a larger focus range.-- Radomianin (talk) 16:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Just discovered in metadata: The fact of the focal length of 386 mm changes my vote to Support :) -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Question Why? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Because with a longer focal length, the depth of field decreases. I had not considered this in my neutral vote. If I had looked in the metadata, my vote would have been a support :) -- Radomianin (talk) 09:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment So because the short depth of field is intentional, that makes the photo great. I don't agree. Beautiful light and textures, but it's not good to me beyond about 40% of full size. I won't break up the unanimous support, though, as I do like the photo at full screen (about 20% of full size) and might react to larger sizes differently if I were looking at a framed photo on a gallery wall at a distance. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your answer. I actually meant it more precisely that the shallow depth of field is technically caused. But I knew about it only after looking into the metadata and accepted the photo as it is, despite the flaw. Greetings :) -- Radomianin (talk) 09:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- As I understood it, Radomianin meant that (please correct me if I'm wrong!) at such a long focal length a narrow depth of field is unavoidable, rather than intentional. Closing down the aperture would bring only a small improvement, at the expense of sharpness ([1]). The photographer could perhaps have focused on the house instead of the centre of the image to make the narrow depth of field less apparent, but in my opinion the larger issue at play is the software used for developing the raw file (likely responsible for the blotchy appearence of the grass and dirt patches, see comment below). Anyway, still a wonderful picture and a great example of the benefits of using a telephoto lens for landscape photography - if one is willing to lug it around :) Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:24, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Many thanks to Julesvernex2, with your excellent knowledge of English, you have clearly stated my point. Thanks to Ikan for the constructive discussion, which is based only on my first decision that I have afterwards changed, based on (for me) new knowledge. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support very satisfying color and light — Rhododendrites talk | 20:03, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 20:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support Nice atmosphere. --Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Ciao • Bestoernesto • ✉ 05:26, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 06:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support Hanooz 07:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:28, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Info Fishmax77, Adobe Camera Raw often does a terrible job demosaicing Fuji's X-trans raw files (e.g. blotchy patches of grass). I would suggest using instead Capture One or Iridient X-Transformer (available as a plugin for Lightroom and Photoshop) to get the most out of this incredible image Julesvernex2 (talk) 14:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Axel (talk) 19:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 12:42, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support Absolutely excellent! --Basotxerri (talk) 18:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Support I wish I could paint this --Schnobby (talk) 07:05, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 00:33, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Italy