Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Krafla power plant - Kröflustöð.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Krafla power plant - Kröflustöð.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Sep 2015 at 16:50:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Industry
Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment. It's a bit unfortunate that the most 'power plant looking' part of the scene is a bit cropped out on the left. A slightly wider view (or panoramic) would have suited I think. Diliff (talk) 20:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- The "Power plant" occupies a very large area, it is run by 18 wells and 44 boreholes (as I read it on a poster there) at a great distance from the turbines found in the building on the right. se Krafla Power Station. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 03:47, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Per Diliff, but it still fascinates me, so in the hope of seeing more of that kind (might even inspires me :) ). - Benh (talk) 20:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Oppose I can see how you would have seen a possible FP in this scene, but it's not this one. Perhaps without the clouds in the sky ... as it is, with them you've got blown spots in the smoke/vapor plume, and the ground is generally too dark. Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)- Support Interesting scenery. --Tremonist (talk) 12:44, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO you should withdraw both, and renominate only the so-called alternative as an original nom. It is going to be confusing...--Jebulon (talk) 20:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Yes Jebulon is right --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 20:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info Another shot at shorter focal length, and the foreground lightned. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 04:58, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 04:58, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I could support this one, but as you say yourself, this is "another shot" with "a shorter focal lenght". Therefore, this is not an alternative, and I cannot chose between two different images, only between two different versions of the same image. Please, nominate it as a separate file.--Jebulon (talk) 09:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Oaky - I will nominate this later I have two nominations right now. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 10:04, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- I would probably support this version too, but as Jebulon said, it should be nominated separately. Also, it's quite tilted. Can you fix the tilt without looking too much resolution? Diliff (talk) 10:58, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thx - I have corrected the tilt now. And will nominate it later. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:25, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Per others (Support probable). --Tremonist (talk) 12:46, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thx - I have corrected the tilt now. And will nominate it later. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:25, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- I would probably support this version too, but as Jebulon said, it should be nominated separately. Also, it's quite tilted. Can you fix the tilt without looking too much resolution? Diliff (talk) 10:58, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 14:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 14:44, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:13, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Weaker oppose It's improved, but I still don't like the sky. Daniel Case (talk) 17:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO you should withdraw both, and renominate only the so-called alternative as an original nom. It is going to be confusing...--Jebulon (talk) 20:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Yes Jebulon is right --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 20:29, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
